Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Skyline Luge Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
162 Valid Reviews
The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has a total of 163 reviews. There are 162 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 162 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 39 |
|
24% |
9/10 | 47 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 40 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 23 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skyline Luge Queenstown valid reviews is 84.38% and is based on 162 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
121 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 162 valid reviews, the experience has 121 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 35 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 32 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 18 |
|
15% |
6/10 | 8 |
|
7% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skyline Luge Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 83.39% and is based on 121 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.63%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Katrina | 5/10 | 2681 days | 77% |
Nicole and Timm | 10/10 | 2714 days | 100% |
Phil Baker | 8/10 | 2716 days | 98% |
Jessica and Henry | 9/10 | 2954 days | 84% |
Audeme Mechain | 9/10 | 2956 days | 84% |
C Clarke | 10/10 | 2978 days | 84% |
Alice Ormandy | 7/10 | 3000 days | 76% |
Chloe Olsen | 6/10 | 3003 days | 70% |
Natasha | 9/10 | 3030 days | 80% |
Barbara Knops | 8/10 | 3035 days | 78% |
Dries | 9/10 | 3036 days | 79% |
Rebecca Holmes | 6/10 | 3037 days | 68% |
Nathalie | 10/10 | 3040 days | 80% |
Hannah Phoenix | 9/10 | 3044 days | 79% |
Manu Liberta | 10/10 | 3045 days | 79% |
Yee How | 8/10 | 3053 days | 77% |
Nanda Dyke | 8/10 | 3061 days | 77% |
Austin Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3084 days | 76% |
Niall Regan | 8/10 | 3092 days | 75% |
Dita Vasquez | 9/10 | 3105 days | 75% |
Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3293 days | 64% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3306 days | 62% |
Sonya Grimm | 9/10 | 3307 days | 63% |
Laura Schafer | 9/10 | 3340 days | 61% |
Remi Lopez | 7/10 | 3341 days | 57% |
David Tholander | 5/10 | 3341 days | 46% |
Melanie Kronbichler | 8/10 | 3352 days | 59% |
Lea Watterson | 9/10 | 3355 days | 60% |
Nicola Wiggan | 8/10 | 3395 days | 57% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 3678 days | 40% |
Chris | 7/10 | 3678 days | 37% |
Sam Smith | 7/10 | 3687 days | 37% |
Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 4019 days | 19% |
Iris Anette Berger | 9/10 | 4019 days | 19% |
Penny Lee | 8/10 | 4026 days | 18% |
Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 4080 days | 15% |
Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4087 days | 15% |
Daniel Danamer | 9/10 | 4090 days | 15% |
Andrew Cattanach | 8/10 | 4112 days | 13% |
Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4112 days | 13% |
Rory Seaton | 7/10 | 4113 days | 12% |
Emeline Dupre | 7/10 | 4113 days | 12% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4265 days | 4% |
hendrik king | 8/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
Yves Vennewald | 7/10 | 4405 days | 26% |
Pia Pitkala | 8/10 | 4407 days | 28% |
Billy Koichopolos | 10/10 | 4411 days | 28% |
Gina Lisi | 10/10 | 4411 days | 28% |
Dave Mertzig | 6/10 | 4418 days | 24% |
Lorna and Seb | 5/10 | 4421 days | 21% |
Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4477 days | 28% |
Dagette | 10/10 | 4569 days | 28% |
Paul Kelly | 10/10 | 4599 days | 28% |
Esther Goh | 10/10 | 4722 days | 28% |
Steffien | 10/10 | 4752 days | 28% |
Jill Homewood | 8/10 | 4776 days | 28% |
Armin Boehmer | 7/10 | 4778 days | 26% |
Anne King | 8/10 | 4792 days | 28% |
Hayley Atkinson | 10/10 | 4794 days | 28% |
Melanie | 6/10 | 4795 days | 24% |
Seth & Carla | 10/10 | 4797 days | 28% |
ToGy | 8/10 | 4812 days | 28% |
J Bliss | 9/10 | 4874 days | 28% |
James McColl | 7/10 | 4904 days | 26% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4965 days | 28% |
cruisysue | 7/10 | 4996 days | 26% |
