Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1928 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2475 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3406 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3423 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3440 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3460 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3476 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3490 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3728 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3728 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3733 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3743 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3749 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3762 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3764 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3782 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3784 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3798 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3828 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3845 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4186 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4453 days | 14% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4456 days | 14% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4458 days | 13% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4458 days | 11% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4497 days | 14% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4512 days | 14% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4526 days | 14% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4819 days | 14% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4825 days | 14% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4825 days | 14% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4826 days | 6% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4854 days | 14% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4854 days | 14% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4857 days | 14% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4857 days | 14% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4858 days | 13% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4876 days | 14% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4909 days | 14% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4928 days | 14% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4939 days | 14% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4947 days | 14% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5182 days | 14% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5202 days | 14% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5210 days | 14% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5211 days | 14% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5211 days | 14% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5211 days | 14% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5215 days | 14% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5215 days | 14% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5215 days | 14% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5217 days | 14% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5221 days | 14% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5224 days | 14% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5225 days | 14% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5227 days | 14% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5229 days | 14% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5229 days | 14% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5232 days | 14% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5236 days | 14% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5239 days | 13% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5257 days | 13% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5275 days | 14% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5315 days | 14% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5318 days | 14% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5336 days | 14% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5539 days | 14% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5555 days | 14% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5563 days | 14% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5564 days | 14% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5566 days | 14% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5566 days | 14% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5568 days | 14% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5571 days | 14% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5575 days | 14% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5575 days | 14% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5578 days | 14% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5579 days | 14% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5582 days | 14% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5582 days | 14% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5586 days | 14% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5587 days | 14% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5588 days | 14% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5588 days | 14% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5594 days | 11% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5594 days | 14% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5595 days | 14% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5596 days | 13% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5596 days | 14% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5597 days | 13% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5599 days | 14% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5602 days | 14% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5604 days | 14% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5606 days | 14% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5606 days | 14% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5608 days | 14% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5671 days | 14% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5701 days | 14% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5732 days | 14% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5824 days | 14% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5880 days | 14% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5893 days | 14% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5915 days | 14% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5927 days | 14% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5928 days | 13% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5932 days | 14% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5933 days | 14% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5946 days | 14% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5947 days | 14% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5952 days | 14% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5956 days | 13% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5967 days | 14% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5974 days | 14% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5980 days | 13% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5983 days | 14% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6005 days | 9% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6005 days | 14% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6020 days | 14% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6020 days | 14% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6021 days | 14% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6024 days | 14% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6029 days | 14% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6034 days | 14% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6036 days | 14% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6036 days | 14% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6038 days | 14% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6040 days | 14% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6044 days | 14% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6044 days | 14% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6047 days | 14% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6048 days | 14% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6062 days | 14% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6066 days | 14% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6081 days | 14% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6127 days | 14% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6149 days | 14% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6162 days | 14% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6189 days | 14% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6280 days | 14% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6281 days | 14% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6281 days | 14% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6282 days | 14% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6284 days | 11% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6296 days | 14% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6296 days | 14% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6298 days | 14% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6298 days | 14% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6303 days | 14% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6305 days | 14% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6306 days | 14% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6306 days | 14% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6311 days | 14% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6311 days | 14% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6311 days | 14% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6312 days | 14% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6314 days | 14% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6314 days | 14% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6316 days | 14% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6318 days | 14% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6321 days | 14% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6323 days | 14% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6325 days | 14% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6328 days | 14% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6330 days | 14% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6330 days | 14% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6337 days | 14% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6342 days | 14% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6343 days | 14% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6344 days | 14% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6344 days | 14% |
| John | 9/10 | 6349 days | 14% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6352 days | 14% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6353 days | 14% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6360 days | 14% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6361 days | 14% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6364 days | 14% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6366 days | 14% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6370 days | 14% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6383 days | 11% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6389 days | 14% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6393 days | 14% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6398 days | 14% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6398 days | 14% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6402 days | 14% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6408 days | 14% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6414 days | 14% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6418 days | 14% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6436 days | 14% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6445 days | 14% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6447 days | 14% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6453 days | 14% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6454 days | 14% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6462 days | 14% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6477 days | 14% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6477 days | 14% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6490 days | 14% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6498 days | 14% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6515 days | 14% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6528 days | 14% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6532 days | 14% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6652 days | 14% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6660 days | 14% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6663 days | 14% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6677 days | 14% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6692 days | 13% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6694 days | 14% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6699 days | 14% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6716 days | 14% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6755 days | 14% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6758 days | 14% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6761 days | 14% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6765 days | 14% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7015 days | 14% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7017 days | 14% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7024 days | 14% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7045 days | 14% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7045 days | 14% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7046 days | 9% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7050 days | 9% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7057 days | 14% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7058 days | 14% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7058 days | 14% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 113 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.24% |
| 198 | -2.26% |
| 199 | -2.27% |
| 200 | -2.28% |
| 201 | -2.29% |
| 202 | -2.30% |
| 203 | -2.31% |
| … | … |
1.46% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.