Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.95%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1504 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1504 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3024 days 20%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3056 days 20%
Matt Harris 9/10 3281 days 15%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3282 days 15%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3289 days 15%
Christian Krause 10/10 3289 days 15%
Philipp 8/10 3291 days 15%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3312 days 15%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3312 days 15%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3317 days 15%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3320 days 15%
Lennox 10/10 3321 days 15%
Philip Piel 10/10 3341 days 14%
Jonas 10/10 3341 days 14%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3343 days 14%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3348 days 13%
Hans 9/10 3373 days 14%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3373 days 13%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3394 days 13%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4029 days 1%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4057 days 0%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4057 days 1%
Jake Bell 9/10 4092 days 0%
Annika 6/10 4402 days 3%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4405 days 4%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4408 days 4%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4431 days 4%
Jens Moller 10/10 4756 days 4%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 4777 days 4%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 4779 days 4%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 4784 days 4%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 4786 days 4%
Asha 10/10 4823 days 4%
dally 10/10 5068 days 4%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5068 days 4%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5094 days 4%
carol50 10/10 5098 days 4%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5117 days 4%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5127 days 4%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5150 days 1%
Clamdine 9/10 5152 days 4%
Hull 10/10 5152 days 4%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5476 days 4%
Will Jemma 10/10 5507 days 4%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5514 days 4%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5517 days 4%
John-Paul 8/10 5522 days 4%
stroalki 9/10 5553 days 4%
biene 3/10 5568 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 5582 days 4%
Mille Winther 6/10 5595 days 3%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5645 days 4%
Neil 10/10 5756 days 4%
michellew 8/10 5776 days 4%
BryonyS 10/10 5816 days 4%
KatieR 9/10 5826 days 4%
Sally477 10/10 5829 days 4%
Katy1 8/10 5830 days 4%
ElissaH 10/10 5830 days 4%
Paul 7/10 5832 days 4%
AnneliesK 9/10 5838 days 4%
Jon Li 10/10 5840 days 4%
EleanorL 10/10 5861 days 4%
VickiS 9/10 5861 days 4%
soccaplaya14 10/10 5868 days 4%
kiwibrit86 10/10 5872 days 4%
StefanieW 10/10 5878 days 4%
NinaH1 10/10 5878 days 4%
Noamiki 9/10 5890 days 4%
Michael 10/10 5892 days 4%
Alon 10/10 5893 days 4%
Dan 10/10 5893 days 4%
Sabrina 10/10 5894 days 4%
Kelly 10/10 5894 days 4%
Chris 10/10 5895 days 4%
swizzler 10/10 5898 days 4%
Lieke 9/10 5901 days 4%
Ans 10/10 5902 days 4%
Alan 10/10 5907 days 4%
Emory 8/10 5913 days 4%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 5918 days 4%
Evi 10/10 5934 days 4%
Christian 10/10 5947 days 4%
Tim 10/10 5949 days 4%
Ben 10/10 5969 days 4%
Clare 9/10 5995 days 4%
Chris 10/10 6004 days 4%
Jimmy 9/10 6026 days 4%
Charlotte 9/10 6039 days 4%
Fiona 9/10 6048 days 4%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6159 days 4%
L1z4rd 10/10 6159 days 4%
Mark 9/10 6198 days 4%
Joanne M 9/10 6204 days 4%
Anna 9/10 6205 days 4%
Julie 8/10 6208 days 4%
Claire 10/10 6214 days 4%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6214 days 4%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6215 days 4%
Laurie 8/10 6239 days 4%
Stephanie 10/10 6240 days 4%
Katharina 9/10 6240 days 4%
Maree 9/10 6241 days 4%
Orlaith 10/10 6241 days 4%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6244 days 4%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6268 days 4%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6268 days 4%
Tim 10/10 6268 days 4%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6271 days 4%
ranker_734 10/10 6271 days 4%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6302 days 4%
marion 9/10 6309 days 4%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6310 days 4%
Kevin 10/10 6313 days 4%
dieter 9/10 6315 days 4%
Pete 10/10 6317 days 4%
Orla 9/10 6318 days 4%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6320 days 4%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6430 days 4%
Sabine 9/10 6540 days 4%
Will 9/10 6544 days 4%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6549 days 4%
Elaine 10/10 6549 days 4%
Kitsu 10/10 6552 days 4%
Valerie 5/10 6555 days 2%
Janning 8/10 6564 days 4%
Kim Holland 10/10 6564 days 4%
Sean 10/10 6568 days 4%
Mary 10/10 6579 days 4%
PamWalter 10/10 6605 days 4%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.98% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.92%
198 -3.94%
199 -3.96%
200 -3.98%
201 -4.00%
202 -4.02%
203 -4.04%

Balancing Adjustment

1.00% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.