Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for New Zealand Frontiers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
225 Valid Reviews
The New Zealand Frontiers experience has a total of 248 reviews. There are 225 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 23 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 225 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 203 |
|
90% |
9/10 | 22 |
|
10% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.02% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the New Zealand Frontiers valid reviews is 99.02% and is based on 225 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 225 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
9/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the New Zealand Frontiers face-to-face reviews is 95.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
99.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
O Evans | 10/10 | 1542 days | 100% |
Jenny Barkley | 10/10 | 1572 days | 90% |
Colin Ferrington | 10/10 | 1664 days | 67% |
ARTHUR ROBERTS UK | 10/10 | 1664 days | 67% |
Bryan Y. | 10/10 | 1664 days | 67% |
Marie-Dominique King | 10/10 | 1693 days | 62% |
Georgia | 10/10 | 1724 days | 58% |
Will Bernard and Ciara O'Donnell | 10/10 | 1724 days | 58% |
Norbert | 10/10 | 1784 days | 53% |
Robert van de Wetering | 10/10 | 1785 days | 53% |
Piotr and Magda | 10/10 | 1785 days | 53% |
Clive Browning | 10/10 | 1846 days | 51% |
Darren Looker | 10/10 | 1969 days | 49% |
Cliff LaPlant | 10/10 | 1999 days | 48% |
Cathy and Kevin - UK | 10/10 | 2058 days | 47% |
Simon and Julie | 9/10 | 2089 days | 46% |
Elizabeth Kenn | 10/10 | 2089 days | 46% |
Juliet Woodman | 10/10 | 2089 days | 46% |
Rob and Leslie, Oregon USA | 10/10 | 2150 days | 45% |
Dina & Craig from Toronto | 10/10 | 2150 days | 45% |
Sue & Andy Millard | 10/10 | 2150 days | 45% |
Verena and Eduard | 10/10 | 2273 days | 43% |
Jamie Roberts | 10/10 | 2273 days | 43% |
julie frost | 10/10 | 2364 days | 41% |
Armando | 10/10 | 2364 days | 41% |
Brian Parsons | 10/10 | 2395 days | 40% |
Bruce W | 10/10 | 2395 days | 40% |
Alexander | 10/10 | 2423 days | 40% |
Helen Flanagan | 10/10 | 2423 days | 40% |
Martyn Chambers | 10/10 | 2453 days | 39% |
David Jenen | 10/10 | 2453 days | 39% |
Don Wilkes | 10/10 | 2453 days | 39% |
Andrew Jose | 10/10 | 2484 days | 38% |
Jay Lawton | 10/10 | 2484 days | 38% |
John McCready | 10/10 | 2637 days | 35% |
John Graham | 9/10 | 2759 days | 32% |
julie frost | 10/10 | 2787 days | 32% |
Timo Herzel | 10/10 | 2910 days | 30% |
Christopher Käufer | 10/10 | 3093 days | 26% |
Nefyn Provis-Evans | 10/10 | 3124 days | 25% |
Bill Kan | 10/10 | 3124 days | 25% |
Sandy | 10/10 | 3124 days | 25% |
Robin Hewson | 10/10 | 3124 days | 25% |
Karen and Paul | 10/10 | 3125 days | 25% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3135 days | 14% |
Jack Bryniarski | 10/10 | 3153 days | 24% |
Randy and Kim | 10/10 | 3153 days | 24% |
sgtbean | 10/10 | 3184 days | 24% |
Mark Freitas | 10/10 | 3184 days | 24% |
andrea campo | 10/10 | 3184 days | 24% |
Hernan Chaves | 10/10 | 3184 days | 24% |
Tiggy Booth-Jones | 10/10 | 3185 days | 24% |
Farid Baharuddin | 10/10 | 3215 days | 23% |
Elise Lau | 10/10 | 3216 days | 23% |
Gayle Campbell | 10/10 | 3245 days | 23% |
Tim Blong | 10/10 | 3307 days | 21% |
Will Waine | 10/10 | 3337 days | 21% |
Jason C | 10/10 | 3337 days | 21% |
Alan Largue | 10/10 | 3429 days | 19% |
Susie Ides | 10/10 | 3430 days | 19% |
Michael Wagner | 10/10 | 3459 days | 18% |
Bob Large | 10/10 | 3459 days | 18% |
david watson | 10/10 | 3459 days | 18% |
john McManus | 10/10 | 3459 days | 18% |
