Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre

Valid Reviews

175 Valid Reviews

The Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 179 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 68
39%
9/10 38
22%
8/10 37
21%
7/10 12
7%
6/10 9
5%
5/10 6
3%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 2
1%

85.71% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

165 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 59
36%
9/10 38
23%
8/10 37
22%
7/10 12
7%
6/10 9
5%
5/10 6
4%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

85.39% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

87.74%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
S Weslake 10/10 2583 days 100%
Rebecca Martin 10/10 2628 days 97%
Sophie Ingram 10/10 2764 days 90%
C Flynn 1/10 3023 days 31%
Josh Lesley-Smith 10/10 3044 days 74%
Marc 9/10 3064 days 72%
Emily Noyd 9/10 3301 days 59%
Cayla Stanley 10/10 3301 days 60%
Salvador Jimenez 10/10 3373 days 56%
Philipp Richter 6/10 3440 days 45%
Simon Quass 10/10 3441 days 52%
Sarah Boettcher 9/10 3448 days 51%
Clement Oudjaovok 8/10 3666 days 39%
Katherine Halliday 9/10 3668 days 39%
Daniela Wall 7/10 3668 days 37%
Katherine Britten 9/10 3671 days 39%
Megan 10/10 3672 days 39%
Nina Müller 9/10 3694 days 38%
Maria Schober 4/10 3695 days 25%
Marie Schmid 10/10 3700 days 38%
Charles Aubry 10/10 3701 days 38%
Arvid Hellquist 9/10 3711 days 37%
Celia Nowak 8/10 3712 days 36%
Jiri Blecha 8/10 3713 days 36%
Marie Weber 9/10 3713 days 37%
Michal Kamradek 7/10 3748 days 33%
Dieter Schmees 9/10 3750 days 35%
Barbara 9/10 3752 days 35%
Mathieu Brunel 10/10 3752 days 35%
Thomas and Sonja 10/10 3761 days 34%
Jam Boggomann 10/10 3765 days 34%
Pauline Gibson 10/10 3767 days 34%
Ian Brand 10/10 3769 days 34%
Antoine Vernay 8/10 3774 days 33%
Shona MacDonald 10/10 4010 days 21%
Ane Didriksen 10/10 4010 days 21%
Iris Anette Berger 10/10 4010 days 21%
Claudia de Winter 7/10 4015 days 19%
Cecilia Anderson 4/10 4015 days 13%
Christina Perez 8/10 4019 days 20%
Paula Renton 8/10 4020 days 20%
Maria-Julia Frilaj 9/10 4021 days 20%
Simon Mehlmann 9/10 4021 days 20%
Carolin Siegert 9/10 4021 days 20%
Pavel Jarolimek 5/10 4021 days 15%
Patricia Erni 8/10 4022 days 19%
Robert Erni 8/10 4022 days 19%
Lilli Erni 8/10 4022 days 19%
Erik Nestlez 8/10 4027 days 19%
Wouter Vanmoz 10/10 4028 days 19%
Laure Cops 9/10 4028 days 19%
Annika Marz 10/10 4036 days 19%
Julian Zeissler 8/10 4036 days 19%
Adam 7/10 4036 days 18%
Petra Albrchtoval 6/10 4036 days 16%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 4041 days 17%
Drame Mahmadou 8/10 4041 days 18%
Joanna Mulcahy 10/10 4041 days 19%
Helma Druyken 9/10 4042 days 19%
marcel and conny 10/10 4044 days 19%
Helen 10/10 4044 days 19%
Igor 7/10 4044 days 17%
Ray Bygrave 9/10 4045 days 18%
Maria Camen Santos Lopez 10/10 4045 days 19%
Veeh Barrington 8/10 4045 days 18%
Hirsch Svenja 10/10 4047 days 18%
Mahr Svenja 7/10 4047 days 17%
Johanna Kofler 6/10 4047 days 16%
Kathrin Deichmann 7/10 4049 days 17%
Konrad Ullmann 8/10 4050 days 18%
Lukas Lehmeyer 8/10 4050 days 18%
Mark Hofmann 9/10 4050 days 18%
Louison Laissus 10/10 4053 days 18%
Ennico 10/10 4056 days 18%
Juliane 7/10 4056 days 17%
Hannah 7/10 4056 days 17%
Callum 6/10 4056 days 15%
Barbara 10/10 4056 days 18%
