Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.72%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2253 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 3032 days | 81% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 3035 days | 96% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 3035 days | 94% |
Tome | 8/10 | 3058 days | 92% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3318 days | 66% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3356 days | 68% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3365 days | 67% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3411 days | 65% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3413 days | 63% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3655 days | 43% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3676 days | 41% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3726 days | 34% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3942 days | 19% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 4030 days | 12% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 4035 days | 11% |
Laura | 8/10 | 4046 days | 10% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 4048 days | 11% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 4049 days | 9% |
Libby | 9/10 | 4073 days | 8% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 4101 days | 5% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 4101 days | 5% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4172 days | 0% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4416 days | 26% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4417 days | 25% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4421 days | 23% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4424 days | 25% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4440 days | 26% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4445 days | 26% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4476 days | 26% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4476 days | 26% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4751 days | 26% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4774 days | 20% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4778 days | 23% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4792 days | 26% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4794 days | 26% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4795 days | 26% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4796 days | 25% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4799 days | 11% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4804 days | 20% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4806 days | 26% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4810 days | 25% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4880 days | 26% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4882 days | 25% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4882 days | 11% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4889 days | 25% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4903 days | 6% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5134 days | 26% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5137 days | 25% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5138 days | 26% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5139 days | 25% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5145 days | 23% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5147 days | 16% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5152 days | 25% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5153 days | 25% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5163 days | 25% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5164 days | 25% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5167 days | 11% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5168 days | 25% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5171 days | 26% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5172 days | 6% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5175 days | 25% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5175 days | 25% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5238 days | 26% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5268 days | 25% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5500 days | 25% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5504 days | 25% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5516 days | 20% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5527 days | 25% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5534 days | 25% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5547 days | 26% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5555 days | 26% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5588 days | 25% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5601 days | 25% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5607 days | 25% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5607 days | 25% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5607 days | 26% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5615 days | 23% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5618 days | 23% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5626 days | 25% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5756 days | 6% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5817 days | 26% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5841 days | 25% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5843 days | 20% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5844 days | 25% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5852 days | 16% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5854 days | 25% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5864 days | 25% |
david | 9/10 | 5864 days | 25% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5871 days | 25% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5871 days | 26% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5871 days | 25% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5878 days | 2% |
IM | 8/10 | 5878 days | 25% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5880 days | 23% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5880 days | 23% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5880 days | 16% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5880 days | 20% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5880 days | 20% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5880 days | 25% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5881 days | 20% |
John | 8/10 | 5883 days | 25% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5888 days | 16% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5888 days | 25% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5892 days | 16% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5895 days | 25% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5897 days | 26% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5897 days | 25% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5902 days | 23% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5909 days | 26% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5909 days | 25% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5909 days | 26% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5910 days | 23% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5913 days | 26% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5913 days | 26% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5915 days | 25% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5919 days | 11% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5934 days | 26% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5946 days | 26% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5951 days | 23% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5959 days | 25% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5965 days | 25% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5972 days | 25% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5978 days | 26% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5981 days | 25% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5987 days | 26% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 6021 days | 23% |
Chris | 10/10 | 6022 days | 26% |
Lara | 9/10 | 6024 days | 25% |
Kay | 10/10 | 6026 days | 26% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 6033 days | 26% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 6056 days | 26% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6213 days | 6% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6223 days | 25% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6224 days | 26% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6231 days | 23% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6231 days | 25% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6233 days | 25% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6233 days | 26% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6233 days | 23% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6234 days | 25% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6238 days | 6% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6238 days | 25% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6239 days | 25% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6239 days | 25% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6240 days | 20% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6244 days | 26% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6246 days | 25% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6256 days | 25% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6256 days | 25% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6256 days | 25% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6260 days | 2% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6260 days | 25% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6260 days | 23% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6260 days | 25% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6261 days | 25% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6266 days | 16% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6286 days | 26% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6287 days | 25% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6287 days | 26% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6287 days | 25% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6287 days | 25% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6289 days | 25% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6290 days | 25% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6290 days | 25% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6294 days | 25% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6294 days | 6% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6295 days | 23% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6299 days | 25% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6318 days | 23% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6321 days | 25% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6328 days | 25% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6331 days | 25% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6337 days | 25% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6339 days | 23% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6449 days | 23% |
James | 8/10 | 6449 days | 25% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6537 days | 26% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6553 days | 25% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6554 days | 25% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6563 days | 25% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6563 days | 25% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6563 days | 25% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6565 days | 25% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6565 days | 23% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6565 days | 25% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6570 days | 23% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6570 days | 25% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6571 days | 25% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6571 days | 25% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6572 days | 25% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6574 days | 25% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6575 days | 25% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6577 days | 25% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6577 days | 25% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6584 days | 23% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6584 days | 23% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6584 days | 25% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6594 days | 25% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6602 days | 25% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6603 days | 26% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6603 days | 26% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6605 days | 25% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6617 days | 25% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6621 days | 11% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6623 days | 6% |
johan | 5/10 | 6630 days | 16% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6636 days | 26% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6638 days | 25% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8160 days | 11% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.68% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.63% |
198 | -3.65% |
199 | -3.66% |
200 | -3.68% |
201 | -3.70% |
202 | -3.72% |
203 | -3.74% |
… | … |
3.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.