Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Seabreeze Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Seabreeze Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
45 Valid Reviews
The Seabreeze Holiday Park experience has a total of 47 reviews. There are 45 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
74.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Seabreeze Holiday Park valid reviews is 74.44% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
60.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Seabreeze Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 60.00% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.56%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brent | 9/10 | 674 days | 100% |
| AWattie | 10/10 | 980 days | 62% |
| AWattie | 10/10 | 980 days | 62% |
| Inge | 7/10 | 1070 days | 48% |
| Tony Wade | 9/10 | 1101 days | 47% |
| Ellie | 8/10 | 1131 days | 43% |
| Nicky | 9/10 | 1345 days | 24% |
| Damon | 10/10 | 1527 days | 14% |
| Izzy | 7/10 | 2227 days | 5% |
| Balvamar | 8/10 | 2531 days | 5% |
| Jonas R. | 10/10 | 2592 days | 5% |
| Nick | 8/10 | 2623 days | 5% |
| Keith Salway | 7/10 | 2876 days | 2% |
| Manuel Fessler | 5/10 | 2910 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 10/10 | 2916 days | 4% |
| Emma Clarke | 1/10 | 2926 days | 2% |
| Lucy Allaby | 6/10 | 2962 days | 3% |
| Leonie Scholten | 8/10 | 3037 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 3/10 | 3065 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 6/10 | 3124 days | 3% |
| Madelyn Fagerman | 10/10 | 3165 days | 3% |
| Shane Connaughton | 7/10 | 3255 days | 3% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 7/10 | 3260 days | 3% |
| Mark van Beers | 8/10 | 3269 days | 3% |
| S Webb | 7/10 | 3321 days | 3% |
| Jeffrey Ross | 6/10 | 3375 days | 2% |
| Philippa and Adam | 8/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Tanja Laube | 6/10 | 3554 days | 2% |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 6/10 | 3563 days | 2% |
| Sarah Gurney | 7/10 | 3699 days | 2% |
| Alina Pollak | 8/10 | 3730 days | 2% |
| Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3774 days | 2% |
| Daniel Gwinner | 10/10 | 3812 days | 1% |
| Stephanie | 7/10 | 3877 days | 1% |
| Atilio | 8/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
| Annabel Pirrie | 10/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
| Thomas Marte | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
| Sonja | 5/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
| Jenben | 8/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
| Chris Sylvia | 3/10 | 5021 days | 0% |
| sidcupjon | 3/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
| stonedavi1 | 10/10 | 5606 days | 1% |
| Hansjoerg Ehrmann | 10/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
| Majken | 1/10 | 6142 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Seabreeze Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Seabreeze Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Seabreeze Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.