G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.63%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1482 days | 100% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2029 days | 39% |
Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 2960 days | 24% |
Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 2977 days | 23% |
Monique | 10/10 | 2994 days | 23% |
Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3014 days | 22% |
Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3030 days | 22% |
Danny | 10/10 | 3044 days | 22% |
Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3282 days | 18% |
Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3282 days | 18% |
Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3287 days | 18% |
Navina | 7/10 | 3297 days | 17% |
Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3303 days | 18% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3316 days | 18% |
Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3318 days | 17% |
Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3336 days | 17% |
Dorothy | 10/10 | 3338 days | 17% |
Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3352 days | 17% |
Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3382 days | 16% |
KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3399 days | 16% |
Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3740 days | 11% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4007 days | 6% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 4010 days | 6% |
Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4012 days | 6% |
Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4012 days | 5% |
Ennico | 10/10 | 4051 days | 5% |
Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4066 days | 5% |
Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4080 days | 5% |
Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
Rainer | 9/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4380 days | 6% |
Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4408 days | 8% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4408 days | 8% |
Raquel | 8/10 | 4411 days | 8% |
Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4411 days | 8% |
Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4412 days | 8% |
Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4430 days | 8% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4463 days | 9% |
M Natterser | 9/10 | 4482 days | 8% |
Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4493 days | 8% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4501 days | 9% |
Anna | 8/10 | 4736 days | 8% |
Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 4756 days | 8% |
Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 4764 days | 9% |
Richard Rite | 10/10 | 4765 days | 9% |
Alex Ross | 10/10 | 4765 days | 9% |
Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 4765 days | 8% |
sidcupjon | 9/10 | 4769 days | 8% |
kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 4769 days | 8% |
Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 4769 days | 8% |
Erik | 10/10 | 4771 days | 9% |
Brasier | 8/10 | 4775 days | 8% |
Harald | 8/10 | 4778 days | 8% |
Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 4779 days | 9% |
Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 4781 days | 8% |
Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 4783 days | 8% |
Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 4783 days | 8% |
Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 4786 days | 8% |
John Hughes | 9/10 | 4790 days | 8% |
Louis Smit | 7/10 | 4793 days | 8% |
Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 4811 days | 8% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4829 days | 8% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 4869 days | 8% |
Josh | 9/10 | 4872 days | 8% |
jule | 10/10 | 4890 days | 9% |
Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5093 days | 8% |
David Taylor | 9/10 | 5109 days | 8% |
Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5117 days | 9% |
Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5118 days | 8% |
Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5120 days | 8% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5120 days | 8% |
Jacob | 8/10 | 5122 days | 8% |
Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5125 days | 8% |
Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5129 days | 8% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5129 days | 8% |
Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5132 days | 8% |
E C Frans | 10/10 | 5133 days | 9% |
Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5136 days | 8% |
Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5136 days | 8% |
Cesar | 9/10 | 5140 days | 8% |
Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5141 days | 8% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5142 days | 8% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5142 days | 8% |
Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5148 days | 7% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5148 days | 9% |
John Brand | 8/10 | 5149 days | 8% |
Andy | 7/10 | 5150 days | 8% |
Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5150 days | 8% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5151 days | 8% |
Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5153 days | 8% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5156 days | 8% |
Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5158 days | 9% |
Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5160 days | 8% |
Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5160 days | 8% |
Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5162 days | 9% |
mmallen | 10/10 | 5225 days | 9% |
alku83 | 10/10 | 5255 days | 9% |
KAA | 10/10 | 5286 days | 9% |
penz | 9/10 | 5378 days | 8% |
koster | 9/10 | 5434 days | 8% |
BelindaT | 10/10 | 5447 days | 9% |
nuwee | 10/10 | 5469 days | 9% |
Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5481 days | 9% |
Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5482 days | 8% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5486 days | 8% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5487 days | 8% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5500 days | 8% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5501 days | 9% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5506 days | 8% |
M Sicard | 7/10 | 5510 days | 8% |
John Helle | 9/10 | 5521 days | 8% |
Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5528 days | 8% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5534 days | 8% |
Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5537 days | 9% |
Arran J | 5/10 | 5559 days | 6% |
Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5559 days | 8% |
csziegler | 10/10 | 5574 days | 9% |
katharinatum | 9/10 | 5574 days | 8% |
marcol | 9/10 | 5575 days | 8% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5578 days | 9% |
martint | 10/10 | 5583 days | 9% |
koellner | 9/10 | 5588 days | 8% |
The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5590 days | 9% |
alasiac | 10/10 | 5590 days | 9% |
Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5592 days | 9% |
kencook | 10/10 | 5594 days | 9% |
Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5598 days | 8% |
Deede K | 8/10 | 5598 days | 8% |
Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5601 days | 8% |
Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5602 days | 8% |
Tillener | 8/10 | 5616 days | 8% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5620 days | 8% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5635 days | 8% |
waters811 | 10/10 | 5681 days | 9% |
alanvn | 9/10 | 5703 days | 8% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5716 days | 8% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5743 days | 9% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5834 days | 9% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5835 days | 8% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5835 days | 9% |
KjellR | 8/10 | 5836 days | 8% |
Ronny | 6/10 | 5838 days | 7% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5850 days | 8% |
MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 5850 days | 9% |
NatasjaV | 9/10 | 5852 days | 8% |
JimmyK | 8/10 | 5852 days | 8% |
Joery | 9/10 | 5857 days | 8% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 5859 days | 8% |
robix | 9/10 | 5860 days | 8% |
Lynn White | 8/10 | 5860 days | 8% |
Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 5865 days | 9% |
amyd | 9/10 | 5865 days | 8% |
Tolsten | 10/10 | 5865 days | 9% |
Kelly | 8/10 | 5866 days | 8% |
Steven | 8/10 | 5868 days | 8% |
CarleyJ | 9/10 | 5868 days | 8% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5870 days | 9% |
Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 5872 days | 8% |
henriettalee | 8/10 | 5875 days | 8% |
IreneF | 9/10 | 5877 days | 8% |
FeliciaY | 9/10 | 5879 days | 8% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 5882 days | 9% |
Carly | 9/10 | 5884 days | 8% |
Conway | 9/10 | 5884 days | 8% |
niall stephenson | 10/10 | 5891 days | 9% |
Camilia | 9/10 | 5896 days | 8% |
De Kievit | 8/10 | 5897 days | 8% |
Klalis | 10/10 | 5898 days | 9% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5898 days | 9% |
John | 9/10 | 5903 days | 8% |
Foost | 8/10 | 5906 days | 8% |
Rosa | 9/10 | 5907 days | 8% |
LeaciaS | 8/10 | 5914 days | 8% |
PhillS | 8/10 | 5915 days | 8% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 5918 days | 8% |
Ofer | 10/10 | 5920 days | 9% |
BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 5924 days | 8% |
JulianeH | 6/10 | 5937 days | 7% |
Priyanka | 10/10 | 5943 days | 9% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5947 days | 9% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5952 days | 9% |
Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 5952 days | 8% |
Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 5956 days | 9% |
Susie Wang | 10/10 | 5962 days | 9% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5968 days | 9% |
Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 5972 days | 9% |
angusb | 9/10 | 5990 days | 8% |
Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 5999 days | 8% |
Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6001 days | 8% |
Jessie | 10/10 | 6007 days | 9% |
Emilie | 10/10 | 6008 days | 9% |
HollyB | 10/10 | 6016 days | 9% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6031 days | 9% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 6031 days | 8% |
Michaela | 9/10 | 6044 days | 8% |
Katerina | 10/10 | 6052 days | 9% |
Gray | 9/10 | 6069 days | 8% |
Christine | 8/10 | 6082 days | 8% |
Christine | 8/10 | 6086 days | 8% |
Toby | 10/10 | 6206 days | 9% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 6214 days | 9% |
Stewart | 9/10 | 6217 days | 8% |
Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6231 days | 8% |
Jody | 7/10 | 6246 days | 8% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6248 days | 8% |
Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6253 days | 8% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 6270 days | 9% |
Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6309 days | 9% |
Lena | 8/10 | 6312 days | 8% |
Edwin | 9/10 | 6315 days | 8% |
caroline | 9/10 | 6319 days | 8% |
Stevenson | 10/10 | 6569 days | 9% |
Anita | 8/10 | 6571 days | 8% |
Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6578 days | 9% |
Berke | 10/10 | 6599 days | 9% |
Madeleine | 10/10 | 6599 days | 9% |
Rogier | 5/10 | 6600 days | 6% |
Wendy | 5/10 | 6604 days | 6% |
Sonja | 8/10 | 6611 days | 8% |
Hennielene | 9/10 | 6612 days | 8% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6612 days | 8% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.90% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 58 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.84% |
198 | -3.86% |
199 | -3.88% |
200 | -3.90% |
201 | -3.92% |
202 | -3.94% |
203 | -3.96% |
… | … |
1.68% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.