Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
96 Valid Reviews
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has a total of 100 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 40 |
|
42% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 18 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging valid reviews is 88.13% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
71 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 71 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging face-to-face reviews is 85.92% and is based on 71 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Alex Victor | 8/10 | 2881 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 9/10 | 2926 days | 98% |
Jolien | 8/10 | 2929 days | 97% |
Cathrin Wisgiekl | 8/10 | 3950 days | 26% |
Marc Engstle | 5/10 | 3968 days | 18% |
Matthias Freiling | 7/10 | 3972 days | 23% |
Johannes | 7/10 | 3973 days | 23% |
Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 3995 days | 23% |
Hendrik Schanz | 9/10 | 3998 days | 23% |
Philip Gosemann | 9/10 | 3998 days | 23% |
Jake Bell | 10/10 | 4005 days | 22% |
Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4321 days | 0% |
Laurits and Bettina | 8/10 | 4408 days | 31% |
Curry | 10/10 | 4779 days | 32% |
Craig Hathaway | 10/10 | 5010 days | 32% |
Sarah James | 10/10 | 5010 days | 32% |
Nicola Young | 6/10 | 5010 days | 27% |
Isabell | 10/10 | 5030 days | 32% |
Justin Pearce | 4/10 | 5046 days | 20% |
tandysandhu | 10/10 | 5101 days | 32% |
alexiap | 8/10 | 5132 days | 31% |
TerriH | 10/10 | 5254 days | 32% |
Marea | 9/10 | 5285 days | 32% |
Pete & Judy McChesney | 10/10 | 5339 days | 32% |
claireamanda | 9/10 | 5346 days | 32% |
laurabridges | 10/10 | 5346 days | 32% |
Ben Thomas | 10/10 | 5376 days | 32% |
sam jones | 10/10 | 5407 days | 32% |
Rachel Honore | 10/10 | 5407 days | 32% |
Pip | 10/10 | 5407 days | 32% |
Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5409 days | 31% |
Alzbeta Czech | 10/10 | 5421 days | 32% |
sazz | 10/10 | 5435 days | 32% |
Amelie Sutcliffe | 10/10 | 5435 days | 32% |
iep_crew | 10/10 | 5435 days | 32% |
Kane Chain | 8/10 | 5452 days | 31% |
stroalki | 7/10 | 5466 days | 30% |
Angela Stringer | 9/10 | 5466 days | 32% |
hendrik gottschalk | 10/10 | 5466 days | 32% |
katesc | 9/10 | 5486 days | 32% |
rosalindm | 10/10 | 5491 days | 32% |
Lesley Nixon | 6/10 | 5507 days | 27% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5606 days | 32% |
Keith | 9/10 | 5765 days | 32% |
kiwibrit86 | 9/10 | 5785 days | 32% |
NinaH1 | 8/10 | 5791 days | 31% |
renanf | 9/10 | 5792 days | 32% |
DaraghD | 9/10 | 5798 days | 32% |
Michael | 8/10 | 5803 days | 31% |
Lucas | 4/10 | 5803 days | 20% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5807 days | 32% |
Liekens | 8/10 | 5861 days | 31% |
jfletch | 10/10 | 5871 days | 32% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5873 days | 32% |
siobhan | 10/10 | 5875 days | 32% |
mike brett | 8/10 | 5875 days | 31% |
Evelyn | 7/10 | 5876 days | 30% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5882 days | 32% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5916 days | 32% |
maria d | 10/10 | 5983 days | 32% |
JP Alberto | 10/10 | 5986 days | 32% |
Daniala | 9/10 | 6008 days | 32% |
Rhys Howell | 9/10 | 6075 days | 32% |
Toni Keown | 10/10 | 6100 days | 32% |
Nicnac | 9/10 | 6107 days | 32% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6111 days | 32% |
Claire | 10/10 | 6127 days | 32% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6153 days | 32% |
Marc Hertogs | 9/10 | 6157 days | 32% |
Chris | 8/10 | 6166 days | 31% |
Stacey | 10/10 | 6166 days | 32% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6181 days | 32% |
Hayley | 7/10 | 6181 days | 30% |
Lindsey Woosnam | 9/10 | 6184 days | 32% |
Fred | 6/10 | 6188 days | 27% |
Anneli | 10/10 | 6189 days | 32% |
Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6189 days | 31% |
Rich | 9/10 | 6222 days | 32% |
Neil Cooke | 8/10 | 6223 days | 31% |
Manuel | 9/10 | 6230 days | 32% |
Tom Clements | 8/10 | 6231 days | 31% |
Richard Kindgren | 8/10 | 6233 days | 31% |
Linda | 10/10 | 6457 days | 32% |
ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6462 days | 32% |
LauraMarini | 9/10 | 6466 days | 32% |
Cohen | 8/10 | 6467 days | 31% |
Valerie | 8/10 | 6468 days | 31% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6469 days | 30% |
Kate | 10/10 | 6471 days | 32% |
AnnaHerbert | 10/10 | 6477 days | 32% |
Austin | 9/10 | 6485 days | 32% |
Claire | 9/10 | 6485 days | 32% |
AnnaOwen | 10/10 | 6496 days | 32% |
AndrewEwen | 6/10 | 6496 days | 27% |
Nina | 7/10 | 6513 days | 30% |
Helen | 10/10 | 6513 days | 32% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.98% |
198 | -4.00% |
199 | -4.02% |
200 | -4.04% |
201 | -4.06% |
202 | -4.08% |
203 | -4.10% |
… | … |
1.91% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.