Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.91%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2741 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2759 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2771 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2780 days | 96% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 2837 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 2848 days | 86% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 2851 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 2851 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 2856 days | 92% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 2856 days | 92% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 2856 days | 91% |
Luke | 8/10 | 2861 days | 90% |
Kat | 9/10 | 2861 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 2863 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 2881 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 2881 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 2884 days | 90% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3097 days | 77% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3097 days | 77% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3103 days | 76% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3106 days | 77% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3106 days | 76% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3106 days | 75% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3108 days | 75% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3108 days | 76% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3116 days | 75% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3119 days | 74% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3119 days | 75% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3119 days | 75% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3119 days | 76% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3120 days | 70% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3121 days | 76% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3121 days | 74% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3122 days | 70% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3128 days | 70% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3128 days | 75% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3130 days | 75% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3133 days | 74% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3134 days | 74% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3140 days | 74% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3146 days | 74% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3150 days | 74% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3166 days | 73% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3198 days | 71% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3202 days | 70% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3204 days | 70% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3205 days | 70% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3209 days | 70% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3218 days | 70% |
Till | 10/10 | 3218 days | 70% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3218 days | 70% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3477 days | 53% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3480 days | 49% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3480 days | 49% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3480 days | 53% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3524 days | 49% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3529 days | 50% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3541 days | 49% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3563 days | 48% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 3822 days | 31% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 3822 days | 31% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 3826 days | 29% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 3826 days | 15% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 3847 days | 30% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 3847 days | 28% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 3856 days | 29% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 3856 days | 29% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 3861 days | 29% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 3861 days | 29% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 3866 days | 28% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 3866 days | 29% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 3870 days | 28% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 3870 days | 28% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 3871 days | 26% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 3871 days | 28% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 3872 days | 28% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 3874 days | 28% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 3874 days | 28% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 3874 days | 28% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 3874 days | 26% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 3874 days | 26% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 3880 days | 28% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 3881 days | 27% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 3881 days | 27% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 3886 days | 23% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 3902 days | 24% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 3902 days | 26% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 3904 days | 26% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 3904 days | 26% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 3906 days | 26% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 3909 days | 26% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3914 days | 26% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4195 days | 8% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4207 days | 7% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4210 days | 7% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4210 days | 7% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4212 days | 7% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4213 days | 6% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4216 days | 7% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4216 days | 6% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4220 days | 6% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4224 days | 6% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4224 days | 6% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4225 days | 6% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4230 days | 6% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4239 days | 4% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4319 days | 0% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4550 days | 28% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4552 days | 29% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4560 days | 29% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4594 days | 28% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4594 days | 29% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4595 days | 24% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4597 days | 28% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4598 days | 26% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4599 days | 28% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4600 days | 28% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4601 days | 29% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4602 days | 29% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4607 days | 28% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4615 days | 28% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4627 days | 28% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4627 days | 28% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4683 days | 28% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4687 days | 28% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 4896 days | 28% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 4928 days | 28% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 4929 days | 28% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 4931 days | 29% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 4934 days | 24% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 4934 days | 29% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 4936 days | 28% |
noname | 8/10 | 4936 days | 28% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 4938 days | 28% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 4941 days | 28% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 4941 days | 26% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 4942 days | 26% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 4942 days | 29% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 4942 days | 29% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 4943 days | 28% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 4944 days | 28% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 4945 days | 28% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 4946 days | 28% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 4949 days | 28% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 4951 days | 29% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 4954 days | 28% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 4954 days | 29% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 4955 days | 28% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 4956 days | 28% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 4962 days | 28% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 4966 days | 28% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 4969 days | 28% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 4969 days | 28% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 4971 days | 24% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 4972 days | 29% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 4972 days | 26% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 4978 days | 29% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5229 days | 28% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5229 days | 29% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5233 days | 29% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5249 days | 28% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5285 days | 28% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5290 days | 29% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5291 days | 29% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5294 days | 29% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5302 days | 29% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5302 days | 28% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5304 days | 28% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5317 days | 28% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5318 days | 28% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5319 days | 29% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5320 days | 28% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5322 days | 28% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5322 days | 24% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5323 days | 28% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5325 days | 28% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5326 days | 28% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5329 days | 28% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5338 days | 28% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5344 days | 28% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5344 days | 29% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5349 days | 28% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5356 days | 29% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5399 days | 26% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5408 days | 29% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5429 days | 28% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5429 days | 29% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5645 days | 28% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5650 days | 28% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5650 days | 29% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5650 days | 26% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5650 days | 26% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5653 days | 28% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5759 days | 28% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5760 days | 29% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5781 days | 29% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5781 days | 29% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 5848 days | 26% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.31% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.