Jennie Lamb | 10/10 | 3518 days | 17% |
Robyn Lancaster | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
Matt Sparkes | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
Chris Hindley | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
andrew Pullan | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
Bev abrahall | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
Wils | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
Linda Fargher | 10/10 | 3549 days | 16% |
Fabio Lentini | 10/10 | 3580 days | 16% |
Lauren M | 10/10 | 3580 days | 16% |
Judy Lambert | 10/10 | 3610 days | 15% |
Jan Compton | 10/10 | 3610 days | 15% |
Phil & Lin Wilde | 10/10 | 3641 days | 14% |
Lester Adams | 10/10 | 3641 days | 14% |
Ruth Hyslop | 10/10 | 3671 days | 14% |
Andrew Main | 10/10 | 3702 days | 13% |
Marcos AG | 10/10 | 3703 days | 13% |
Benjamin Salazar | 10/10 | 3795 days | 11% |
Mieke_Jacko | 10/10 | 3795 days | 11% |
Philip Worby | 9/10 | 3856 days | 10% |
Deb & Craig | 9/10 | 3884 days | 9% |
Stephen Clark | 10/10 | 3884 days | 9% |
Carol Seward | 10/10 | 3884 days | 9% |
Frank Wölfel | 10/10 | 3884 days | 9% |
Ann Barrett | 10/10 | 3884 days | 9% |
James Capel | 10/10 | 3884 days | 9% |
Roger McCabe | 10/10 | 3915 days | 9% |
Miles Chisholm | 10/10 | 3915 days | 9% |
andreas wolf | 10/10 | 3946 days | 8% |
Brian | 10/10 | 3976 days | 8% |
Jordan M | 10/10 | 3976 days | 8% |
KATHLEEN CUNEY | 10/10 | 4007 days | 7% |
Patrick Shapland | 10/10 | 4007 days | 7% |
Arthur W | 10/10 | 4007 days | 7% |
Joan Kelley | 10/10 | 4037 days | 6% |
David Johns | 10/10 | 4037 days | 6% |
Bronwyn Cikuts | 10/10 | 4037 days | 6% |
Mel Catlin | 10/10 | 4068 days | 6% |
Gary Kerr | 10/10 | 4099 days | 5% |
matt_ellington | 10/10 | 4129 days | 4% |
Dorien Broothaerts | 10/10 | 4160 days | 4% |
Anthony Smith | 10/10 | 4190 days | 3% |
Julian Roots | 10/10 | 4221 days | 2% |
Elke + Holger | 10/10 | 4221 days | 2% |
lynandsimon | 10/10 | 4221 days | 2% |
Helen Grant | 10/10 | 4221 days | 2% |
Mike McG | 10/10 | 4249 days | 2% |
Hans Zima | 10/10 | 4249 days | 2% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4249 days | 2% |
william harrison | 10/10 | 4280 days | 1% |
Al Campbell | 10/10 | 4280 days | 1% |
heyjude | 10/10 | 4280 days | 1% |
Nils Andersson | 10/10 | 4280 days | 1% |
Andrew Crow | 9/10 | 4311 days | 1% |
barbequeman | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Chillingworth | 9/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
ianscubadiver | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
stefael | 10/10 | 4433 days | 10% |
markchiller | 9/10 | 4433 days | 10% |
liamandkat2012 | 10/10 | 4464 days | 10% |
danielthembawhite | 10/10 | 4494 days | 10% |
jodel | 9/10 | 4525 days | 10% |
Tramper49 | 10/10 | 4555 days | 10% |
TheHoon | 9/10 | 4555 days | 10% |
Roy Barton | 9/10 | 4583 days | 5% |
royb | 10/10 | 4586 days | 10% |
tmdilly | 10/10 | 4586 days | 10% |
mkkbven | 10/10 | 4586 days | 10% |
JML | 10/10 | 4586 days | 10% |
bedards | 10/10 | 4615 days | 10% |
Chattykathy | 10/10 | 4615 days | 10% |
Dazler | 9/10 | 4615 days | 10% |
elaineandbob | 10/10 | 4615 days | 10% |
Edeeee | 10/10 | 4615 days | 10% |
darylw | 9/10 | 4646 days | 10% |
Robeliza | 9/10 | 4646 days | 10% |
kiwihaus | 10/10 | 4646 days | 10% |
jenny | 9/10 | 4646 days | 10% |
fms95032 | 10/10 | 4677 days | 10% |
theoverlander | 10/10 | 4738 days | 10% |
sharons0 | 10/10 | 4738 days | 10% |
Sally_Watson | 10/10 | 4738 days | 10% |
Tonyb436 | 10/10 | 4738 days | 10% |
Wenny Yap | 10/10 | 4768 days | 10% |
garethd1980 | 10/10 | 4768 days | 10% |
jodienblue | 10/10 | 4799 days | 10% |
Discen | 10/10 | 4860 days | 10% |
