Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.42%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1417 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1417 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 2937 days 19%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 2969 days 19%
Matt Harris 9/10 3194 days 15%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3195 days 15%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3202 days 15%
Christian Krause 10/10 3202 days 15%
Philipp 8/10 3204 days 15%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3225 days 15%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3225 days 15%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3230 days 15%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3233 days 15%
Lennox 10/10 3234 days 15%
Philip Piel 10/10 3254 days 15%
Jonas 10/10 3254 days 15%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3256 days 15%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3261 days 14%
Hans 9/10 3286 days 14%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3286 days 14%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3307 days 14%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 3942 days 5%
Rhys Williams 7/10 3970 days 5%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 3970 days 5%
Jake Bell 9/10 4005 days 5%
Annika 6/10 4315 days 0%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4318 days 0%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4321 days 0%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4344 days 0%
Jens Moller 10/10 4669 days 6%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 4690 days 6%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 4692 days 6%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 4697 days 6%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 4699 days 6%
Asha 10/10 4736 days 6%
dally 10/10 4981 days 6%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 4981 days 6%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5007 days 6%
carol50 10/10 5011 days 6%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5030 days 6%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5040 days 6%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5063 days 4%
Clamdine 9/10 5065 days 6%
Hull 10/10 5065 days 6%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5389 days 6%
Will Jemma 10/10 5420 days 6%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5427 days 6%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5430 days 6%
John-Paul 8/10 5435 days 6%
stroalki 9/10 5466 days 6%
biene 3/10 5481 days 3%
jamesg 9/10 5495 days 6%
Mille Winther 6/10 5508 days 5%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5558 days 6%
Neil 10/10 5669 days 6%
michellew 8/10 5689 days 6%
BryonyS 10/10 5729 days 6%
KatieR 9/10 5739 days 6%
Sally477 10/10 5742 days 6%
Katy1 8/10 5743 days 6%
ElissaH 10/10 5743 days 6%
Paul 7/10 5744 days 6%
AnneliesK 9/10 5751 days 6%
Jon Li 10/10 5753 days 6%
EleanorL 10/10 5774 days 6%
VickiS 9/10 5774 days 6%
soccaplaya14 10/10 5781 days 6%
kiwibrit86 10/10 5785 days 6%
StefanieW 10/10 5791 days 6%
NinaH1 10/10 5791 days 6%
Noamiki 9/10 5803 days 6%
Michael 10/10 5805 days 6%
Alon 10/10 5806 days 6%
Dan 10/10 5806 days 6%
Sabrina 10/10 5807 days 6%
Kelly 10/10 5807 days 6%
Chris 10/10 5808 days 6%
swizzler 10/10 5811 days 6%
Lieke 9/10 5813 days 6%
Ans 10/10 5814 days 6%
Alan 10/10 5820 days 6%
Emory 8/10 5826 days 6%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 5831 days 6%
Evi 10/10 5847 days 6%
Christian 10/10 5860 days 6%
Tim 10/10 5862 days 6%
Ben 10/10 5882 days 6%
Clare 9/10 5908 days 6%
Chris 10/10 5916 days 6%
Jimmy 9/10 5939 days 6%
Charlotte 9/10 5952 days 6%
Fiona 9/10 5961 days 6%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6072 days 6%
L1z4rd 10/10 6072 days 6%
Mark 9/10 6111 days 6%
Joanne M 9/10 6117 days 6%
Anna 9/10 6118 days 6%
Julie 8/10 6121 days 6%
Claire 10/10 6127 days 6%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6127 days 6%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6128 days 6%
Laurie 8/10 6152 days 6%
Stephanie 10/10 6153 days 6%
Katharina 9/10 6153 days 6%
Maree 9/10 6154 days 6%
Orlaith 10/10 6154 days 6%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6157 days 6%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6181 days 6%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6181 days 6%
Tim 10/10 6181 days 6%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6184 days 6%
ranker_734 10/10 6184 days 6%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6215 days 6%
marion 9/10 6222 days 6%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6223 days 6%
Kevin 10/10 6226 days 6%
dieter 9/10 6228 days 6%
Pete 10/10 6230 days 6%
Orla 9/10 6231 days 6%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6233 days 6%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6343 days 6%
Sabine 9/10 6453 days 6%
Will 9/10 6457 days 6%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6462 days 6%
Elaine 10/10 6462 days 6%
Kitsu 10/10 6465 days 6%
Valerie 5/10 6468 days 5%
Janning 8/10 6477 days 6%
Kim Holland 10/10 6477 days 6%
Sean 10/10 6481 days 6%
Mary 10/10 6492 days 6%
PamWalter 10/10 6518 days 6%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.04% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.98%
198 -4.00%
199 -4.02%
200 -4.04%
201 -4.06%
202 -4.08%
203 -4.10%

Balancing Adjustment

0.95% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.