G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2802 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2820 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2832 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2841 days | 96% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 2898 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 2909 days | 87% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 2912 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 2912 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 2917 days | 92% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 2917 days | 92% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 2917 days | 91% |
Luke | 8/10 | 2922 days | 91% |
Kat | 9/10 | 2922 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 2924 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 2942 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 2942 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 2945 days | 90% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3158 days | 77% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3158 days | 77% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3164 days | 76% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3167 days | 77% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3167 days | 76% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3167 days | 75% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3169 days | 75% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3169 days | 76% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3177 days | 75% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3180 days | 75% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3180 days | 75% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3180 days | 75% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3180 days | 76% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3181 days | 71% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3182 days | 76% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3182 days | 74% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3183 days | 71% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3189 days | 70% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3189 days | 75% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3191 days | 75% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3194 days | 74% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3195 days | 74% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3201 days | 74% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3207 days | 74% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3211 days | 74% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3227 days | 73% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3259 days | 71% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3263 days | 70% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3265 days | 70% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3266 days | 70% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3270 days | 70% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3279 days | 70% |
Till | 10/10 | 3279 days | 70% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3279 days | 70% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3538 days | 53% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3541 days | 49% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3541 days | 49% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3541 days | 53% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3585 days | 49% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3590 days | 50% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3602 days | 49% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3624 days | 48% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 3883 days | 31% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 3883 days | 31% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 3887 days | 29% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 3887 days | 17% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 3908 days | 30% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 3908 days | 28% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 3917 days | 29% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 3917 days | 29% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 3922 days | 29% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 3922 days | 29% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 3927 days | 28% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 3927 days | 29% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 3931 days | 28% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 3931 days | 28% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 3932 days | 26% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 3932 days | 28% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 3933 days | 28% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 3935 days | 28% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 3935 days | 28% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 3935 days | 28% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 3935 days | 26% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 3935 days | 26% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 3941 days | 27% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 3942 days | 27% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 3942 days | 27% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 3947 days | 24% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 3963 days | 24% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 3963 days | 26% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 3965 days | 26% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 3965 days | 26% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 3967 days | 26% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 3970 days | 26% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3975 days | 26% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4256 days | 8% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4268 days | 7% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4271 days | 7% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4271 days | 7% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4273 days | 7% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4274 days | 6% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4277 days | 6% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4277 days | 6% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4281 days | 6% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4285 days | 6% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4285 days | 6% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4286 days | 6% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4291 days | 6% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4300 days | 5% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4380 days | 32% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4611 days | 32% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4613 days | 32% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4621 days | 32% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4655 days | 32% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4655 days | 32% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4656 days | 28% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4658 days | 32% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4659 days | 30% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4660 days | 32% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4661 days | 32% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4662 days | 32% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4663 days | 32% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4668 days | 32% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4676 days | 32% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4688 days | 32% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4688 days | 32% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4744 days | 32% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4748 days | 32% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 4957 days | 32% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 4989 days | 32% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 4990 days | 32% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 4992 days | 32% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 4995 days | 28% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 4995 days | 32% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 4997 days | 32% |
noname | 8/10 | 4997 days | 32% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 4999 days | 32% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5002 days | 32% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5002 days | 30% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5003 days | 30% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5003 days | 32% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5003 days | 32% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5004 days | 32% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5005 days | 32% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5006 days | 32% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5007 days | 32% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5010 days | 32% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5012 days | 32% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5015 days | 32% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5015 days | 32% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5016 days | 32% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5017 days | 32% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5023 days | 32% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5027 days | 32% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5030 days | 32% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5030 days | 32% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5032 days | 28% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5033 days | 32% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5033 days | 30% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5039 days | 32% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5290 days | 32% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5290 days | 32% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5294 days | 32% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5310 days | 32% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5346 days | 32% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5351 days | 32% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5352 days | 32% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5355 days | 32% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5363 days | 32% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5363 days | 32% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5365 days | 32% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5378 days | 32% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5379 days | 32% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5380 days | 32% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5381 days | 32% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5383 days | 32% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5383 days | 28% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5384 days | 32% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5386 days | 32% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5387 days | 32% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5390 days | 32% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5399 days | 32% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5405 days | 32% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5405 days | 32% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5410 days | 32% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5417 days | 32% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5460 days | 30% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5469 days | 32% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5490 days | 32% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5490 days | 32% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5706 days | 32% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5711 days | 32% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5711 days | 32% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5711 days | 30% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5711 days | 30% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5714 days | 32% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5820 days | 32% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5821 days | 32% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5842 days | 32% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5842 days | 32% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 5909 days | 30% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.