Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Kauwhata Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
60 Valid Reviews
The Te Kauwhata Domain experience has a total of 67 reviews. There are 60 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
42% |
9/10 | 13 |
|
22% |
8/10 | 16 |
|
27% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
88.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kauwhata Domain valid reviews is 88.00% and is based on 60 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
88.16%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Cucamest | 10/10 | 31 days | 100% |
Millie | 9/10 | 61 days | 99% |
Jill | 8/10 | 184 days | 96% |
Guest | 9/10 | 214 days | 96% |
Nadja | 10/10 | 305 days | 95% |
Dee | 7/10 | 336 days | 87% |
Brie | 6/10 | 336 days | 80% |
Ruta | 1/10 | 366 days | 36% |
Malcolm Greenhalgh | 8/10 | 397 days | 89% |
Jan | 8/10 | 397 days | 89% |
Sara | 8/10 | 458 days | 86% |
Bobbie | 10/10 | 489 days | 86% |
Christa | 10/10 | 550 days | 82% |
wvdbos | 8/10 | 580 days | 79% |
sarah penney | 9/10 | 580 days | 80% |
Steve Hawes | 10/10 | 611 days | 78% |
Camila | 10/10 | 611 days | 78% |
Joakim | 8/10 | 639 days | 75% |
Anya | 10/10 | 639 days | 76% |
Odette | 10/10 | 639 days | 76% |
Caroline | 9/10 | 639 days | 75% |
Kate | 9/10 | 670 days | 73% |
Adrian | 10/10 | 670 days | 74% |
Geri Ng | 10/10 | 701 days | 71% |
Emily | 8/10 | 731 days | 67% |
Dave | 10/10 | 762 days | 66% |
Laura Jarry | 8/10 | 762 days | 65% |
Chloe | 8/10 | 854 days | 56% |
Eyisha | 7/10 | 884 days | 50% |
Jose | 10/10 | 976 days | 45% |
Emma | 9/10 | 976 days | 44% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 1035 days | 39% |
Joe | 10/10 | 1035 days | 39% |
Roque | 10/10 | 1369 days | 15% |
Aj | 10/10 | 1461 days | 10% |
Shannon | 10/10 | 1492 days | 9% |
Karen | 9/10 | 1522 days | 8% |
Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 1706 days | 3% |
Merche | 9/10 | 1735 days | 3% |
Silly American | 10/10 | 1766 days | 3% |
Gap year | 10/10 | 1797 days | 3% |
Christina | 8/10 | 1797 days | 2% |
Jun | 9/10 | 1827 days | 2% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 1827 days | 2% |
Bartezz | 8/10 | 1827 days | 2% |
Ancient Uncle | 10/10 | 1858 days | 2% |
Marty | 8/10 | 1888 days | 2% |
Johannes | 8/10 | 2072 days | 2% |
Georgia Trompf | 9/10 | 2131 days | 2% |
Trudy Worboys | 10/10 | 2131 days | 2% |
Liv | 10/10 | 2162 days | 2% |
The Flip Flop Family | 10/10 | 2252 days | 2% |
CHA LEMAY | 9/10 | 2406 days | 1% |
Fivetogether | 9/10 | 2437 days | 1% |
Muhammad fayadh Mad jamil | 8/10 | 2464 days | 1% |
Flavia Confalonieri | 7/10 | 2539 days | 1% |
Lucy Winfield | 5/10 | 2663 days | 0% |
Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 2669 days | 1% |
Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 2759 days | 1% |
Christine Allgaier | 10/10 | 2812 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Kauwhata Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.27% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.