Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
64 Valid Reviews
The Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 65 reviews. There are 64 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
85.78% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.78% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
41 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 64 valid reviews, the experience has 41 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 41 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 88.29% and is based on 41 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
76.84%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lily | 1/10 | 797 days | 52% |
| Andrew Smith | 6/10 | 858 days | 100% |
| Max | 9/10 | 950 days | 96% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 1070 days | 75% |
| Steve Courtenay | 9/10 | 1223 days | 51% |
| traveller2019 | 9/10 | 2197 days | 8% |
| Richard K | 10/10 | 2227 days | 8% |
| Dlg | 8/10 | 2500 days | 7% |
| Fer&And | 8/10 | 2684 days | 6% |
| Shira LA | 8/10 | 2865 days | 6% |
| Steve Johnn | 6/10 | 2879 days | 5% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 2896 days | 6% |
| CARMERS | 6/10 | 3018 days | 4% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 3298 days | 4% |
| Janin Kleine | 9/10 | 3664 days | 3% |
| Jan mentink | 8/10 | 3788 days | 2% |
| Stephanie | 9/10 | 3877 days | 2% |
| Richard | 7/10 | 4176 days | 1% |
| Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 4206 days | 1% |
| Brita Topp | 9/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Rachael Venour | 10/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Matthew Rowles | 9/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Glenda | 7/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Celine Darde | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Ludovic Denee | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Alastair MacDonald | 9/10 | 4740 days | 2% |
| Martin Thomas | 9/10 | 4745 days | 2% |
| Thys | 7/10 | 4765 days | 2% |
| Peter W. | 10/10 | 4936 days | 2% |
| Annie | 9/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Mickey | 6/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Rene | 8/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Dirk Faupel | 10/10 | 5123 days | 2% |
| Dirk Faupel | 10/10 | 5123 days | 2% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 5133 days | 2% |
| Verhahr | 8/10 | 5139 days | 2% |
| AndreF | 10/10 | 5149 days | 2% |
| Boehmer | 9/10 | 5378 days | 2% |
| Schroeder | 10/10 | 5382 days | 2% |
| J Palmer | 8/10 | 5386 days | 2% |
| Ursula Scherch | 9/10 | 5398 days | 2% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5413 days | 2% |
| Daniel Lang | 10/10 | 5415 days | 2% |
| D Oostrum | 8/10 | 5417 days | 2% |
| Andreas | 10/10 | 5421 days | 2% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 5728 days | 2% |
| Gerhard Kronen | 9/10 | 5756 days | 2% |
| Mary | 9/10 | 5761 days | 2% |
| Klass | 10/10 | 5773 days | 2% |
| JeanOddy | 9/10 | 5781 days | 2% |
| joe Reibli | 10/10 | 5784 days | 2% |
| Douglas Kirby | 9/10 | 5800 days | 2% |
| nadinef | 8/10 | 5841 days | 2% |
| aages | 9/10 | 5842 days | 2% |
| mvano | 7/10 | 5843 days | 2% |
| Sandra M | 9/10 | 5851 days | 2% |
| David D S | 10/10 | 5857 days | 2% |
| Hans Barth | 10/10 | 5869 days | 2% |
| Andrew Wilson | 9/10 | 6110 days | 2% |
| Marianne Klotterich | 8/10 | 6111 days | 2% |
| Kruiver | 8/10 | 6134 days | 2% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 6140 days | 2% |
| Carmel | 9/10 | 6142 days | 2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Ohakune TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
5.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.