G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.03%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1358 days | 100% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 1905 days | 28% |
Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 2836 days | 17% |
Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 2853 days | 17% |
Monique | 10/10 | 2870 days | 17% |
Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 2890 days | 16% |
Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 2906 days | 16% |
Danny | 10/10 | 2920 days | 16% |
Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3158 days | 14% |
Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3158 days | 14% |
Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3163 days | 13% |
Navina | 7/10 | 3173 days | 13% |
Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3179 days | 13% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3192 days | 13% |
Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3194 days | 12% |
Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3213 days | 13% |
Dorothy | 10/10 | 3214 days | 13% |
Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3228 days | 13% |
Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3258 days | 12% |
KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3275 days | 12% |
Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3616 days | 8% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 3883 days | 5% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 3886 days | 5% |
Penny Lee | 7/10 | 3888 days | 5% |
Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 3888 days | 5% |
Ennico | 10/10 | 3927 days | 5% |
Becky Davis | 9/10 | 3942 days | 5% |
Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 3956 days | 5% |
Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4249 days | 1% |
Rainer | 9/10 | 4255 days | 1% |
Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4255 days | 1% |
Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4256 days | 1% |
Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4284 days | 1% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4284 days | 1% |
Raquel | 8/10 | 4287 days | 1% |
Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4287 days | 1% |
Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4288 days | 1% |
Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4306 days | 1% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 9/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Anna | 8/10 | 4612 days | 6% |
Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 4632 days | 6% |
Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 4640 days | 6% |
Richard Rite | 10/10 | 4641 days | 6% |
Alex Ross | 10/10 | 4641 days | 6% |
Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 4641 days | 6% |
sidcupjon | 9/10 | 4645 days | 6% |
kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 4645 days | 6% |
Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 4645 days | 6% |
Erik | 10/10 | 4647 days | 6% |
Brasier | 8/10 | 4651 days | 6% |
Harald | 8/10 | 4654 days | 6% |
Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 4655 days | 6% |
Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 4657 days | 6% |
Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 4659 days | 6% |
Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 4659 days | 6% |
Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 4662 days | 6% |
John Hughes | 9/10 | 4666 days | 6% |
Louis Smit | 7/10 | 4669 days | 5% |
Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 4687 days | 5% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4705 days | 6% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 4745 days | 6% |
Josh | 9/10 | 4748 days | 6% |
jule | 10/10 | 4766 days | 6% |
Res Kormann | 8/10 | 4969 days | 6% |
David Taylor | 9/10 | 4985 days | 6% |
Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 4993 days | 6% |
Helen Evans | 9/10 | 4994 days | 6% |
Mark Vass | 8/10 | 4996 days | 6% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 4996 days | 6% |
Jacob | 8/10 | 4998 days | 6% |
Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5001 days | 6% |
Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5005 days | 6% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5005 days | 6% |
Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5008 days | 6% |
E C Frans | 10/10 | 5009 days | 6% |
Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5012 days | 6% |
Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5012 days | 6% |
Cesar | 9/10 | 5016 days | 6% |
Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5017 days | 6% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5018 days | 6% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5018 days | 6% |
Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5024 days | 5% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5024 days | 6% |
John Brand | 8/10 | 5025 days | 6% |
Andy | 7/10 | 5026 days | 5% |
Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5026 days | 6% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5027 days | 5% |
Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5029 days | 6% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5032 days | 6% |
Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5034 days | 6% |
Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5036 days | 6% |
Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5036 days | 6% |
Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5038 days | 6% |
mmallen | 10/10 | 5101 days | 6% |
alku83 | 10/10 | 5131 days | 6% |
KAA | 10/10 | 5162 days | 6% |
penz | 9/10 | 5254 days | 6% |
koster | 9/10 | 5310 days | 6% |
BelindaT | 10/10 | 5323 days | 6% |
nuwee | 10/10 | 5345 days | 6% |
Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5357 days | 6% |
Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5358 days | 5% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5362 days | 6% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5363 days | 6% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5376 days | 6% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5377 days | 6% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5382 days | 6% |
M Sicard | 7/10 | 5386 days | 5% |
John Helle | 9/10 | 5397 days | 6% |
Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5404 days | 6% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5410 days | 5% |
Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5413 days | 6% |
Arran J | 5/10 | 5435 days | 4% |
Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5435 days | 6% |
csziegler | 10/10 | 5450 days | 6% |
katharinatum | 9/10 | 5450 days | 6% |
marcol | 9/10 | 5451 days | 6% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5454 days | 6% |
martint | 10/10 | 5459 days | 6% |
koellner | 9/10 | 5464 days | 6% |
The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5466 days | 6% |
alasiac | 10/10 | 5466 days | 6% |
Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5468 days | 6% |
kencook | 10/10 | 5470 days | 6% |
Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5474 days | 6% |
Deede K | 8/10 | 5474 days | 6% |
Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5477 days | 6% |
Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5478 days | 6% |
Tillener | 8/10 | 5492 days | 6% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5496 days | 6% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5511 days | 6% |
waters811 | 10/10 | 5557 days | 6% |
alanvn | 9/10 | 5579 days | 6% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5592 days | 6% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5619 days | 6% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5710 days | 6% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5711 days | 6% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5712 days | 6% |
KjellR | 8/10 | 5712 days | 6% |
Ronny | 6/10 | 5714 days | 5% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5726 days | 6% |
MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 5726 days | 6% |
NatasjaV | 9/10 | 5728 days | 6% |
JimmyK | 8/10 | 5728 days | 6% |
Joery | 9/10 | 5734 days | 6% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 5736 days | 6% |
robix | 9/10 | 5736 days | 6% |
Lynn White | 8/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 5741 days | 6% |
amyd | 9/10 | 5741 days | 6% |
Tolsten | 10/10 | 5742 days | 6% |
Kelly | 8/10 | 5743 days | 6% |
Steven | 8/10 | 5744 days | 6% |
CarleyJ | 9/10 | 5744 days | 6% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5747 days | 6% |
Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 5749 days | 6% |
henriettalee | 8/10 | 5752 days | 6% |
IreneF | 9/10 | 5753 days | 6% |
FeliciaY | 9/10 | 5755 days | 6% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 5759 days | 6% |
Carly | 9/10 | 5761 days | 6% |
Conway | 9/10 | 5761 days | 6% |
niall stephenson | 10/10 | 5767 days | 6% |
Camilia | 9/10 | 5772 days | 6% |
De Kievit | 8/10 | 5774 days | 6% |
Klalis | 10/10 | 5775 days | 6% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5775 days | 6% |
John | 9/10 | 5780 days | 6% |
Foost | 8/10 | 5782 days | 6% |
Rosa | 9/10 | 5784 days | 6% |
LeaciaS | 8/10 | 5790 days | 6% |
PhillS | 8/10 | 5791 days | 6% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 5795 days | 6% |
Ofer | 10/10 | 5797 days | 6% |
BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 5800 days | 6% |
JulianeH | 6/10 | 5813 days | 5% |
Priyanka | 10/10 | 5819 days | 6% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5824 days | 6% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5829 days | 6% |
Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 5829 days | 6% |
Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 5833 days | 6% |
Susie Wang | 10/10 | 5838 days | 6% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5845 days | 6% |
Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 5849 days | 6% |
angusb | 9/10 | 5866 days | 6% |
Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 5875 days | 6% |
Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 5877 days | 6% |
Jessie | 10/10 | 5884 days | 6% |
Emilie | 10/10 | 5885 days | 6% |
HollyB | 10/10 | 5892 days | 6% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5908 days | 6% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 5908 days | 6% |
Michaela | 9/10 | 5921 days | 6% |
Katerina | 10/10 | 5929 days | 6% |
Gray | 9/10 | 5946 days | 6% |
Christine | 8/10 | 5959 days | 6% |
Christine | 8/10 | 5962 days | 6% |
Toby | 10/10 | 6082 days | 6% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 6090 days | 6% |
Stewart | 9/10 | 6093 days | 6% |
Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6107 days | 6% |
Jody | 7/10 | 6122 days | 5% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6124 days | 6% |
Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6129 days | 6% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 6146 days | 6% |
Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6185 days | 6% |
Lena | 8/10 | 6188 days | 6% |
Edwin | 9/10 | 6191 days | 6% |
caroline | 9/10 | 6195 days | 6% |
Stevenson | 10/10 | 6445 days | 6% |
Anita | 8/10 | 6447 days | 6% |
Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6454 days | 6% |
Berke | 10/10 | 6475 days | 6% |
Madeleine | 10/10 | 6475 days | 6% |
Rogier | 5/10 | 6476 days | 4% |
Wendy | 5/10 | 6480 days | 4% |
Sonja | 8/10 | 6487 days | 6% |
Hennielene | 9/10 | 6488 days | 6% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6488 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.97% |
198 | -3.99% |
199 | -4.01% |
200 | -4.03% |
201 | -4.05% |
202 | -4.07% |
203 | -4.09% |
… | … |
1.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.