Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cust Domain.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Cust Domain

Valid Reviews

45 Valid Reviews

The Cust Domain experience has a total of 45 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 33
73%
9/10 4
9%
8/10 2
4%
7/10 3
7%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
2%

92.22% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cust Domain valid reviews is 92.22% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

93.24%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Ellen 9/10 119 days 99%
Nancy Campbell 10/10 149 days 100%
Hayley 10/10 241 days 98%
FRANDS 10/10 241 days 98%
Valg 8/10 363 days 92%
Mike Fricker 9/10 363 days 93%
Philipp 10/10 454 days 89%
Ciara Jo 10/10 515 days 86%
Leon 10/10 515 days 86%
Sandrine Wandelburg 10/10 729 days 70%
Mini-K 10/10 760 days 67%
Mylène 10/10 880 days 55%
Graham Thompson 6/10 880 days 47%
Tony 7/10 911 days 48%
Richie 10/10 941 days 49%
TK 1/10 941 days 18%
Liz 10/10 1184 days 27%
CCMAS 10/10 1276 days 20%
Johnboy 9/10 1276 days 20%
Cory and Tarah 10/10 1306 days 18%
Lisa Boag 10/10 1368 days 15%
Linda Campbell 10/10 1429 days 12%
Valg 10/10 1518 days 8%
Eloise 10/10 1549 days 7%
Jan Filipcik 10/10 1884 days 2%
Lua 10/10 1946 days 2%
Elizabeth 10/10 1946 days 2%
Sita 10/10 1946 days 2%
Brandon 10/10 1946 days 2%
Lisa 10/10 1976 days 2%
Mel 10/10 2037 days 2%
Michael K. 10/10 2160 days 2%
Babyinplug 8/10 2280 days 1%
Niki 10/10 2280 days 1%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2280 days 1%
Martin 10/10 2311 days 1%
Daniel P 10/10 2311 days 1%
Boa 5/10 2433 days 0%
Rachel 10/10 2464 days 1%
Loic Morvan 9/10 2525 days 1%
Christina 7/10 2555 days 0%
John Griffith 10/10 2614 days 1%
Mick Havill 7/10 2650 days 0%
Jon Harris 10/10 2681 days 0%
Jozef Pinkerton 10/10 2756 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cust Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.61% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

94%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.