Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dunedin Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
133 Valid Reviews
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has a total of 137 reviews. There are 133 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 133 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 14 |
|
11% |
9/10 | 21 |
|
16% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
35% |
7/10 | 21 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 12 |
|
9% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
74.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park valid reviews is 74.14% and is based on 133 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 133 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.68% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
77.77%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Cafe | 10/10 | 63 days | 100% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 63 days | 93% |
Brett | 9/10 | 94 days | 99% |
Debyron | 8/10 | 94 days | 98% |
Lu | 8/10 | 369 days | 91% |
Janneke | 9/10 | 369 days | 92% |
Diana Heffner | 1/10 | 490 days | 35% |
Nicky | 7/10 | 521 days | 79% |
Shykiwi | 7/10 | 674 days | 69% |
Amy Fortin-Barrette | 9/10 | 674 days | 74% |
Lukas Meier | 2/10 | 735 days | 32% |
Laz. | 8/10 | 735 days | 68% |
Paul McLaughlin | 8/10 | 763 days | 66% |
RR | 6/10 | 825 days | 53% |
Colin | 9/10 | 886 days | 55% |
Carol | 9/10 | 1039 days | 40% |
Rosie | 7/10 | 1281 days | 20% |
Ogilvie family of 5 | 8/10 | 1524 days | 10% |
Monkeyalan | 7/10 | 1646 days | 6% |
Carla | 8/10 | 1859 days | 5% |
Tanja & Sven | 6/10 | 1890 days | 4% |
Nigel Crane | 10/10 | 1921 days | 5% |
Corin Krainer | 5/10 | 1921 days | 4% |
Fran | 6/10 | 1921 days | 4% |
Stevie | 5/10 | 2165 days | 3% |
Cassie | 9/10 | 2377 days | 4% |
Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 2439 days | 4% |
Sue | 6/10 | 2439 days | 3% |
sally m | 10/10 | 2469 days | 4% |
Bailey Dunne | 8/10 | 2561 days | 3% |
Benn | 8/10 | 2561 days | 3% |
Angela MacPherson | 8/10 | 2580 days | 3% |
Shira LA | 8/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
Mark Lindeman | 3/10 | 2589 days | 2% |
Jack James | 8/10 | 2647 days | 3% |
Rodney Morris | 7/10 | 2681 days | 3% |
Laeticia Coelho | 10/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
Samantha Brewin | 7/10 | 2692 days | 3% |
Suzanne Halfpenny | 6/10 | 2710 days | 3% |
Charlie Dodds | 8/10 | 2736 days | 3% |
Jo Dawson | 8/10 | 2820 days | 3% |
Per Rantze | 1/10 | 2833 days | 1% |
Chris Nugent | 10/10 | 2856 days | 3% |
Josh Withell | 4/10 | 2910 days | 2% |
Iris Maatman | 10/10 | 2916 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2920 days | 3% |
Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 2920 days | 3% |
Josephine Ayvadian | 10/10 | 2926 days | 3% |
Walter Neff | 7/10 | 2953 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 2984 days | 3% |
Lenka Pruherova | 8/10 | 2996 days | 3% |
Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
Alex Dorrington | 10/10 | 3010 days | 3% |
estelle D | 6/10 | 3015 days | 2% |
Sheryl Hicks | 8/10 | 3058 days | 3% |
Helen Keck | 10/10 | 3143 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3162 days | 2% |
Sarah Hammond | 9/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
Tony | 8/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 3277 days | 2% |
Roland Tauchner | 3/10 | 3296 days | 1% |
Peter Fink | 9/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 7/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 7/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
Valerie Wee | 7/10 | 3390 days | 2% |
Pang Albert | 7/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3514 days | 2% |
Nicole | 9/10 | 3572 days | 2% |
Barry Goodwin | 5/10 | 3653 days | 1% |
Larry Dashiell | 10/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
John Drake | 6/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 5/10 | 3738 days | 1% |
Lucy Grund | 9/10 | 3748 days | 1% |
Gianpiero Rodari | 8/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
Bert Snel | 8/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 3807 days | 1% |
Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
Marek Heiurich | 3/10 | 4000 days | 0% |
Stefan Glock | 9/10 | 4005 days | 1% |
Brita Topp | 8/10 | 4022 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 8/10 | 4049 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 7/10 | 4050 days | 1% |
Carina Borho | 8/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 4057 days | 0% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 8/10 | 4071 days | 0% |
Andy Karl | 8/10 | 4081 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 5/10 | 4088 days | 0% |
A Farquhar | 6/10 | 4142 days | 0% |
Henrik Joshua | 8/10 | 4173 days | 0% |
Kerri | 8/10 | 4203 days | 0% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
Verena | 9/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
Anja S | 9/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
Moni Sangoi | 6/10 | 4415 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 9/10 | 4446 days | 1% |
Martin | 8/10 | 4446 days | 1% |
Hanneke P | 7/10 | 4446 days | 1% |
Martyn Kool | 4/10 | 4463 days | 0% |
Marieke | 4/10 | 4463 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 8/10 | 4465 days | 1% |
Katharina Pape | 9/10 | 4475 days | 1% |
Kimothy | 8/10 | 4721 days | 1% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 7/10 | 4749 days | 1% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
John Heal | 8/10 | 4857 days | 1% |
Heather & Jenny | 7/10 | 4858 days | 1% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4934 days | 1% |
damaca | 1/10 | 4934 days | 0% |
redmatthew16 | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Ed Piotrowski | 8/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
Graham Greentree | 8/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
G Cucel | 10/10 | 5101 days | 1% |
Siggi Wick | 6/10 | 5109 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 8/10 | 5109 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 7/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
LandJ | 3/10 | 5118 days | 1% |
Lenore Dejong | 10/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
Mr & Mrs Mackie | 5/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 8/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Ellen Thompson | 3/10 | 5141 days | 0% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5177 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5299 days | 1% |
Paula Martinez | 8/10 | 5486 days | 1% |
Dieter Groscurth | 7/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 8/10 | 5528 days | 1% |
asselman | 8/10 | 5558 days | 1% |
hellami | 8/10 | 5603 days | 1% |
Ritag | 9/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 7/10 | 5850 days | 1% |
Dirk | 8/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
John | 6/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.02% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 56 days. However the Dunedin Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 1 day. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
0 | -0.00% |
1 | -0.02% |
2 | -0.04% |
3 | -0.06% |
4 | -0.08% |
… | … |
3.67% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.