Marinette 10/10 4056 days 18%
Larry Majerus 10/10 4057 days 18%
Jan Majerus 10/10 4057 days 18%
Philip Donachie 10/10 4060 days 18%
Luisa Bach 10/10 4060 days 18%
Karel 10/10 4060 days 18%
Phillip 8/10 4062 days 17%
Libby 5/10 4065 days 13%
Colin Billington 5/10 4066 days 13%
Gassat 10/10 4066 days 17%
Janis Gallois 8/10 4067 days 17%
Andreas Jung 6/10 4068 days 15%
Francisco Pablo Miguel 8/10 4069 days 17%
Constanza Salas 10/10 4077 days 17%
Jesse Flynn 8/10 4079 days 16%
Andrea Hiemer 10/10 4079 days 17%
Bella Danaher 9/10 4081 days 16%
Daniel Danamer 10/10 4081 days 17%
Christina Habranke 10/10 4084 days 16%
Julia Bonisch 10/10 4087 days 16%
Ina Daubenbuechel 9/10 4088 days 16%
Nelle Dutilleur 8/10 4090 days 16%
Johanna Bak 10/10 4091 days 16%
David Esner 10/10 4092 days 16%
Felix 10/10 4092 days 16%
David Brooks 10/10 4092 days 16%
Camille Gagnant 5/10 4093 days 12%
kamil Benes 6/10 4100 days 13%
Johannes Markus 6/10 4101 days 13%
Greg Fischer 10/10 4101 days 15%
Harel Cliad 10/10 4101 days 15%
Danica Vrsljko 7/10 4101 days 14%
Simon Cassie 9/10 4102 days 15%
nimrod yaron 10/10 4102 days 15%
Claire Dann 7/10 4103 days 14%
Carina Huhmann 8/10 4108 days 15%
Anne Schneider 10/10 4108 days 15%
Hennk Hartke 9/10 4109 days 15%
Charles Busnel 10/10 4110 days 15%
Paige Galbraith 8/10 4111 days 15%
Bjorn Van Mulders 9/10 4113 days 15%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4113 days 14%
Eric and Nienke 10/10 4134 days 14%
Elly Kappert 10/10 4164 days 12%
Sylvia Klatt 10/10 4378 days 0%
Supiot Zudovic 10/10 4391 days 28%
Fjord 9/10 4393 days 28%
Sophie Spady 10/10 4395 days 28%
Soizic 9/10 4395 days 28%
Christofer Tonn 10/10 4395 days 28%
Ken Milligan 8/10 4396 days 28%
Sarah Horn 9/10 4397 days 28%
Yu-Ti Chu 8/10 4400 days 28%
Ton Martens 10/10 4400 days 28%
Hendrik Rother 9/10 4400 days 28%
Nora 8/10 4402 days 28%
Katey Justice 10/10 4404 days 28%
Douglas Walker 8/10 4404 days 28%
tim wettack 10/10 4409 days 28%
Marketa 9/10 4409 days 28%
Sabisch Moritz 9/10 4409 days 28%
Stella Thoben 10/10 4411 days 28%
Paul Liecke 9/10 4411 days 28%
Caderet 10/10 4411 days 28%
James Young 10/10 4411 days 28%
Florent Corino 9/10 4413 days 28%
Lea Bulle 9/10 4413 days 28%
Tobi 5/10 4414 days 22%
Ian 8/10 4415 days 28%
Anna Niesl 10/10 4415 days 28%
Janine Kohlgrueler 9/10 4416 days 28%
Arno Leleu 8/10 4418 days 28%
Alessa Ndra 10/10 4419 days 28%
Patrick O'Connell 10/10 4419 days 28%
Francois Marchar 6/10 4419 days 24%
Kristine and William 5/10 4422 days 22%
Veronica and Jordi 10/10 4428 days 28%
Johnny McManmon 9/10 4430 days 28%
Christoph Mueller 6/10 4431 days 24%
Nora and Edward 8/10 4432 days 28%
Christina Rodewald 8/10 4442 days 28%
Nadine and Jan 8/10 4481 days 28%
Henrik Steinruecken 8/10 4481 days 28%
Wertra 9/10 4482 days 28%
Aurelie Morin 9/10 4490 days 28%
Leticia Martin 10/10 4490 days 28%
Martin Thomas 9/10 4491 days 28%
Franz Schueler 10/10 4491 days 28%
F Soppelsa 1/10 4492 days 11%
Dirk 4/10 4497 days 18%
Katharina Pape 8/10 4497 days 28%
Abby Rushmer 9/10 4498 days 28%
Sasha and Sandra Bonavia 10/10 4499 days 28%
Dio 8/10 4501 days 28%
Stephan Olivier 8/10 4503 days 28%
Stephan Olivier 8/10 4503 days 28%
Anna 9/10 4741 days 28%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.33% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.