Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1741 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2288 days | 75% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3219 days | 41% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3236 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3253 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3273 days | 38% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3289 days | 38% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3303 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3541 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3541 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3546 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3556 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3562 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3575 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3577 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3595 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3597 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3611 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3641 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3658 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3999 days | 12% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4266 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4269 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4271 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4271 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4310 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4325 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4632 days | 17% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4638 days | 17% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4638 days | 17% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4639 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4667 days | 17% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4667 days | 17% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4670 days | 17% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4670 days | 17% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4671 days | 16% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4689 days | 17% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4722 days | 17% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4741 days | 17% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4752 days | 17% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4760 days | 17% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 4995 days | 17% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5015 days | 17% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5023 days | 17% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5024 days | 17% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5024 days | 17% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5024 days | 17% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5028 days | 17% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5028 days | 17% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5028 days | 17% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5030 days | 17% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5034 days | 17% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5037 days | 17% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5038 days | 17% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5040 days | 17% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5042 days | 17% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5042 days | 17% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5045 days | 17% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5049 days | 17% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5052 days | 16% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5070 days | 16% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5088 days | 17% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5128 days | 17% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5131 days | 17% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5149 days | 17% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5352 days | 17% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5368 days | 17% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5376 days | 17% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5377 days | 17% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5379 days | 17% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5379 days | 17% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5381 days | 17% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5384 days | 17% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5388 days | 17% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5388 days | 17% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5391 days | 17% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5392 days | 17% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5395 days | 17% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5395 days | 17% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5399 days | 17% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5400 days | 17% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5401 days | 17% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5401 days | 17% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5407 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5407 days | 17% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5408 days | 17% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5409 days | 16% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5409 days | 17% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5410 days | 16% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5412 days | 17% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5415 days | 17% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5417 days | 17% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5419 days | 17% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5419 days | 17% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5421 days | 17% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5484 days | 17% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5514 days | 17% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5545 days | 17% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5637 days | 17% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5693 days | 17% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5706 days | 17% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5728 days | 17% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5740 days | 17% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5741 days | 16% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5745 days | 17% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5746 days | 17% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5759 days | 17% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5760 days | 17% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5765 days | 17% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5769 days | 16% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5780 days | 17% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5787 days | 17% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5793 days | 16% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5796 days | 17% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5818 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5818 days | 17% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5833 days | 17% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5833 days | 17% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5834 days | 17% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5837 days | 17% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5842 days | 17% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5847 days | 17% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5849 days | 17% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5849 days | 17% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5851 days | 17% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5853 days | 17% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5857 days | 17% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5857 days | 17% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5860 days | 17% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5861 days | 17% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5875 days | 17% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5879 days | 17% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5894 days | 17% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5940 days | 17% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5962 days | 17% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5975 days | 17% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6002 days | 17% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6093 days | 17% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6094 days | 17% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6094 days | 17% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6095 days | 17% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6097 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6109 days | 17% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6109 days | 17% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6111 days | 17% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6111 days | 17% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6116 days | 17% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6118 days | 17% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6119 days | 17% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6119 days | 17% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6124 days | 17% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6124 days | 17% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6124 days | 17% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6125 days | 17% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6127 days | 17% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6127 days | 17% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6129 days | 17% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6131 days | 17% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6134 days | 17% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6136 days | 17% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6138 days | 17% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6141 days | 17% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6143 days | 17% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6143 days | 17% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6150 days | 17% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6155 days | 17% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6156 days | 17% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6157 days | 17% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6157 days | 17% |
| John | 9/10 | 6162 days | 17% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6165 days | 17% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6166 days | 17% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6173 days | 17% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6174 days | 17% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6177 days | 17% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6179 days | 17% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6183 days | 17% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6196 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6202 days | 17% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6206 days | 17% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6211 days | 17% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6211 days | 17% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6215 days | 17% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6221 days | 17% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6227 days | 17% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6231 days | 17% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6249 days | 17% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6258 days | 17% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6260 days | 17% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6266 days | 17% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6267 days | 17% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6275 days | 17% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6290 days | 17% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6290 days | 17% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6303 days | 17% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6311 days | 17% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6328 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6341 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6345 days | 17% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6465 days | 17% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6473 days | 17% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6476 days | 17% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6490 days | 17% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6505 days | 16% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6507 days | 17% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6512 days | 17% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6529 days | 17% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6568 days | 17% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6571 days | 17% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6574 days | 17% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6578 days | 17% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6828 days | 17% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6830 days | 17% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6837 days | 17% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6858 days | 17% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6858 days | 17% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6859 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6863 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6870 days | 17% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6871 days | 17% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6871 days | 17% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.