G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort
Valid Reviews
69 Valid Reviews
The Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience has a total of 72 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 26 |
|
38% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.75% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort valid reviews is 82.75% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
60 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 60 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
12% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
40% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort face-to-face reviews is 81.83% and is based on 60 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
83.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johannes F | 8/10 | 3038 days | 100% |
| ben carroll | 10/10 | 3068 days | 100% |
| Ludovica Velo | 9/10 | 3334 days | 73% |
| Jan | 6/10 | 3342 days | 59% |
| Ral Pritchard | 8/10 | 3358 days | 69% |
| Catherine Schlachter | 9/10 | 4020 days | 6% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 4020 days | 6% |
| Marc Engstle | 8/10 | 4067 days | 2% |
| Toke Frederiksen | 7/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| Jirka Sirka | 10/10 | 4398 days | 22% |
| Jill Fischer | 9/10 | 4438 days | 21% |
| Craig Jones | 8/10 | 4469 days | 21% |
| Michal | 8/10 | 4486 days | 21% |
| Adam Hassan | 8/10 | 4505 days | 21% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 9/10 | 4505 days | 21% |
| The Mowbrays | 9/10 | 4510 days | 21% |
| Helmut Schmid | 10/10 | 4769 days | 22% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 4782 days | 21% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 4782 days | 21% |
| Suzanne van Kol | 9/10 | 4797 days | 21% |
| Ellen Jacobs | 8/10 | 4802 days | 21% |
| _mel_ | 8/10 | 4835 days | 21% |
| kiwifrenchy | 7/10 | 4835 days | 18% |
| Tobias Forst | 9/10 | 4867 days | 21% |
| Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4873 days | 22% |
| David & Mary-Jane Ryder | 10/10 | 4878 days | 22% |
| Eric & Liz McKean | 10/10 | 5123 days | 22% |
| Aimee Pollett | 7/10 | 5131 days | 18% |
| Marty Fey | 7/10 | 5132 days | 18% |
| Joop Ezendam | 8/10 | 5133 days | 21% |
| John Taylor | 9/10 | 5140 days | 21% |
| Nick Roberts | 7/10 | 5144 days | 18% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 9/10 | 5144 days | 21% |
| mr Schumader | 8/10 | 5155 days | 21% |
| Eva Weichs | 7/10 | 5159 days | 18% |
| David | 10/10 | 5159 days | 22% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 8/10 | 5161 days | 21% |
| Matthijs Muijsers | 8/10 | 5162 days | 21% |
| Alan & Gill Geach | 8/10 | 5163 days | 21% |
| Sarah Ewing | 10/10 | 5166 days | 22% |
| weed | 9/10 | 5169 days | 21% |
| HighlandLassie | 10/10 | 5169 days | 22% |
| Gunther | 9/10 | 5419 days | 21% |
| Adam Gerrard | 5/10 | 5436 days | 10% |
| marisraneth | 8/10 | 5475 days | 21% |
| John N | 9/10 | 5500 days | 21% |
| Blair Malcolm | 7/10 | 5515 days | 18% |
| Josy | 5/10 | 5526 days | 10% |
| JeanOddy | 9/10 | 5528 days | 21% |
| jeffandlou | 8/10 | 5585 days | 21% |
| Jarda Novotag | 6/10 | 5606 days | 15% |
| Charles Lyne | 9/10 | 5810 days | 21% |
| LucieG | 8/10 | 5849 days | 21% |
| ZimmermannA | 8/10 | 5849 days | 21% |
| CharlesG | 7/10 | 5852 days | 18% |
| Kruiver | 8/10 | 5859 days | 21% |
| MauzcoV | 8/10 | 5860 days | 21% |
| Jasmin | 8/10 | 5870 days | 21% |
| Nadine | 9/10 | 5870 days | 21% |
| AnthonyB1 | 9/10 | 5874 days | 21% |
| Rafael | 5/10 | 5876 days | 10% |
| Marieke | 9/10 | 5933 days | 21% |
| woodolly | 10/10 | 6183 days | 22% |
| Linda and Peter | 8/10 | 6219 days | 21% |
| Andria Davis | 8/10 | 6233 days | 21% |
| Jane Holm | 8/10 | 6288 days | 21% |
| Bas Marieke | 9/10 | 6581 days | 21% |
| Dennis | 9/10 | 6587 days | 21% |
| Ulla | 9/10 | 6594 days | 21% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.81% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.75% |
| 198 | -3.77% |
| 199 | -3.79% |
| 200 | -3.81% |
| 201 | -3.82% |
| 202 | -3.84% |
| 203 | -3.86% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.11% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.