Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Hukafalls Jet Taupo.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Hukafalls Jet Taupo

Valid Reviews

80 Valid Reviews

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
33%
9/10 20
25%
8/10 21
26%
7/10 6
8%
6/10 4
5%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.75% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo valid reviews is 85.75% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

63 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 63 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 17
27%
9/10 18
29%
8/10 16
25%
7/10 6
10%
6/10 4
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

84.76% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo face-to-face reviews is 84.76% and is based on 63 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.01%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Alan 10/10 264 days 100%
Les Hendy 10/10 3103 days 2%
Mauricio Daniele 9/10 3391 days 1%
Marilyn and Steffen 8/10 3448 days 1%
Lea Karl 5/10 3782 days 0%
Franz Birkefeld 6/10 4049 days 0%
Petr Dvorak 9/10 4441 days 0%
Jes Paulsen 9/10 4514 days 0%
Siegfried Richter 10/10 4810 days 0%
Grahame MacKay 8/10 4821 days 0%
Tim Clark 8/10 4828 days 0%
Steve Neilson 10/10 4898 days 0%
Stefanny Ling 7/10 5131 days 0%
Kate Morgan 9/10 5154 days 0%
Andy Johnson 9/10 5157 days 0%
Shirley 10/10 5164 days 0%
Belony 10/10 5181 days 0%
Tayler Gray 8/10 5181 days 0%
Harriet Banes 9/10 5185 days 0%
Lynn Leitch 9/10 5187 days 0%
Stephen Leitch 10/10 5187 days 0%
Jane Hancock 10/10 5189 days 0%
katiec82 10/10 5378 days 0%
thomo182 10/10 5470 days 0%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5513 days 0%
Gerhard Kronen 9/10 5528 days 0%
Susiekj 10/10 5531 days 0%
B Willmore 10/10 5533 days 0%
Mark and Natasha UK 9/10 5533 days 0%
Alzbeta Czech 10/10 5545 days 0%
Tanja Titze 9/10 5552 days 0%
Caitriona Doyle 3/10 5553 days 0%
Toni 8/10 5553 days 0%
Arne van Schol 7/10 5555 days 0%
Sebastian Kramer 8/10 5565 days 0%
pedawrds 10/10 5610 days 0%
Steven Walsh 8/10 5629 days 0%
Holly 8/10 5682 days 0%
trvlbug 10/10 5774 days 0%
Kirsten Stewart 9/10 5804 days 0%
IRLJohnny 4/10 5835 days 0%
Debra-anne Signal 10/10 5835 days 0%
suet 9/10 5865 days 0%
Nick 10/10 5881 days 0%
John 10/10 5908 days 0%
Bobby 10/10 5914 days 0%
niall stephenson 8/10 5928 days 0%
Ko 8/10 5929 days 0%
Kelly 8/10 5931 days 0%
Patricia 8/10 5933 days 0%
Cindy 7/10 5978 days 0%
Paul 9/10 5982 days 0%
rustytrombone 8/10 6016 days 0%
Louise 9/10 6029 days 0%
Michelle 9/10 6039 days 0%
Atsuko 8/10 6071 days 0%
Bronagh Mcartan 7/10 6113 days 0%
Naki_Girlz 8/10 6195 days 0%
L1z4rd 8/10 6195 days 0%
Liz Brown 10/10 6201 days 0%
Hoetnagels 8/10 6248 days 0%
RhysP 7/10 6250 days 0%
James Davies 10/10 6257 days 0%
Richard Steward 10/10 6262 days 0%
Silvia 7/10 6262 days 0%
Stacy Gould 10/10 6265 days 0%
Sabine Feiner 9/10 6270 days 0%
lawrence Walker 8/10 6339 days 0%
FrankOosterwijk 8/10 6552 days 0%
Bonnie 9/10 6575 days 0%
Clive 9/10 6581 days 0%
Kitsu 9/10 6589 days 0%
Mike Shirley 8/10 6593 days 0%
Fred Highsmith 8/10 6595 days 0%
Roran 6/10 6612 days 0%
Elena Babitcheva 10/10 6612 days 0%
Mary 6/10 6616 days 0%
Didier 6/10 6639 days 0%
Rolf 10/10 6643 days 0%
Nicole 9/10 6643 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.31% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 70 days. However the Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.26%
198 -3.28%
199 -3.30%
200 -3.31%
201 -3.33%
202 -3.35%
203 -3.36%

Balancing Adjustment

0.91% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.