Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dunedin Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
129 Valid Reviews
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has a total of 133 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
9/10 | 20 |
|
16% |
8/10 | 46 |
|
36% |
7/10 | 20 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 12 |
|
9% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
73.80% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park valid reviews is 73.80% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.68% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
74.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lu | 8/10 | 290 days | 99% |
Janneke | 9/10 | 290 days | 100% |
Diana Heffner | 1/10 | 411 days | 39% |
Nicky | 7/10 | 442 days | 88% |
Shykiwi | 7/10 | 595 days | 79% |
Amy Fortin-Barrette | 9/10 | 595 days | 84% |
Lukas Meier | 2/10 | 656 days | 36% |
Laz. | 8/10 | 656 days | 78% |
Paul McLaughlin | 8/10 | 684 days | 76% |
RR | 6/10 | 746 days | 62% |
Colin | 9/10 | 807 days | 66% |
Carol | 9/10 | 960 days | 50% |
Rosie | 7/10 | 1202 days | 27% |
Ogilvie family of 5 | 8/10 | 1445 days | 14% |
Monkeyalan | 7/10 | 1567 days | 9% |
Carla | 8/10 | 1780 days | 5% |
Tanja & Sven | 6/10 | 1811 days | 5% |
Nigel Crane | 10/10 | 1842 days | 5% |
Corin Krainer | 5/10 | 1842 days | 4% |
Fran | 6/10 | 1842 days | 5% |
Stevie | 5/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
Cassie | 9/10 | 2298 days | 4% |
Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 2360 days | 4% |
Sue | 6/10 | 2360 days | 4% |
sally m | 10/10 | 2390 days | 4% |
Bailey Dunne | 8/10 | 2482 days | 4% |
Benn | 8/10 | 2482 days | 4% |
Angela MacPherson | 8/10 | 2501 days | 4% |
Shira LA | 8/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 3/10 | 2510 days | 2% |
Jack James | 8/10 | 2568 days | 4% |
Rodney Morris | 7/10 | 2602 days | 3% |
Laeticia Coelho | 10/10 | 2608 days | 4% |
Samantha Brewin | 7/10 | 2613 days | 3% |
Suzanne Halfpenny | 6/10 | 2631 days | 3% |
Charlie Dodds | 8/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
Jo Dawson | 8/10 | 2741 days | 3% |
Per Rantze | 1/10 | 2754 days | 1% |
Chris Nugent | 10/10 | 2777 days | 3% |
Josh Withell | 4/10 | 2831 days | 2% |
Iris Maatman | 10/10 | 2837 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
Josephine Ayvadian | 10/10 | 2847 days | 3% |
Walter Neff | 7/10 | 2875 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 2906 days | 3% |
Lenka Pruherova | 8/10 | 2917 days | 3% |
Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
Alex Dorrington | 10/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
estelle D | 6/10 | 2937 days | 3% |
Sheryl Hicks | 8/10 | 2979 days | 3% |
Helen Keck | 10/10 | 3064 days | 3% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3083 days | 3% |
Sarah Hammond | 9/10 | 3101 days | 3% |
Tony | 8/10 | 3181 days | 2% |
Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
Roland Tauchner | 3/10 | 3217 days | 1% |
Peter Fink | 9/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 7/10 | 3286 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 7/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
Valerie Wee | 7/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
Pang Albert | 7/10 | 3398 days | 2% |
Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3435 days | 2% |
Nicole | 9/10 | 3493 days | 2% |
Barry Goodwin | 5/10 | 3574 days | 1% |
Larry Dashiell | 10/10 | 3578 days | 2% |
John Drake | 6/10 | 3583 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 5/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
Lucy Grund | 9/10 | 3669 days | 1% |
Gianpiero Rodari | 8/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
Bert Snel | 8/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 3729 days | 1% |
Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3851 days | 1% |
Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 3912 days | 1% |
Marek Heiurich | 3/10 | 3921 days | 0% |
Stefan Glock | 9/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
Brita Topp | 8/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 8/10 | 3970 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 7/10 | 3971 days | 1% |
Carina Borho | 8/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 8/10 | 3992 days | 1% |
Andy Karl | 8/10 | 4002 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 5/10 | 4009 days | 0% |
A Farquhar | 6/10 | 4063 days | 1% |
Henrik Joshua | 8/10 | 4094 days | 1% |
Kerri | 8/10 | 4124 days | 0% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4277 days | 0% |
Verena | 9/10 | 4299 days | 0% |
Anja S | 9/10 | 4299 days | 0% |
Moni Sangoi | 6/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 9/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
Martin | 8/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
Hanneke P | 7/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
Martyn Kool | 4/10 | 4384 days | 0% |
Marieke | 4/10 | 4384 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 8/10 | 4386 days | 1% |
Katharina Pape | 9/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
Kimothy | 8/10 | 4642 days | 1% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 7/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4683 days | 1% |
Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 4688 days | 1% |
John Heal | 8/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
Heather & Jenny | 7/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4855 days | 1% |
damaca | 1/10 | 4855 days | 0% |
redmatthew16 | 9/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
Ed Piotrowski | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Graham Greentree | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
G Cucel | 10/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
Siggi Wick | 6/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 8/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 7/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
LandJ | 3/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
Lenore Dejong | 10/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
Mr & Mrs Mackie | 5/10 | 5049 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 8/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
Ellen Thompson | 3/10 | 5062 days | 0% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5220 days | 1% |
Paula Martinez | 8/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
Dieter Groscurth | 7/10 | 5414 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 8/10 | 5449 days | 1% |
asselman | 8/10 | 5479 days | 1% |
hellami | 8/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
Ritag | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 7/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
Dirk | 8/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
John | 6/10 | 5787 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Dunedin Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
6.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.