Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for New Zealand Frontiers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
226 Valid Reviews
The New Zealand Frontiers experience has a total of 249 reviews. There are 226 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 23 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 226 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 204 |
|
90% |
9/10 | 22 |
|
10% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the New Zealand Frontiers valid reviews is 99.03% and is based on 226 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 226 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
9/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the New Zealand Frontiers face-to-face reviews is 95.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
99.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Joshua Morris | 10/10 | 96 days | 100% |
O Evans | 10/10 | 1710 days | 6% |
Jenny Barkley | 10/10 | 1740 days | 5% |
Colin Ferrington | 10/10 | 1832 days | 5% |
ARTHUR ROBERTS UK | 10/10 | 1832 days | 5% |
Bryan Y. | 10/10 | 1832 days | 5% |
Marie-Dominique King | 10/10 | 1861 days | 5% |
Georgia | 10/10 | 1892 days | 5% |
Will Bernard and Ciara O'Donnell | 10/10 | 1892 days | 5% |
Norbert | 10/10 | 1953 days | 5% |
Robert van de Wetering | 10/10 | 1953 days | 5% |
Piotr and Magda | 10/10 | 1953 days | 5% |
Clive Browning | 10/10 | 2014 days | 5% |
Darren Looker | 10/10 | 2137 days | 4% |
Cliff LaPlant | 10/10 | 2167 days | 4% |
Cathy and Kevin - UK | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
Simon and Julie | 9/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Elizabeth Kenn | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Juliet Woodman | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Rob and Leslie, Oregon USA | 10/10 | 2318 days | 4% |
Dina & Craig from Toronto | 10/10 | 2318 days | 4% |
Sue & Andy Millard | 10/10 | 2318 days | 4% |
Verena and Eduard | 10/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
Jamie Roberts | 10/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
julie frost | 10/10 | 2532 days | 4% |
Armando | 10/10 | 2532 days | 4% |
Brian Parsons | 10/10 | 2563 days | 4% |
Bruce W | 10/10 | 2563 days | 4% |
Alexander | 10/10 | 2591 days | 3% |
Helen Flanagan | 10/10 | 2591 days | 3% |
Martyn Chambers | 10/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
David Jenen | 10/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
Don Wilkes | 10/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
Andrew Jose | 10/10 | 2653 days | 3% |
Jay Lawton | 10/10 | 2653 days | 3% |
John McCready | 10/10 | 2806 days | 3% |
John Graham | 9/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
julie frost | 10/10 | 2956 days | 3% |
Timo Herzel | 10/10 | 3079 days | 3% |
Christopher Käufer | 10/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
Nefyn Provis-Evans | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
Bill Kan | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
Sandy | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
Robin Hewson | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
Karen and Paul | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3303 days | 1% |
Jack Bryniarski | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
Randy and Kim | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
sgtbean | 10/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
Mark Freitas | 10/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
andrea campo | 10/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
Hernan Chaves | 10/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
Tiggy Booth-Jones | 10/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
Farid Baharuddin | 10/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
Elise Lau | 10/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
Gayle Campbell | 10/10 | 3414 days | 2% |
Tim Blong | 10/10 | 3475 days | 2% |
Will Waine | 10/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
Jason C | 10/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
Alan Largue | 10/10 | 3598 days | 1% |
Susie Ides | 10/10 | 3598 days | 1% |
Michael Wagner | 10/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
Bob Large | 10/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
david watson | 10/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
john McManus | 10/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
Jennie Lamb | 10/10 | 3687 days | 1% |
Robyn Lancaster | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Matt Sparkes | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Chris Hindley | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
andrew Pullan | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Bev abrahall | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Wils | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Linda Fargher | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Fabio Lentini | 10/10 | 3749 days | 1% |
Lauren M | 10/10 | 3749 days | 1% |
Judy Lambert | 10/10 | 3779 days | 1% |
Jan Compton | 10/10 | 3779 days | 1% |
Phil & Lin Wilde | 10/10 | 3810 days | 1% |
Lester Adams | 10/10 | 3810 days | 1% |
Ruth Hyslop | 10/10 | 3840 days | 1% |
Andrew Main | 10/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
Marcos AG | 10/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
Benjamin Salazar | 10/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
Mieke_Jacko | 10/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
Philip Worby | 9/10 | 4024 days | 1% |
Deb & Craig | 9/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
Stephen Clark | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
Carol Seward | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
Frank Wölfel | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
Ann Barrett | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
James Capel | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
Roger McCabe | 10/10 | 4083 days | 1% |
Miles Chisholm | 10/10 | 4083 days | 1% |
andreas wolf | 10/10 | 4114 days | 0% |
Brian | 10/10 | 4144 days | 0% |
Jordan M | 10/10 | 4144 days | 0% |
KATHLEEN CUNEY | 10/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
Patrick Shapland | 10/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
Arthur W | 10/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
Joan Kelley | 10/10 | 4205 days | 0% |
David Johns | 10/10 | 4205 days | 0% |
Bronwyn Cikuts | 10/10 | 4205 days | 0% |
Mel Catlin | 10/10 | 4236 days | 0% |
Gary Kerr | 10/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
matt_ellington | 10/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
Dorien Broothaerts | 10/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
Anthony Smith | 10/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
Julian Roots | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Elke + Holger | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
