G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waitomo Adventures Ltd.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Waitomo Adventures Ltd
Valid Reviews
93 Valid Reviews
The Waitomo Adventures Ltd experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 93 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 93 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 32 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo Adventures Ltd valid reviews is 86.13% and is based on 93 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 93 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.32% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo Adventures Ltd face-to-face reviews is 85.32% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.57%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis | 10/10 | 3204 days | 100% |
| Thomas Klinting | 10/10 | 3258 days | 94% |
| Franz Mesey | 9/10 | 3272 days | 91% |
| Judit Van lanen | 10/10 | 3291 days | 90% |
| Jack Robinson | 8/10 | 3329 days | 84% |
| Mikulas and Dominika | 8/10 | 3351 days | 81% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3400 days | 78% |
| Craig Forsyth | 10/10 | 3517 days | 65% |
| Lea Behnem | 10/10 | 3591 days | 57% |
| Nicolas Justin | 7/10 | 3935 days | 15% |
| Stephanie Piou | 8/10 | 3935 days | 18% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 3963 days | 15% |
| Devan Sheppard | 10/10 | 4032 days | 8% |
| Nina Coopmans | 7/10 | 4644 days | 22% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 4668 days | 26% |
| Lieven De Vlaminck | 9/10 | 4674 days | 25% |
| Andy | 10/10 | 4765 days | 26% |
| Ron | 9/10 | 4769 days | 25% |
| Bart Slingerland | 9/10 | 5024 days | 25% |
| Birds Tubbs | 10/10 | 5025 days | 26% |
| Malena | 10/10 | 5040 days | 26% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5044 days | 26% |
| Ryan Pynappels | 9/10 | 5051 days | 25% |
| Tobias Forst | 8/10 | 5132 days | 25% |
| Sarah and Soren | 9/10 | 5137 days | 25% |
| Alberto Redner | 10/10 | 5147 days | 26% |
| Dozza | 10/10 | 5192 days | 26% |
| Sarah James | 10/10 | 5374 days | 26% |
| Nick Taylor | 10/10 | 5374 days | 26% |
| Laurent P | 10/10 | 5378 days | 26% |
| Paap | 8/10 | 5411 days | 25% |
| Wouter Jansen | 8/10 | 5411 days | 25% |
| Luise Jaeger | 3/10 | 5424 days | 0% |
| Steff | 9/10 | 5426 days | 25% |
| wannaraft | 10/10 | 5434 days | 26% |
| elpo | 6/10 | 5678 days | 18% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5709 days | 25% |
| Andy | 8/10 | 5761 days | 25% |
| Sam Bishop | 10/10 | 5771 days | 26% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5773 days | 26% |
| Johan | 10/10 | 5781 days | 26% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 7/10 | 5781 days | 22% |
| Jens van Evp | 9/10 | 5795 days | 25% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5795 days | 25% |
| Carolina Gonzalez | 8/10 | 5797 days | 25% |
| Kasper | 9/10 | 5797 days | 25% |
| Chance McGuire | 10/10 | 5799 days | 26% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5850 days | 25% |
| rosalindm | 9/10 | 5855 days | 25% |
| jennyb | 9/10 | 5859 days | 25% |
| Thomas Willi | 10/10 | 5871 days | 26% |
| Jess Pasos | 10/10 | 5880 days | 26% |
| Nikki Turner | 8/10 | 6025 days | 25% |
| Sejna | 8/10 | 6046 days | 25% |
| michellew | 10/10 | 6052 days | 26% |
| erikholland | 8/10 | 6105 days | 25% |
| mariea | 9/10 | 6116 days | 25% |
| Krapels | 9/10 | 6129 days | 25% |
| Halley | 5/10 | 6135 days | 12% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6153 days | 26% |
| Ian S | 8/10 | 6154 days | 25% |
| Debbie | 7/10 | 6155 days | 22% |
| Daniel | 8/10 | 6164 days | 25% |
| Kristy825 | 10/10 | 6167 days | 26% |
| Limor | 6/10 | 6176 days | 18% |
| Prentner | 6/10 | 6185 days | 18% |
| Sonja | 9/10 | 6209 days | 25% |
| Bronagh Mcartan | 9/10 | 6353 days | 25% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6377 days | 26% |
| Brent Scanlan | 10/10 | 6446 days | 26% |
| Meike Biel | 10/10 | 6454 days | 26% |
| Hendrik | 6/10 | 6497 days | 18% |
| Sabrina | 8/10 | 6497 days | 25% |
| Peter Aston | 5/10 | 6497 days | 12% |
| helga | 9/10 | 6498 days | 25% |
| Janne | 8/10 | 6508 days | 25% |
| Melissa Steedman | 9/10 | 6544 days | 25% |
| gemma1 | 6/10 | 6548 days | 18% |
| Francesco | 8/10 | 6579 days | 25% |
| Jim&Rachel | 9/10 | 6661 days | 25% |
| MarkReid | 10/10 | 6794 days | 26% |
| HalRoberts | 8/10 | 6816 days | 25% |
| David | 9/10 | 6825 days | 25% |
| Justin | 8/10 | 6825 days | 25% |
| Alex | 8/10 | 6832 days | 25% |
| Hilary | 7/10 | 6841 days | 22% |
| Roran | 7/10 | 6852 days | 22% |
| Nina | 10/10 | 6877 days | 26% |
| Inga | 9/10 | 6877 days | 25% |
| Italy | 8/10 | 6877 days | 25% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 6877 days | 25% |
| Helen | 7/10 | 6877 days | 22% |
| JuanPablo | 7/10 | 6894 days | 22% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Waitomo Adventures Ltd experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Waitomo Adventures Ltd experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Waitomo Adventures Ltd experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.13% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.