Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Travellers Autobarn.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
66 Valid Reviews
The Travellers Autobarn experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 66 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 66 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 33 |
|
50% |
9/10 | 14 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
85.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Travellers Autobarn valid reviews is 85.45% and is based on 66 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
7 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 66 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 2 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 1 |
|
14% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
29% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Travellers Autobarn face-to-face reviews is 85.71% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.65%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Khaleeq | 10/10 | 470 days | 100% |
Jessica Delattre | 5/10 | 624 days | 67% |
Michelle | 6/10 | 624 days | 76% |
Salvo | 3/10 | 683 days | 45% |
Steve Brooking | 9/10 | 714 days | 80% |
joanne hollings | 10/10 | 1048 days | 44% |
Samantha Jayne | 10/10 | 1079 days | 41% |
Kelli | 10/10 | 1292 days | 23% |
axel schulze | 8/10 | 1747 days | 4% |
Joe Culbertson | 9/10 | 1778 days | 4% |
Victorine MARIE | 1/10 | 1779 days | 1% |
Anh Phan | 8/10 | 1962 days | 4% |
Jessica Rose | 10/10 | 1992 days | 4% |
Alice | 9/10 | 2023 days | 4% |
Arnold van der Linden | 5/10 | 2112 days | 2% |
JC Oli | 10/10 | 2143 days | 3% |
Anne Wallace | 10/10 | 2144 days | 3% |
Karen Gething | 8/10 | 2144 days | 3% |
Christian Cippis | 10/10 | 2174 days | 3% |
Joseph | 10/10 | 2265 days | 3% |
João Carvalho | 10/10 | 2418 days | 3% |
laurent twardowski | 9/10 | 2418 days | 3% |
Tim Pellenkoft | 8/10 | 2449 days | 3% |
yvonne smolders | 10/10 | 2450 days | 3% |
alc012 | 1/10 | 2450 days | 0% |
Pieterjan Tuybens | 8/10 | 2477 days | 3% |
Sasa Jamsek | 9/10 | 2477 days | 3% |
Allyson Ekin | 9/10 | 2508 days | 3% |
Alexandra Alles | 7/10 | 2508 days | 2% |
Gillian Laing | 10/10 | 2539 days | 3% |
Kate Brandist | 10/10 | 2539 days | 3% |
Matt McCloskey | 7/10 | 2552 days | 1% |
Jorg Luypaert | 9/10 | 2569 days | 2% |
Bryn Howells | 7/10 | 2569 days | 2% |
Sam Ye | 10/10 | 2569 days | 3% |
Jennie Tollerton | 9/10 | 2571 days | 1% |
Hannibal Winther | 7/10 | 2575 days | 1% |
Carl von Horstig | 8/10 | 2584 days | 1% |
Carly Walton | 9/10 | 2600 days | 2% |
Ilse Haakman | 10/10 | 2630 days | 2% |
AMIRUL AZRAI ZOHARI | 10/10 | 2630 days | 2% |
Kennie Pritchard | 10/10 | 2630 days | 2% |
Brent Lebeter | 9/10 | 2630 days | 2% |
Tytti Turpeinen | 1/10 | 2630 days | 0% |
Thomas Hill | 10/10 | 2661 days | 2% |
Robby Thomas | 9/10 | 2661 days | 2% |
Bach ADBA | 10/10 | 2661 days | 2% |
Sarah Dawes | 10/10 | 2692 days | 2% |
Kerrod Moller-Nielsen | 10/10 | 2692 days | 2% |
Bill Grainger | 7/10 | 2753 days | 2% |
Megan Raymond | 10/10 | 2753 days | 2% |
Franz Russ | 10/10 | 2783 days | 2% |
Rachel | 10/10 | 2783 days | 2% |
Stefanie and Yvonne | 9/10 | 2804 days | 1% |
Ashley Hatch | 3/10 | 2814 days | 0% |
Claire Presland | 10/10 | 2814 days | 2% |
Lynda Ky | 10/10 | 2835 days | 1% |
David R | 10/10 | 2873 days | 2% |
Thomas Hartley | 10/10 | 2873 days | 2% |
Jared Campbell | 10/10 | 2873 days | 2% |
Mike Stafford | 10/10 | 2873 days | 2% |
Sam Bateman | 10/10 | 2873 days | 2% |
Rebecka Ekman | 9/10 | 2873 days | 2% |
Geoff | 9/10 | 2904 days | 2% |
Felix | 10/10 | 2919 days | 1% |
Sallie Gregory | 10/10 | 2934 days | 2% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Travellers Autobarn experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-7.01% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 45 days. The Travellers Autobarn experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
---|---|
0 | -3.00% |
1 | -2.63% |
2 | -1.50% |
3 | -0.38% |
4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Travellers Autobarn experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.95% |
198 | -3.97% |
199 | -3.99% |
200 | -4.01% |
201 | -4.03% |
202 | -4.05% |
203 | -4.07% |
… | … |
4.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
74%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.