G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1753 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2300 days | 77% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3231 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3248 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3265 days | 41% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3285 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3301 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3315 days | 39% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3553 days | 30% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3553 days | 30% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3558 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3568 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3574 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3587 days | 29% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3589 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3607 days | 28% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3609 days | 28% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3623 days | 27% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3653 days | 26% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3670 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4011 days | 13% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4278 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4281 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4283 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4283 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4322 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4337 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4644 days | 18% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4650 days | 18% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4650 days | 18% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4651 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4679 days | 18% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4679 days | 18% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4682 days | 18% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4682 days | 18% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4683 days | 17% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4701 days | 18% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4734 days | 18% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4753 days | 18% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4764 days | 18% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4772 days | 18% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5007 days | 18% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5027 days | 18% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5035 days | 18% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5040 days | 18% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5040 days | 18% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5040 days | 18% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5042 days | 18% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5046 days | 18% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5049 days | 18% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5050 days | 18% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5052 days | 18% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5054 days | 18% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5054 days | 18% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5057 days | 18% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5061 days | 18% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5064 days | 17% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5082 days | 17% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5100 days | 18% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5140 days | 18% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5143 days | 18% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5161 days | 18% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5364 days | 18% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5380 days | 18% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5388 days | 18% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5389 days | 18% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5391 days | 18% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5391 days | 18% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5393 days | 18% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5396 days | 18% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5400 days | 18% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5400 days | 18% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5403 days | 18% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5404 days | 18% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5407 days | 18% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5407 days | 18% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5411 days | 18% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5412 days | 18% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5413 days | 18% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5413 days | 18% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5419 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5419 days | 18% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5420 days | 18% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5421 days | 17% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5421 days | 18% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5422 days | 17% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5424 days | 18% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5427 days | 18% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5429 days | 18% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5431 days | 18% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5431 days | 18% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5433 days | 18% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5496 days | 18% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5526 days | 18% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5557 days | 18% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5649 days | 18% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5705 days | 18% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5718 days | 18% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5740 days | 18% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5752 days | 18% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5753 days | 17% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5757 days | 18% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5758 days | 18% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5771 days | 18% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5772 days | 18% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5777 days | 18% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5781 days | 17% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5792 days | 18% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5799 days | 18% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5805 days | 17% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5808 days | 18% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5830 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5830 days | 18% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5845 days | 18% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5845 days | 18% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5846 days | 18% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5849 days | 18% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5854 days | 18% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5859 days | 18% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5861 days | 18% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5861 days | 18% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5863 days | 18% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5865 days | 18% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5869 days | 18% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5869 days | 18% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5872 days | 18% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5873 days | 18% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5887 days | 18% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5891 days | 18% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5906 days | 18% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5952 days | 18% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5974 days | 18% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5987 days | 18% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6014 days | 18% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6105 days | 18% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6106 days | 18% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6107 days | 18% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6107 days | 18% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6109 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6121 days | 18% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6121 days | 18% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6123 days | 18% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6123 days | 18% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6128 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6130 days | 18% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6131 days | 18% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6131 days | 18% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6136 days | 18% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6136 days | 18% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6136 days | 18% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6137 days | 18% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6139 days | 18% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6139 days | 18% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6141 days | 18% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6143 days | 18% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6146 days | 18% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6148 days | 18% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6150 days | 18% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6153 days | 18% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6155 days | 18% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6155 days | 18% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6162 days | 18% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6167 days | 18% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6169 days | 18% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6169 days | 18% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6169 days | 18% |
| John | 9/10 | 6174 days | 18% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6177 days | 18% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6178 days | 18% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6185 days | 18% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6186 days | 18% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6189 days | 18% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6191 days | 18% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6195 days | 18% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6208 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6214 days | 18% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6218 days | 18% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6223 days | 18% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6223 days | 18% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6227 days | 18% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6233 days | 18% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6239 days | 18% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6243 days | 18% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6261 days | 18% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6270 days | 18% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6272 days | 18% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6278 days | 18% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6279 days | 18% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6287 days | 18% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6302 days | 18% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6303 days | 18% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6315 days | 18% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6323 days | 18% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6340 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6353 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6357 days | 18% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6477 days | 18% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6485 days | 18% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6488 days | 18% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6502 days | 18% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6517 days | 17% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6519 days | 18% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6524 days | 18% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6541 days | 18% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6580 days | 18% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6583 days | 18% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6586 days | 18% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6590 days | 18% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6840 days | 18% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6842 days | 18% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6849 days | 18% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6870 days | 18% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6870 days | 18% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6871 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6875 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6882 days | 18% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6883 days | 18% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6883 days | 18% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.