Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
70 Valid Reviews
The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has a total of 70 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
87% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
8/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours valid reviews is 98.57% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
98.79%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Minesh Govenji | 10/10 | 1939 days | 100% |
Srikant | 10/10 | 1939 days | 100% |
Meir Boukris | 9/10 | 2000 days | 96% |
Shravan Shetty | 10/10 | 2031 days | 96% |
Mariano | 10/10 | 2123 days | 92% |
Océane | 10/10 | 2184 days | 90% |
Elyce Rotella | 10/10 | 2245 days | 87% |
Nir | 10/10 | 2273 days | 86% |
Lisa Hanline | 10/10 | 2365 days | 82% |
Jaime G. del Rosario | 10/10 | 2396 days | 81% |
Bob and Joyce Kroencke, USA | 10/10 | 2610 days | 72% |
John M | 10/10 | 2668 days | 70% |
Vivien Kalvaria | 9/10 | 2699 days | 68% |
Stephen Forte | 10/10 | 2729 days | 67% |
Christian | 10/10 | 3339 days | 42% |
gloria tseng | 10/10 | 4040 days | 13% |
Steven Hucik | 10/10 | 4099 days | 10% |
Brid Devlin | 9/10 | 4099 days | 10% |
David McLemore | 10/10 | 4099 days | 10% |
Carrie | 10/10 | 4099 days | 10% |
Ed | 10/10 | 4130 days | 9% |
reviewer | 10/10 | 4161 days | 8% |
Felicia Ng | 10/10 | 4191 days | 6% |
Timmy & Megan | 10/10 | 4191 days | 6% |
Christian | 10/10 | 4191 days | 6% |
anton prawira | 9/10 | 4283 days | 3% |
june isono | 9/10 | 4314 days | 1% |
Cynthia Nardelli | 10/10 | 4314 days | 1% |
angeline_ang | 9/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
Alex London | 8/10 | 4436 days | 19% |
Sharon K | 10/10 | 4436 days | 20% |
Terry Bryk | 10/10 | 4464 days | 20% |
Philips | 10/10 | 4495 days | 20% |
scott | 10/10 | 4526 days | 20% |
Courtney1 | 10/10 | 4587 days | 20% |
aurbanes | 10/10 | 4648 days | 20% |
joanhsieh | 10/10 | 4679 days | 20% |
Varda Mehta | 10/10 | 4679 days | 20% |
raminderrayar | 10/10 | 4740 days | 20% |
PegTraveller | 10/10 | 4740 days | 20% |
Shaunhk | 10/10 | 4770 days | 20% |
arlenemattera | 10/10 | 4770 days | 20% |
MBaum735 | 10/10 | 4801 days | 20% |
terig | 10/10 | 4830 days | 20% |
tfeng | 9/10 | 4830 days | 20% |
james09173 | 10/10 | 4922 days | 20% |
Lei | 10/10 | 4983 days | 20% |
shlomo iager | 10/10 | 4983 days | 20% |
gigirup | 10/10 | 4983 days | 20% |
pinecliffs | 10/10 | 5195 days | 20% |
GiancarloB | 10/10 | 5195 days | 20% |
Maria_in_HongKong | 10/10 | 5195 days | 20% |
gtspencer | 10/10 | 5226 days | 20% |
dgreddy | 10/10 | 5257 days | 20% |
nancy33 | 10/10 | 5318 days | 20% |
PrettyPrincess | 10/10 | 5348 days | 20% |
NawshirMirza | 10/10 | 5440 days | 20% |
barbarakburtb | 10/10 | 5501 days | 20% |
clive903 | 10/10 | 5622 days | 20% |
Carlos | 10/10 | 5622 days | 20% |
Jody | 10/10 | 5683 days | 20% |
Holdenluvr | 10/10 | 5897 days | 20% |
Irina | 10/10 | 5956 days | 20% |
franz_renate | 10/10 | 6017 days | 20% |
harpal | 10/10 | 6201 days | 20% |
enngee | 10/10 | 6383 days | 20% |
shivaniagarwala | 10/10 | 6475 days | 20% |
primarosa | 10/10 | 6718 days | 20% |
gilluncles | 9/10 | 6779 days | 20% |
Mohan_Leela_KamnaKrishnan | 10/10 | 6962 days | 20% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.29% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 71 days. However the Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.24% |
198 | -3.26% |
199 | -3.28% |
200 | -3.29% |
201 | -3.31% |
202 | -3.32% |
203 | -3.34% |
… | … |
0.39% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.