Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Village Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
70 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Village Holiday Park experience has a total of 71 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 23 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 11 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.86% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Village Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.86% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 70 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 7 |
|
39% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
44% |
8/10 | 2 |
|
11% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Village Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.67% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.69%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Walvins | 10/10 | 109 days | 100% |
BC Choi | 7/10 | 262 days | 90% |
Christi | 10/10 | 414 days | 91% |
Walt Drechsler | 10/10 | 598 days | 80% |
Varneia | 8/10 | 598 days | 78% |
Courtney Gearhart | 7/10 | 687 days | 68% |
Yvonne | 10/10 | 718 days | 71% |
RR | 9/10 | 749 days | 68% |
Amel | 10/10 | 749 days | 68% |
Joe Johnson | 8/10 | 1540 days | 9% |
Jim Henderson | 8/10 | 1540 days | 9% |
Anna Swain | 9/10 | 1662 days | 6% |
Just a guy | 10/10 | 1754 days | 5% |
M&P | 9/10 | 1783 days | 5% |
Cath | 10/10 | 1814 days | 5% |
Steff | 10/10 | 1845 days | 5% |
Ryan | 10/10 | 1875 days | 5% |
Sue W | 9/10 | 1875 days | 4% |
Philip | 9/10 | 1936 days | 4% |
Jenna | 9/10 | 1998 days | 4% |
Gay Hamilton | 10/10 | 2028 days | 4% |
Maryline | 9/10 | 2089 days | 4% |
Andrew | 7/10 | 2148 days | 4% |
Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 2271 days | 4% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 9/10 | 2557 days | 3% |
Debbie Lesurf | 9/10 | 2564 days | 3% |
Michelle Rice | 10/10 | 2660 days | 3% |
Jane | 9/10 | 2760 days | 3% |
Belinda Clarke | 8/10 | 2823 days | 3% |
Walter Neff | 9/10 | 2877 days | 3% |
Murray Spiers | 9/10 | 3005 days | 2% |
Rosanne van Dooren | 7/10 | 3021 days | 2% |
Mike Hancock | 7/10 | 3128 days | 2% |
Wayne Jeskie | 7/10 | 3164 days | 2% |
Volker Stroenisch | 9/10 | 3243 days | 2% |
Annabelle deMontignie | 8/10 | 3427 days | 1% |
Yann Le Gac | 4/10 | 3519 days | 1% |
Sally Smith | 8/10 | 3519 days | 1% |
Mike Merrick | 7/10 | 3579 days | 1% |
Thomas Blom | 6/10 | 3608 days | 1% |
Hol. M. | 8/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
Robert Warner | 10/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
Matthias Thorn | 8/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
Joanna du Toit | 7/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
catherine welsh | 7/10 | 4005 days | 0% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 8/10 | 4066 days | 0% |
Helen King | 10/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
I & K Urquhart | 8/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
Andrea Wollmann | 10/10 | 4388 days | 0% |
S & J McDonald | 7/10 | 4686 days | 0% |
Melanie Mathiak | 10/10 | 4688 days | 0% |
Inge Davbbert | 10/10 | 4688 days | 0% |
Butz | 9/10 | 4691 days | 0% |
Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 4691 days | 0% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4703 days | 0% |
Balonno | 10/10 | 4736 days | 1% |
jule | 8/10 | 4797 days | 1% |
henriket | 9/10 | 5036 days | 0% |
Grant | 9/10 | 5328 days | 0% |
Baumgarten | 10/10 | 5343 days | 0% |
jbchandler | 9/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
Victoria Slater | 9/10 | 5381 days | 0% |
Tony B | 9/10 | 5388 days | 0% |
David Morton | 8/10 | 5409 days | 0% |
Horst | 9/10 | 5410 days | 0% |
Barry Sutcliffe | 9/10 | 5465 days | 0% |
Raewyn | 10/10 | 5738 days | 0% |
mikestep | 8/10 | 5741 days | 0% |
familytravellers | 10/10 | 5753 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Moeraki Village Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.48% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Moeraki Village Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Moeraki Village Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 73 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
70 | -1.41% |
71 | -1.44% |
72 | -1.46% |
73 | -1.48% |
74 | -1.50% |
75 | -1.52% |
76 | -1.54% |
… | … |
1.26% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.