Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Apex Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
208 Valid Reviews
The Apex Rental Cars experience has a total of 232 reviews. There are 208 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 24 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 208 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 48 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 40 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 17 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 8 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 1/10 | 36 |
|
17% |
66.73% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars valid reviews is 66.73% and is based on 208 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
94 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 208 valid reviews, the experience has 94 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 34 |
|
36% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars face-to-face reviews is 82.45% and is based on 94 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
71.78%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB | 10/10 | 44 days | 100% |
| Ondrej | 1/10 | 654 days | 31% |
| Will | 1/10 | 683 days | 30% |
| Derek UK | 10/10 | 683 days | 73% |
| Barry | 3/10 | 745 days | 37% |
| Klm | 3/10 | 775 days | 36% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 806 days | 63% |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 806 days | 63% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 836 days | 60% |
| Melissa | 1/10 | 867 days | 23% |
| Nyah | 1/10 | 1020 days | 17% |
| David M | 3/10 | 1020 days | 23% |
| Karla, Sydney | 10/10 | 1201 days | 27% |
| Neville | 1/10 | 1385 days | 6% |
| A Tango | 10/10 | 1413 days | 15% |
| Nicholas Chin | 1/10 | 1536 days | 4% |
| Trista McLean | 10/10 | 1750 days | 5% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 1809 days | 5% |
| Kane | 1/10 | 1840 days | 2% |
| Melanie Brown | 8/10 | 1931 days | 5% |
| World Traveller | 1/10 | 1962 days | 2% |
| Dave Berry | 10/10 | 1962 days | 5% |
| RJ | 1/10 | 1962 days | 2% |
| R Woolley | 10/10 | 2115 days | 4% |
| Claire Wood | 10/10 | 2144 days | 4% |
| ALEKSANDROV Igor Avramovski | 1/10 | 2175 days | 2% |
| Luiz | 2/10 | 2175 days | 2% |
| Jorge | 1/10 | 2206 days | 2% |
| Adam Beevers | 3/10 | 2206 days | 2% |
| Megan | 1/10 | 2206 days | 2% |
| Marc | 3/10 | 2236 days | 2% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2236 days | 4% |
| Jacques | 1/10 | 2236 days | 2% |
| Janet | 10/10 | 2267 days | 4% |
| Shelby and Matt | 10/10 | 2267 days | 4% |
| Taki Green | 1/10 | 2297 days | 2% |
| Mel | 1/10 | 2297 days | 2% |
| David | 5/10 | 2297 days | 3% |
| JS | 1/10 | 2420 days | 1% |
| Yoke | 1/10 | 2450 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Gallant | 7/10 | 2450 days | 3% |
| Yvonne M Hackenberg | 10/10 | 2450 days | 4% |
| Miss T | 1/10 | 2450 days | 1% |
| Me | 1/10 | 2450 days | 1% |
| Mike Purchas | 2/10 | 2481 days | 2% |
| Gal | 1/10 | 2481 days | 1% |
| M Reeder | 2/10 | 2509 days | 2% |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2540 days | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2540 days | 3% |
| Reena Scobie | 1/10 | 2540 days | 1% |
| Bill Brennan | 9/10 | 2540 days | 3% |
| Jeff & Sharon | 2/10 | 2540 days | 2% |
| Craig | 5/10 | 2540 days | 3% |
| Mel B | 1/10 | 2540 days | 1% |
| David | 1/10 | 2540 days | 1% |
| JR WU | 2/10 | 2571 days | 2% |
| Kirstie Lilly | 10/10 | 2601 days | 3% |
| Arlene | 8/10 | 2662 days | 3% |
| Penny Mackay | 10/10 | 2662 days | 3% |
| Laura | 3/10 | 2724 days | 2% |
| Bharat | 10/10 | 2785 days | 3% |
| Gandalf | 4/10 | 2815 days | 2% |
| siti fatimah adnan | 10/10 | 2846 days | 3% |
| Katie | 1/10 | 2846 days | 1% |
| Giovanni | 5/10 | 2846 days | 2% |
| Aileen Davies | 2/10 | 2846 days | 1% |
| Nicola | 1/10 | 2846 days | 1% |
| Dane | 1/10 | 2846 days | 1% |
| David williams | 3/10 | 2846 days | 2% |
| Yan Xiao | 3/10 | 2846 days | 2% |
| Peter Dawkins | 10/10 | 2874 days | 3% |
| David | 2/10 | 2874 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 10/10 | 2905 days | 3% |
| You Joon Kim | 1/10 | 2905 days | 1% |
| Chris Monk | 8/10 | 2936 days | 3% |
| Helen Burgess | 2/10 | 2966 days | 1% |
| Carol Smith | 1/10 | 2966 days | 1% |
| Richard Hunter | 1/10 | 2966 days | 1% |
| peter hendry | 1/10 | 2997 days | 1% |
| Katharina Koch | 8/10 | 3223 days | 2% |
| Luna Tarius | 1/10 | 3239 days | 1% |
| Carly Biedul | 10/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Guillaume Deleuze | 6/10 | 3264 days | 2% |
| Brad Dean | 2/10 | 3270 days | 1% |
| dave car | 1/10 | 3270 days | 1% |
| Rhydian Templer | 8/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 3283 days | 2% |
| Nina Kaspar | 6/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| Silvia Hermosillo | 1/10 | 3301 days | 1% |
| Tony Algie | 8/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| diane wong | 8/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Maryanne Wardlaw | 2/10 | 3392 days | 1% |
| Hans Dersch | 1/10 | 3454 days | 1% |
| Kuldeep Nandurkar | 9/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
| Emily Noyd | 10/10 | 3564 days | 1% |
| Christofer Cronholm | 6/10 | 3605 days | 1% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 9/10 | 3608 days | 1% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 3632 days | 1% |
| Geoff Plunkett | 10/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| Pawa | 7/10 | 3667 days | 1% |
| James Norcliffe | 10/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| Andrew Barnden | 10/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