Cookie | 9/10 | 4891 days | 10% |
Marylyn | 10/10 | 4891 days | 10% |
mcatlin | 10/10 | 4891 days | 10% |
GWHarris | 10/10 | 4921 days | 10% |
davidfrances | 10/10 | 4952 days | 10% |
TraceyE | 10/10 | 4952 days | 10% |
Nancycox | 10/10 | 4952 days | 10% |
Kensa | 10/10 | 4952 days | 10% |
roasty | 10/10 | 4980 days | 10% |
WGregory | 10/10 | 4980 days | 10% |
HighlandLassie | 10/10 | 4980 days | 10% |
trar | 10/10 | 5011 days | 10% |
AlexM | 10/10 | 5042 days | 10% |
alixgibson | 9/10 | 5042 days | 10% |
Jaap | 9/10 | 5072 days | 10% |
millar | 10/10 | 5072 days | 10% |
Hummpj | 10/10 | 5072 days | 10% |
ARLENE | 10/10 | 5103 days | 10% |
fittock | 10/10 | 5103 days | 10% |
stinfamily | 10/10 | 5133 days | 10% |
jimwood | 9/10 | 5133 days | 10% |
Jem2378 | 10/10 | 5164 days | 10% |
cornishcouple | 10/10 | 5256 days | 10% |
lorrainej | 10/10 | 5286 days | 10% |
PeteandEm | 10/10 | 5286 days | 10% |
Roodinthehouse | 10/10 | 5286 days | 10% |
Paul Roberts | 10/10 | 5317 days | 10% |
Alan Howe | 10/10 | 5337 days | 6% |
Martina Olley | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
jorgewoods2000 | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
BevM | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
cosic1 | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
Stephen O'Connor | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
Kent ONeill | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
Elin McCallum | 10/10 | 5376 days | 10% |
fionaanddaveare | 10/10 | 5407 days | 10% |
Carlos Grana | 10/10 | 5407 days | 10% |
Ian Shaw | 10/10 | 5407 days | 10% |
Jerry | 10/10 | 5437 days | 10% |
Lisa Brooks | 10/10 | 5437 days | 10% |
Philip Worby | 10/10 | 5437 days | 10% |
pyxxel | 10/10 | 5437 days | 10% |
JimTheCanuck | 10/10 | 5468 days | 10% |
JANOT Gerard | 10/10 | 5468 days | 10% |
TonyS | 10/10 | 5468 days | 10% |
cal knight | 10/10 | 5529 days | 10% |
John Robinson | 10/10 | 5529 days | 10% |
helmet_p | 10/10 | 5529 days | 10% |
sue dobbs | 10/10 | 5529 days | 10% |
Ashley McGee | 10/10 | 5621 days | 10% |
GusCrotty | 10/10 | 5621 days | 10% |
Robin | 10/10 | 5651 days | 10% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 5651 days | 10% |
skent | 9/10 | 5651 days | 10% |
David Clarke | 10/10 | 5651 days | 10% |
Ed | 10/10 | 5651 days | 10% |
ian_s | 10/10 | 5656 days | 10% |
Graham | 9/10 | 5672 days | 10% |
Tony Pearson | 10/10 | 5673 days | 10% |
Adrian | 10/10 | 5682 days | 10% |
yvonne_and_leon | 10/10 | 5682 days | 10% |
Brian Etheridge | 10/10 | 5683 days | 10% |
Jan Emrick | 10/10 | 5697 days | 10% |
Roberto Mazumdar | 9/10 | 5698 days | 10% |
Alan Morris | 10/10 | 5699 days | 10% |
Dave739 | 10/10 | 5749 days | 10% |
Carole Leonard | 10/10 | 5772 days | 10% |
bugs | 10/10 | 5772 days | 10% |
Peter_C | 10/10 | 5788 days | 10% |
Jeff Kotz | 10/10 | 5792 days | 10% |
Dave Carlyle | 10/10 | 5793 days | 10% |
George (Harry) Beardow | 10/10 | 5803 days | 10% |
Peter Peterson | 10/10 | 5873 days | 10% |
Jen | 10/10 | 6421 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The New Zealand Frontiers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-6.05% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 74 days. The New Zealand Frontiers experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
---|---|
0 | -3.00% |
1 | -2.63% |
2 | -1.50% |
3 | -0.38% |
4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The New Zealand Frontiers experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.01% |
198 | -3.02% |
199 | -3.04% |
200 | -3.05% |
201 | -3.07% |
202 | -3.08% |
203 | -3.10% |
… | … |
0.61% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.