Sam papworth | 10/10 | 5117 days | 28% |
Jon_and_Family | 10/10 | 5118 days | 28% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5133 days | 28% |
Steve & Pearl Baker | 9/10 | 5139 days | 28% |
Victoria Boolsen | 9/10 | 5141 days | 28% |
Tanya & Florian | 10/10 | 5143 days | 28% |
taniadeanryanbrittany | 9/10 | 5149 days | 28% |
Katie Mitchell | 10/10 | 5149 days | 28% |
Lenore Dejong | 9/10 | 5151 days | 28% |
Caroline Sheridan | 7/10 | 5153 days | 26% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5156 days | 28% |
Lauren Pestell | 10/10 | 5156 days | 28% |
John | 8/10 | 5161 days | 28% |
Van den Borne | 8/10 | 5163 days | 28% |
Julia | 9/10 | 5169 days | 28% |
georgiarose89 | 7/10 | 5208 days | 26% |
Lyndell | 7/10 | 5239 days | 26% |
Jill | 9/10 | 5269 days | 28% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5300 days | 28% |
thomas merrin | 10/10 | 5483 days | 28% |
Marcus Kippner | 8/10 | 5505 days | 28% |
John Bost | 8/10 | 5514 days | 28% |
Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5523 days | 28% |
Pete Hallam | 8/10 | 5541 days | 28% |
Samantha Piekuta | 8/10 | 5551 days | 28% |
Gracieb | 9/10 | 5573 days | 28% |
wenerz | 8/10 | 5589 days | 28% |
TomL | 8/10 | 5634 days | 28% |
eowyn2k | 9/10 | 5634 days | 28% |
rincoln | 8/10 | 5634 days | 28% |
paulandcathy | 9/10 | 5665 days | 28% |
ToryL | 6/10 | 5726 days | 24% |
jessica | 8/10 | 5769 days | 28% |
DustyLaptop | 8/10 | 5787 days | 28% |
gerrys | 8/10 | 5803 days | 28% |
Sofie | 9/10 | 5818 days | 28% |
Johnnie | 8/10 | 5829 days | 28% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5848 days | 28% |
kymberlyw | 10/10 | 5849 days | 28% |
Becca1 | 10/10 | 5850 days | 28% |
Andy Baker | 8/10 | 5868 days | 28% |
amyd | 8/10 | 5879 days | 28% |
RichardB1 | 9/10 | 5883 days | 28% |
RobH | 10/10 | 5884 days | 28% |
Theresa | 10/10 | 5884 days | 28% |
Brian | 8/10 | 5887 days | 28% |
Amanda Williams | 10/10 | 5888 days | 28% |
Kelly23 | 10/10 | 5926 days | 28% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5961 days | 28% |
Laura | 9/10 | 5973 days | 28% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5973 days | 28% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6023 days | 28% |
Davina | 8/10 | 6023 days | 28% |
Jennie | 8/10 | 6054 days | 28% |
Spike | 10/10 | 6054 days | 28% |
Zoe Summers | 7/10 | 6060 days | 26% |
Annie Walsh | 6/10 | 6063 days | 24% |
Tsmith | 9/10 | 6091 days | 28% |
Charlie Bond | 9/10 | 6129 days | 28% |
Rhys Howell | 10/10 | 6190 days | 28% |
Ben | 10/10 | 6219 days | 28% |
Benjamin Throk | 8/10 | 6227 days | 28% |
Elizabeth Woodruff | 9/10 | 6228 days | 28% |
Jason Page | 7/10 | 6228 days | 26% |
Stuart Bartram | 9/10 | 6231 days | 28% |
Klaus Uhl | 6/10 | 6231 days | 24% |
Beixin Wang | 10/10 | 6234 days | 28% |
Neil | 10/10 | 6239 days | 28% |
Emily Houston | 7/10 | 6245 days | 26% |
Kenneth and Mette | 10/10 | 6248 days | 28% |
Lena1 | 9/10 | 6248 days | 28% |
Pauline Thai | 8/10 | 6267 days | 28% |
Bex | 9/10 | 6275 days | 28% |
Rebekah Holbrook | 8/10 | 6276 days | 28% |
Simon Chettleburgh | 7/10 | 6276 days | 26% |
Stephen Brightman | 7/10 | 6276 days | 26% |
Tim | 9/10 | 6288 days | 28% |
Hugh McCarthy | 7/10 | 6295 days | 26% |
Dave Simmons | 10/10 | 6323 days | 28% |
purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6335 days | 28% |
Wendy Williams | 7/10 | 6340 days | 26% |
Rene Schotvanger | 8/10 | 6450 days | 28% |
Julie | 7/10 | 6534 days | 26% |
Svenja | 9/10 | 6564 days | 28% |
Michael | 9/10 | 6566 days | 28% |
Adi | 10/10 | 6574 days | 28% |
Kate | 7/10 | 6574 days | 26% |
Raul | 9/10 | 6583 days | 28% |
Hanneke | 7/10 | 6592 days | 26% |
Jennifer | 9/10 | 6602 days | 28% |
Ian | 9/10 | 6602 days | 28% |
Pam | 4/10 | 6604 days | 17% |
Fabian | 8/10 | 6606 days | 28% |
Helle | 9/10 | 6613 days | 28% |
beesom | 6/10 | 6614 days | 24% |
Albert | 6/10 | 6631 days | 24% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.66% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Skyline Luge Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.61% |
198 | -3.63% |
199 | -3.65% |
200 | -3.66% |
201 | -3.68% |
202 | -3.70% |
203 | -3.72% |
… | … |
2.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.