Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1752 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2299 days | 77% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3230 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3247 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3264 days | 41% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3284 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3300 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3314 days | 39% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3552 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3552 days | 30% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3557 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3567 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3573 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3586 days | 29% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3588 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3606 days | 28% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3608 days | 28% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3622 days | 27% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3652 days | 26% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3669 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4010 days | 13% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4277 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4280 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4282 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4282 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4321 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4336 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4643 days | 18% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4649 days | 18% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4649 days | 18% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4650 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4678 days | 18% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4678 days | 18% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4681 days | 18% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4681 days | 18% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4682 days | 17% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4700 days | 18% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4733 days | 18% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4752 days | 18% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4763 days | 18% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4771 days | 18% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5006 days | 18% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5026 days | 18% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5034 days | 18% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5035 days | 18% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5035 days | 18% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5035 days | 18% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5039 days | 18% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5039 days | 18% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5039 days | 18% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5041 days | 18% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5045 days | 18% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5048 days | 18% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5049 days | 18% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5051 days | 18% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5053 days | 18% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5053 days | 18% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5056 days | 18% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5060 days | 18% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5063 days | 17% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5081 days | 17% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5099 days | 18% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5139 days | 18% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5142 days | 18% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5160 days | 18% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5363 days | 18% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5379 days | 18% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5387 days | 18% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5388 days | 18% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5390 days | 18% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5390 days | 18% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5392 days | 18% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5395 days | 18% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5399 days | 18% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5399 days | 18% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5402 days | 18% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5403 days | 18% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5406 days | 18% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5406 days | 18% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5410 days | 18% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5411 days | 18% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5412 days | 18% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5412 days | 18% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5418 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5418 days | 18% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5419 days | 18% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5420 days | 17% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5420 days | 18% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5421 days | 17% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5423 days | 18% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5426 days | 18% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5428 days | 18% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5430 days | 18% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5430 days | 18% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5432 days | 18% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5495 days | 18% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5525 days | 18% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5556 days | 18% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5648 days | 18% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5704 days | 18% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5717 days | 18% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5739 days | 18% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5751 days | 18% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5752 days | 17% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5756 days | 18% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5757 days | 18% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5770 days | 18% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5771 days | 18% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5776 days | 18% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5780 days | 17% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5791 days | 18% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5798 days | 18% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5804 days | 17% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5807 days | 18% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5829 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5829 days | 18% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5844 days | 18% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5844 days | 18% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5845 days | 18% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5848 days | 18% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5853 days | 18% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5858 days | 18% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5860 days | 18% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5860 days | 18% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5862 days | 18% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5864 days | 18% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5868 days | 18% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5868 days | 18% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5871 days | 18% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5872 days | 18% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5886 days | 18% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5890 days | 18% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5905 days | 18% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5951 days | 18% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5973 days | 18% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5986 days | 18% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6013 days | 18% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6104 days | 18% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6104 days | 18% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6105 days | 18% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6106 days | 18% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6108 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6120 days | 18% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6120 days | 18% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6122 days | 18% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6122 days | 18% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6127 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6129 days | 18% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6130 days | 18% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6130 days | 18% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6135 days | 18% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6135 days | 18% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6135 days | 18% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6136 days | 18% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6140 days | 18% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6142 days | 18% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6145 days | 18% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6147 days | 18% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6149 days | 18% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6152 days | 18% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6154 days | 18% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6154 days | 18% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6161 days | 18% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6166 days | 18% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6167 days | 18% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6168 days | 18% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6168 days | 18% |
| John | 9/10 | 6173 days | 18% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6176 days | 18% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6177 days | 18% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6184 days | 18% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6185 days | 18% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6188 days | 18% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6190 days | 18% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6194 days | 18% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6207 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6213 days | 18% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6217 days | 18% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6222 days | 18% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6222 days | 18% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6226 days | 18% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6232 days | 18% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6238 days | 18% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6242 days | 18% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6260 days | 18% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6268 days | 18% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6270 days | 18% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6277 days | 18% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6278 days | 18% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6286 days | 18% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6301 days | 18% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6301 days | 18% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6314 days | 18% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6322 days | 18% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6339 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6352 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6356 days | 18% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6476 days | 18% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6484 days | 18% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6487 days | 18% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6501 days | 18% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6516 days | 17% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6518 days | 18% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6523 days | 18% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6540 days | 18% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6579 days | 18% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6582 days | 18% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6585 days | 18% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6589 days | 18% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6839 days | 18% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6841 days | 18% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6848 days | 18% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6869 days | 18% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6869 days | 18% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6870 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6874 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6881 days | 18% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6882 days | 18% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6882 days | 18% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.