Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Government Gardens Thermal Area.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Government Gardens Thermal Area
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Government Gardens Thermal Area experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 65 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 65 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 19 |
|
29% |
| 6/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.85% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Government Gardens Thermal Area valid reviews is 73.85% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
74.60%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| El and Em | 9/10 | 79 days | 100% |
| Mel. | 7/10 | 170 days | 93% |
| Paula | 5/10 | 201 days | 75% |
| Rya | 10/10 | 230 days | 98% |
| KERL-travelers | 7/10 | 230 days | 91% |
| Jan | 7/10 | 292 days | 90% |
| tortuga | 8/10 | 292 days | 94% |
| Becks | 5/10 | 322 days | 72% |
| Henry | 9/10 | 414 days | 90% |
| Marg Dale | 7/10 | 445 days | 83% |
| D&S | 9/10 | 445 days | 89% |
| Taylor Russell | 5/10 | 506 days | 65% |
| erica | 6/10 | 536 days | 73% |
| Clem | 6/10 | 536 days | 73% |
| Katie | 7/10 | 536 days | 79% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 567 days | 81% |
| Weronika | 9/10 | 567 days | 82% |
| Helen E | 8/10 | 567 days | 81% |
| Suzanne p | 9/10 | 567 days | 82% |
| Gilles | 6/10 | 626 days | 67% |
| Terry | 8/10 | 687 days | 72% |
| BonnieBE | 5/10 | 718 days | 54% |
| RosieW | 6/10 | 810 days | 54% |
| Rachel Leghorn | 7/10 | 901 days | 50% |
| Sharlene | 9/10 | 1022 days | 41% |
| Ashleigh | 7/10 | 1297 days | 19% |
| Rebecca | 10/10 | 1448 days | 12% |
| Lisa J | 9/10 | 1478 days | 11% |
| sharon armstrong | 10/10 | 1478 days | 11% |
| Roy Swan | 10/10 | 1509 days | 10% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1540 days | 8% |
| Lucy | 8/10 | 1540 days | 8% |
| Celeste | 8/10 | 1662 days | 5% |
| Serena | 6/10 | 1691 days | 4% |
| Emily | 7/10 | 1691 days | 4% |
| Mike Smith | 7/10 | 1722 days | 4% |
| Almudena | 3/10 | 1722 days | 2% |
| Stuart | 7/10 | 1753 days | 4% |
| Isadora | 8/10 | 1753 days | 4% |
| Bert | 7/10 | 1753 days | 4% |
| Silly American | 9/10 | 1753 days | 4% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 6/10 | 1783 days | 3% |
| Lianne | 8/10 | 1814 days | 4% |
| Sven | 7/10 | 1844 days | 3% |
| Steve Mac | 7/10 | 1844 days | 3% |
| Alison | 10/10 | 1936 days | 3% |
| Becca | 7/10 | 1967 days | 3% |
| David Wilson | 8/10 | 1967 days | 3% |
| Lucy751 | 7/10 | 2028 days | 3% |
| Matthias | 8/10 | 2056 days | 3% |
| Courtney | 8/10 | 2056 days | 3% |
| Johnston’s | 8/10 | 2179 days | 3% |
| The Flip Flop Family | 5/10 | 2209 days | 2% |
| Tiago | 7/10 | 2240 days | 3% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 2240 days | 3% |
| jarren Verbeek | 9/10 | 2271 days | 3% |
| A Brad in a van | 7/10 | 2301 days | 2% |
| ascotandanaussie | 6/10 | 2362 days | 2% |
| jofa972 | 8/10 | 2362 days | 3% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 6/10 | 2435 days | 0% |
| Debbie Lesurf | 9/10 | 2490 days | 2% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 8/10 | 2505 days | 2% |
| Jasmine Andrew | 7/10 | 2539 days | 2% |
| Diana Fuenco | 7/10 | 2559 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 2/10 | 2800 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Government Gardens Thermal Area does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
4.80% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
79%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.