Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
96 Valid Reviews
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has a total of 100 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
42% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging valid reviews is 88.13% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
71 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 71 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging face-to-face reviews is 85.92% and is based on 71 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.11%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Victor | 8/10 | 3233 days | 100% |
| Jessica Freeland | 9/10 | 3278 days | 97% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 3281 days | 96% |
| Cathrin Wisgiekl | 8/10 | 4302 days | 5% |
| Marc Engstle | 5/10 | 4320 days | 2% |
| Matthias Freiling | 7/10 | 4324 days | 3% |
| Johannes | 7/10 | 4325 days | 3% |
| Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 4347 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Schanz | 9/10 | 4350 days | 1% |
| Philip Gosemann | 9/10 | 4350 days | 1% |
| Jake Bell | 10/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4673 days | 44% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 8/10 | 4760 days | 43% |
| Curry | 10/10 | 5131 days | 44% |
| Craig Hathaway | 10/10 | 5362 days | 44% |
| Sarah James | 10/10 | 5362 days | 44% |
| Nicola Young | 6/10 | 5362 days | 38% |
| Isabell | 10/10 | 5382 days | 44% |
| Justin Pearce | 4/10 | 5398 days | 28% |
| tandysandhu | 10/10 | 5453 days | 44% |
| alexiap | 8/10 | 5484 days | 43% |
| TerriH | 10/10 | 5606 days | 44% |
| Marea | 9/10 | 5637 days | 44% |
| Pete & Judy McChesney | 10/10 | 5691 days | 44% |
| claireamanda | 9/10 | 5698 days | 44% |
| laurabridges | 10/10 | 5698 days | 44% |
| Ben Thomas | 10/10 | 5728 days | 44% |
| sam jones | 10/10 | 5759 days | 44% |
| Rachel Honore | 10/10 | 5759 days | 44% |
| Pip | 10/10 | 5759 days | 44% |
| Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5761 days | 43% |
| Alzbeta Czech | 10/10 | 5773 days | 44% |
| sazz | 10/10 | 5787 days | 44% |
| Amelie Sutcliffe | 10/10 | 5787 days | 44% |
| iep_crew | 10/10 | 5787 days | 44% |
| Kane Chain | 8/10 | 5804 days | 43% |
| stroalki | 7/10 | 5818 days | 41% |
| Angela Stringer | 9/10 | 5818 days | 44% |
| hendrik gottschalk | 10/10 | 5818 days | 44% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5838 days | 44% |
| rosalindm | 10/10 | 5843 days | 44% |
| Lesley Nixon | 6/10 | 5859 days | 38% |
| bondd | 10/10 | 5958 days | 44% |
| Keith | 9/10 | 6117 days | 44% |
| kiwibrit86 | 9/10 | 6136 days | 44% |
| NinaH1 | 8/10 | 6143 days | 43% |
| renanf | 9/10 | 6144 days | 44% |
| DaraghD | 9/10 | 6150 days | 44% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 6155 days | 43% |
| Lucas | 4/10 | 6155 days | 28% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 6159 days | 44% |
| Liekens | 8/10 | 6213 days | 43% |
| jfletch | 10/10 | 6223 days | 44% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 6224 days | 44% |
| siobhan | 10/10 | 6226 days | 44% |
| mike brett | 8/10 | 6227 days | 43% |
| Evelyn | 7/10 | 6227 days | 41% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 6233 days | 44% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6268 days | 44% |
| maria d | 10/10 | 6335 days | 44% |
| JP Alberto | 10/10 | 6337 days | 44% |
| Daniala | 9/10 | 6360 days | 44% |
| Rhys Howell | 9/10 | 6427 days | 44% |
| Toni Keown | 10/10 | 6451 days | 44% |
| Nicnac | 9/10 | 6458 days | 44% |
| Mark | 9/10 | 6463 days | 44% |
| Claire | 10/10 | 6479 days | 44% |
| Stephanie | 10/10 | 6505 days | 44% |
| Marc Hertogs | 9/10 | 6509 days | 44% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6518 days | 43% |
| Stacey | 10/10 | 6518 days | 44% |
| Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6533 days | 44% |
| Hayley | 7/10 | 6533 days | 41% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 9/10 | 6536 days | 44% |
| Fred | 6/10 | 6540 days | 38% |
| Anneli | 10/10 | 6541 days | 44% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6541 days | 43% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 6574 days | 44% |
| Neil Cooke | 8/10 | 6575 days | 43% |
| Manuel | 9/10 | 6582 days | 44% |
| Tom Clements | 8/10 | 6583 days | 43% |
| Richard Kindgren | 8/10 | 6585 days | 43% |
| Linda | 10/10 | 6809 days | 44% |
| ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6814 days | 44% |
| LauraMarini | 9/10 | 6818 days | 44% |
| Cohen | 8/10 | 6819 days | 43% |
| Valerie | 8/10 | 6820 days | 43% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 6821 days | 41% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 6823 days | 44% |
| AnnaHerbert | 10/10 | 6829 days | 44% |
| Austin | 9/10 | 6837 days | 44% |
| Claire | 9/10 | 6837 days | 44% |
| AnnaOwen | 10/10 | 6848 days | 44% |
| AndrewEwen | 6/10 | 6848 days | 38% |
| Nina | 7/10 | 6865 days | 41% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 6865 days | 44% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
1.82% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.