G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2925 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2943 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2955 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2964 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 3021 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 3032 days | 86% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 3035 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 3035 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 3040 days | 91% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 3040 days | 91% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 3040 days | 90% |
Luke | 8/10 | 3045 days | 90% |
Kat | 9/10 | 3045 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 3047 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 3065 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 3065 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 3068 days | 89% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3281 days | 75% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3281 days | 75% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3287 days | 74% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3290 days | 75% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3290 days | 74% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3290 days | 73% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3292 days | 73% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3292 days | 74% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3300 days | 73% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3303 days | 73% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3303 days | 73% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3303 days | 73% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3303 days | 74% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3304 days | 69% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3305 days | 74% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3305 days | 72% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3306 days | 69% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3312 days | 68% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3312 days | 73% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3314 days | 73% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3317 days | 72% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3318 days | 72% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3324 days | 72% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3330 days | 72% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3334 days | 72% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3350 days | 71% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3382 days | 69% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3386 days | 68% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3388 days | 67% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3389 days | 67% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3393 days | 67% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3402 days | 67% |
Till | 10/10 | 3402 days | 67% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3402 days | 67% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3661 days | 49% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3664 days | 46% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3664 days | 46% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3664 days | 49% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3708 days | 45% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3713 days | 46% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3725 days | 45% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3747 days | 43% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 4006 days | 25% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 4006 days | 25% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 4010 days | 24% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 4010 days | 14% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 4031 days | 24% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 4031 days | 22% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 4040 days | 23% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 4040 days | 23% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 4045 days | 23% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 4045 days | 23% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 4050 days | 22% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 4050 days | 23% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 4054 days | 22% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 4054 days | 22% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 4055 days | 21% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 4055 days | 22% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 4056 days | 22% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 4058 days | 22% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 4058 days | 22% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 4058 days | 22% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 4058 days | 21% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 4058 days | 21% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 4064 days | 21% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 4065 days | 21% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 4065 days | 21% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 4070 days | 18% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 4086 days | 19% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 4086 days | 20% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 4088 days | 20% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 4088 days | 20% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4090 days | 20% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 4093 days | 20% |
Alex | 10/10 | 4098 days | 19% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4391 days | 34% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4394 days | 35% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4394 days | 34% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4396 days | 35% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4397 days | 33% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4400 days | 35% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4400 days | 35% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4404 days | 34% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4408 days | 35% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4408 days | 35% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4409 days | 35% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4414 days | 35% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4423 days | 33% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4501 days | 35% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4503 days | 35% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4734 days | 34% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4736 days | 35% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4744 days | 35% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4778 days | 34% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4778 days | 35% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4779 days | 30% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4781 days | 35% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4782 days | 33% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4783 days | 34% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4784 days | 35% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4785 days | 35% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4786 days | 35% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4791 days | 35% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4799 days | 34% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4811 days | 35% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4811 days | 34% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4867 days | 35% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4871 days | 35% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 5080 days | 35% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 5112 days | 34% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 5113 days | 35% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5115 days | 35% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 5118 days | 30% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 5118 days | 35% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 5120 days | 34% |
noname | 8/10 | 5120 days | 34% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5122 days | 35% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5125 days | 35% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5125 days | 33% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5126 days | 33% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5126 days | 35% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5126 days | 35% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5127 days | 35% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5128 days | 35% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5129 days | 35% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5130 days | 35% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5133 days | 35% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5135 days | 35% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5138 days | 35% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5138 days | 35% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5139 days | 35% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5140 days | 34% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5146 days | 35% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5150 days | 34% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5153 days | 35% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5153 days | 34% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5155 days | 30% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5156 days | 35% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5156 days | 33% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5162 days | 35% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5413 days | 35% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5413 days | 35% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5417 days | 35% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5433 days | 34% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5469 days | 34% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5474 days | 35% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5475 days | 35% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5478 days | 35% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5486 days | 35% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5486 days | 35% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5488 days | 35% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5501 days | 34% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5502 days | 35% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5503 days | 35% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5504 days | 35% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5506 days | 35% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5506 days | 30% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5507 days | 34% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5509 days | 35% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5510 days | 35% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5513 days | 34% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5522 days | 34% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5528 days | 34% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5528 days | 35% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5533 days | 34% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5540 days | 35% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5583 days | 33% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5592 days | 35% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5613 days | 34% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5613 days | 35% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5829 days | 35% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5834 days | 34% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5834 days | 35% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5834 days | 33% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5834 days | 33% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5837 days | 34% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5943 days | 35% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5944 days | 35% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5965 days | 35% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5965 days | 35% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 6032 days | 33% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.