Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

121 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 124 reviews. There are 121 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 76
63%
9/10 24
20%
8/10 11
9%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.89% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.89% and is based on 121 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 121 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.07%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Monika 10/10 200 days 100%
Joanna 10/10 260 days 98%
Sue 10/10 260 days 98%
Jana 10/10 260 days 98%
Celeste 10/10 291 days 97%
Jimothyhike 10/10 382 days 94%
Dee Sage 10/10 382 days 94%
Daniel 10/10 566 days 84%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 566 days 84%
simon 10/10 594 days 82%
Juju 6/10 625 days 68%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 625 days 80%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 625 days 79%
Florian S. 4/10 656 days 50%
Sophie 10/10 656 days 77%
Deb 9/10 656 days 76%
Daniel 10/10 686 days 75%
Alec 10/10 990 days 46%
Mike Whalen 10/10 990 days 46%
Melissa 10/10 1021 days 43%
Catherine 10/10 1265 days 23%
Helen 6/10 1265 days 20%
Jane 10/10 1324 days 20%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1355 days 18%
Mitch 10/10 1355 days 18%
ZMad 10/10 1416 days 15%
Abi 8/10 1447 days 13%
Aaron 10/10 1569 days 9%
Marika Naylor 10/10 1569 days 9%
Lisa 10/10 1661 days 7%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 1661 days 7%
Neil 10/10 1690 days 6%
Hatessandflys 10/10 1690 days 6%
Sue 10/10 1690 days 6%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 1690 days 6%
Niko Schachner 4/10 1720 days 4%
Mark 10/10 1721 days 6%
Achim 10/10 1721 days 6%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 1721 days 6%
Lukas 10/10 1752 days 5%
Tom McKernan 10/10 1781 days 5%
Gil 10/10 1782 days 5%
Katherine Ong 10/10 1813 days 5%
Pedro 9/10 2055 days 4%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2086 days 4%
Barry 10/10 2086 days 4%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2086 days 4%
Macker 8/10 2147 days 4%
Guillaume 10/10 2208 days 4%
Karli18 9/10 2331 days 4%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2331 days 4%
Jenny 10/10 2331 days 4%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2392 days 4%
Nat 10/10 2392 days 4%
The Weathersons 8/10 2405 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2433 days 4%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2449 days 4%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2450 days 4%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 2481 days 4%
Edwin Bos 10/10 2492 days 4%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 2517 days 4%
Prudence Jane 10/10 2526 days 4%
Owen Dilling 10/10 2542 days 4%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2542 days 4%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 2662 days 3%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 2717 days 3%
Ann Teeters 10/10 2756 days 3%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 2784 days 3%
Alan Brown 9/10 2784 days 3%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 2799 days 3%
Amy Smith 9/10 2805 days 3%
Katie Ball 10/10 2818 days 3%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3060 days 3%
Roland Syha 10/10 3086 days 2%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3097 days 2%
Max 7/10 3104 days 2%
Werner Langer 10/10 3121 days 2%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3134 days 2%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3135 days 2%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3136 days 2%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3136 days 2%
Steve Newton 10/10 3157 days 2%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3165 days 2%
R Werder 10/10 3166 days 2%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3179 days 2%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3182 days 2%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3205 days 2%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3212 days 2%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3212 days 2%
Alan White 10/10 3255 days 2%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3412 days 2%
ct2034 10/10 3456 days 2%
Alistair Millward 9/10 3484 days 2%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 3515 days 2%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 3551 days 2%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 3577 days 1%
Annie Butler 10/10 3638 days 1%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 3638 days 1%
Tina Johnson 10/10 3731 days 1%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 3761 days 1%
Bob Morrison 9/10 3792 days 1%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 3853 days 1%
Monique Monique 9/10 3881 days 1%
Paul W 9/10 3881 days 1%
Michael Uebe 10/10 3884 days 0%
Helen King 9/10 4034 days 1%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4211 days 0%
Julian Roots 8/10 4218 days 0%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4299 days 0%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4317 days 0%
Josef 9/10 4593 days 0%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 4600 days 0%
Arron 10/10 4612 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 4612 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 4888 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 4918 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 4933 days 0%
Mark 8/10 4956 days 0%
John 9/10 4961 days 0%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5362 days 0%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5414 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.64% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 76 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 177 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
174 -2.60%
175 -2.61%
176 -2.63%
177 -2.64%
178 -2.66%
179 -2.67%
180 -2.69%

Balancing Adjustment

0.70% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

93%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.