Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
95 Valid Reviews
The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 100 reviews. There are 95 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 28 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 95 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
84.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 8/10 | 42 days | 100% |
| CEV | 8/10 | 42 days | 100% |
| NomadAnna | 9/10 | 226 days | 98% |
| Will | 8/10 | 226 days | 97% |
| Felicia | 7/10 | 256 days | 91% |
| Pat | 8/10 | 346 days | 93% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 377 days | 87% |
| Milly Struthers | 8/10 | 468 days | 87% |
| Franzi | 9/10 | 560 days | 83% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 621 days | 78% |
| Elise | 7/10 | 621 days | 74% |
| Emeline | 9/10 | 621 days | 78% |
| Pluto | 9/10 | 621 days | 78% |
| Max | 6/10 | 652 days | 66% |
| Rya | 10/10 | 681 days | 75% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 712 days | 71% |
| Celia | 9/10 | 773 days | 66% |
| Phoebe | 6/10 | 773 days | 57% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 804 days | 64% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 834 days | 60% |
| Berthe | 9/10 | 865 days | 57% |
| Mo | 10/10 | 896 days | 54% |
| Nic | 8/10 | 926 days | 50% |
| Hugo | 8/10 | 957 days | 47% |
| Taylor Russell | 9/10 | 957 days | 47% |
| Sarah Lange | 8/10 | 957 days | 47% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 957 days | 48% |
| Zack | 10/10 | 987 days | 45% |
| Elizabeth Keller | 9/10 | 987 days | 44% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 987 days | 45% |
| MC | 8/10 | 1018 days | 41% |
| Roxie | 9/10 | 1018 days | 41% |
| Guenter | 8/10 | 1046 days | 38% |
| Mickey Smillie | 7/10 | 1046 days | 36% |
| Paige Hayward | 1/10 | 1108 days | 12% |
| Audrey & Jake | 8/10 | 1169 days | 28% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 1169 days | 29% |
| Steven | 9/10 | 1199 days | 26% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1230 days | 23% |
| Leyna H. | 8/10 | 1322 days | 18% |
| Jordan | 8/10 | 1352 days | 16% |
| Jazzy | 9/10 | 1383 days | 14% |
| Hugh | 9/10 | 1411 days | 13% |
| Tee | 10/10 | 1442 days | 12% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 1473 days | 10% |
| Gab | 8/10 | 1473 days | 10% |
| Natalie Perrett | 10/10 | 1656 days | 5% |
| Jackie | 10/10 | 1656 days | 5% |
| Bluescruize | 9/10 | 1807 days | 3% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 1807 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 1899 days | 3% |
| Ellefree | 10/10 | 1991 days | 3% |
| Gaël | 10/10 | 2142 days | 2% |
| Mona | 8/10 | 2173 days | 2% |
| Sabine | 9/10 | 2173 days | 2% |
| Backpack On Fire | 10/10 | 2173 days | 2% |
| Abraca | 10/10 | 2204 days | 2% |
| Rachelle | 8/10 | 2204 days | 2% |
| Lauren Cottle | 8/10 | 2234 days | 2% |
| Bert | 6/10 | 2234 days | 1% |
| Sean | 8/10 | 2265 days | 2% |
| Mike Sc | 9/10 | 2265 days | 2% |
| Suzanne J | 8/10 | 2295 days | 2% |
| Charlotte | 7/10 | 2357 days | 1% |
| Margaret Robinson | 10/10 | 2418 days | 2% |
| Jeff | 10/10 | 2448 days | 2% |
| Ryan | 9/10 | 2479 days | 1% |
| Matthias | 7/10 | 2507 days | 1% |
| Mona | 10/10 | 2507 days | 1% |
| Caro Del | 10/10 | 2507 days | 1% |
| Andy and Julia | 9/10 | 2507 days | 1% |
| Flatlanders | 8/10 | 2538 days | 1% |
| Dirk Taubner | 8/10 | 2569 days | 1% |
| Sharona de Bruijn | 10/10 | 2599 days | 1% |
| Jude | 10/10 | 2599 days | 1% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2599 days | 1% |
| Hyemin Park | 9/10 | 2630 days | 1% |
| john hambly | 9/10 | 2630 days | 1% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 2660 days | 1% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 2660 days | 1% |
| blogspot.westwardgo.com | 9/10 | 2691 days | 1% |
| Joseph | 8/10 | 2722 days | 1% |
| Antoine | 8/10 | 2722 days | 1% |
| Marcus Wyatt | 8/10 | 2783 days | 1% |
| Ryan | 8/10 | 2783 days | 1% |
| Juliane | 10/10 | 2783 days | 1% |
| Isabel van Megen | 10/10 | 2844 days | 1% |
| Fabian Hock | 8/10 | 2856 days | 1% |
| Shen Heng | 9/10 | 2917 days | 1% |
| richard maguire | 7/10 | 2946 days | 0% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2958 days | 1% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2961 days | 1% |
| Cathy Riley | 9/10 | 2962 days | 1% |
| Nathan Bosia | 10/10 | 3016 days | 0% |
| Silvana Pintao | 7/10 | 3144 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.