G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
132 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 71 |
|
54% |
9/10 | 40 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
113 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 58 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 36 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
94.61%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Margaret | 10/10 | 1325 days | 100% |
ILDIKO JUHASZ | 10/10 | 1325 days | 100% |
Sandra Reynders | 10/10 | 2845 days | 14% |
Jessica Nasstrom | 10/10 | 2877 days | 14% |
Matt Harris | 9/10 | 3102 days | 12% |
Nadja Guiliani | 9/10 | 3103 days | 12% |
Laerke Soee | 10/10 | 3110 days | 12% |
Christian Krause | 10/10 | 3110 days | 12% |
Philipp | 8/10 | 3112 days | 11% |
Matt Irwin | 9/10 | 3133 days | 11% |
Tom Hurst | 9/10 | 3133 days | 11% |
Luca Herzig | 10/10 | 3138 days | 11% |
Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3141 days | 11% |
Lennox | 10/10 | 3142 days | 11% |
Philip Piel | 10/10 | 3162 days | 11% |
Jonas | 10/10 | 3162 days | 11% |
Mikkel Palleson | 10/10 | 3164 days | 11% |
Asborn Damgaard | 7/10 | 3169 days | 10% |
Hans | 9/10 | 3194 days | 11% |
Raviv Regev | 8/10 | 3194 days | 11% |
Sophie Jenkins | 10/10 | 3215 days | 11% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3850 days | 4% |
Rhys Williams | 7/10 | 3878 days | 4% |
Ruth Watkin | 10/10 | 3878 days | 4% |
Jake Bell | 9/10 | 3913 days | 3% |
Annika | 6/10 | 4223 days | 0% |
Courtney Quintrell | 8/10 | 4226 days | 0% |
Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4229 days | 0% |
Christina Rodewald | 9/10 | 4252 days | 0% |
Jens Moller | 10/10 | 4577 days | 4% |
Yves & Sylvia | 10/10 | 4598 days | 4% |
Nelly & Lisa | 9/10 | 4600 days | 4% |
Franziska & Katrin | 9/10 | 4605 days | 4% |
Graham Swinyard | 8/10 | 4607 days | 4% |
Asha | 10/10 | 4644 days | 4% |
dally | 10/10 | 4889 days | 4% |
Ryan_Packer | 10/10 | 4889 days | 4% |
Stefanny Ling | 9/10 | 4915 days | 4% |
carol50 | 10/10 | 4919 days | 4% |
Kate Morgan | 10/10 | 4938 days | 4% |
Ann-Katrine & Sille | 8/10 | 4948 days | 4% |
Leslie Aldridge | 4/10 | 4971 days | 2% |
Clamdine | 9/10 | 4973 days | 4% |
Hull | 10/10 | 4973 days | 4% |
Family_Thomsen | 10/10 | 5297 days | 4% |
Will Jemma | 10/10 | 5328 days | 4% |
Martÿn Steenvoorden | 9/10 | 5335 days | 4% |
Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5338 days | 4% |
John-Paul | 8/10 | 5343 days | 4% |
stroalki | 9/10 | 5374 days | 4% |
biene | 3/10 | 5389 days | 2% |
jamesg | 9/10 | 5403 days | 4% |
Mille Winther | 6/10 | 5416 days | 3% |
Matty Boombatty | 10/10 | 5466 days | 4% |
Neil | 10/10 | 5577 days | 4% |
michellew | 8/10 | 5597 days | 4% |
BryonyS | 10/10 | 5637 days | 4% |
KatieR | 9/10 | 5647 days | 4% |
Sally477 | 10/10 | 5650 days | 4% |
Katy1 | 8/10 | 5651 days | 4% |
ElissaH | 10/10 | 5651 days | 4% |
Paul | 7/10 | 5652 days | 4% |
AnneliesK | 9/10 | 5658 days | 4% |
Jon Li | 10/10 | 5661 days | 4% |
EleanorL | 10/10 | 5682 days | 4% |
VickiS | 9/10 | 5682 days | 4% |
soccaplaya14 | 10/10 | 5689 days | 4% |
kiwibrit86 | 10/10 | 5692 days | 4% |
StefanieW | 10/10 | 5699 days | 4% |
NinaH1 | 10/10 | 5699 days | 4% |
Noamiki | 9/10 | 5711 days | 4% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5713 days | 4% |
Alon | 10/10 | 5713 days | 4% |
Dan | 10/10 | 5713 days | 4% |
Sabrina | 10/10 | 5715 days | 4% |
Kelly | 10/10 | 5715 days | 4% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5716 days | 4% |
swizzler | 10/10 | 5718 days | 4% |
Lieke | 9/10 | 5721 days | 4% |
Ans | 10/10 | 5722 days | 4% |
Alan | 10/10 | 5727 days | 4% |
Emory | 8/10 | 5733 days | 4% |
Bonnie Turner | 9/10 | 5739 days | 4% |
Evi | 10/10 | 5754 days | 4% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5767 days | 4% |
Tim | 10/10 | 5769 days | 4% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5790 days | 4% |
Clare | 9/10 | 5816 days | 4% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5824 days | 4% |
Jimmy | 9/10 | 5846 days | 4% |
Charlotte | 9/10 | 5859 days | 4% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 5868 days | 4% |
Naki_Girlz | 10/10 | 5979 days | 4% |
L1z4rd | 10/10 | 5979 days | 4% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6019 days | 4% |
Joanne M | 9/10 | 6025 days | 4% |
Anna | 9/10 | 6026 days | 4% |
Julie | 8/10 | 6029 days | 4% |
Claire | 10/10 | 6035 days | 4% |
Sarah Maudsley | 9/10 | 6035 days | 4% |
Kelly Noirin | 9/10 | 6036 days | 4% |
Laurie | 8/10 | 6060 days | 4% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6061 days | 4% |
Katharina | 9/10 | 6061 days | 4% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6062 days | 4% |
Orlaith | 10/10 | 6062 days | 4% |
Marc Hertogs | 10/10 | 6065 days | 4% |
Stephanie Jones | 10/10 | 6089 days | 4% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6089 days | 4% |
Tim | 10/10 | 6089 days | 4% |
Aske Helbor | 10/10 | 6092 days | 4% |
ranker_734 | 10/10 | 6092 days | 4% |
Martin Nigschit | 8/10 | 6123 days | 4% |
marion | 9/10 | 6130 days | 4% |
Michelle Orr | 10/10 | 6131 days | 4% |
Kevin | 10/10 | 6134 days | 4% |
dieter | 9/10 | 6136 days | 4% |
Pete | 10/10 | 6138 days | 4% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6139 days | 4% |
Richard Kindgren | 10/10 | 6141 days | 4% |
Jessica Callen | 10/10 | 6251 days | 4% |
Sabine | 9/10 | 6361 days | 4% |
Will | 9/10 | 6365 days | 4% |
ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6370 days | 4% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 6370 days | 4% |
Kitsu | 10/10 | 6373 days | 4% |
Valerie | 5/10 | 6376 days | 3% |
Janning | 8/10 | 6385 days | 4% |
Kim Holland | 10/10 | 6385 days | 4% |
Sean | 10/10 | 6389 days | 4% |
Mary | 10/10 | 6400 days | 4% |
PamWalter | 10/10 | 6426 days | 4% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.01% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 75 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -2.96% |
198 | -2.98% |
199 | -2.99% |
200 | -3.01% |
201 | -3.02% |
202 | -3.04% |
203 | -3.05% |
… | … |
0.80% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.