Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau).
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau)
Valid Reviews
44 Valid Reviews
The Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) experience has a total of 44 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
39% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) valid reviews is 80.45% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 44 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.53% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) face-to-face reviews is 80.53% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
80.30%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Schaeffer | 8/10 | 2854 days | 100% |
| Kathrin Herbst | 8/10 | 2858 days | 100% |
| Michael | 7/10 | 2894 days | 92% |
| Lucie Revay | 9/10 | 2895 days | 98% |
| Micha Kuster | 8/10 | 2896 days | 97% |
| Theresa Slaghekke | 8/10 | 2907 days | 96% |
| Sarah | 7/10 | 2919 days | 90% |
| Eva Neumann | 7/10 | 3151 days | 75% |
| Ana Coulee | 8/10 | 3155 days | 79% |
| Cecile Santiaux | 8/10 | 3155 days | 79% |
| Janina | 10/10 | 3155 days | 81% |
| Arthur | 8/10 | 3155 days | 79% |
| Maike W | 9/10 | 3161 days | 80% |
| Elbrich | 6/10 | 3161 days | 68% |
| Gerbrand Smidt | 8/10 | 3164 days | 78% |
| Thea Nicholas | 7/10 | 3180 days | 73% |
| Sebastian Reinhardy | 6/10 | 3204 days | 66% |
| Joris | 9/10 | 3205 days | 76% |
| Juro | 9/10 | 3205 days | 76% |
| Mark White | 10/10 | 3207 days | 77% |
| Melanie Kronbichler | 7/10 | 3211 days | 71% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 6/10 | 3211 days | 65% |
| Dario Leyrer | 6/10 | 3213 days | 65% |
| David | 8/10 | 3220 days | 75% |
| Julie | 9/10 | 3256 days | 73% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3301 days | 69% |
| Eva Marsikova | 10/10 | 3538 days | 54% |
| Marie Schmid | 7/10 | 3568 days | 48% |
| Laurent Arditi | 8/10 | 3759 days | 37% |
| Lola | 10/10 | 3880 days | 29% |
| Alisa | 10/10 | 3880 days | 29% |
| Garry Renton | 10/10 | 3888 days | 29% |
| Claire Dann | 10/10 | 3971 days | 23% |
| Christian | 8/10 | 4270 days | 2% |
| Selina Lott | 6/10 | 4281 days | 0% |
| Constanze | 7/10 | 4281 days | 0% |
| Andy Lever | 8/10 | 4748 days | 29% |
| Dogoneit | 8/10 | 4977 days | 29% |
| Liz & Jim | 8/10 | 5002 days | 29% |
| Matthew Franklin | 8/10 | 5010 days | 29% |
| Barry | 7/10 | 5029 days | 28% |
| Laura Walters | 7/10 | 5400 days | 28% |
| Mathias | 8/10 | 5432 days | 29% |
| Stefanie Micheler | 10/10 | 5474 days | 30% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.92% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.