lynandsimon | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Helen Grant | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Mike McG | 10/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
Hans Zima | 10/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
william harrison | 10/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
Al Campbell | 10/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
heyjude | 10/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
Nils Andersson | 10/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
Andrew Crow | 9/10 | 4479 days | 1% |
barbequeman | 10/10 | 4509 days | 1% |
Chillingworth | 9/10 | 4509 days | 1% |
ianscubadiver | 10/10 | 4509 days | 1% |
stefael | 10/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
markchiller | 9/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
liamandkat2012 | 10/10 | 4632 days | 1% |
danielthembawhite | 10/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
jodel | 9/10 | 4693 days | 1% |
Tramper49 | 10/10 | 4723 days | 1% |
TheHoon | 9/10 | 4723 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 9/10 | 4751 days | 1% |
royb | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
tmdilly | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
mkkbven | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
JML | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
bedards | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
Chattykathy | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
Dazler | 9/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
elaineandbob | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
Edeeee | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
darylw | 9/10 | 4814 days | 1% |
Robeliza | 9/10 | 4814 days | 1% |
kiwihaus | 10/10 | 4814 days | 1% |
jenny | 9/10 | 4814 days | 1% |
fms95032 | 10/10 | 4845 days | 1% |
theoverlander | 10/10 | 4906 days | 1% |
sharons0 | 10/10 | 4906 days | 1% |
Sally_Watson | 10/10 | 4906 days | 1% |
Tonyb436 | 10/10 | 4906 days | 1% |
Wenny Yap | 10/10 | 4936 days | 1% |
garethd1980 | 10/10 | 4936 days | 1% |
jodienblue | 10/10 | 4967 days | 1% |
Discen | 10/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
Cookie | 9/10 | 5059 days | 1% |
Marylyn | 10/10 | 5059 days | 1% |
mcatlin | 10/10 | 5059 days | 1% |
GWHarris | 10/10 | 5089 days | 1% |
davidfrances | 10/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
TraceyE | 10/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
Nancycox | 10/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
Kensa | 10/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
roasty | 10/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
WGregory | 10/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
HighlandLassie | 10/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
trar | 10/10 | 5179 days | 1% |
AlexM | 10/10 | 5210 days | 1% |
alixgibson | 9/10 | 5210 days | 1% |
Jaap | 9/10 | 5240 days | 1% |
millar | 10/10 | 5240 days | 1% |
Hummpj | 10/10 | 5240 days | 1% |
ARLENE | 10/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
fittock | 10/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
stinfamily | 10/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
jimwood | 9/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
Jem2378 | 10/10 | 5332 days | 1% |
cornishcouple | 10/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
lorrainej | 10/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
PeteandEm | 10/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
Roodinthehouse | 10/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
Paul Roberts | 10/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
Alan Howe | 10/10 | 5505 days | 1% |
Martina Olley | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
jorgewoods2000 | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
BevM | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
cosic1 | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
Stephen O'Connor | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
Kent ONeill | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
Elin McCallum | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
fionaanddaveare | 10/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
Carlos Grana | 10/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
Ian Shaw | 10/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
Jerry | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
Lisa Brooks | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
Philip Worby | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
pyxxel | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
JimTheCanuck | 10/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
JANOT Gerard | 10/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
TonyS | 10/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
cal knight | 10/10 | 5697 days | 1% |
John Robinson | 10/10 | 5697 days | 1% |
helmet_p | 10/10 | 5697 days | 1% |
sue dobbs | 10/10 | 5697 days | 1% |
Ashley McGee | 10/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
GusCrotty | 10/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
Robin | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
skent | 9/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
David Clarke | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
Ed | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
ian_s | 10/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
Graham | 9/10 | 5840 days | 1% |
Tony Pearson | 10/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
Adrian | 10/10 | 5850 days | 1% |
yvonne_and_leon | 10/10 | 5850 days | 1% |
Brian Etheridge | 10/10 | 5851 days | 1% |
Jan Emrick | 10/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
Roberto Mazumdar | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
Alan Morris | 10/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
Dave739 | 10/10 | 5917 days | 1% |
Carole Leonard | 10/10 | 5940 days | 1% |
bugs | 10/10 | 5940 days | 1% |
Peter_C | 10/10 | 5957 days | 1% |
Jeff Kotz | 10/10 | 5960 days | 1% |
Dave Carlyle | 10/10 | 5961 days | 1% |
George (Harry) Beardow | 10/10 | 5971 days | 1% |
Peter Peterson | 10/10 | 6041 days | 1% |
Jen | 10/10 | 6589 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The New Zealand Frontiers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.59% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 56 days. The New Zealand Frontiers experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
---|---|
0 | -3.00% |
1 | -2.63% |
2 | -1.50% |
3 | -0.38% |
4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The New Zealand Frontiers experience has been adjusted for 78 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
75 | -1.52% |
76 | -1.55% |
77 | -1.57% |
78 | -1.59% |
79 | -1.61% |
80 | -1.63% |
81 | -1.65% |
… | … |
0.45% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.