Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

122 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 125 reviews. There are 122 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 122 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 77
63%
9/10 24
20%
8/10 11
9%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.95% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.95% and is based on 122 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 122 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.42%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Anaïs 10/10 77 days 100%
Monika 10/10 291 days 95%
Joanna 10/10 351 days 93%
Sue 10/10 351 days 93%
Jana 10/10 351 days 93%
Celeste 10/10 382 days 92%
Jimothyhike 10/10 473 days 88%
Dee Sage 10/10 473 days 88%
Daniel 10/10 657 days 76%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 657 days 76%
simon 10/10 685 days 73%
Juju 6/10 716 days 61%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 716 days 71%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 716 days 70%
Florian S. 4/10 747 days 45%
Sophie 10/10 747 days 68%
Deb 9/10 747 days 68%
Daniel 10/10 777 days 66%
Alec 10/10 1081 days 37%
Mike Whalen 10/10 1081 days 37%
Melissa 10/10 1112 days 34%
Catherine 10/10 1356 days 17%
Helen 6/10 1356 days 15%
Jane 10/10 1415 days 15%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1446 days 13%
Mitch 10/10 1446 days 13%
ZMad 10/10 1507 days 11%
Abi 8/10 1538 days 9%
Aaron 10/10 1660 days 6%
Marika Naylor 10/10 1660 days 6%
Lisa 10/10 1752 days 5%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 1752 days 5%
Neil 10/10 1781 days 5%
Hatessandflys 10/10 1781 days 5%
Sue 10/10 1781 days 5%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 1781 days 5%
Niko Schachner 4/10 1812 days 3%
Mark 10/10 1812 days 5%
Achim 10/10 1812 days 5%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 1812 days 5%
Lukas 10/10 1843 days 5%
Tom McKernan 10/10 1873 days 5%
Gil 10/10 1873 days 5%
Katherine Ong 10/10 1904 days 5%
Pedro 9/10 2146 days 4%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2177 days 4%
Barry 10/10 2177 days 4%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2177 days 4%
Macker 8/10 2238 days 4%
Guillaume 10/10 2299 days 4%
Karli18 9/10 2422 days 4%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2422 days 4%
Jenny 10/10 2422 days 4%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2483 days 4%
Nat 10/10 2483 days 4%
The Weathersons 8/10 2496 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2524 days 3%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2540 days 3%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2541 days 3%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 2573 days 3%
Edwin Bos 10/10 2583 days 3%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 2608 days 3%
Prudence Jane 10/10 2617 days 3%
Owen Dilling 10/10 2634 days 3%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2634 days 3%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 2753 days 3%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 2808 days 3%
Ann Teeters 10/10 2848 days 3%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 2876 days 3%
Alan Brown 9/10 2876 days 3%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 2890 days 3%
Amy Smith 9/10 2896 days 3%
Katie Ball 10/10 2909 days 3%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3152 days 2%
Roland Syha 10/10 3177 days 2%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3188 days 2%
Max 7/10 3195 days 2%
Werner Langer 10/10 3213 days 2%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3225 days 2%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3226 days 2%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3227 days 2%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3227 days 2%
Steve Newton 10/10 3248 days 2%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3256 days 2%
R Werder 10/10 3257 days 2%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3270 days 2%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3273 days 2%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3296 days 2%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3304 days 2%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3304 days 2%
Alan White 10/10 3346 days 2%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3503 days 2%
ct2034 10/10 3548 days 1%
Alistair Millward 9/10 3575 days 1%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 3607 days 1%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 3642 days 1%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 3669 days 1%
Annie Butler 10/10 3730 days 1%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 3730 days 1%
Tina Johnson 10/10 3822 days 1%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 3852 days 1%
Bob Morrison 9/10 3883 days 1%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 3944 days 1%
Monique Monique 9/10 3972 days 1%
Paul W 9/10 3972 days 1%
Michael Uebe 10/10 3975 days 0%
Helen King 9/10 4125 days 0%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4302 days 0%
Julian Roots 8/10 4309 days 0%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4390 days 0%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4408 days 0%
Josef 9/10 4684 days 0%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 4691 days 0%
Arron 10/10 4703 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 4703 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 4979 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 5009 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 5024 days 0%
Mark 8/10 5047 days 0%
John 9/10 5052 days 0%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5453 days 0%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5505 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-1.28% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 63 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
60 -1.21%
61 -1.23%
62 -1.26%
63 -1.28%
64 -1.30%
65 -1.32%
66 -1.34%

Balancing Adjustment

0.52% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.