| Sheila Wee | 10/10 | 3911 days | 1% |
| Joana | 8/10 | 3958 days | 1% |
| Lea Karl | 8/10 | 4019 days | 1% |
| Travelgirl | 1/10 | 4032 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 4304 days | 0% |
| Natalie Boehm | 8/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Bradford Young | 1/10 | 4397 days | 0% |
| regi kiwi | 10/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 9/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 10/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4679 days | 1% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
| Wright | 7/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 9/10 | 5049 days | 1% |
| Jeroen Bartos | 8/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 8/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Aled | 9/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
| Ute Rogawski | 6/10 | 5058 days | 1% |
| Asha | 7/10 | 5097 days | 1% |
| Rene Rypkema | 8/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5117 days | 1% |
| ZubZubZub | 10/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| Mascot | 9/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| joE | 10/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| Sherbertdip | 8/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| tj10128 | 10/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
| Nicky Bell | 9/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
| Gerryq Winters | 9/10 | 5374 days | 1% |
| A Jones | 6/10 | 5375 days | 1% |
| Katarina Bokor | 8/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Karen Stephens | 7/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| M Bigras | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Binder | 7/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Jo Meekley | 8/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Guy Cohen | 8/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Ven | 8/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Wouter Moui | 7/10 | 5395 days | 1% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
| Tanya & Florian | 9/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
| Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Diana Clipsham | 6/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
| Lynn Leitch | 9/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
| Stephen Leitch | 9/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
| hellsknipe356 | 10/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
| chumfft | 10/10 | 5646 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5731 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5737 days | 1% |
| Hana Vokata | 8/10 | 5742 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 8/10 | 5765 days | 1% |
| Senel | 10/10 | 5775 days | 1% |
| Cheryl Gorman | 10/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 8/10 | 5790 days | 1% |
| Eva | 6/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
| Alain Deslandres | 7/10 | 5809 days | 1% |
| Ross & Catherine Litherland | 8/10 | 5809 days | 1% |
| graemeh1 | 7/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| martinab | 8/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| taupoguy | 10/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 8/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 5862 days | 1% |
| Thomas Rust | 9/10 | 5862 days | 1% |
| X Otte | 8/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
| kymberlyw | 9/10 | 6103 days | 1% |
| stephen | 9/10 | 6103 days | 1% |
| StijmH | 8/10 | 6119 days | 1% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6119 days | 1% |
| Rene | 9/10 | 6126 days | 1% |
| BrzezinskaM | 10/10 | 6127 days | 1% |
| AndreB | 9/10 | 6127 days | 1% |
| Dalibor | 9/10 | 6136 days | 1% |
| Pavel | 8/10 | 6139 days | 1% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6172 days | 1% |
| AndreM | 9/10 | 6172 days | 1% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6172 days | 1% |
| Eugen | 9/10 | 6175 days | 1% |
| Maike | 9/10 | 6175 days | 1% |
| Mary | 7/10 | 6176 days | 1% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6192 days | 1% |
| Emilie | 9/10 | 6277 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 6277 days | 1% |
| Vanessa | 5/10 | 6292 days | 1% |
| chubby69 | 10/10 | 6345 days | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6351 days | 1% |
| David Fowler | 7/10 | 6370 days | 1% |
| Karen C | 6/10 | 6434 days | 1% |
| Menashe | 7/10 | 6472 days | 1% |
| Bryony Wilson | 8/10 | 6482 days | 1% |
| Beate Sinn | 9/10 | 6486 days | 1% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6486 days | 1% |
| Smith | 6/10 | 6495 days | 1% |
| Carmen Dolny | 8/10 | 6503 days | 1% |
| Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6503 days | 1% |
| Gustavo | 9/10 | 6503 days | 1% |
| Kilsby | 9/10 | 6530 days | 1% |
| Juerg | 9/10 | 6543 days | 1% |
| Tanya | 9/10 | 6545 days | 1% |
| Kehoe | 7/10 | 6548 days | 1% |
| Iain | 8/10 | 6549 days | 1% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 6573 days | 1% |
| Dennis | 10/10 | 6849 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Apex Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.15% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 42 days. The Apex Rental Cars experience has 1 recent ranking. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Apex Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 26 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 23 | -0.47% |
| 24 | -0.49% |
| 25 | -0.51% |
| 26 | -0.53% |
| 27 | -0.55% |
| 28 | -0.57% |
| 29 | -0.59% |
| … | … |
7.79% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.