Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ambury Park Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Ambury Park Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
48 Valid Reviews
The Ambury Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 49 reviews. There are 48 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 48 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 48 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
25% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
75.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ambury Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 75.00% and is based on 48 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
82.88%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabienne | 5/10 | 353 days | 79% |
| Sandie | 9/10 | 414 days | 100% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 445 days | 97% |
| James | 8/10 | 598 days | 87% |
| Becks | 5/10 | 628 days | 66% |
| James Kidston | 10/10 | 659 days | 84% |
| Joel Ross | 7/10 | 659 days | 78% |
| Helen E | 9/10 | 659 days | 83% |
| Neleski | 8/10 | 687 days | 80% |
| Nathan | 10/10 | 687 days | 82% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 749 days | 76% |
| JMS | 10/10 | 810 days | 70% |
| cearon | 10/10 | 963 days | 53% |
| Laura D | 8/10 | 1082 days | 40% |
| Martin Hansen | 7/10 | 1906 days | 5% |
| D&R | 3/10 | 1936 days | 3% |
| Nate | 7/10 | 2059 days | 5% |
| QueeenBeee | 10/10 | 2148 days | 5% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 2210 days | 5% |
| JL Canada | 2/10 | 2332 days | 2% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 2454 days | 4% |
| Derek Gillard | 7/10 | 2485 days | 4% |
| Laura | 5/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
| Nat | 8/10 | 2485 days | 4% |
| Ben H | 6/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
| Lewis Milnes | 7/10 | 2565 days | 4% |
| Max Gunnarsson | 7/10 | 2946 days | 3% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 8/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
| Michelle Smit | 8/10 | 3061 days | 3% |
| Gordon Lee | 8/10 | 3150 days | 2% |
| Jeremy Wienert | 7/10 | 3178 days | 2% |
| Kirstyn Wallace | 7/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Ken Balfour | 8/10 | 3272 days | 1% |
| Kresten Skak | 9/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
| Christina Sperling | 3/10 | 3305 days | 1% |
| Philipp Weber | 4/10 | 3345 days | 1% |
| Ben Apellido | 7/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
| Christine Slowiak | 5/10 | 3458 days | 1% |
| Victoria Byrnes | 7/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
| Lara Banane | 8/10 | 3581 days | 2% |
| Jean-Claude Escutary | 7/10 | 3609 days | 1% |
| Ian | 8/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
| Ian Watson | 8/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 8/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4005 days | 1% |
| auré bis | 7/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
| Puravida | 10/10 | 5101 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 10/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ambury Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.27% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.