Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Taupo Information Centre
Valid Reviews
87 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Information Centre experience has a total of 88 reviews. There are 87 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 87 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Information Centre valid reviews is 80.34% and is based on 87 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
86 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 87 valid reviews, the experience has 86 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 86 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 80.12% and is based on 86 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
83.07%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Jacobs | 10/10 | 2730 days | 100% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 3662 days | 38% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 3662 days | 38% |
| Naelan Le Borgue | 7/10 | 3665 days | 35% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 3666 days | 38% |
| Nicol | 4/10 | 3703 days | 20% |
| Marie Weber | 10/10 | 3709 days | 35% |
| Sue Hempstead | 8/10 | 3710 days | 34% |
| Lukas Dost | 8/10 | 3722 days | 34% |
| Sophie Huybrechts | 9/10 | 3756 days | 32% |
| Bram and Laura | 6/10 | 3765 days | 26% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 3/10 | 4011 days | 4% |
| Mattias | 4/10 | 4011 days | 7% |
| Doreen Gendel | 10/10 | 4019 days | 15% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 4022 days | 15% |
| Kathrin Lerch | 8/10 | 4022 days | 14% |
| Meredith Griffiths | 8/10 | 4028 days | 14% |
| Philippe Chiasson | 8/10 | 4028 days | 14% |
| Stephen Revah | 9/10 | 4037 days | 13% |
| Hadler | 9/10 | 4041 days | 13% |
| Christine Helleiner | 10/10 | 4041 days | 13% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4043 days | 13% |
| Sergey Pronkin | 9/10 | 4043 days | 13% |
| Nina Helmling | 8/10 | 4043 days | 13% |
| Tobias Thull | 9/10 | 4043 days | 13% |
| Sara Clausen | 8/10 | 4046 days | 13% |
| Marieke Feyteres | 8/10 | 4046 days | 13% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 10/10 | 4050 days | 13% |
| Ian Garner | 9/10 | 4053 days | 12% |
| Steven Lotrian | 7/10 | 4054 days | 11% |
| Marvin Koever | 10/10 | 4054 days | 13% |
| Max Meternich | 10/10 | 4054 days | 13% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 4056 days | 12% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 4056 days | 12% |
| Sophia | 8/10 | 4057 days | 12% |
| Lopez Anandine | 6/10 | 4057 days | 9% |
| Ruth Watkin | 8/10 | 4064 days | 12% |
| Matthias Freiling | 8/10 | 4066 days | 11% |
| Jesseca Klausch | 5/10 | 4066 days | 7% |
| Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4066 days | 12% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4067 days | 11% |
| Florian Littmann | 9/10 | 4070 days | 11% |
| Victor Herranz | 8/10 | 4071 days | 11% |
| Andreas Brodhaeker | 6/10 | 4082 days | 8% |
| Marius Buseh | 6/10 | 4082 days | 8% |
| Benedict Seite | 7/10 | 4082 days | 9% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4082 days | 10% |
| Julia Bonisch | 2/10 | 4083 days | 0% |
| Luca Willensrock | 6/10 | 4084 days | 8% |
| Mathias Butterlin | 8/10 | 4086 days | 10% |
| Alexia Greasbaum | 9/10 | 4087 days | 10% |
| Petra Kurcova | 10/10 | 4088 days | 10% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4088 days | 10% |
| Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 4089 days | 10% |
| Camille Gagnant | 10/10 | 4089 days | 10% |
| Anne Collet | 10/10 | 4092 days | 10% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 7/10 | 4102 days | 8% |
| Carina Huhmann | 9/10 | 4104 days | 9% |
| Romina Bolz | 4/10 | 4104 days | 3% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4104 days | 9% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 4106 days | 9% |
| Guillaume Boudrand | 7/10 | 4388 days | 22% |
| Debiesse | 8/10 | 4393 days | 24% |
| Katya Verikaitis | 9/10 | 4398 days | 24% |
| Clodec | 7/10 | 4400 days | 22% |
| Molly Ladd | 6/10 | 4401 days | 20% |
| Sebastian | 9/10 | 4409 days | 24% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 4409 days | 25% |
| Fabian | 9/10 | 4409 days | 24% |
| Jonas Herrmann | 8/10 | 4409 days | 24% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4413 days | 22% |
| Missy and Chaz | 9/10 | 4415 days | 24% |
| Dani Wallinger | 8/10 | 4427 days | 24% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4428 days | 25% |
| Reinier Timmer | 9/10 | 4477 days | 24% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 4481 days | 25% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4487 days | 24% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4499 days | 24% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4499 days | 24% |
| Doan | 8/10 | 4500 days | 24% |
| Thibault Bonenfant | 2/10 | 4501 days | 6% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 7/10 | 4501 days | 22% |
| Shannon Taylor | 6/10 | 4504 days | 20% |
| Harald Prinz | 9/10 | 4506 days | 24% |
| Martina Posch | 8/10 | 4509 days | 24% |
| Megan Child | 3/10 | 4512 days | 9% |
| Jessica Marling | 10/10 | 4779 days | 25% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taupo Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.23% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.