Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
122 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 125 reviews. There are 122 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 122 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 77 |
|
63% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
20% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.95% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.95% and is based on 122 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 122 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
95.37%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Anaïs | 10/10 | 32 days | 100% |
Monika | 10/10 | 246 days | 97% |
Joanna | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
Sue | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
Jana | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
Celeste | 10/10 | 337 days | 94% |
Jimothyhike | 10/10 | 428 days | 90% |
Dee Sage | 10/10 | 428 days | 90% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 612 days | 79% |
Sue and Scott Collington | 10/10 | 612 days | 79% |
simon | 10/10 | 640 days | 77% |
Juju | 6/10 | 671 days | 64% |
Jo Hopkinson | 10/10 | 671 days | 74% |
PAULA WALLACE | 9/10 | 671 days | 74% |
Florian S. | 4/10 | 702 days | 47% |
Sophie | 10/10 | 702 days | 72% |
Deb | 9/10 | 702 days | 71% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 732 days | 69% |
Alec | 10/10 | 1036 days | 41% |
Mike Whalen | 10/10 | 1036 days | 41% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 1067 days | 38% |
Catherine | 10/10 | 1311 days | 20% |
Helen | 6/10 | 1311 days | 17% |
Jane | 10/10 | 1370 days | 17% |
Sass and Pete | 10/10 | 1401 days | 15% |
Mitch | 10/10 | 1401 days | 15% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 1462 days | 12% |
Abi | 8/10 | 1493 days | 11% |
Aaron | 10/10 | 1615 days | 7% |
Marika Naylor | 10/10 | 1615 days | 7% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Neil | 10/10 | 1736 days | 5% |
Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 1736 days | 5% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1736 days | 5% |
Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 1736 days | 5% |
Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 1767 days | 3% |
Mark | 10/10 | 1767 days | 5% |
Achim | 10/10 | 1767 days | 5% |
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 1767 days | 5% |
Lukas | 10/10 | 1798 days | 5% |
Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 1828 days | 5% |
Gil | 10/10 | 1828 days | 5% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 1859 days | 5% |
Pedro | 9/10 | 2101 days | 4% |
Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2132 days | 4% |
Barry | 10/10 | 2132 days | 4% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2132 days | 4% |
Macker | 8/10 | 2193 days | 4% |
Guillaume | 10/10 | 2254 days | 4% |
Karli18 | 9/10 | 2377 days | 4% |
Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 2377 days | 4% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 2377 days | 4% |
Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 2438 days | 4% |
Nat | 10/10 | 2438 days | 4% |
The Weathersons | 8/10 | 2451 days | 2% |
Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 2479 days | 4% |
Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 2495 days | 4% |
Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 2496 days | 4% |
Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 2528 days | 4% |
Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 2538 days | 4% |
Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 2563 days | 4% |
Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 2572 days | 4% |
Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 2763 days | 3% |
Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 2803 days | 3% |
Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 2831 days | 3% |
Alan Brown | 9/10 | 2831 days | 3% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 2845 days | 3% |
Amy Smith | 9/10 | 2851 days | 3% |
Katie Ball | 10/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 3107 days | 2% |
Roland Syha | 10/10 | 3132 days | 2% |
Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 3143 days | 2% |
Max | 7/10 | 3150 days | 2% |
Werner Langer | 10/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 3181 days | 2% |
Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
Steve Newton | 10/10 | 3203 days | 2% |
Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 3211 days | 2% |
R Werder | 10/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
Alan White | 10/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 3458 days | 2% |
ct2034 | 10/10 | 3503 days | 2% |
Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 3530 days | 2% |
Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
Annie Butler | 10/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 3777 days | 1% |
Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 3807 days | 1% |
Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 3838 days | 1% |
Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 3899 days | 1% |
Monique Monique | 9/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
Paul W | 9/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 3930 days | 0% |
Helen King | 9/10 | 4080 days | 1% |
Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 4257 days | 0% |
Julian Roots | 8/10 | 4264 days | 0% |
Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
Josef | 9/10 | 4639 days | 1% |
Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 4646 days | 0% |
Arron | 10/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
polzeath | 7/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
richdrkt | 9/10 | 4934 days | 1% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 4964 days | 1% |
Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
Mark | 8/10 | 5002 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 5007 days | 1% |
Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5460 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.35% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 18 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
15 | -0.29% |
16 | -0.31% |
17 | -0.33% |
18 | -0.35% |
19 | -0.37% |
20 | -0.39% |
21 | -0.41% |
… | … |
0.43% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.