Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
122 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 125 reviews. There are 122 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 122 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 77 |
|
63% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
20% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.95% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.95% and is based on 122 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 122 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
95.39%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Anaïs | 10/10 | 48 days | 100% |
Monika | 10/10 | 262 days | 96% |
Joanna | 10/10 | 322 days | 94% |
Sue | 10/10 | 322 days | 94% |
Jana | 10/10 | 322 days | 94% |
Celeste | 10/10 | 353 days | 93% |
Jimothyhike | 10/10 | 444 days | 89% |
Dee Sage | 10/10 | 444 days | 89% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 628 days | 78% |
Sue and Scott Collington | 10/10 | 628 days | 78% |
simon | 10/10 | 656 days | 76% |
Juju | 6/10 | 687 days | 63% |
Jo Hopkinson | 10/10 | 687 days | 73% |
PAULA WALLACE | 9/10 | 687 days | 72% |
Florian S. | 4/10 | 718 days | 46% |
Sophie | 10/10 | 718 days | 71% |
Deb | 9/10 | 718 days | 70% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 748 days | 68% |
Alec | 10/10 | 1052 days | 39% |
Mike Whalen | 10/10 | 1052 days | 39% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 1083 days | 36% |
Catherine | 10/10 | 1327 days | 19% |
Helen | 6/10 | 1327 days | 17% |
Jane | 10/10 | 1386 days | 16% |
Sass and Pete | 10/10 | 1417 days | 15% |
Mitch | 10/10 | 1417 days | 15% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 1478 days | 12% |
Abi | 8/10 | 1509 days | 10% |
Aaron | 10/10 | 1631 days | 7% |
Marika Naylor | 10/10 | 1631 days | 7% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 1723 days | 6% |
Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 1723 days | 6% |
Neil | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 1783 days | 3% |
Mark | 10/10 | 1783 days | 5% |
Achim | 10/10 | 1783 days | 5% |
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 1783 days | 5% |
Lukas | 10/10 | 1814 days | 5% |
Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 1844 days | 5% |
Gil | 10/10 | 1844 days | 5% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 1875 days | 5% |
Pedro | 9/10 | 2117 days | 4% |
Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2148 days | 4% |
Barry | 10/10 | 2148 days | 4% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2148 days | 4% |
Macker | 8/10 | 2209 days | 4% |
Guillaume | 10/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
Karli18 | 9/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 2454 days | 4% |
Nat | 10/10 | 2454 days | 4% |
The Weathersons | 8/10 | 2467 days | 2% |
Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 2495 days | 4% |
Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 2511 days | 4% |
Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 2512 days | 4% |
Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 2544 days | 4% |
Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 2554 days | 4% |
Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 2579 days | 4% |
Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 2588 days | 4% |
Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 2724 days | 3% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 2779 days | 3% |
Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 2819 days | 3% |
Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 2847 days | 3% |
Alan Brown | 9/10 | 2847 days | 3% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 2861 days | 3% |
Amy Smith | 9/10 | 2867 days | 3% |
Katie Ball | 10/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
Roland Syha | 10/10 | 3148 days | 2% |
Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 3159 days | 2% |
Max | 7/10 | 3166 days | 2% |
Werner Langer | 10/10 | 3184 days | 2% |
Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 3196 days | 2% |
Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 3197 days | 2% |
Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
Steve Newton | 10/10 | 3219 days | 2% |
Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 3227 days | 2% |
R Werder | 10/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 3241 days | 2% |
Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 3267 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 3275 days | 2% |
Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 3275 days | 2% |
Alan White | 10/10 | 3317 days | 2% |
Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 3474 days | 2% |
ct2034 | 10/10 | 3519 days | 2% |
Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 3546 days | 2% |
Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 3578 days | 2% |
Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 3613 days | 2% |
Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
Annie Butler | 10/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 3793 days | 1% |
Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 3915 days | 1% |
Monique Monique | 9/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
Paul W | 9/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
Helen King | 9/10 | 4096 days | 1% |
Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 4273 days | 0% |
Julian Roots | 8/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Josef | 9/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 4662 days | 0% |
Arron | 10/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
polzeath | 7/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
richdrkt | 9/10 | 4950 days | 1% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 4995 days | 1% |
Mark | 8/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 5023 days | 1% |
Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.69% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 34 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
31 | -0.63% |
32 | -0.65% |
33 | -0.67% |
34 | -0.69% |
35 | -0.71% |
36 | -0.73% |
37 | -0.75% |
… | … |
0.46% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
95%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.