Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
72 Valid Reviews
The Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park experience has a total of 74 reviews. There are 72 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 14 |
|
19% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
7/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
5/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
77.36% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park valid reviews is 77.36% and is based on 72 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
36 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 72 valid reviews, the experience has 36 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 36 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
9/10 | 12 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 6 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
17% |
5/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 74.44% and is based on 36 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
77.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Stacey Brown | 10/10 | 540 days | 100% |
Sonia | 1/10 | 752 days | 33% |
Gem | 7/10 | 1147 days | 35% |
Tom McKernan | 6/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
Lyndsay | 10/10 | 2062 days | 5% |
Gary Prescot | 7/10 | 2641 days | 4% |
Alex Ray | 4/10 | 2669 days | 2% |
Bill Alexander | 5/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
Becky and James | 7/10 | 3007 days | 3% |
Kelly Hitchins | 7/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 3224 days | 3% |
Nic Love | 10/10 | 3277 days | 2% |
Nick Johnstone | 8/10 | 3369 days | 2% |
Pete Arney | 1/10 | 3584 days | 1% |
SUE COLEMAN | 7/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
Erhard Wallentin | 7/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
Henrik Joshua | 6/10 | 4069 days | 0% |
Elise Robson | 1/10 | 4222 days | 0% |
AusCampa | 8/10 | 4253 days | 0% |
Barbara Lee | 8/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
Alexandra van den Brack | 8/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
Sue Robertson | 6/10 | 4692 days | 1% |
Michael & Rosemary Smith | 9/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
Tom Connis | 8/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
Duncan & Ellen | 6/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
Graham | 10/10 | 4739 days | 1% |
Johanna Maria Brigitta | 6/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
Matthias | 9/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 5/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Mel | 10/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
Ian & Phyllis | 9/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
Sandra | 9/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
mr Schumader | 10/10 | 5059 days | 1% |
Gordon and Sue | 8/10 | 5061 days | 1% |
Mike and Alice Powner | 6/10 | 5064 days | 1% |
edwardwyllie | 10/10 | 5073 days | 1% |
larsjoramo | 9/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
Marleen | 10/10 | 5196 days | 1% |
michelleandgreg | 9/10 | 5196 days | 1% |
Gforce7 | 10/10 | 5196 days | 1% |
Stephen M | 9/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
Gold_Panner | 10/10 | 5410 days | 1% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5410 days | 1% |
Janny Meerdinnk Veldboow | 6/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Hans de Rijk | 7/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
Annie | 6/10 | 5432 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 9/10 | 5435 days | 1% |
Luternauer | 3/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
Mike | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Lorena | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Gerry Donoghue | 9/10 | 5452 days | 1% |
Glenn Nicholson | 8/10 | 5458 days | 1% |
Barry Sutcliffe | 8/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
Josh | 10/10 | 5469 days | 1% |
eldichter | 10/10 | 5469 days | 1% |
JoshG | 10/10 | 5469 days | 1% |
Felicity | 10/10 | 5469 days | 1% |
Meg | 10/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
wei | 10/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 10/10 | 5561 days | 1% |
CAD1977 | 10/10 | 5591 days | 1% |
Sofie | 7/10 | 5739 days | 1% |
DirkGermany | 10/10 | 5739 days | 1% |
davidne | 8/10 | 5744 days | 1% |
Peter Jackie | 9/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
KatrinS | 9/10 | 5756 days | 1% |
SabineGermany | 9/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
StefanGermany1 | 9/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
Hetty | 5/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
Cate | 5/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
Bronwyn | 2/10 | 5788 days | 0% |
Oord | 5/10 | 5793 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kiwi Park Motels & Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.97% |
198 | -3.99% |
199 | -4.01% |
200 | -4.03% |
201 | -4.05% |
202 | -4.07% |
203 | -4.09% |
… | … |
5.35% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
79%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.