Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.53%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1364 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1364 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 2884 days 16%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 2916 days 16%
Matt Harris 9/10 3141 days 13%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3142 days 13%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3149 days 13%
Christian Krause 10/10 3149 days 13%
Philipp 8/10 3151 days 13%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3172 days 13%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3172 days 13%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3177 days 13%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3180 days 13%
Lennox 10/10 3181 days 13%
Philip Piel 10/10 3201 days 13%
Jonas 10/10 3201 days 13%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3203 days 13%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3208 days 12%
Hans 9/10 3233 days 12%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3233 days 12%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3254 days 12%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 3889 days 5%
Rhys Williams 7/10 3917 days 4%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 3917 days 4%
Jake Bell 9/10 3952 days 4%
Annika 6/10 4262 days 0%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4265 days 0%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4268 days 0%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4291 days 0%
Jens Moller 10/10 4616 days 5%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 4637 days 5%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 4639 days 5%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 4644 days 5%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 4646 days 5%
Asha 10/10 4683 days 5%
dally 10/10 4928 days 5%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 4928 days 5%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 4954 days 5%
carol50 10/10 4958 days 5%
Kate Morgan 10/10 4977 days 5%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 4987 days 5%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5010 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5012 days 5%
Hull 10/10 5012 days 5%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5336 days 5%
Will Jemma 10/10 5367 days 5%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5374 days 5%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5377 days 5%
John-Paul 8/10 5382 days 5%
stroalki 9/10 5413 days 5%
biene 3/10 5428 days 2%
jamesg 9/10 5442 days 5%
Mille Winther 6/10 5455 days 4%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5505 days 5%
Neil 10/10 5616 days 5%
michellew 8/10 5636 days 5%
BryonyS 10/10 5676 days 5%
KatieR 9/10 5686 days 5%
Sally477 10/10 5689 days 5%
Katy1 8/10 5690 days 5%
ElissaH 10/10 5690 days 5%
Paul 7/10 5691 days 4%
AnneliesK 9/10 5697 days 5%
Jon Li 10/10 5700 days 5%
EleanorL 10/10 5721 days 5%
VickiS 9/10 5721 days 5%
soccaplaya14 10/10 5728 days 5%
kiwibrit86 10/10 5731 days 5%
StefanieW 10/10 5738 days 5%
NinaH1 10/10 5738 days 5%
Noamiki 9/10 5750 days 5%
Michael 10/10 5752 days 5%
Alon 10/10 5752 days 5%
Dan 10/10 5752 days 5%
Sabrina 10/10 5754 days 5%
Kelly 10/10 5754 days 5%
Chris 10/10 5755 days 5%
swizzler 10/10 5757 days 5%
Lieke 9/10 5760 days 5%
Ans 10/10 5761 days 5%
Alan 10/10 5766 days 5%
Emory 8/10 5772 days 5%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 5778 days 5%
Evi 10/10 5793 days 5%
Christian 10/10 5806 days 5%
Tim 10/10 5808 days 5%
Ben 10/10 5829 days 5%
Clare 9/10 5855 days 5%
Chris 10/10 5863 days 5%
Jimmy 9/10 5885 days 5%
Charlotte 9/10 5898 days 5%
Fiona 9/10 5907 days 5%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6018 days 5%
L1z4rd 10/10 6018 days 5%
Mark 9/10 6058 days 5%
Joanne M 9/10 6064 days 5%
Anna 9/10 6065 days 5%
Julie 8/10 6068 days 5%
Claire 10/10 6074 days 5%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6074 days 5%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6075 days 5%
Laurie 8/10 6099 days 5%
Stephanie 10/10 6100 days 5%
Katharina 9/10 6100 days 5%
Maree 9/10 6101 days 5%
Orlaith 10/10 6101 days 5%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6104 days 5%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6128 days 5%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6128 days 5%
Tim 10/10 6128 days 5%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6131 days 5%
ranker_734 10/10 6131 days 5%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6162 days 5%
marion 9/10 6169 days 5%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6170 days 5%
Kevin 10/10 6173 days 5%
dieter 9/10 6175 days 5%
Pete 10/10 6177 days 5%
Orla 9/10 6178 days 5%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6180 days 5%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6290 days 5%
Sabine 9/10 6400 days 5%
Will 9/10 6404 days 5%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6409 days 5%
Elaine 10/10 6409 days 5%
Kitsu 10/10 6412 days 5%
Valerie 5/10 6415 days 3%
Janning 8/10 6424 days 5%
Kim Holland 10/10 6424 days 5%
Sean 10/10 6428 days 5%
Mary 10/10 6439 days 5%
PamWalter 10/10 6465 days 5%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.79% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 52 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.74%
198 -3.76%
199 -3.78%
200 -3.79%
201 -3.81%
202 -3.83%
203 -3.85%

Balancing Adjustment

0.90% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.