Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
121 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 124 reviews. There are 121 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 76 |
|
63% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
20% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.89% and is based on 121 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 121 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
95.07%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Monika | 10/10 | 200 days | 100% |
Joanna | 10/10 | 260 days | 98% |
Sue | 10/10 | 260 days | 98% |
Jana | 10/10 | 260 days | 98% |
Celeste | 10/10 | 291 days | 97% |
Jimothyhike | 10/10 | 382 days | 94% |
Dee Sage | 10/10 | 382 days | 94% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 566 days | 84% |
Sue and Scott Collington | 10/10 | 566 days | 84% |
simon | 10/10 | 594 days | 82% |
Juju | 6/10 | 625 days | 68% |
Jo Hopkinson | 10/10 | 625 days | 80% |
PAULA WALLACE | 9/10 | 625 days | 79% |
Florian S. | 4/10 | 656 days | 50% |
Sophie | 10/10 | 656 days | 77% |
Deb | 9/10 | 656 days | 76% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 686 days | 75% |
Alec | 10/10 | 990 days | 46% |
Mike Whalen | 10/10 | 990 days | 46% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 1021 days | 43% |
Catherine | 10/10 | 1265 days | 23% |
Helen | 6/10 | 1265 days | 20% |
Jane | 10/10 | 1324 days | 20% |
Sass and Pete | 10/10 | 1355 days | 18% |
Mitch | 10/10 | 1355 days | 18% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 1416 days | 15% |
Abi | 8/10 | 1447 days | 13% |
Aaron | 10/10 | 1569 days | 9% |
Marika Naylor | 10/10 | 1569 days | 9% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 1661 days | 7% |
Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 1661 days | 7% |
Neil | 10/10 | 1690 days | 6% |
Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 1690 days | 6% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1690 days | 6% |
Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 1690 days | 6% |
Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 1720 days | 4% |
Mark | 10/10 | 1721 days | 6% |
Achim | 10/10 | 1721 days | 6% |
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 1721 days | 6% |
Lukas | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 1781 days | 5% |
Gil | 10/10 | 1782 days | 5% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 1813 days | 5% |
Pedro | 9/10 | 2055 days | 4% |
Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
Barry | 10/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
Macker | 8/10 | 2147 days | 4% |
Guillaume | 10/10 | 2208 days | 4% |
Karli18 | 9/10 | 2331 days | 4% |
Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 2331 days | 4% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 2331 days | 4% |
Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 2392 days | 4% |
Nat | 10/10 | 2392 days | 4% |
The Weathersons | 8/10 | 2405 days | 2% |
Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 2433 days | 4% |
Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 2450 days | 4% |
Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 2481 days | 4% |
Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 2492 days | 4% |
Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 2526 days | 4% |
Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 2542 days | 4% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 2542 days | 4% |
Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 2662 days | 3% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 2756 days | 3% |
Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 2784 days | 3% |
Alan Brown | 9/10 | 2784 days | 3% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 2799 days | 3% |
Amy Smith | 9/10 | 2805 days | 3% |
Katie Ball | 10/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 3060 days | 3% |
Roland Syha | 10/10 | 3086 days | 2% |
Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 3097 days | 2% |
Max | 7/10 | 3104 days | 2% |
Werner Langer | 10/10 | 3121 days | 2% |
Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 3134 days | 2% |
Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 3136 days | 2% |
Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 3136 days | 2% |
Steve Newton | 10/10 | 3157 days | 2% |
Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 3165 days | 2% |
R Werder | 10/10 | 3166 days | 2% |
Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 3179 days | 2% |
Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 3205 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
Alan White | 10/10 | 3255 days | 2% |
Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 3412 days | 2% |
ct2034 | 10/10 | 3456 days | 2% |
Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 3484 days | 2% |
Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 3577 days | 1% |
Annie Butler | 10/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 3731 days | 1% |
Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 3761 days | 1% |
Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 3792 days | 1% |
Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 3853 days | 1% |
Monique Monique | 9/10 | 3881 days | 1% |
Paul W | 9/10 | 3881 days | 1% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 3884 days | 0% |
Helen King | 9/10 | 4034 days | 1% |
Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 4211 days | 0% |
Julian Roots | 8/10 | 4218 days | 0% |
Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 4299 days | 0% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
Josef | 9/10 | 4593 days | 0% |
Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 4600 days | 0% |
Arron | 10/10 | 4612 days | 1% |
polzeath | 7/10 | 4612 days | 1% |
richdrkt | 9/10 | 4888 days | 1% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 4918 days | 1% |
Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 4933 days | 0% |
Mark | 8/10 | 4956 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4961 days | 0% |
Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 5362 days | 0% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5414 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.64% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 76 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 177 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
174 | -2.60% |
175 | -2.61% |
176 | -2.63% |
177 | -2.64% |
178 | -2.66% |
179 | -2.67% |
180 | -2.69% |
… | … |
0.70% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.