Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2219 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 2998 days | 81% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 3001 days | 97% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 3001 days | 95% |
Tome | 8/10 | 3024 days | 93% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3284 days | 67% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3322 days | 69% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3331 days | 67% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3377 days | 65% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3379 days | 63% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3621 days | 43% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3642 days | 42% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3692 days | 35% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3908 days | 20% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 3996 days | 13% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 4001 days | 12% |
Laura | 8/10 | 4012 days | 11% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 4014 days | 11% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 4015 days | 9% |
Libby | 9/10 | 4039 days | 9% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 4067 days | 5% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 4067 days | 5% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4138 days | 0% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4382 days | 24% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4383 days | 23% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4387 days | 21% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4390 days | 23% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4406 days | 24% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4411 days | 24% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4442 days | 24% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4442 days | 24% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4717 days | 24% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4740 days | 18% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4744 days | 21% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4758 days | 24% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4760 days | 24% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4761 days | 24% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4762 days | 23% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4765 days | 9% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4770 days | 18% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4772 days | 24% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4776 days | 23% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4846 days | 24% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4848 days | 23% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4848 days | 9% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4855 days | 23% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4869 days | 4% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5100 days | 24% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5103 days | 23% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5104 days | 24% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5105 days | 23% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5111 days | 21% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5113 days | 13% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5118 days | 23% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5119 days | 23% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5129 days | 23% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5130 days | 23% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5133 days | 9% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5134 days | 23% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5137 days | 24% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5138 days | 4% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5141 days | 23% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5141 days | 23% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5204 days | 24% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5234 days | 23% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5466 days | 23% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5470 days | 23% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5482 days | 18% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5493 days | 23% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5500 days | 23% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5513 days | 24% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5521 days | 24% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5554 days | 23% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5567 days | 23% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5573 days | 23% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5573 days | 23% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5573 days | 24% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5581 days | 21% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5584 days | 21% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5592 days | 23% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5722 days | 4% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5783 days | 24% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5807 days | 23% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5809 days | 18% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5810 days | 23% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5818 days | 13% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5820 days | 23% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5830 days | 23% |
david | 9/10 | 5830 days | 23% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5837 days | 23% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5837 days | 24% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5837 days | 23% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5844 days | 0% |
IM | 8/10 | 5844 days | 23% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5846 days | 21% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5846 days | 21% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5846 days | 13% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5846 days | 18% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5846 days | 18% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5846 days | 23% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5847 days | 18% |
John | 8/10 | 5849 days | 23% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5854 days | 13% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5854 days | 23% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5858 days | 13% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5861 days | 23% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5863 days | 24% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5863 days | 23% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5868 days | 21% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5875 days | 24% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5875 days | 23% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5875 days | 24% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5876 days | 21% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5879 days | 24% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5879 days | 24% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5881 days | 23% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5885 days | 9% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5900 days | 24% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5912 days | 24% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5917 days | 21% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5925 days | 23% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5931 days | 23% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5938 days | 23% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5944 days | 24% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5947 days | 23% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5953 days | 24% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5987 days | 21% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5988 days | 24% |
Lara | 9/10 | 5990 days | 23% |
Kay | 10/10 | 5992 days | 24% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 5999 days | 24% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 6022 days | 24% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6179 days | 4% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6189 days | 23% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6190 days | 24% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6197 days | 21% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6197 days | 23% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6199 days | 23% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6199 days | 24% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6199 days | 21% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6200 days | 23% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6204 days | 4% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6204 days | 23% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6205 days | 23% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6205 days | 23% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6206 days | 18% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6210 days | 24% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6212 days | 23% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6222 days | 23% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6222 days | 23% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6222 days | 23% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6226 days | 0% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6226 days | 23% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6226 days | 21% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6226 days | 23% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6227 days | 23% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6232 days | 13% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6252 days | 24% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6253 days | 23% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6253 days | 24% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6253 days | 23% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6253 days | 23% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6255 days | 23% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6256 days | 23% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6256 days | 23% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6260 days | 23% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6260 days | 4% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6261 days | 21% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6265 days | 23% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6284 days | 21% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6287 days | 23% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6294 days | 23% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6297 days | 23% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6303 days | 23% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6305 days | 21% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6415 days | 21% |
James | 8/10 | 6415 days | 23% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6503 days | 24% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6519 days | 23% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6520 days | 23% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6529 days | 23% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6529 days | 23% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6529 days | 23% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6531 days | 23% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6531 days | 21% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6531 days | 23% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6536 days | 21% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6536 days | 23% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6537 days | 23% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6537 days | 23% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6538 days | 23% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6540 days | 23% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6541 days | 23% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6543 days | 23% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6543 days | 23% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6550 days | 21% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6550 days | 21% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6550 days | 23% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6560 days | 23% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6568 days | 23% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6569 days | 24% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6569 days | 24% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6571 days | 23% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6583 days | 23% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6587 days | 9% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6589 days | 4% |
johan | 5/10 | 6596 days | 13% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6602 days | 24% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6604 days | 23% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8126 days | 9% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.11% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 55 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.05% |
198 | -4.07% |
199 | -4.09% |
200 | -4.11% |
201 | -4.13% |
202 | -4.15% |
203 | -4.17% |
… | … |
3.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.