Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
75 Valid Reviews
The Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 81 reviews. There are 75 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 75 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
82.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 82.13% and is based on 75 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 75 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 85.00% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
67.89%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lii | 1/10 | 429 days | 57% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 794 days | 100% |
| Pierre Marty | 1/10 | 856 days | 37% |
| Michael D | 2/10 | 978 days | 33% |
| Suzanne | 8/10 | 1435 days | 21% |
| Douglas | 5/10 | 1677 days | 7% |
| Justine | 7/10 | 1769 days | 7% |
| Al | 10/10 | 1921 days | 7% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 2013 days | 7% |
| Erin | 10/10 | 2105 days | 6% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2105 days | 6% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 2135 days | 6% |
| TP&MM | 10/10 | 2227 days | 6% |
| Zoe | 7/10 | 2286 days | 5% |
| Macker | 8/10 | 2347 days | 6% |
| Angela | 9/10 | 2378 days | 6% |
| Brad | 4/10 | 2378 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 2378 days | 6% |
| Ray Tombs | 9/10 | 2561 days | 5% |
| Michael Stützle | 10/10 | 2561 days | 5% |
| Qi Moss | 10/10 | 2592 days | 5% |
| S Weslake | 8/10 | 2592 days | 5% |
| Adrian Trumper | 6/10 | 2605 days | 4% |
| Shira LA | 9/10 | 2620 days | 5% |
| Audrey Wong | 9/10 | 2659 days | 5% |
| Jack James | 9/10 | 2678 days | 5% |
| Paul and Paula | 8/10 | 2687 days | 5% |
| Joanne Haslam | 10/10 | 2876 days | 4% |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 2913 days | 4% |
| Wendy Kildey | 10/10 | 2929 days | 4% |
| Kerry Lee | 10/10 | 2956 days | 4% |
| Robert Hunt | 9/10 | 3048 days | 3% |
| Greg MacFire | 8/10 | 3053 days | 3% |
| Shelly Stanchuk | 9/10 | 3077 days | 3% |
| Margo Wiltens | 8/10 | 3100 days | 3% |
| Becky and James | 10/10 | 3117 days | 3% |
| Lyn Pobke | 8/10 | 3240 days | 3% |
| Carl_Larsen | 10/10 | 3261 days | 3% |
| Teresa Ash | 8/10 | 3316 days | 3% |
| Gloria Berlari | 8/10 | 3326 days | 3% |
| Caro G | 8/10 | 3448 days | 2% |
| Paul Frost | 10/10 | 3456 days | 2% |
| Aaron Soh | 7/10 | 3485 days | 2% |
| Amy Steiger | 9/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Karl | 9/10 | 3619 days | 2% |
| John Drake | 4/10 | 3687 days | 1% |
| Robert Warner | 9/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 9/10 | 3727 days | 1% |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3747 days | 1% |
| tschavalon | 8/10 | 3839 days | 1% |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 3992 days | 1% |
| Andy Karl | 8/10 | 4112 days | 0% |
| eagle | 1/10 | 4387 days | 0% |
| doepie277 | 8/10 | 4477 days | 1% |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 4599 days | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4764 days | 1% |
| Sabine & Stefan | 10/10 | 4796 days | 1% |
| Markus & Miriam | 8/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
| Jonathan Philp | 9/10 | 4804 days | 1% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 4843 days | 1% |
| Melissa | 8/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
| Julie and Russ Charles | 10/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Richard Dudfield | 9/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Nick Secker | 8/10 | 5167 days | 1% |
| Margaret O'Sullivan | 4/10 | 5509 days | 0% |
| dring | 10/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 6/10 | 5523 days | 0% |
| Gordon and Joyce | 8/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5538 days | 1% |
| Rachel & Barak | 10/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
| meggles | 7/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
| marleen451 | 9/10 | 5665 days | 1% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
| RobH | 9/10 | 5884 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.66% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Queenstown TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.61% |
| 198 | -3.63% |
| 199 | -3.65% |
| 200 | -3.66% |
| 201 | -3.68% |
| 202 | -3.70% |
| 203 | -3.72% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
10.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
75%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.