Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dunedin Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Dunedin Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

129 Valid Reviews

The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has a total of 133 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 13
10%
9/10 20
16%
8/10 46
36%
7/10 20
16%
6/10 12
9%
5/10 6
5%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 5
4%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 3
2%

73.80% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park valid reviews is 73.80% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

38 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
5%
9/10 8
21%
8/10 13
34%
7/10 6
16%
6/10 3
8%
5/10 2
5%
4/10 2
5%
3/10 2
5%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

73.68% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.68% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

74.85%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Lu 8/10 263 days 99%
Janneke 9/10 263 days 100%
Diana Heffner 1/10 384 days 39%
Nicky 7/10 415 days 88%
Shykiwi 7/10 568 days 80%
Amy Fortin-Barrette 9/10 568 days 85%
Lukas Meier 2/10 629 days 37%
Laz. 8/10 629 days 80%
Paul McLaughlin 8/10 657 days 78%
RR 6/10 719 days 64%
Colin 9/10 780 days 68%
Carol 9/10 933 days 52%
Rosie 7/10 1175 days 28%
Ogilvie family of 5 8/10 1418 days 15%
Monkeyalan 7/10 1540 days 9%
Carla 8/10 1753 days 5%
Tanja & Sven 6/10 1784 days 5%
Nigel Crane 10/10 1815 days 5%
Corin Krainer 5/10 1815 days 4%
Fran 6/10 1815 days 5%
Stevie 5/10 2059 days 4%
Cassie 9/10 2271 days 4%
Kiri Edwards 7/10 2333 days 4%
Sue 6/10 2333 days 4%
sally m 10/10 2363 days 4%
Bailey Dunne 8/10 2455 days 4%
Benn 8/10 2455 days 4%
Angela MacPherson 8/10 2474 days 4%
Shira LA 8/10 2483 days 4%
Mark Lindeman 3/10 2483 days 2%
Jack James 8/10 2541 days 4%
Rodney Morris 7/10 2575 days 3%
Laeticia Coelho 10/10 2581 days 4%
Samantha Brewin 7/10 2586 days 3%
Suzanne Halfpenny 6/10 2604 days 3%
Charlie Dodds 8/10 2630 days 4%
Jo Dawson 8/10 2714 days 3%
Per Rantze 1/10 2727 days 1%
Chris Nugent 10/10 2750 days 3%
Josh Withell 4/10 2804 days 2%
Iris Maatman 10/10 2810 days 3%
Paul Smith 8/10 2814 days 3%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 2814 days 3%
Josephine Ayvadian 10/10 2820 days 3%
Walter Neff 7/10 2848 days 3%
Rebecca Lindsey 8/10 2879 days 3%
Lenka Pruherova 8/10 2890 days 3%
Sylvie Martel 10/10 2898 days 3%
Alex Dorrington 10/10 2904 days 3%
estelle D 6/10 2910 days 3%
Sheryl Hicks 8/10 2952 days 3%
Helen Keck 10/10 3037 days 3%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3056 days 3%
Sarah Hammond 9/10 3074 days 3%
Tony 8/10 3154 days 2%
Ray Tombs 8/10 3171 days 2%
Roland Tauchner 3/10 3190 days 1%
Peter Fink 9/10 3195 days 2%
David From Switzerland 7/10 3259 days 2%
Richard Kirby 7/10 3260 days 2%
Valerie Wee 7/10 3284 days 2%
Pang Albert 7/10 3371 days 2%
Fabien Metro 9/10 3408 days 2%
Nicole 9/10 3466 days 2%
Barry Goodwin 5/10 3547 days 1%
Larry Dashiell 10/10 3551 days 2%
John Drake 6/10 3556 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 5/10 3632 days 1%
Lucy Grund 9/10 3642 days 1%
Gianpiero Rodari 8/10 3671 days 1%
Bert Snel 8/10 3671 days 1%
Andrea 8/10 3702 days 1%
Rawiri johnston 8/10 3824 days 1%
Mike Fricker 8/10 3885 days 1%
Marek Heiurich 3/10 3894 days 0%
Stefan Glock 9/10 3899 days 1%
Brita Topp 8/10 3916 days 1%
Becky Davis 8/10 3943 days 1%
Ted Cole 7/10 3944 days 1%
Carina Borho 8/10 3950 days 1%
Markus Spitzmueller 9/10 3951 days 1%
Maya Bakker-deDreu 8/10 3965 days 1%
Andy Karl 8/10 3975 days 1%
Elly Zimmer 5/10 3982 days 0%
A Farquhar 6/10 4036 days 1%
Henrik Joshua 8/10 4067 days 1%
Kerri 8/10 4097 days 1%
Florian 8/10 4250 days 0%
Verena 9/10 4272 days 0%
Anja S 9/10 4272 days 0%
Moni Sangoi 6/10 4309 days 0%
Lis Bon 9/10 4340 days 0%
Martin 8/10 4340 days 0%
Hanneke P 7/10 4340 days 0%
Martyn Kool 4/10 4357 days 0%
Marieke 4/10 4357 days 0%
M Natterser 8/10 4359 days 0%
Katharina Pape 9/10 4369 days 0%
Kimothy 8/10 4615 days 1%
Hilbert vanEssen 7/10 4643 days 1%
Beeny 6/10 4656 days 1%
Peter Aertssen 7/10 4661 days 1%
John Heal 8/10 4751 days 1%
Heather & Jenny 7/10 4752 days 1%
neilqecosse 9/10 4828 days 1%
damaca 1/10 4828 days 0%
redmatthew16 9/10 4920 days 1%
Ed Piotrowski 8/10 4989 days 1%
Graham Greentree 8/10 4989 days 1%
G Cucel 10/10 4995 days 1%
Siggi Wick 6/10 5003 days 1%
Barbara Link 8/10 5003 days 1%
Tinnermans 7/10 5006 days 1%
LandJ 3/10 5012 days 1%
Lenore Dejong 10/10 5014 days 1%
Mr & Mrs Mackie 5/10 5022 days 1%
Dana Pagliarini 8/10 5028 days 1%
Ellen Thompson 3/10 5035 days 0%
dollimyxture 9/10 5071 days 1%
nelliekaye 8/10 5193 days 1%
Paula Martinez 8/10 5380 days 1%
Dieter Groscurth 7/10 5387 days 1%
Jennifer Templeton 8/10 5422 days 1%
asselman 8/10 5452 days 1%
hellami 8/10 5497 days 1%
Ritag 9/10 5583 days 1%
GrahamM1 7/10 5744 days 1%
Dirk 8/10 5754 days 1%
John 6/10 5760 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.04% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Dunedin Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.98%
198 -4.00%
199 -4.02%
200 -4.04%
201 -4.06%
202 -4.08%
203 -4.10%

Balancing Adjustment

6.56% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

77%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.