G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cobden Beachfront, Greymouth.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
109 Valid Reviews
The Cobden Beachfront, Greymouth experience has a total of 113 reviews. There are 109 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 109 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 109 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 53 |
|
49% |
9/10 | 20 |
|
18% |
8/10 | 28 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.55% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cobden Beachfront, Greymouth valid reviews is 90.55% and is based on 109 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
89.80%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Weerapon N. | 8/10 | 23 days | 98% |
Jie Hao Moh | 10/10 | 54 days | 100% |
Marine | 10/10 | 54 days | 100% |
Morgane | 8/10 | 82 days | 98% |
Nick | 7/10 | 82 days | 93% |
Henrik | 9/10 | 82 days | 99% |
Laura | 9/10 | 82 days | 99% |
Lilly Braun | 9/10 | 113 days | 98% |
Eric | 10/10 | 113 days | 99% |
Dina | 10/10 | 144 days | 99% |
Sven | 9/10 | 144 days | 98% |
Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 144 days | 99% |
EI | 10/10 | 174 days | 98% |
Aoife | 9/10 | 205 days | 97% |
Kevin Westcott | 7/10 | 235 days | 90% |
Glenda | 9/10 | 235 days | 96% |
Laura | 8/10 | 235 days | 95% |
Matt | 6/10 | 266 days | 82% |
Unhappy camper | 9/10 | 388 days | 90% |
Ann | 10/10 | 448 days | 88% |
Chloé | 8/10 | 448 days | 87% |
GB99 | 10/10 | 479 days | 87% |
Joel Fryett | 10/10 | 479 days | 87% |
Maren den Besten | 8/10 | 510 days | 83% |
Pupu2023 | 10/10 | 510 days | 85% |
Maren | 8/10 | 510 days | 83% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 571 days | 81% |
Josh | 8/10 | 601 days | 77% |
Christa | 10/10 | 693 days | 72% |
Matthew | 8/10 | 693 days | 70% |
Niall Hamilton | 9/10 | 724 days | 69% |
Laura | 10/10 | 785 days | 64% |
Tom | 10/10 | 813 days | 61% |
Ju | 8/10 | 813 days | 60% |
Cathy Abernethy | 10/10 | 844 days | 58% |
Vish | 10/10 | 844 days | 58% |
Anna Tatje | 8/10 | 844 days | 57% |
Aiden | 9/10 | 844 days | 58% |
Casey Bond | 10/10 | 905 days | 52% |
Lucy | 8/10 | 997 days | 42% |
Valerie | 10/10 | 1209 days | 24% |
Jenna | 8/10 | 1240 days | 22% |
Laurie | 8/10 | 1270 days | 20% |
mike gardner | 5/10 | 1515 days | 5% |
Vanessa | 10/10 | 1515 days | 8% |
The Gillies | 7/10 | 1543 days | 6% |
Seh | 7/10 | 1574 days | 5% |
Pablo Boris | 8/10 | 1574 days | 6% |
Kris Day | 10/10 | 1635 days | 4% |
Ying | 10/10 | 1666 days | 4% |
Nick Lamb | 10/10 | 1696 days | 3% |
Chelize | 10/10 | 1696 days | 3% |
E M M C | 10/10 | 1758 days | 2% |
Boardwalk Blss | 10/10 | 1758 days | 2% |
Nic | 10/10 | 1788 days | 2% |
Kerry | 10/10 | 1880 days | 2% |
Cody | 10/10 | 1880 days | 2% |
Maria | 9/10 | 1880 days | 2% |
GERARD & AXELLES | 8/10 | 1909 days | 2% |
Geoff M | 8/10 | 1909 days | 2% |
Angela | 9/10 | 1940 days | 2% |
Peter | 8/10 | 1940 days | 2% |
Henry Waters | 10/10 | 1971 days | 2% |
Javier Williams | 8/10 | 2001 days | 2% |
Katherine Ong | 9/10 | 2032 days | 2% |
Charlotte | 10/10 | 2154 days | 1% |
Eugene Tan | 10/10 | 2185 days | 1% |
Kate | 9/10 | 2185 days | 1% |
Kristal | 10/10 | 2185 days | 1% |
Andy and Julia | 10/10 | 2214 days | 1% |
Brice | 9/10 | 2215 days | 1% |
Rick’d | 10/10 | 2215 days | 1% |
Kipnkeri | 10/10 | 2215 days | 1% |
Dean Coran | 10/10 | 2246 days | 1% |
Aparna | 10/10 | 2246 days | 1% |
TP&MM | 8/10 | 2246 days | 1% |
Susie | 10/10 | 2274 days | 1% |
Rosemary M | 10/10 | 2274 days | 1% |
Marinette Kegels | 10/10 | 2274 days | 1% |
Freya | 8/10 | 2274 days | 1% |
Pedro | 10/10 | 2274 days | 1% |
Martin | 10/10 | 2305 days | 1% |
Ymke Huisman | 8/10 | 2336 days | 1% |
Jacqui | 8/10 | 2336 days | 1% |
Joe | 10/10 | 2336 days | 1% |
Sian | 10/10 | 2366 days | 1% |
Joanne | 10/10 | 2366 days | 1% |
Jana | 9/10 | 2366 days | 1% |
Tatjana & Manuel | 10/10 | 2397 days | 1% |
Jonas R. | 10/10 | 2397 days | 1% |
Sharon | 9/10 | 2427 days | 1% |
Rachel | 9/10 | 2427 days | 1% |
Judy | 7/10 | 2458 days | 1% |
Eb Brough | 8/10 | 2489 days | 1% |
Sue | 8/10 | 2489 days | 1% |
Jayden | 9/10 | 2550 days | 1% |
Cefa | 10/10 | 2580 days | 1% |
Mallory | 10/10 | 2611 days | 1% |
The Farrs | 8/10 | 2611 days | 0% |
S Weslake | 10/10 | 2611 days | 1% |
Danielle Wolff | 10/10 | 2643 days | 0% |
Tay Dao Han | 9/10 | 2682 days | 0% |
Michael Pitman | 9/10 | 2684 days | -1% |
Maggie Konstanski | 8/10 | 2702 days | 0% |
Julian Kihnle | 8/10 | 2729 days | -1% |
Jana Erdel | 10/10 | 2730 days | -1% |
Jamie Hack | 10/10 | 2733 days | 0% |
Jasmine Andrew | 7/10 | 2746 days | 0% |
Phil and Mel Rowson | 8/10 | 2750 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cobden Beachfront, Greymouth does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.03% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.