G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1505 days | 100% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2052 days | 39% |
Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 2983 days | 21% |
Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3000 days | 21% |
Monique | 10/10 | 3017 days | 21% |
Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3037 days | 20% |
Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3053 days | 20% |
Danny | 10/10 | 3067 days | 20% |
Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3305 days | 15% |
Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3305 days | 15% |
Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3310 days | 15% |
Navina | 7/10 | 3320 days | 14% |
Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3326 days | 15% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3339 days | 15% |
Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3341 days | 13% |
Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3359 days | 14% |
Dorothy | 10/10 | 3361 days | 14% |
Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3375 days | 14% |
Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3405 days | 13% |
KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3422 days | 13% |
Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3763 days | 6% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4030 days | 1% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 4033 days | 1% |
Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4035 days | 1% |
Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4035 days | 0% |
Ennico | 10/10 | 4074 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4089 days | 0% |
Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4103 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4396 days | 5% |
Rainer | 9/10 | 4402 days | 4% |
Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4402 days | 4% |
Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4431 days | 4% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4431 days | 4% |
Raquel | 8/10 | 4434 days | 4% |
Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4434 days | 4% |
Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4435 days | 4% |
Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4453 days | 4% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4486 days | 5% |
M Natterser | 9/10 | 4505 days | 4% |
Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4516 days | 4% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4524 days | 5% |
Anna | 8/10 | 4759 days | 4% |
Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 4779 days | 4% |
Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 4787 days | 5% |
Richard Rite | 10/10 | 4788 days | 5% |
Alex Ross | 10/10 | 4788 days | 5% |
Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 4788 days | 4% |
sidcupjon | 9/10 | 4792 days | 4% |
kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 4792 days | 4% |
Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 4792 days | 4% |
Erik | 10/10 | 4794 days | 5% |
Brasier | 8/10 | 4798 days | 4% |
Harald | 8/10 | 4801 days | 4% |
Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 4802 days | 5% |
Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 4804 days | 4% |
Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 4806 days | 4% |
Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 4806 days | 4% |
Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 4809 days | 4% |
John Hughes | 9/10 | 4813 days | 4% |
Louis Smit | 7/10 | 4816 days | 4% |
Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 4834 days | 4% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4852 days | 4% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 4892 days | 4% |
Josh | 9/10 | 4895 days | 4% |
jule | 10/10 | 4913 days | 5% |
Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5116 days | 4% |
David Taylor | 9/10 | 5132 days | 4% |
Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5140 days | 5% |
Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5141 days | 4% |
Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5143 days | 4% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5143 days | 4% |
Jacob | 8/10 | 5145 days | 4% |
Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5148 days | 4% |
Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5152 days | 4% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5152 days | 4% |
Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5155 days | 4% |
E C Frans | 10/10 | 5156 days | 5% |
Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5159 days | 4% |
Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5159 days | 4% |
Cesar | 9/10 | 5163 days | 4% |
Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5164 days | 4% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5165 days | 4% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5165 days | 4% |
Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5171 days | 3% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5171 days | 5% |
John Brand | 8/10 | 5172 days | 4% |
Andy | 7/10 | 5173 days | 4% |
Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5173 days | 4% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5174 days | 4% |
Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5176 days | 4% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5179 days | 4% |
Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5181 days | 5% |
Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5183 days | 4% |
Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5183 days | 4% |
Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5185 days | 5% |
mmallen | 10/10 | 5248 days | 5% |
alku83 | 10/10 | 5278 days | 5% |
KAA | 10/10 | 5309 days | 5% |
penz | 9/10 | 5401 days | 4% |
koster | 9/10 | 5457 days | 4% |
BelindaT | 10/10 | 5470 days | 5% |
nuwee | 10/10 | 5492 days | 5% |
Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5504 days | 5% |
Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5505 days | 4% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5509 days | 4% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5510 days | 4% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5523 days | 4% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5524 days | 5% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5529 days | 4% |
M Sicard | 7/10 | 5533 days | 4% |
John Helle | 9/10 | 5544 days | 4% |
Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5551 days | 4% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5557 days | 4% |
Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5560 days | 5% |
Arran J | 5/10 | 5582 days | 2% |
Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5582 days | 4% |
csziegler | 10/10 | 5597 days | 5% |
katharinatum | 9/10 | 5597 days | 4% |
marcol | 9/10 | 5598 days | 4% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5601 days | 5% |
martint | 10/10 | 5606 days | 5% |
koellner | 9/10 | 5611 days | 4% |
The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5613 days | 5% |
alasiac | 10/10 | 5613 days | 5% |
Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5615 days | 5% |
kencook | 10/10 | 5617 days | 5% |
Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5621 days | 4% |
Deede K | 8/10 | 5621 days | 4% |
Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5624 days | 4% |
Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5625 days | 4% |
Tillener | 8/10 | 5639 days | 4% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5643 days | 4% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5658 days | 4% |
waters811 | 10/10 | 5704 days | 5% |
alanvn | 9/10 | 5726 days | 4% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5739 days | 4% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5766 days | 5% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5857 days | 5% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5858 days | 4% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5858 days | 5% |
KjellR | 8/10 | 5859 days | 4% |
Ronny | 6/10 | 5861 days | 3% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5873 days | 4% |
MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 5873 days | 5% |
NatasjaV | 9/10 | 5875 days | 4% |
JimmyK | 8/10 | 5875 days | 4% |
Joery | 9/10 | 5880 days | 4% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 5882 days | 4% |
robix | 9/10 | 5883 days | 4% |
Lynn White | 8/10 | 5883 days | 4% |
Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 5888 days | 5% |
amyd | 9/10 | 5888 days | 4% |
Tolsten | 10/10 | 5888 days | 5% |
Kelly | 8/10 | 5889 days | 4% |
Steven | 8/10 | 5891 days | 4% |
CarleyJ | 9/10 | 5891 days | 4% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5893 days | 5% |
Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 5895 days | 4% |
henriettalee | 8/10 | 5898 days | 4% |
IreneF | 9/10 | 5900 days | 4% |
FeliciaY | 9/10 | 5902 days | 4% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 5905 days | 5% |
Carly | 9/10 | 5907 days | 4% |
Conway | 9/10 | 5907 days | 4% |
niall stephenson | 10/10 | 5914 days | 5% |
Camilia | 9/10 | 5919 days | 4% |
De Kievit | 8/10 | 5920 days | 4% |
Klalis | 10/10 | 5921 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5921 days | 5% |
John | 9/10 | 5926 days | 4% |
Foost | 8/10 | 5929 days | 4% |
Rosa | 9/10 | 5930 days | 4% |
LeaciaS | 8/10 | 5937 days | 4% |
PhillS | 8/10 | 5938 days | 4% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 5941 days | 4% |
Ofer | 10/10 | 5943 days | 5% |
BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 5947 days | 4% |
JulianeH | 6/10 | 5960 days | 3% |
Priyanka | 10/10 | 5966 days | 5% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5970 days | 5% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5975 days | 5% |
Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 5975 days | 4% |
Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 5979 days | 5% |
Susie Wang | 10/10 | 5985 days | 5% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5991 days | 5% |
Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 5995 days | 5% |
angusb | 9/10 | 6013 days | 4% |
Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6022 days | 4% |
Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6024 days | 4% |
Jessie | 10/10 | 6030 days | 5% |
Emilie | 10/10 | 6031 days | 5% |
HollyB | 10/10 | 6039 days | 5% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6054 days | 5% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 6054 days | 4% |
Michaela | 9/10 | 6067 days | 4% |
Katerina | 10/10 | 6075 days | 5% |
Gray | 9/10 | 6092 days | 4% |
Christine | 8/10 | 6105 days | 4% |
Christine | 8/10 | 6109 days | 4% |
Toby | 10/10 | 6229 days | 5% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 6237 days | 5% |
Stewart | 9/10 | 6240 days | 4% |
Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6254 days | 4% |
Jody | 7/10 | 6269 days | 4% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6271 days | 4% |
Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6276 days | 4% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 6293 days | 5% |
Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6332 days | 5% |
Lena | 8/10 | 6335 days | 4% |
Edwin | 9/10 | 6338 days | 4% |
caroline | 9/10 | 6342 days | 4% |
Stevenson | 10/10 | 6592 days | 5% |
Anita | 8/10 | 6594 days | 4% |
Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6601 days | 5% |
Berke | 10/10 | 6622 days | 5% |
Madeleine | 10/10 | 6622 days | 5% |
Rogier | 5/10 | 6623 days | 2% |
Wendy | 5/10 | 6627 days | 2% |
Sonja | 8/10 | 6634 days | 4% |
Hennielene | 9/10 | 6635 days | 4% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6635 days | 4% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.48% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 65 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.43% |
198 | -3.45% |
199 | -3.47% |
200 | -3.48% |
201 | -3.50% |
202 | -3.52% |
203 | -3.54% |
… | … |
1.60% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.