Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.29%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2148 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 2926 days | 86% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 2929 days | 99% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 2929 days | 97% |
Tome | 8/10 | 2952 days | 96% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3212 days | 74% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3250 days | 77% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3259 days | 75% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3306 days | 73% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3307 days | 72% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3550 days | 55% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3570 days | 54% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3620 days | 48% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3836 days | 36% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 3924 days | 30% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 3929 days | 30% |
Laura | 8/10 | 3940 days | 29% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3942 days | 29% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 3943 days | 27% |
Libby | 9/10 | 3967 days | 28% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 3995 days | 24% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 3995 days | 24% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4066 days | 21% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4310 days | 4% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4311 days | 4% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4315 days | 3% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4318 days | 4% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4334 days | 2% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4339 days | 2% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4645 days | 35% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4668 days | 30% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4672 days | 32% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4686 days | 35% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4688 days | 35% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4689 days | 35% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4690 days | 34% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4693 days | 22% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4698 days | 30% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4700 days | 35% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4704 days | 34% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4774 days | 35% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4776 days | 34% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4776 days | 22% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4783 days | 34% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4797 days | 19% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5028 days | 35% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5031 days | 34% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5032 days | 35% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5033 days | 34% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5039 days | 32% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5041 days | 26% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5046 days | 34% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5047 days | 34% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5057 days | 34% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5058 days | 34% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5061 days | 22% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5062 days | 34% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5065 days | 35% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5066 days | 19% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5069 days | 34% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5069 days | 34% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5132 days | 35% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5162 days | 34% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5394 days | 34% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5398 days | 34% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5410 days | 30% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5421 days | 34% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5428 days | 34% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5441 days | 35% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5449 days | 35% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5482 days | 34% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5495 days | 34% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5501 days | 34% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5501 days | 34% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5501 days | 35% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5509 days | 32% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5512 days | 32% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5520 days | 34% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5650 days | 19% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5711 days | 35% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5735 days | 34% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5737 days | 30% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5738 days | 34% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5746 days | 26% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5748 days | 34% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5758 days | 34% |
david | 9/10 | 5759 days | 34% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5765 days | 34% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5765 days | 35% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5765 days | 34% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5772 days | 15% |
IM | 8/10 | 5773 days | 34% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5774 days | 32% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5774 days | 32% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5774 days | 26% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5774 days | 30% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5774 days | 30% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5775 days | 34% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5775 days | 30% |
John | 8/10 | 5778 days | 34% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5782 days | 26% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5782 days | 34% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5786 days | 26% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5789 days | 34% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5792 days | 35% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5792 days | 34% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5796 days | 32% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5803 days | 35% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5803 days | 34% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5803 days | 35% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5805 days | 32% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5807 days | 35% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5807 days | 35% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5809 days | 34% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5813 days | 22% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5829 days | 35% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5840 days | 35% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5845 days | 32% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5854 days | 34% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5860 days | 34% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5867 days | 34% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5873 days | 35% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5876 days | 34% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5882 days | 35% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5916 days | 32% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5916 days | 35% |
Lara | 9/10 | 5919 days | 34% |
Kay | 10/10 | 5920 days | 35% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 5928 days | 35% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 5950 days | 35% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6107 days | 19% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6117 days | 34% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6118 days | 35% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6125 days | 32% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6125 days | 34% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6127 days | 34% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6127 days | 35% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6127 days | 32% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6128 days | 34% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6132 days | 19% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6132 days | 34% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6133 days | 34% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6133 days | 34% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6134 days | 30% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6138 days | 35% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6140 days | 34% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6150 days | 34% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6150 days | 34% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6150 days | 34% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6154 days | 15% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6154 days | 34% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6154 days | 32% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6154 days | 34% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6156 days | 34% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6160 days | 26% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6180 days | 35% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6181 days | 34% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6181 days | 35% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6181 days | 34% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6181 days | 34% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6183 days | 34% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6184 days | 34% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6184 days | 34% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6188 days | 34% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6188 days | 19% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6189 days | 32% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6193 days | 34% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6212 days | 32% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6215 days | 34% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6222 days | 34% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6225 days | 34% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6231 days | 34% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6233 days | 32% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6343 days | 32% |
James | 8/10 | 6343 days | 34% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6431 days | 35% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6447 days | 34% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6448 days | 34% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6457 days | 34% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6457 days | 34% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6457 days | 34% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6459 days | 34% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6459 days | 32% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6459 days | 34% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6464 days | 32% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6464 days | 34% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6465 days | 34% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6465 days | 34% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6466 days | 34% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6468 days | 34% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6469 days | 34% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6471 days | 34% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6471 days | 34% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6478 days | 32% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6478 days | 32% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6478 days | 34% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6488 days | 34% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6496 days | 34% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6497 days | 35% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6497 days | 35% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6499 days | 34% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6511 days | 34% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6515 days | 22% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6517 days | 19% |
johan | 5/10 | 6524 days | 26% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6530 days | 35% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6532 days | 34% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8054 days | 22% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.98% |
198 | -4.00% |
199 | -4.02% |
200 | -4.04% |
201 | -4.06% |
202 | -4.08% |
203 | -4.10% |
… | … |
3.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.