Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau).
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau)
Valid Reviews
44 Valid Reviews
The Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) experience has a total of 44 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
39% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) valid reviews is 80.45% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 44 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.53% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) face-to-face reviews is 80.53% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
80.28%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Schaeffer | 8/10 | 2890 days | 100% |
| Kathrin Herbst | 8/10 | 2894 days | 100% |
| Michael | 7/10 | 2930 days | 92% |
| Lucie Revay | 9/10 | 2931 days | 98% |
| Micha Kuster | 8/10 | 2932 days | 97% |
| Theresa Slaghekke | 8/10 | 2943 days | 96% |
| Sarah | 7/10 | 2955 days | 90% |
| Eva Neumann | 7/10 | 3187 days | 75% |
| Ana Coulee | 8/10 | 3191 days | 79% |
| Cecile Santiaux | 8/10 | 3191 days | 79% |
| Janina | 10/10 | 3191 days | 81% |
| Arthur | 8/10 | 3191 days | 79% |
| Maike W | 9/10 | 3197 days | 79% |
| Elbrich | 6/10 | 3197 days | 69% |
| Gerbrand Smidt | 8/10 | 3200 days | 78% |
| Thea Nicholas | 7/10 | 3216 days | 73% |
| Sebastian Reinhardy | 6/10 | 3240 days | 66% |
| Joris | 9/10 | 3241 days | 76% |
| Juro | 9/10 | 3241 days | 76% |
| Mark White | 10/10 | 3243 days | 77% |
| Melanie Kronbichler | 7/10 | 3247 days | 71% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 6/10 | 3247 days | 66% |
| Dario Leyrer | 6/10 | 3249 days | 65% |
| David | 8/10 | 3256 days | 74% |
| Julie | 9/10 | 3292 days | 73% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3337 days | 69% |
| Eva Marsikova | 10/10 | 3574 days | 53% |
| Marie Schmid | 7/10 | 3604 days | 47% |
| Laurent Arditi | 8/10 | 3795 days | 37% |
| Lola | 10/10 | 3916 days | 29% |
| Alisa | 10/10 | 3916 days | 29% |
| Garry Renton | 10/10 | 3924 days | 29% |
| Claire Dann | 10/10 | 4007 days | 23% |
| Christian | 8/10 | 4306 days | 1% |
| Selina Lott | 6/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Constanze | 7/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Andy Lever | 8/10 | 4784 days | 32% |
| Dogoneit | 8/10 | 5013 days | 32% |
| Liz & Jim | 8/10 | 5038 days | 32% |
| Matthew Franklin | 8/10 | 5046 days | 32% |
| Barry | 7/10 | 5065 days | 30% |
| Laura Walters | 7/10 | 5436 days | 30% |
| Mathias | 8/10 | 5468 days | 32% |
| Stefanie Micheler | 10/10 | 5510 days | 32% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mount / Mt Eden (Maungawhau) does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.92% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.