Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.57%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1777 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1777 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3297 days 41%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3329 days 40%
Matt Harris 9/10 3554 days 31%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3555 days 31%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3562 days 31%
Christian Krause 10/10 3562 days 31%
Philipp 8/10 3564 days 30%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3585 days 30%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3585 days 30%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3590 days 30%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3593 days 30%
Lennox 10/10 3594 days 30%
Philip Piel 10/10 3614 days 29%
Jonas 10/10 3614 days 29%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3616 days 29%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3621 days 27%
Hans 9/10 3646 days 27%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3646 days 27%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3667 days 27%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4302 days 2%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4330 days 1%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4330 days 1%
Jake Bell 9/10 4365 days 0%
Annika 6/10 4675 days 16%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4678 days 19%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4681 days 19%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4704 days 19%
Jens Moller 10/10 5029 days 19%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5050 days 19%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5052 days 19%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5057 days 19%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5059 days 19%
Asha 10/10 5096 days 19%
dally 10/10 5341 days 19%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5341 days 19%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5367 days 19%
carol50 10/10 5371 days 19%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5390 days 19%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5400 days 19%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5423 days 12%
Clamdine 9/10 5425 days 19%
Hull 10/10 5425 days 19%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5749 days 19%
Will Jemma 10/10 5780 days 19%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5787 days 19%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5790 days 19%
John-Paul 8/10 5795 days 19%
stroalki 9/10 5826 days 19%
biene 3/10 5841 days 10%
jamesg 9/10 5855 days 19%
Mille Winther 6/10 5868 days 16%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5918 days 19%
Neil 10/10 6029 days 19%
michellew 8/10 6049 days 19%
BryonyS 10/10 6089 days 19%
KatieR 9/10 6099 days 19%
Sally477 10/10 6102 days 19%
Katy1 8/10 6103 days 19%
ElissaH 10/10 6103 days 19%
Paul 7/10 6104 days 18%
AnneliesK 9/10 6110 days 19%
Jon Li 10/10 6113 days 19%
EleanorL 10/10 6134 days 19%
VickiS 9/10 6134 days 19%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6141 days 19%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6144 days 19%
StefanieW 10/10 6151 days 19%
NinaH1 10/10 6151 days 19%
Noamiki 9/10 6163 days 19%
Michael 10/10 6165 days 19%
Alon 10/10 6165 days 19%
Dan 10/10 6165 days 19%
Sabrina 10/10 6167 days 19%
Kelly 10/10 6167 days 19%
Chris 10/10 6168 days 19%
swizzler 10/10 6170 days 19%
Lieke 9/10 6173 days 19%
Ans 10/10 6174 days 19%
Alan 10/10 6179 days 19%
Emory 8/10 6185 days 19%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6191 days 19%
Evi 10/10 6206 days 19%
Christian 10/10 6219 days 19%
Tim 10/10 6221 days 19%
Ben 10/10 6241 days 19%
Clare 9/10 6267 days 19%
Chris 10/10 6276 days 19%
Jimmy 9/10 6298 days 19%
Charlotte 9/10 6311 days 19%
Fiona 9/10 6320 days 19%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6431 days 19%
L1z4rd 10/10 6431 days 19%
Mark 9/10 6471 days 19%
Joanne M 9/10 6477 days 19%
Anna 9/10 6478 days 19%
Julie 8/10 6481 days 19%
Claire 10/10 6487 days 19%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6487 days 19%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6488 days 19%
Laurie 8/10 6512 days 19%
Stephanie 10/10 6513 days 19%
Katharina 9/10 6513 days 19%
Maree 9/10 6514 days 19%
Orlaith 10/10 6514 days 19%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6517 days 19%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6541 days 19%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6541 days 19%
Tim 10/10 6541 days 19%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6544 days 19%
ranker_734 10/10 6544 days 19%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6575 days 19%
marion 9/10 6582 days 19%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6583 days 19%
Kevin 10/10 6586 days 19%
dieter 9/10 6588 days 19%
Pete 10/10 6590 days 19%
Orla 9/10 6591 days 19%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6593 days 19%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6703 days 19%
Sabine 9/10 6813 days 19%
Will 9/10 6817 days 19%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6822 days 19%
Elaine 10/10 6822 days 19%
Kitsu 10/10 6825 days 19%
Valerie 5/10 6828 days 14%
Janning 8/10 6837 days 19%
Kim Holland 10/10 6837 days 19%
Sean 10/10 6841 days 19%
Mary 10/10 6852 days 19%
PamWalter 10/10 6878 days 19%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.06% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.00%
198 -4.02%
199 -4.04%
200 -4.06%
201 -4.08%
202 -4.10%
203 -4.12%

Balancing Adjustment

1.07% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.