G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
96 Valid Reviews
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has a total of 100 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 40 |
|
42% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 18 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging valid reviews is 88.13% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
71 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 71 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging face-to-face reviews is 85.92% and is based on 71 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.76%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Alex Victor | 8/10 | 2981 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 9/10 | 3026 days | 97% |
Jolien | 8/10 | 3029 days | 96% |
Cathrin Wisgiekl | 8/10 | 4050 days | 8% |
Marc Engstle | 5/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
Matthias Freiling | 7/10 | 4072 days | 4% |
Johannes | 7/10 | 4073 days | 4% |
Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 4095 days | 4% |
Hendrik Schanz | 9/10 | 4098 days | 4% |
Philip Gosemann | 9/10 | 4098 days | 4% |
Jake Bell | 10/10 | 4105 days | 3% |
Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4421 days | 24% |
Laurits and Bettina | 8/10 | 4508 days | 23% |
Curry | 10/10 | 4879 days | 24% |
Craig Hathaway | 10/10 | 5110 days | 24% |
Sarah James | 10/10 | 5110 days | 24% |
Nicola Young | 6/10 | 5110 days | 18% |
Isabell | 10/10 | 5130 days | 24% |
Justin Pearce | 4/10 | 5146 days | 8% |
tandysandhu | 10/10 | 5201 days | 24% |
alexiap | 8/10 | 5232 days | 23% |
TerriH | 10/10 | 5354 days | 24% |
Marea | 9/10 | 5385 days | 24% |
Pete & Judy McChesney | 10/10 | 5439 days | 24% |
claireamanda | 9/10 | 5446 days | 24% |
laurabridges | 10/10 | 5446 days | 24% |
Ben Thomas | 10/10 | 5476 days | 24% |
sam jones | 10/10 | 5507 days | 24% |
Rachel Honore | 10/10 | 5507 days | 24% |
Pip | 10/10 | 5507 days | 24% |
Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5509 days | 23% |
Alzbeta Czech | 10/10 | 5521 days | 24% |
sazz | 10/10 | 5535 days | 24% |
Amelie Sutcliffe | 10/10 | 5535 days | 24% |
iep_crew | 10/10 | 5535 days | 24% |
Kane Chain | 8/10 | 5552 days | 23% |
stroalki | 7/10 | 5566 days | 21% |
Angela Stringer | 9/10 | 5566 days | 24% |
hendrik gottschalk | 10/10 | 5566 days | 24% |
katesc | 9/10 | 5586 days | 24% |
rosalindm | 10/10 | 5591 days | 24% |
Lesley Nixon | 6/10 | 5607 days | 18% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5706 days | 24% |
Keith | 9/10 | 5865 days | 24% |
kiwibrit86 | 9/10 | 5885 days | 24% |
NinaH1 | 8/10 | 5891 days | 23% |
renanf | 9/10 | 5892 days | 24% |
DaraghD | 9/10 | 5898 days | 24% |
Michael | 8/10 | 5903 days | 23% |
Lucas | 4/10 | 5903 days | 8% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5907 days | 24% |
Liekens | 8/10 | 5961 days | 23% |
jfletch | 10/10 | 5971 days | 24% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5972 days | 24% |
siobhan | 10/10 | 5974 days | 24% |
mike brett | 8/10 | 5975 days | 23% |
Evelyn | 7/10 | 5976 days | 21% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5982 days | 24% |
Chris | 10/10 | 6016 days | 24% |
maria d | 10/10 | 6083 days | 24% |
JP Alberto | 10/10 | 6086 days | 24% |
Daniala | 9/10 | 6108 days | 24% |
Rhys Howell | 9/10 | 6175 days | 24% |
Toni Keown | 10/10 | 6200 days | 24% |
Nicnac | 9/10 | 6207 days | 24% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6211 days | 24% |
Claire | 10/10 | 6227 days | 24% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6253 days | 24% |
Marc Hertogs | 9/10 | 6257 days | 24% |
Chris | 8/10 | 6266 days | 23% |
Stacey | 10/10 | 6266 days | 24% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6281 days | 24% |
Hayley | 7/10 | 6281 days | 21% |
Lindsey Woosnam | 9/10 | 6284 days | 24% |
Fred | 6/10 | 6288 days | 18% |
Anneli | 10/10 | 6289 days | 24% |
Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6289 days | 23% |
Rich | 9/10 | 6322 days | 24% |
Neil Cooke | 8/10 | 6323 days | 23% |
Manuel | 9/10 | 6330 days | 24% |
Tom Clements | 8/10 | 6331 days | 23% |
Richard Kindgren | 8/10 | 6333 days | 23% |
Linda | 10/10 | 6557 days | 24% |
ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6562 days | 24% |
LauraMarini | 9/10 | 6566 days | 24% |
Cohen | 8/10 | 6567 days | 23% |
Valerie | 8/10 | 6568 days | 23% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6569 days | 21% |
Kate | 10/10 | 6571 days | 24% |
AnnaHerbert | 10/10 | 6577 days | 24% |
Austin | 9/10 | 6585 days | 24% |
Claire | 9/10 | 6585 days | 24% |
AnnaOwen | 10/10 | 6596 days | 24% |
AndrewEwen | 6/10 | 6596 days | 18% |
Nina | 7/10 | 6613 days | 21% |
Helen | 10/10 | 6613 days | 24% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.79% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.73% |
198 | -3.75% |
199 | -3.77% |
200 | -3.79% |
201 | -3.81% |
202 | -3.83% |
203 | -3.85% |
… | … |
1.83% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.