Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
132 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 71 |
|
54% |
9/10 | 40 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
113 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 58 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 36 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
94.53%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Margaret | 10/10 | 1364 days | 100% |
ILDIKO JUHASZ | 10/10 | 1364 days | 100% |
Sandra Reynders | 10/10 | 2884 days | 16% |
Jessica Nasstrom | 10/10 | 2916 days | 16% |
Matt Harris | 9/10 | 3141 days | 13% |
Nadja Guiliani | 9/10 | 3142 days | 13% |
Laerke Soee | 10/10 | 3149 days | 13% |
Christian Krause | 10/10 | 3149 days | 13% |
Philipp | 8/10 | 3151 days | 13% |
Matt Irwin | 9/10 | 3172 days | 13% |
Tom Hurst | 9/10 | 3172 days | 13% |
Luca Herzig | 10/10 | 3177 days | 13% |
Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3180 days | 13% |
Lennox | 10/10 | 3181 days | 13% |
Philip Piel | 10/10 | 3201 days | 13% |
Jonas | 10/10 | 3201 days | 13% |
Mikkel Palleson | 10/10 | 3203 days | 13% |
Asborn Damgaard | 7/10 | 3208 days | 12% |
Hans | 9/10 | 3233 days | 12% |
Raviv Regev | 8/10 | 3233 days | 12% |
Sophie Jenkins | 10/10 | 3254 days | 12% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3889 days | 5% |
Rhys Williams | 7/10 | 3917 days | 4% |
Ruth Watkin | 10/10 | 3917 days | 4% |
Jake Bell | 9/10 | 3952 days | 4% |
Annika | 6/10 | 4262 days | 0% |
Courtney Quintrell | 8/10 | 4265 days | 0% |
Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4268 days | 0% |
Christina Rodewald | 9/10 | 4291 days | 0% |
Jens Moller | 10/10 | 4616 days | 5% |
Yves & Sylvia | 10/10 | 4637 days | 5% |
Nelly & Lisa | 9/10 | 4639 days | 5% |
Franziska & Katrin | 9/10 | 4644 days | 5% |
Graham Swinyard | 8/10 | 4646 days | 5% |
Asha | 10/10 | 4683 days | 5% |
dally | 10/10 | 4928 days | 5% |
Ryan_Packer | 10/10 | 4928 days | 5% |
Stefanny Ling | 9/10 | 4954 days | 5% |
carol50 | 10/10 | 4958 days | 5% |
Kate Morgan | 10/10 | 4977 days | 5% |
Ann-Katrine & Sille | 8/10 | 4987 days | 5% |
Leslie Aldridge | 4/10 | 5010 days | 3% |
Clamdine | 9/10 | 5012 days | 5% |
Hull | 10/10 | 5012 days | 5% |
Family_Thomsen | 10/10 | 5336 days | 5% |
Will Jemma | 10/10 | 5367 days | 5% |
Martÿn Steenvoorden | 9/10 | 5374 days | 5% |
Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5377 days | 5% |
John-Paul | 8/10 | 5382 days | 5% |
stroalki | 9/10 | 5413 days | 5% |
biene | 3/10 | 5428 days | 2% |
jamesg | 9/10 | 5442 days | 5% |
Mille Winther | 6/10 | 5455 days | 4% |
Matty Boombatty | 10/10 | 5505 days | 5% |
Neil | 10/10 | 5616 days | 5% |
michellew | 8/10 | 5636 days | 5% |
BryonyS | 10/10 | 5676 days | 5% |
KatieR | 9/10 | 5686 days | 5% |
Sally477 | 10/10 | 5689 days | 5% |
Katy1 | 8/10 | 5690 days | 5% |
ElissaH | 10/10 | 5690 days | 5% |
Paul | 7/10 | 5691 days | 4% |
AnneliesK | 9/10 | 5697 days | 5% |
Jon Li | 10/10 | 5700 days | 5% |
EleanorL | 10/10 | 5721 days | 5% |
VickiS | 9/10 | 5721 days | 5% |
soccaplaya14 | 10/10 | 5728 days | 5% |
kiwibrit86 | 10/10 | 5731 days | 5% |
StefanieW | 10/10 | 5738 days | 5% |
NinaH1 | 10/10 | 5738 days | 5% |
Noamiki | 9/10 | 5750 days | 5% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5752 days | 5% |
Alon | 10/10 | 5752 days | 5% |
Dan | 10/10 | 5752 days | 5% |
Sabrina | 10/10 | 5754 days | 5% |
Kelly | 10/10 | 5754 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5755 days | 5% |
swizzler | 10/10 | 5757 days | 5% |
Lieke | 9/10 | 5760 days | 5% |
Ans | 10/10 | 5761 days | 5% |
Alan | 10/10 | 5766 days | 5% |
Emory | 8/10 | 5772 days | 5% |
Bonnie Turner | 9/10 | 5778 days | 5% |
Evi | 10/10 | 5793 days | 5% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5806 days | 5% |
Tim | 10/10 | 5808 days | 5% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5829 days | 5% |
Clare | 9/10 | 5855 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5863 days | 5% |
Jimmy | 9/10 | 5885 days | 5% |
Charlotte | 9/10 | 5898 days | 5% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 5907 days | 5% |
Naki_Girlz | 10/10 | 6018 days | 5% |
L1z4rd | 10/10 | 6018 days | 5% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6058 days | 5% |
Joanne M | 9/10 | 6064 days | 5% |
Anna | 9/10 | 6065 days | 5% |
Julie | 8/10 | 6068 days | 5% |
Claire | 10/10 | 6074 days | 5% |
Sarah Maudsley | 9/10 | 6074 days | 5% |
Kelly Noirin | 9/10 | 6075 days | 5% |
Laurie | 8/10 | 6099 days | 5% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6100 days | 5% |
Katharina | 9/10 | 6100 days | 5% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6101 days | 5% |
Orlaith | 10/10 | 6101 days | 5% |
Marc Hertogs | 10/10 | 6104 days | 5% |
Stephanie Jones | 10/10 | 6128 days | 5% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6128 days | 5% |
Tim | 10/10 | 6128 days | 5% |
Aske Helbor | 10/10 | 6131 days | 5% |
ranker_734 | 10/10 | 6131 days | 5% |
Martin Nigschit | 8/10 | 6162 days | 5% |
marion | 9/10 | 6169 days | 5% |
Michelle Orr | 10/10 | 6170 days | 5% |
Kevin | 10/10 | 6173 days | 5% |
dieter | 9/10 | 6175 days | 5% |
Pete | 10/10 | 6177 days | 5% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6178 days | 5% |
Richard Kindgren | 10/10 | 6180 days | 5% |
Jessica Callen | 10/10 | 6290 days | 5% |
Sabine | 9/10 | 6400 days | 5% |
Will | 9/10 | 6404 days | 5% |
ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6409 days | 5% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 6409 days | 5% |
Kitsu | 10/10 | 6412 days | 5% |
Valerie | 5/10 | 6415 days | 3% |
Janning | 8/10 | 6424 days | 5% |
Kim Holland | 10/10 | 6424 days | 5% |
Sean | 10/10 | 6428 days | 5% |
Mary | 10/10 | 6439 days | 5% |
PamWalter | 10/10 | 6465 days | 5% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.79% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 52 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.74% |
198 | -3.76% |
199 | -3.78% |
200 | -3.79% |
201 | -3.81% |
202 | -3.83% |
203 | -3.85% |
… | … |
0.90% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.