G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mawley Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Mawley Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
31 Valid Reviews
The Mawley Holiday Park experience has a total of 31 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 31 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 31 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
48% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.10% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mawley Holiday Park valid reviews is 87.10% and is based on 31 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
92.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roxanne | 10/10 | 1095 days | 100% |
| Tania | 10/10 | 1340 days | 52% |
| Krash | 5/10 | 1796 days | 11% |
| Raewyn | 10/10 | 1796 days | 14% |
| Gavin Long | 10/10 | 1826 days | 14% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 1857 days | 14% |
| Mark Mccarthy | 3/10 | 2040 days | 7% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 2130 days | 12% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 2161 days | 12% |
| A Brad in a van | 8/10 | 2344 days | 11% |
| mohd hadi zainol shokor | 10/10 | 2544 days | 10% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 7/10 | 2566 days | 9% |
| Bridget Brebner | 8/10 | 2652 days | 9% |
| Mercury Kamsteeg | 10/10 | 2683 days | 9% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 2844 days | 8% |
| Bernadette Figueroa | 10/10 | 2973 days | 8% |
| Jeffrey Ross | 10/10 | 2974 days | 8% |
| Philippa and Adam | 9/10 | 3178 days | 6% |
| Phillippa McLernon | 9/10 | 3180 days | 6% |
| Leanne Dilnot | 10/10 | 3224 days | 6% |
| Jade Duncan | 7/10 | 3309 days | 5% |
| Ken and Jan | 7/10 | 3439 days | 5% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3500 days | 5% |
| Julia | 8/10 | 3531 days | 5% |
| Lea Hotz | 10/10 | 3575 days | 4% |
| Ana Martinez | 10/10 | 3651 days | 4% |
| Johannes J | 7/10 | 4078 days | 1% |
| Anne and John | 10/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
| Pietersen | 7/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Graham | 9/10 | 4687 days | 3% |
| HelenR | 9/10 | 4718 days | 3% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mawley Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.85% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 50 days. However the Mawley Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mawley Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.80% |
| 198 | -3.82% |
| 199 | -3.83% |
| 200 | -3.85% |
| 201 | -3.87% |
| 202 | -3.89% |
| 203 | -3.91% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.20% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.