G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dunedin Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
129 Valid Reviews
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has a total of 133 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
9/10 | 20 |
|
16% |
8/10 | 46 |
|
36% |
7/10 | 20 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 12 |
|
9% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
73.80% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park valid reviews is 73.80% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.68% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
74.86%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lu | 8/10 | 247 days | 99% |
Janneke | 9/10 | 247 days | 100% |
Diana Heffner | 1/10 | 368 days | 39% |
Nicky | 7/10 | 399 days | 89% |
Shykiwi | 7/10 | 552 days | 80% |
Amy Fortin-Barrette | 9/10 | 552 days | 86% |
Lukas Meier | 2/10 | 613 days | 37% |
Laz. | 8/10 | 613 days | 81% |
Paul McLaughlin | 8/10 | 641 days | 79% |
RR | 6/10 | 703 days | 65% |
Colin | 9/10 | 764 days | 69% |
Carol | 9/10 | 917 days | 54% |
Rosie | 7/10 | 1159 days | 29% |
Ogilvie family of 5 | 8/10 | 1402 days | 16% |
Monkeyalan | 7/10 | 1524 days | 10% |
Carla | 8/10 | 1737 days | 6% |
Tanja & Sven | 6/10 | 1768 days | 5% |
Nigel Crane | 10/10 | 1799 days | 5% |
Corin Krainer | 5/10 | 1799 days | 4% |
Fran | 6/10 | 1799 days | 4% |
Stevie | 5/10 | 2043 days | 4% |
Cassie | 9/10 | 2255 days | 4% |
Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 2317 days | 4% |
Sue | 6/10 | 2317 days | 4% |
sally m | 10/10 | 2347 days | 4% |
Bailey Dunne | 8/10 | 2439 days | 4% |
Benn | 8/10 | 2439 days | 4% |
Angela MacPherson | 8/10 | 2458 days | 4% |
Shira LA | 8/10 | 2467 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 3/10 | 2467 days | 2% |
Jack James | 8/10 | 2525 days | 4% |
Rodney Morris | 7/10 | 2559 days | 3% |
Laeticia Coelho | 10/10 | 2565 days | 4% |
Samantha Brewin | 7/10 | 2570 days | 3% |
Suzanne Halfpenny | 6/10 | 2588 days | 3% |
Charlie Dodds | 8/10 | 2614 days | 3% |
Jo Dawson | 8/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
Per Rantze | 1/10 | 2711 days | 1% |
Chris Nugent | 10/10 | 2734 days | 3% |
Josh Withell | 4/10 | 2788 days | 2% |
Iris Maatman | 10/10 | 2794 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
Josephine Ayvadian | 10/10 | 2804 days | 3% |
Walter Neff | 7/10 | 2831 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 2862 days | 3% |
Lenka Pruherova | 8/10 | 2874 days | 3% |
Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
Alex Dorrington | 10/10 | 2888 days | 3% |
estelle D | 6/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
Sheryl Hicks | 8/10 | 2936 days | 3% |
Helen Keck | 10/10 | 3021 days | 3% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3040 days | 3% |
Sarah Hammond | 9/10 | 3058 days | 3% |
Tony | 8/10 | 3138 days | 2% |
Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 3155 days | 2% |
Roland Tauchner | 3/10 | 3174 days | 1% |
Peter Fink | 9/10 | 3179 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 7/10 | 3243 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 7/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
Valerie Wee | 7/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
Pang Albert | 7/10 | 3355 days | 2% |
Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3392 days | 2% |
Nicole | 9/10 | 3450 days | 2% |
Barry Goodwin | 5/10 | 3531 days | 1% |
Larry Dashiell | 10/10 | 3534 days | 2% |
John Drake | 6/10 | 3540 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 5/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
Lucy Grund | 9/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
Gianpiero Rodari | 8/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
Bert Snel | 8/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3808 days | 1% |
Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 3869 days | 1% |
Marek Heiurich | 3/10 | 3878 days | 0% |
Stefan Glock | 9/10 | 3883 days | 1% |
Brita Topp | 8/10 | 3900 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 8/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 7/10 | 3928 days | 1% |
Carina Borho | 8/10 | 3934 days | 1% |
Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 8/10 | 3949 days | 1% |
Andy Karl | 8/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 5/10 | 3966 days | 0% |
A Farquhar | 6/10 | 4020 days | 1% |
Henrik Joshua | 8/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
Kerri | 8/10 | 4081 days | 1% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4234 days | 0% |
Verena | 9/10 | 4256 days | 0% |
Anja S | 9/10 | 4256 days | 0% |
Moni Sangoi | 6/10 | 4293 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 9/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
Martin | 8/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
Hanneke P | 7/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
Martyn Kool | 4/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Marieke | 4/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 8/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Katharina Pape | 9/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
Kimothy | 8/10 | 4599 days | 1% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 7/10 | 4627 days | 1% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
John Heal | 8/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
Heather & Jenny | 7/10 | 4736 days | 1% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
damaca | 1/10 | 4812 days | 0% |
redmatthew16 | 9/10 | 4904 days | 1% |
Ed Piotrowski | 8/10 | 4973 days | 1% |
Graham Greentree | 8/10 | 4973 days | 1% |
G Cucel | 10/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
Siggi Wick | 6/10 | 4987 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 8/10 | 4987 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 7/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
LandJ | 3/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Lenore Dejong | 10/10 | 4998 days | 1% |
Mr & Mrs Mackie | 5/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 8/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Ellen Thompson | 3/10 | 5019 days | 0% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5177 days | 1% |
Paula Martinez | 8/10 | 5364 days | 1% |
Dieter Groscurth | 7/10 | 5371 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 8/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
asselman | 8/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
hellami | 8/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
Ritag | 9/10 | 5567 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 7/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
Dirk | 8/10 | 5738 days | 1% |
John | 6/10 | 5744 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.89% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Dunedin Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.84% |
198 | -3.86% |
199 | -3.87% |
200 | -3.89% |
201 | -3.91% |
202 | -3.93% |
203 | -3.95% |
… | … |
6.48% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.