Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

129 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 132 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 84
65%
9/10 24
19%
8/10 11
9%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

93.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 93.33% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

97.49%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Wes 10/10 280 days 100%
Anne 10/10 308 days 99%
Cecile 10/10 308 days 99%
VamperCan 10/10 308 days 99%
TikitouringNZ 10/10 339 days 98%
Derek Gillard 10/10 339 days 98%
Quentin Vanantino 10/10 370 days 97%
Anaïs 10/10 431 days 94%
Monika 10/10 645 days 80%
Joanna 10/10 705 days 75%
Sue 10/10 705 days 75%
Jana 10/10 705 days 75%
Celeste 10/10 736 days 72%
Jimothyhike 10/10 827 days 64%
Dee Sage 10/10 827 days 64%
Daniel 10/10 1011 days 45%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 1011 days 45%
simon 10/10 1039 days 42%
Juju 6/10 1070 days 34%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 1070 days 39%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 1070 days 39%
Florian S. 4/10 1101 days 24%
Sophie 10/10 1101 days 36%
Deb 9/10 1101 days 36%
Daniel 10/10 1131 days 34%
Alec 10/10 1435 days 14%
Mike Whalen 10/10 1435 days 14%
Melissa 10/10 1466 days 13%
Catherine 10/10 1710 days 6%
Helen 6/10 1710 days 5%
Jane 10/10 1769 days 5%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1800 days 5%
Mitch 10/10 1800 days 5%
ZMad 10/10 1861 days 5%
Abi 8/10 1892 days 5%
Aaron 10/10 2014 days 5%
Marika Naylor 10/10 2014 days 5%
Lisa 10/10 2106 days 5%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 2106 days 5%
Neil 10/10 2135 days 4%
Hatessandflys 10/10 2135 days 4%
Sue 10/10 2135 days 4%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 2135 days 4%
Niko Schachner 4/10 2165 days 3%
Mark 10/10 2166 days 4%
Achim 10/10 2166 days 4%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 2166 days 4%
Lukas 10/10 2197 days 4%
Tom McKernan 10/10 2226 days 4%
Gil 10/10 2227 days 4%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2258 days 4%
Pedro 9/10 2500 days 4%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2531 days 4%
Barry 10/10 2531 days 4%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2531 days 4%
Macker 8/10 2592 days 3%
Guillaume 10/10 2653 days 3%
Karli18 9/10 2776 days 3%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2776 days 3%
Jenny 10/10 2776 days 3%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2837 days 3%
Nat 10/10 2837 days 3%
The Weathersons 8/10 2850 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2878 days 3%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2894 days 3%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2895 days 3%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 2926 days 3%
Edwin Bos 10/10 2937 days 3%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 2962 days 3%
Prudence Jane 10/10 2971 days 3%
Owen Dilling 10/10 2987 days 3%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2987 days 3%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 3107 days 3%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 3162 days 2%
Ann Teeters 10/10 3201 days 2%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 3229 days 2%
Alan Brown 9/10 3229 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 3244 days 2%
Amy Smith 9/10 3250 days 2%
Katie Ball 10/10 3263 days 2%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3505 days 2%
Roland Syha 10/10 3531 days 2%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3542 days 2%
Max 7/10 3549 days 1%
Werner Langer 10/10 3566 days 2%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3579 days 2%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3580 days 2%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3581 days 2%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3581 days 1%
Steve Newton 10/10 3602 days 1%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3610 days 1%
R Werder 10/10 3611 days 1%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3624 days 1%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3627 days 1%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3650 days 1%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3657 days 1%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3657 days 1%
Alan White 10/10 3700 days 1%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3857 days 1%
ct2034 10/10 3901 days 1%
Alistair Millward 9/10 3929 days 1%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 3960 days 1%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 3996 days 1%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 4022 days 1%
Annie Butler 10/10 4083 days 1%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 4083 days 1%
Tina Johnson 10/10 4176 days 0%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 4206 days 0%
Bob Morrison 9/10 4237 days 0%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 4298 days 0%
Monique Monique 9/10 4326 days 0%
Paul W 9/10 4326 days 0%
Michael Uebe 10/10 4329 days 0%
Helen King 9/10 4479 days 1%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4656 days 1%
Julian Roots 8/10 4663 days 1%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4744 days 1%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4762 days 1%
Josef 9/10 5038 days 1%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 5045 days 0%
Arron 10/10 5057 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 5057 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 5333 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 5363 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 5378 days 1%
Mark 8/10 5401 days 1%
John 9/10 5406 days 1%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5807 days 0%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5859 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.07% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.01%
198 -4.03%
199 -4.05%
200 -4.07%
201 -4.09%
202 -4.11%
203 -4.13%

Balancing Adjustment

0.59% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

94%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.