Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for BMX Pump Track Carpark, Marine Parade.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
BMX Pump Track Carpark, Marine Parade
Valid Reviews
48 Valid Reviews
The BMX Pump Track Carpark, Marine Parade experience has a total of 51 reviews. There are 48 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 48 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
81.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the BMX Pump Track Carpark, Marine Parade valid reviews is 81.46% and is based on 48 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
83.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| AJC | 8/10 | 76 days | 98% |
| Samantha | 10/10 | 106 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 137 days | 99% |
| Andrew | 9/10 | 227 days | 97% |
| Mathilde | 8/10 | 258 days | 95% |
| Jan | 6/10 | 289 days | 82% |
| Knut | 1/10 | 319 days | 38% |
| Abi | 7/10 | 350 days | 87% |
| Maartje | 10/10 | 380 days | 92% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 380 days | 92% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 380 days | 91% |
| Taylor Russell | 8/10 | 503 days | 84% |
| Katie | 6/10 | 533 days | 72% |
| M342 | 8/10 | 592 days | 79% |
| Genevieve | 8/10 | 592 days | 79% |
| Steve Hawes | 9/10 | 623 days | 77% |
| SF | 8/10 | 654 days | 74% |
| P Whit | 10/10 | 745 days | 68% |
| Curtis | 10/10 | 868 days | 57% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 988 days | 44% |
| Skid | 5/10 | 1263 days | 17% |
| sharon armstrong | 9/10 | 1475 days | 11% |
| Martin | 8/10 | 1537 days | 9% |
| Matt | 5/10 | 1567 days | 6% |
| Sally | 10/10 | 1719 days | 5% |
| Stuart | 9/10 | 1750 days | 4% |
| Caitlin | 9/10 | 1811 days | 4% |
| JjLockwood | 9/10 | 1933 days | 4% |
| Lene | 9/10 | 1994 days | 4% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 1994 days | 4% |
| Clare & Gerry | 10/10 | 2025 days | 4% |
| Julie | 8/10 | 2025 days | 4% |
| Matthias | 7/10 | 2053 days | 3% |
| Leanne | 8/10 | 2053 days | 4% |
| The West Texas Cyclist | 9/10 | 2053 days | 4% |
| Jana | 9/10 | 2145 days | 3% |
| Johnston’s | 8/10 | 2176 days | 3% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2206 days | 3% |
| Pauline Lewis | 8/10 | 2237 days | 3% |
| Ozi | 10/10 | 2298 days | 3% |
| ascotandanaussie | 10/10 | 2359 days | 3% |
| Jenni Wells | 7/10 | 2477 days | 3% |
| Jo Dawson | 9/10 | 2633 days | 2% |
| Julia Kurtz | 10/10 | 2726 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 2771 days | 2% |
| Bridget Brebner | 7/10 | 3151 days | 1% |
| Jiri Lank | 6/10 | 3152 days | 1% |
| Sam Howard | 1/10 | 3193 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. BMX Pump Track Carpark, Marine Parade does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.19% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.