Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rawene Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rawene Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
40 Valid Reviews
The Rawene Holiday Park experience has a total of 41 reviews. There are 40 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
40% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.75% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rawene Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.75% and is based on 40 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
8 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 40 valid reviews, the experience has 8 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 8 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
38% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rawene Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 86.25% and is based on 8 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 205 days | 100% |
| Marie Perret | 10/10 | 448 days | 92% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 601 days | 82% |
| Harriet | 8/10 | 1270 days | 23% |
| Annie&Ace | 10/10 | 1513 days | 11% |
| Linda | 9/10 | 1574 days | 9% |
| Alex Tikonoff | 10/10 | 1787 days | 5% |
| Diana Linzmaier | 10/10 | 1857 days | 4% |
| Brian | 7/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
| Debbie | 10/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
| Camper 1 | 10/10 | 2121 days | 5% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
| Sharon | 6/10 | 2274 days | 4% |
| Kilian Krauss | 10/10 | 2487 days | 4% |
| Debbie Lesurf | 10/10 | 2555 days | 4% |
| Laurie Meston | 8/10 | 2812 days | 3% |
| Nienke Best | 6/10 | 2813 days | 3% |
| Victor Miro | 8/10 | 2942 days | 3% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3107 days | 2% |
| Boukje Diijkstra | 9/10 | 3196 days | 2% |
| Chris Hawksworth | 8/10 | 3226 days | 2% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 7/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Malcolm Ridge | 7/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
| Sarah Gurney | 10/10 | 3326 days | 2% |
| Colin Petherbridge | 7/10 | 3549 days | 2% |
| Michael | 7/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 10/10 | 4162 days | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4192 days | 0% |
| Will and Taylor | 7/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
| CanadaGirl23 | 8/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| josianemeier | 10/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Willi & Elke Breier | 10/10 | 4757 days | 1% |
| J van de Vlekkert | 9/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
| Hershell | 7/10 | 5372 days | 1% |
| Brenda | 9/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
| gyrhalde11 | 10/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
| lorah | 10/10 | 5604 days | 1% |
| MargaretH | 5/10 | 5757 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rawene Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.57% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Rawene Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rawene Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 176 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 173 | -3.51% |
| 174 | -3.53% |
| 175 | -3.55% |
| 176 | -3.57% |
| 177 | -3.59% |
| 178 | -3.61% |
| 179 | -3.63% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.03% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.