Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mossburn Country Park

Valid Reviews

129 Valid Reviews

The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 137 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 80
62%
9/10 24
19%
8/10 15
12%
7/10 7
5%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

92.64% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.64% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

15 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
33%
9/10 4
27%
8/10 5
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

96.21%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Vera 10/10 66 days 100%
Eline 10/10 249 days 97%
Rhonda 10/10 308 days 95%
VamperCan 10/10 308 days 95%
Andy Williamson 10/10 339 days 94%
YC 10/10 339 days 94%
Anne 10/10 339 days 94%
Brett 7/10 339 days 87%
Charly and family 10/10 370 days 92%
Christiane 10/10 431 days 90%
Caron 10/10 614 days 79%
Miriam 10/10 705 days 72%
Sandra Staples 9/10 705 days 71%
Chris H 10/10 736 days 69%
Julia Richter 10/10 736 days 69%
Diana Antunez 10/10 766 days 67%
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com 10/10 766 days 67%
Chc 10/10 766 days 67%
annelie slaar 9/10 797 days 63%
Ren15 10/10 797 days 64%
Victoria 7/10 797 days 59%
Pauline 10/10 797 days 64%
Elke 10/10 980 days 46%
Tasmin 9/10 1011 days 42%
Katie Edser 10/10 1011 days 43%
Kelsey Fisher 10/10 1011 days 43%
Dave and Nicky 10/10 1101 days 35%
Rob J 9/10 1101 days 35%
Sue and Ron 10/10 1131 days 33%
Shona Beach 10/10 1131 days 33%
Joan Hermitage 10/10 1161 days 30%
Yuri Fey 10/10 1162 days 30%
Russell 1/10 1162 days 12%
Anne S 9/10 1376 days 16%
Heather and Jim 10/10 1466 days 12%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 1527 days 10%
Steven 10/10 1741 days 5%
Luke 10/10 1769 days 5%
Cait Turner 8/10 1800 days 5%
Tori 10/10 1831 days 5%
Joanne 10/10 1892 days 5%
Lynley and Ian Breeze 10/10 1892 days 5%
Lauren 8/10 2106 days 4%
Amy 10/10 2135 days 4%
Moritz 10/10 2135 days 4%
Pierre-Yves 10/10 2135 days 4%
Allan and Kelly 10/10 2135 days 4%
Johan 10/10 2135 days 4%
Melissa 10/10 2166 days 4%
Nik 10/10 2166 days 4%
Erica 10/10 2166 days 4%
Leon 9/10 2166 days 4%
Chris 10/10 2197 days 4%
Peter Nesnebse 8/10 2197 days 4%
Antoine 10/10 2227 days 4%
Lucie 10/10 2227 days 4%
Javier Williams 9/10 2227 days 4%
K&KRahimi 9/10 2227 days 4%
Shona Beach 10/10 2258 days 4%
Vicki Hoskinson 10/10 2471 days 4%
John 9/10 2472 days 4%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 2500 days 4%
Brigitta 8/10 2500 days 4%
Marty 10/10 2500 days 4%
From DK 9/10 2531 days 4%
Francois & Caroline 9/10 2531 days 4%
Yh kim 10/10 2531 days 4%
Richard 9/10 2531 days 4%
Nadine 10/10 2562 days 4%
Sellers Family 10/10 2592 days 3%
Shona Beach 10/10 2623 days 3%
Carl 10/10 2623 days 3%
S Becker 10/10 2806 days 3%
Jos Mulder 10/10 2868 days 3%
Suzanne Wijsman 9/10 2873 days 3%
Xiao Xiao 9/10 2906 days 3%
Kerine Au 10/10 2926 days 3%
Lukas Hauser 10/10 2945 days 3%
Crystal Wang 3/10 2959 days 1%
Madelyn Fagerman 10/10 3165 days 2%
Vicki 10/10 3175 days 2%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 3196 days 2%
Marie Blom 10/10 3200 days 2%
Josh Marks 10/10 3214 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 9/10 3244 days 2%
Barbara-Rose Townsend 9/10 3247 days 2%
Martine Baars 10/10 3265 days 2%
Ajit Raut 10/10 3307 days 2%
Ivan Wee 8/10 3321 days 2%
Nancy LeRoy 9/10 3321 days 2%
Ivan W. 10/10 3352 days 2%
Susan H 10/10 3355 days 2%
Matteo Verzi 7/10 3554 days 1%
Sandy Bell 10/10 3594 days 1%
Louise Alexander 10/10 3595 days 1%
Yuan Lin 8/10 3601 days 1%
Rachel Macdonald 7/10 3616 days 1%
robert zdebski 9/10 3657 days 1%
Sarah Gurney 7/10 3665 days 1%
Graham Lighner 10/10 3668 days 1%
Jennifer Brown 9/10 3687 days 1%
Lena + Kristof 10/10 3932 days 1%
Thomas Blom 8/10 3961 days 1%
Kodie Howarth 10/10 3990 days 1%
Rasmus Rantil 10/10 3996 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 10/10 4003 days 1%
Kim Frey 7/10 4003 days 1%
Silvia Hudakova 10/10 4022 days 1%
Julian Kuemme 10/10 4273 days 0%
Andrea Sole 10/10 4273 days 0%
Mandy Reich 9/10 4274 days 0%
Monique Monique 7/10 4326 days 0%
Petra Niemann 10/10 4357 days 0%
Eric and Nienke 8/10 4388 days 1%
J Murphy 8/10 4418 days 1%
Luise Fuchs 9/10 4653 days 1%
Michal 8/10 4667 days 1%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4667 days 1%
Guillot 9/10 4670 days 1%
phudgb 10/10 4814 days 1%
Rebecca Doehl 8/10 5041 days 1%
Sue DeVries 8/10 5371 days 1%
Marii Joekalda 9/10 5377 days 1%
Tina Madsen 8/10 5380 days 1%
Sabine Tippman 6/10 5380 days 1%
nelliekaye 9/10 5575 days 1%
hellami 8/10 5879 days 1%
Andrea 10/10 6010 days 1%
JohannaB 10/10 6112 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-1.26% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 62 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
59 -1.20%
60 -1.22%
61 -1.24%
62 -1.26%
63 -1.28%
64 -1.30%
65 -1.32%

Balancing Adjustment

0.44% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.