Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Golden Bay Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Golden Bay Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
42 Valid Reviews
The Golden Bay Holiday Park experience has a total of 44 reviews. There are 42 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 42 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
75.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Golden Bay Holiday Park valid reviews is 75.24% and is based on 42 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 42 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
56% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Golden Bay Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
66.56%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matt | 4/10 | 691 days | 100% |
| Lach | 8/10 | 1421 days | 29% |
| Teesh K | 9/10 | 1482 days | 24% |
| angelika19 | 6/10 | 1848 days | 9% |
| Crsthomas | 9/10 | 1879 days | 10% |
| Tapki | 10/10 | 2183 days | 9% |
| Sally Hodgson | 10/10 | 2523 days | 8% |
| Michael Talbot | 8/10 | 2583 days | 7% |
| Sophie Ross | 2/10 | 2827 days | 3% |
| Andy Kubic | 7/10 | 2829 days | 6% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 3188 days | 5% |
| Florian Kleemann | 5/10 | 3574 days | 2% |
| Thomas Mayerhofer | 10/10 | 3657 days | 3% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 10/10 | 3673 days | 3% |
| Dave Horry | 9/10 | 3765 days | 2% |
| Brita Topp | 9/10 | 3888 days | 2% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 3921 days | 2% |
| Hadar | 3/10 | 3923 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 3931 days | 2% |
| Marinette | 9/10 | 3931 days | 2% |
| GN100 | 8/10 | 3947 days | 2% |
| Max Dobson | 1/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
| Strong Arm | 3/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
| Sandra Cook | 1/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Stefan Roth | 8/10 | 4390 days | 2% |
| maelstrom | 7/10 | 4618 days | 2% |
| Ryan497 | 9/10 | 4649 days | 2% |
| KDS_Holiday | 9/10 | 4649 days | 2% |
| Siegfried Richter | 10/10 | 4659 days | 2% |
| PandD | 10/10 | 4678 days | 2% |
| ZephyrTL | 4/10 | 4709 days | 1% |
| huttguy32 | 9/10 | 4709 days | 2% |
| Bob & Yvonne Myles | 9/10 | 5001 days | 2% |
| Amanda Wells | 8/10 | 5009 days | 2% |
| Flueckiger | 8/10 | 5024 days | 2% |
| Jim Thomsen | 8/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Kate Thomsen | 10/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| rhubarbsky | 9/10 | 5105 days | 2% |
| R Traber | 8/10 | 5387 days | 2% |
| marcol | 8/10 | 5455 days | 2% |
| Mike | 8/10 | 5482 days | 2% |
| Kay | 8/10 | 5763 days | 2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Golden Bay Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Golden Bay Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Golden Bay Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
12.05% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
75%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.