Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
132 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 71 |
|
54% |
9/10 | 40 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
113 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 58 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 36 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Margaret | 10/10 | 1504 days | 100% |
ILDIKO JUHASZ | 10/10 | 1504 days | 100% |
Sandra Reynders | 10/10 | 3024 days | 20% |
Jessica Nasstrom | 10/10 | 3056 days | 20% |
Matt Harris | 9/10 | 3281 days | 15% |
Nadja Guiliani | 9/10 | 3282 days | 15% |
Laerke Soee | 10/10 | 3289 days | 15% |
Christian Krause | 10/10 | 3289 days | 15% |
Philipp | 8/10 | 3291 days | 15% |
Matt Irwin | 9/10 | 3312 days | 15% |
Tom Hurst | 9/10 | 3312 days | 15% |
Luca Herzig | 10/10 | 3317 days | 15% |
Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3320 days | 15% |
Lennox | 10/10 | 3321 days | 15% |
Philip Piel | 10/10 | 3341 days | 14% |
Jonas | 10/10 | 3341 days | 14% |
Mikkel Palleson | 10/10 | 3343 days | 14% |
Asborn Damgaard | 7/10 | 3348 days | 13% |
Hans | 9/10 | 3373 days | 14% |
Raviv Regev | 8/10 | 3373 days | 13% |
Sophie Jenkins | 10/10 | 3394 days | 13% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 4029 days | 1% |
Rhys Williams | 7/10 | 4057 days | 0% |
Ruth Watkin | 10/10 | 4057 days | 1% |
Jake Bell | 9/10 | 4092 days | 0% |
Annika | 6/10 | 4402 days | 3% |
Courtney Quintrell | 8/10 | 4405 days | 4% |
Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4408 days | 4% |
Christina Rodewald | 9/10 | 4431 days | 4% |
Jens Moller | 10/10 | 4756 days | 4% |
Yves & Sylvia | 10/10 | 4777 days | 4% |
Nelly & Lisa | 9/10 | 4779 days | 4% |
Franziska & Katrin | 9/10 | 4784 days | 4% |
Graham Swinyard | 8/10 | 4786 days | 4% |
Asha | 10/10 | 4823 days | 4% |
dally | 10/10 | 5068 days | 4% |
Ryan_Packer | 10/10 | 5068 days | 4% |
Stefanny Ling | 9/10 | 5094 days | 4% |
carol50 | 10/10 | 5098 days | 4% |
Kate Morgan | 10/10 | 5117 days | 4% |
Ann-Katrine & Sille | 8/10 | 5127 days | 4% |
Leslie Aldridge | 4/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Clamdine | 9/10 | 5152 days | 4% |
Hull | 10/10 | 5152 days | 4% |
Family_Thomsen | 10/10 | 5476 days | 4% |
Will Jemma | 10/10 | 5507 days | 4% |
Martÿn Steenvoorden | 9/10 | 5514 days | 4% |
Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5517 days | 4% |
John-Paul | 8/10 | 5522 days | 4% |
stroalki | 9/10 | 5553 days | 4% |
biene | 3/10 | 5568 days | 0% |
jamesg | 9/10 | 5582 days | 4% |
Mille Winther | 6/10 | 5595 days | 3% |
Matty Boombatty | 10/10 | 5645 days | 4% |
Neil | 10/10 | 5756 days | 4% |
michellew | 8/10 | 5776 days | 4% |
BryonyS | 10/10 | 5816 days | 4% |
KatieR | 9/10 | 5826 days | 4% |
Sally477 | 10/10 | 5829 days | 4% |
Katy1 | 8/10 | 5830 days | 4% |
ElissaH | 10/10 | 5830 days | 4% |
Paul | 7/10 | 5832 days | 4% |
AnneliesK | 9/10 | 5838 days | 4% |
Jon Li | 10/10 | 5840 days | 4% |
EleanorL | 10/10 | 5861 days | 4% |
VickiS | 9/10 | 5861 days | 4% |
soccaplaya14 | 10/10 | 5868 days | 4% |
kiwibrit86 | 10/10 | 5872 days | 4% |
StefanieW | 10/10 | 5878 days | 4% |
NinaH1 | 10/10 | 5878 days | 4% |
Noamiki | 9/10 | 5890 days | 4% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5892 days | 4% |
Alon | 10/10 | 5893 days | 4% |
Dan | 10/10 | 5893 days | 4% |
Sabrina | 10/10 | 5894 days | 4% |
Kelly | 10/10 | 5894 days | 4% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5895 days | 4% |
swizzler | 10/10 | 5898 days | 4% |
Lieke | 9/10 | 5901 days | 4% |
Ans | 10/10 | 5902 days | 4% |
Alan | 10/10 | 5907 days | 4% |
Emory | 8/10 | 5913 days | 4% |
Bonnie Turner | 9/10 | 5918 days | 4% |
Evi | 10/10 | 5934 days | 4% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5947 days | 4% |
Tim | 10/10 | 5949 days | 4% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5969 days | 4% |
Clare | 9/10 | 5995 days | 4% |
Chris | 10/10 | 6004 days | 4% |
Jimmy | 9/10 | 6026 days | 4% |
Charlotte | 9/10 | 6039 days | 4% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 6048 days | 4% |
Naki_Girlz | 10/10 | 6159 days | 4% |
L1z4rd | 10/10 | 6159 days | 4% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6198 days | 4% |
Joanne M | 9/10 | 6204 days | 4% |
Anna | 9/10 | 6205 days | 4% |
Julie | 8/10 | 6208 days | 4% |
Claire | 10/10 | 6214 days | 4% |
Sarah Maudsley | 9/10 | 6214 days | 4% |
Kelly Noirin | 9/10 | 6215 days | 4% |
Laurie | 8/10 | 6239 days | 4% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6240 days | 4% |
Katharina | 9/10 | 6240 days | 4% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6241 days | 4% |
Orlaith | 10/10 | 6241 days | 4% |
Marc Hertogs | 10/10 | 6244 days | 4% |
Stephanie Jones | 10/10 | 6268 days | 4% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6268 days | 4% |
Tim | 10/10 | 6268 days | 4% |
Aske Helbor | 10/10 | 6271 days | 4% |
ranker_734 | 10/10 | 6271 days | 4% |
Martin Nigschit | 8/10 | 6302 days | 4% |
marion | 9/10 | 6309 days | 4% |
Michelle Orr | 10/10 | 6310 days | 4% |
Kevin | 10/10 | 6313 days | 4% |
dieter | 9/10 | 6315 days | 4% |
Pete | 10/10 | 6317 days | 4% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6318 days | 4% |
Richard Kindgren | 10/10 | 6320 days | 4% |
Jessica Callen | 10/10 | 6430 days | 4% |
Sabine | 9/10 | 6540 days | 4% |
Will | 9/10 | 6544 days | 4% |
ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6549 days | 4% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 6549 days | 4% |
Kitsu | 10/10 | 6552 days | 4% |
Valerie | 5/10 | 6555 days | 2% |
Janning | 8/10 | 6564 days | 4% |
Kim Holland | 10/10 | 6564 days | 4% |
Sean | 10/10 | 6568 days | 4% |
Mary | 10/10 | 6579 days | 4% |
PamWalter | 10/10 | 6605 days | 4% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.98% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.92% |
198 | -3.94% |
199 | -3.96% |
200 | -3.98% |
201 | -4.00% |
202 | -4.02% |
203 | -4.04% |
… | … |
1.00% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.