Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

65 Valid Reviews

The Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 66 reviews. There are 65 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 29
45%
9/10 17
26%
8/10 11
17%
7/10 4
6%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

89.38% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 89.38% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

13 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 13 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 13 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
54%
9/10 3
23%
8/10 2
15%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

90.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 90.77% and is based on 13 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

83.67%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
@saltyskin 7/10 571 days 100%
Emmy 6/10 691 days 83%
Peter menzies 9/10 691 days 95%
ElizabethE 7/10 691 days 89%
Daniel 9/10 752 days 89%
Jak 10/10 936 days 66%
Paul Costelloe 9/10 1056 days 51%
Loaf 10/10 1240 days 32%
Wendy. 10/10 1362 days 23%
Kyje 8/10 1362 days 22%
Bonbons 10/10 1390 days 21%
Danielle Pegge 9/10 1390 days 21%
Rob 10/10 1421 days 19%
Clara 5/10 1421 days 14%
Vicky 8/10 1513 days 14%
Amy 9/10 1756 days 7%
Eloïse Cook 10/10 1756 days 7%
Javier Williams 9/10 1848 days 6%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 8/10 1879 days 6%
Charlotte 8/10 1971 days 6%
Sarah 10/10 2121 days 6%
Ralph Gleek 7/10 2121 days 5%
Paul Smith 8/10 2121 days 6%
MaryCC 9/10 2183 days 5%
Sarah 6/10 2427 days 4%
Jakub Horner 9/10 2448 days 5%
Robin Heels 10/10 2479 days 3%
Amy Lord 9/10 2493 days 3%
Gordon Otte 9/10 2507 days 3%
Annina Jarvinen 5/10 2536 days 2%
Lukas Kuratko 10/10 2575 days 5%
Haley Everitt 8/10 2745 days 4%
Martin Badley 9/10 2754 days 4%
carter Kedzlie 10/10 2761 days 4%
Rian Talen 8/10 2771 days 4%
Ally Rowe 10/10 2843 days 4%
Lizzy Cobeldick 10/10 2881 days 4%
Emanresu 10/10 2942 days 4%
midlife crisis 10/10 2973 days 3%
Philippa and Adam 9/10 3203 days 3%
Linda Frank 10/10 3229 days 3%
Lucilo Del Castillo 10/10 3235 days 2%
Kiria Logtenberg 9/10 3250 days 3%
Chloe Grand 10/10 3251 days 3%
Christine Slowiak 10/10 3431 days 2%
Christian Jenny 9/10 3501 days 2%
Julia 10/10 3553 days 2%
Felix Holm 9/10 3625 days 1%
Sidney Stokkers 8/10 3704 days 2%
tim winders 10/10 3827 days 1%
Leeann Newton 10/10 3945 days 1%
Jason MacLeod 9/10 3978 days 1%
arnaud paquet 10/10 4009 days 1%
Helene & Peter 10/10 4039 days 1%
GN100 9/10 4070 days 1%
David Restell 10/10 4162 days 0%
Cloarec Guillaume 10/10 4279 days 0%
Clodec 8/10 4279 days 0%
Phil & Laura 7/10 4312 days 0%
Morayfm 10/10 4312 days 0%
Danish_family 8/10 4312 days 0%
Jennifer 10/10 4660 days 1%
Stefan 10/10 4663 days 1%
Susannah Eduart 10/10 4995 days 1%
Craig 8/10 5756 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.10% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.