Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Uretiti Beach Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Uretiti Beach Campsite

Valid Reviews

99 Valid Reviews

The Uretiti Beach Campsite experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 99 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 99 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 35
35%
9/10 30
30%
8/10 26
26%
7/10 4
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 2
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.69% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Uretiti Beach Campsite valid reviews is 88.69% and is based on 99 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

29 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 99 valid reviews, the experience has 29 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 29 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
31%
9/10 10
34%
8/10 9
31%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.62% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Uretiti Beach Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.62% and is based on 29 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.63%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Yolandi Thompson 8/10 41 days 100%
Carmen 7/10 133 days 94%
Nico 8/10 194 days 98%
Felicia 10/10 255 days 98%
Eline & Dave 7/10 286 days 91%
EZYLFE 9/10 314 days 95%
Eleanor 10/10 345 days 95%
Liliane Chassin 9/10 376 days 93%
Stephan Roeder 10/10 406 days 93%
Evelína 9/10 406 days 92%
Wilfried 8/10 406 days 91%
Milly Struthers 10/10 467 days 89%
Carter 9/10 467 days 89%
Rhea Y 10/10 467 days 89%
Morgane 9/10 498 days 87%
Max 10/10 651 days 77%
Femke 9/10 680 days 74%
Yorick 8/10 711 days 71%
Tinka 10/10 711 days 73%
james bucky 10/10 711 days 73%
wvdbos 8/10 986 days 45%
Brick 10/10 1107 days 35%
Ricardo. 5/10 1686 days 5%
James 9/10 1806 days 5%
Olivia 8/10 1806 days 5%
Jamie 10/10 1806 days 5%
Stefan Hohmann 8/10 2112 days 4%
Gareth 10/10 2141 days 4%
Reece Dillon 10/10 2233 days 4%
Ray Tombs 10/10 2417 days 4%
Nir 10/10 2447 days 4%
Jen Doherty 7/10 2505 days 3%
Antonia Vai 10/10 2537 days 4%
Jakob Simons 8/10 2598 days 3%
Pim Brackenie 7/10 2598 days 3%
Coco B. 10/10 2629 days 3%
Alan & Lorraine 8/10 2843 days 3%
Carolyn C 9/10 2899 days 3%
Margriet Geesink 9/10 2901 days 3%
Gary Milne 9/10 2981 days 3%
Michiel de Weerd 10/10 3179 days 2%
Maarten de Weerd 8/10 3179 days 2%
Nienke Best 9/10 3198 days 2%
Mike Robinson 10/10 3216 days 2%
Angela Dixon 9/10 3300 days 2%
Rebecca Green 8/10 3507 days 2%
Debbie 8/10 3601 days 1%
John-Jozef Proczka 9/10 3602 days 2%
Janneke Hekhuis 10/10 3613 days 2%
Julia Summa 9/10 3639 days 1%
Timo von Wirth 9/10 3685 days 1%
Jade Duncan 8/10 3716 days 1%
Corry Stucki 9/10 3716 days 1%
Alicia Munch 10/10 3719 days 1%
Jessica Krapp 9/10 3881 days 1%
andrew simpson 10/10 3905 days 1%
Tarillon Family 8/10 3929 days 1%
Laurie 8/10 3966 days 1%
Julia 9/10 3966 days 1%
Hauke Herdan 9/10 3991 days 1%
Christian Starke 8/10 4004 days 1%
Thomas Marte 10/10 4058 days 1%
Radek Ouhel 10/10 4058 days 1%
Lagarde 9/10 4271 days 0%
Pelletier 8/10 4271 days 0%
Andrew Potratz 10/10 4272 days 0%
Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com 6/10 4273 days 0%
Leonie Moeller 9/10 4282 days 0%
Greg Wilson 8/10 4304 days 0%
Hadler 10/10 4305 days 0%
Christine Helleiner 8/10 4305 days 0%
Felicitas 9/10 4305 days 0%
Kristina 8/10 4322 days 0%
Manuel Bach 8/10 4323 days 0%
Max Tetzlaff 9/10 4330 days 0%
Mike Leopard 10/10 4332 days 0%
Max Grabowski 9/10 4332 days 0%
Aitnan Melman 8/10 4365 days 0%
lisa taylor 9/10 4669 days 1%
Will and Taylor 8/10 4697 days 1%
Markus Frei 9/10 5020 days 1%
Richard Rite 10/10 5030 days 1%
Christina 10/10 5049 days 1%
Carla Mathieu 10/10 5053 days 1%
Anika 9/10 5062 days 1%
Mirando4ka 6/10 5063 days 1%
Elke & Charlotte 9/10 5145 days 1%
Thierry Meylan 8/10 5376 days 1%
Carolin 5/10 5399 days 1%
Christina Fischer 10/10 5423 days 1%
Puravida 10/10 5490 days 1%
Martin 8/10 5704 days 1%
Tanja Titze 10/10 5786 days 1%
annett 10/10 5840 days 1%
Frank de Voogd 9/10 5859 days 1%
Christy 8/10 5865 days 1%
Tim Beuzeval 9/10 5885 days 1%
lorah 10/10 5989 days 1%
Nadine 10/10 6145 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Uretiti Beach Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.05% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.