Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Share a Camper.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Share a Camper
Valid Reviews
32 Valid Reviews
The Share a Camper experience has a total of 41 reviews. There are 32 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 9 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 32 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
6% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 16 |
|
50% |
42.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Share a Camper valid reviews is 42.81% and is based on 32 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 32 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
65.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Share a Camper face-to-face reviews is 65.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
46.75%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Un happy campers | 1/10 | 1106 days | 100% |
| James Henderson | 1/10 | 1288 days | 59% |
| MELINA M CONDOS | 1/10 | 1836 days | 7% |
| berend hoogendijk | 1/10 | 1867 days | 7% |
| Michel | 1/10 | 1927 days | 7% |
| Not a happy camper | 1/10 | 1958 days | 7% |
| Jenny | 1/10 | 2172 days | 5% |
| Bronwyn Clayton | 10/10 | 2233 days | 24% |
| Lili | 2/10 | 2233 days | 7% |
| amy gibbs | 1/10 | 2261 days | 5% |
| Pete UK | 10/10 | 2261 days | 24% |
| Naomi Lacey | 10/10 | 2292 days | 23% |
| James Cook | 10/10 | 2292 days | 23% |
| Max | 10/10 | 2323 days | 23% |
| malcolm woodford | 1/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| TIMOTHY SYKES | 1/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Ryan Gallagher | 1/10 | 2384 days | 4% |
| Donna O’Meara | 5/10 | 2537 days | 13% |
| Cate | 1/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Wendy Amhurst | 1/10 | 2657 days | 2% |
| Martin Lake | 3/10 | 2657 days | 6% |
| Jono C | 10/10 | 2688 days | 17% |
| Steph Balmer | 1/10 | 2841 days | 1% |
| Frank Ryan | 10/10 | 2978 days | 7% |
| jon good | 8/10 | 2991 days | 12% |
| Julia Achatz | 9/10 | 2993 days | 6% |
| Gwen MERLET | 10/10 | 3022 days | 12% |
| ron watson | 1/10 | 3022 days | 0% |
| Fran Janes | 7/10 | 3053 days | 11% |
| Jon Jon | 1/10 | 3053 days | 0% |
| Hector | 3/10 | 3295 days | -4% |
| Carlos | 4/10 | 3295 days | -2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Share a Camper experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-6.55% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 63 days. The Share a Camper experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Share a Camper experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.49% |
| 198 | -3.51% |
| 199 | -3.53% |
| 200 | -3.55% |
| 201 | -3.56% |
| 202 | -3.58% |
| 203 | -3.60% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
28.88% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Onboarding Rating
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
Final Ranking Score
67%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.