G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taupo Information Centre
Valid Reviews
87 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Information Centre experience has a total of 88 reviews. There are 87 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 87 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Information Centre valid reviews is 80.34% and is based on 87 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
86 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 87 valid reviews, the experience has 86 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 86 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 80.12% and is based on 86 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Jacobs | 10/10 | 2961 days | 100% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 3894 days | 33% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 3894 days | 33% |
| Naelan Le Borgue | 7/10 | 3897 days | 30% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 3898 days | 32% |
| Nicol | 4/10 | 3935 days | 19% |
| Marie Weber | 10/10 | 3941 days | 30% |
| Sue Hempstead | 8/10 | 3942 days | 29% |
| Lukas Dost | 8/10 | 3954 days | 28% |
| Sophie Huybrechts | 9/10 | 3988 days | 26% |
| Bram and Laura | 6/10 | 3997 days | 22% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 3/10 | 4243 days | 3% |
| Mattias | 4/10 | 4243 days | 4% |
| Doreen Gendel | 10/10 | 4251 days | 7% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 4254 days | 7% |
| Kathrin Lerch | 8/10 | 4254 days | 7% |
| Meredith Griffiths | 8/10 | 4260 days | 6% |
| Philippe Chiasson | 8/10 | 4260 days | 6% |
| Stephen Revah | 9/10 | 4269 days | 6% |
| Hadler | 9/10 | 4273 days | 6% |
| Christine Helleiner | 10/10 | 4273 days | 6% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4275 days | 5% |
| Sergey Pronkin | 9/10 | 4275 days | 5% |
| Nina Helmling | 8/10 | 4275 days | 5% |
| Tobias Thull | 9/10 | 4275 days | 5% |
| Sara Clausen | 8/10 | 4278 days | 5% |
| Marieke Feyteres | 8/10 | 4278 days | 5% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 10/10 | 4282 days | 5% |
| Ian Garner | 9/10 | 4285 days | 5% |
| Steven Lotrian | 7/10 | 4286 days | 4% |
| Marvin Koever | 10/10 | 4286 days | 5% |
| Max Meternich | 10/10 | 4286 days | 5% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 4288 days | 5% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 4288 days | 5% |
| Sophia | 8/10 | 4289 days | 4% |
| Lopez Anandine | 6/10 | 4289 days | 4% |
| Ruth Watkin | 8/10 | 4296 days | 4% |
| Matthias Freiling | 8/10 | 4298 days | 4% |
| Jesseca Klausch | 5/10 | 4298 days | 2% |
| Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4298 days | 4% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4299 days | 4% |
| Florian Littmann | 9/10 | 4302 days | 3% |
| Victor Herranz | 8/10 | 4303 days | 3% |
| Andreas Brodhaeker | 6/10 | 4314 days | 2% |
| Marius Buseh | 6/10 | 4314 days | 2% |
| Benedict Seite | 7/10 | 4314 days | 2% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4314 days | 3% |
| Julia Bonisch | 2/10 | 4315 days | 0% |
| Luca Willensrock | 6/10 | 4316 days | 2% |
| Mathias Butterlin | 8/10 | 4318 days | 2% |
| Alexia Greasbaum | 9/10 | 4319 days | 2% |
| Petra Kurcova | 10/10 | 4320 days | 2% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4320 days | 2% |
| Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 4321 days | 2% |
| Camille Gagnant | 10/10 | 4321 days | 2% |
| Anne Collet | 10/10 | 4324 days | 2% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 7/10 | 4334 days | 1% |
| Carina Huhmann | 9/10 | 4336 days | 1% |
| Romina Bolz | 4/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4336 days | 1% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 4338 days | 1% |
| Guillaume Boudrand | 7/10 | 4620 days | 32% |
| Debiesse | 8/10 | 4625 days | 34% |
| Katya Verikaitis | 9/10 | 4630 days | 34% |
| Clodec | 7/10 | 4632 days | 32% |
| Molly Ladd | 6/10 | 4633 days | 30% |
| Sebastian | 9/10 | 4641 days | 34% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 4641 days | 35% |
| Fabian | 9/10 | 4641 days | 34% |
| Jonas Herrmann | 8/10 | 4641 days | 34% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4645 days | 32% |
| Missy and Chaz | 9/10 | 4647 days | 34% |
| Dani Wallinger | 8/10 | 4659 days | 34% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4660 days | 35% |
| Reinier Timmer | 9/10 | 4709 days | 34% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 4713 days | 35% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4719 days | 34% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4731 days | 34% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4731 days | 34% |
| Doan | 8/10 | 4732 days | 34% |
| Thibault Bonenfant | 2/10 | 4733 days | 15% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 7/10 | 4733 days | 32% |
| Shannon Taylor | 6/10 | 4736 days | 30% |
| Harald Prinz | 9/10 | 4738 days | 34% |
| Martina Posch | 8/10 | 4741 days | 34% |
| Megan Child | 3/10 | 4744 days | 18% |
| Jessica Marling | 10/10 | 5011 days | 35% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taupo Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.29% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.