Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.61%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1325 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1325 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 2845 days 14%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 2877 days 14%
Matt Harris 9/10 3102 days 12%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3103 days 12%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3110 days 12%
Christian Krause 10/10 3110 days 12%
Philipp 8/10 3112 days 11%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3133 days 11%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3133 days 11%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3138 days 11%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3141 days 11%
Lennox 10/10 3142 days 11%
Philip Piel 10/10 3162 days 11%
Jonas 10/10 3162 days 11%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3164 days 11%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3169 days 10%
Hans 9/10 3194 days 11%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3194 days 11%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3215 days 11%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 3850 days 4%
Rhys Williams 7/10 3878 days 4%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 3878 days 4%
Jake Bell 9/10 3913 days 3%
Annika 6/10 4223 days 0%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4226 days 0%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4229 days 0%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4252 days 0%
Jens Moller 10/10 4577 days 4%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 4598 days 4%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 4600 days 4%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 4605 days 4%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 4607 days 4%
Asha 10/10 4644 days 4%
dally 10/10 4889 days 4%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 4889 days 4%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 4915 days 4%
carol50 10/10 4919 days 4%
Kate Morgan 10/10 4938 days 4%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 4948 days 4%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 4971 days 2%
Clamdine 9/10 4973 days 4%
Hull 10/10 4973 days 4%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5297 days 4%
Will Jemma 10/10 5328 days 4%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5335 days 4%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5338 days 4%
John-Paul 8/10 5343 days 4%
stroalki 9/10 5374 days 4%
biene 3/10 5389 days 2%
jamesg 9/10 5403 days 4%
Mille Winther 6/10 5416 days 3%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5466 days 4%
Neil 10/10 5577 days 4%
michellew 8/10 5597 days 4%
BryonyS 10/10 5637 days 4%
KatieR 9/10 5647 days 4%
Sally477 10/10 5650 days 4%
Katy1 8/10 5651 days 4%
ElissaH 10/10 5651 days 4%
Paul 7/10 5652 days 4%
AnneliesK 9/10 5658 days 4%
Jon Li 10/10 5661 days 4%
EleanorL 10/10 5682 days 4%
VickiS 9/10 5682 days 4%
soccaplaya14 10/10 5689 days 4%
kiwibrit86 10/10 5692 days 4%
StefanieW 10/10 5699 days 4%
NinaH1 10/10 5699 days 4%
Noamiki 9/10 5711 days 4%
Michael 10/10 5713 days 4%
Alon 10/10 5713 days 4%
Dan 10/10 5713 days 4%
Sabrina 10/10 5715 days 4%
Kelly 10/10 5715 days 4%
Chris 10/10 5716 days 4%
swizzler 10/10 5718 days 4%
Lieke 9/10 5721 days 4%
Ans 10/10 5722 days 4%
Alan 10/10 5727 days 4%
Emory 8/10 5733 days 4%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 5739 days 4%
Evi 10/10 5754 days 4%
Christian 10/10 5767 days 4%
Tim 10/10 5769 days 4%
Ben 10/10 5790 days 4%
Clare 9/10 5816 days 4%
Chris 10/10 5824 days 4%
Jimmy 9/10 5846 days 4%
Charlotte 9/10 5859 days 4%
Fiona 9/10 5868 days 4%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 5979 days 4%
L1z4rd 10/10 5979 days 4%
Mark 9/10 6019 days 4%
Joanne M 9/10 6025 days 4%
Anna 9/10 6026 days 4%
Julie 8/10 6029 days 4%
Claire 10/10 6035 days 4%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6035 days 4%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6036 days 4%
Laurie 8/10 6060 days 4%
Stephanie 10/10 6061 days 4%
Katharina 9/10 6061 days 4%
Maree 9/10 6062 days 4%
Orlaith 10/10 6062 days 4%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6065 days 4%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6089 days 4%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6089 days 4%
Tim 10/10 6089 days 4%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6092 days 4%
ranker_734 10/10 6092 days 4%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6123 days 4%
marion 9/10 6130 days 4%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6131 days 4%
Kevin 10/10 6134 days 4%
dieter 9/10 6136 days 4%
Pete 10/10 6138 days 4%
Orla 9/10 6139 days 4%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6141 days 4%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6251 days 4%
Sabine 9/10 6361 days 4%
Will 9/10 6365 days 4%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6370 days 4%
Elaine 10/10 6370 days 4%
Kitsu 10/10 6373 days 4%
Valerie 5/10 6376 days 3%
Janning 8/10 6385 days 4%
Kim Holland 10/10 6385 days 4%
Sean 10/10 6389 days 4%
Mary 10/10 6400 days 4%
PamWalter 10/10 6426 days 4%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.01% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 75 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -2.96%
198 -2.98%
199 -2.99%
200 -3.01%
201 -3.02%
202 -3.04%
203 -3.05%

Balancing Adjustment

0.80% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.