Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Skyline Luge Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
162 Valid Reviews
The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has a total of 163 reviews. There are 162 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 162 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 39 |
|
24% |
9/10 | 47 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 40 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 23 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skyline Luge Queenstown valid reviews is 84.38% and is based on 162 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
121 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 162 valid reviews, the experience has 121 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 35 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 32 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 18 |
|
15% |
6/10 | 8 |
|
7% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skyline Luge Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 83.39% and is based on 121 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.63%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Katrina | 5/10 | 2674 days | 77% |
Nicole and Timm | 10/10 | 2707 days | 100% |
Phil Baker | 8/10 | 2709 days | 98% |
Jessica and Henry | 9/10 | 2947 days | 84% |
Audeme Mechain | 9/10 | 2949 days | 84% |
C Clarke | 10/10 | 2971 days | 84% |
Alice Ormandy | 7/10 | 2993 days | 76% |
Chloe Olsen | 6/10 | 2996 days | 70% |
Natasha | 9/10 | 3023 days | 80% |
Barbara Knops | 8/10 | 3028 days | 78% |
Dries | 9/10 | 3029 days | 79% |
Rebecca Holmes | 6/10 | 3030 days | 68% |
Nathalie | 10/10 | 3033 days | 80% |
Hannah Phoenix | 9/10 | 3037 days | 79% |
Manu Liberta | 10/10 | 3038 days | 79% |
Yee How | 8/10 | 3046 days | 77% |
Nanda Dyke | 8/10 | 3054 days | 77% |
Austin Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3077 days | 76% |
Niall Regan | 8/10 | 3085 days | 75% |
Dita Vasquez | 9/10 | 3098 days | 75% |
Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3286 days | 64% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3299 days | 62% |
Sonya Grimm | 9/10 | 3300 days | 63% |
Laura Schafer | 9/10 | 3333 days | 61% |
Remi Lopez | 7/10 | 3334 days | 57% |
David Tholander | 5/10 | 3334 days | 46% |
Melanie Kronbichler | 8/10 | 3345 days | 59% |
Lea Watterson | 9/10 | 3348 days | 60% |
Nicola Wiggan | 8/10 | 3388 days | 57% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 3671 days | 40% |
Chris | 7/10 | 3671 days | 37% |
Sam Smith | 7/10 | 3680 days | 37% |
Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 4012 days | 19% |
Iris Anette Berger | 9/10 | 4012 days | 19% |
Penny Lee | 8/10 | 4019 days | 18% |
Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 4073 days | 15% |
Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4080 days | 15% |
Daniel Danamer | 9/10 | 4083 days | 15% |
Andrew Cattanach | 8/10 | 4105 days | 13% |
Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4105 days | 13% |
Rory Seaton | 7/10 | 4106 days | 12% |
Emeline Dupre | 7/10 | 4106 days | 12% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4258 days | 4% |
hendrik king | 8/10 | 4319 days | 0% |
Yves Vennewald | 7/10 | 4398 days | 26% |
Pia Pitkala | 8/10 | 4400 days | 27% |
Billy Koichopolos | 10/10 | 4404 days | 28% |
Gina Lisi | 10/10 | 4404 days | 28% |
Dave Mertzig | 6/10 | 4411 days | 24% |
Lorna and Seb | 5/10 | 4414 days | 20% |
Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4470 days | 28% |
Dagette | 10/10 | 4562 days | 28% |
Paul Kelly | 10/10 | 4592 days | 28% |
Esther Goh | 10/10 | 4715 days | 28% |
Steffien | 10/10 | 4745 days | 28% |
Jill Homewood | 8/10 | 4769 days | 27% |
Armin Boehmer | 7/10 | 4771 days | 26% |
Anne King | 8/10 | 4785 days | 27% |
Hayley Atkinson | 10/10 | 4787 days | 28% |
Melanie | 6/10 | 4788 days | 24% |
Seth & Carla | 10/10 | 4790 days | 28% |
ToGy | 8/10 | 4805 days | 27% |
J Bliss | 9/10 | 4867 days | 28% |
James McColl | 7/10 | 4897 days | 26% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4958 days | 28% |
cruisysue | 7/10 | 4989 days | 26% |
Sam papworth | 10/10 | 5110 days | 28% |
Jon_and_Family | 10/10 | 5111 days | 28% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5126 days | 28% |
Steve & Pearl Baker | 9/10 | 5132 days | 28% |
Victoria Boolsen | 9/10 | 5134 days | 28% |
Tanya & Florian | 10/10 | 5136 days | 28% |
taniadeanryanbrittany | 9/10 | 5142 days | 28% |
Katie Mitchell | 10/10 | 5142 days | 28% |
Lenore Dejong | 9/10 | 5144 days | 28% |
Caroline Sheridan | 7/10 | 5146 days | 26% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5149 days | 28% |
Lauren Pestell | 10/10 | 5149 days | 28% |
John | 8/10 | 5154 days | 27% |
Van den Borne | 8/10 | 5156 days | 27% |
Julia | 9/10 | 5162 days | 28% |
georgiarose89 | 7/10 | 5201 days | 26% |
Lyndell | 7/10 | 5232 days | 26% |
Jill | 9/10 | 5262 days | 28% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5293 days | 28% |
thomas merrin | 10/10 | 5476 days | 28% |
Marcus Kippner | 8/10 | 5498 days | 27% |
John Bost | 8/10 | 5507 days | 27% |
Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5516 days | 28% |
Pete Hallam | 8/10 | 5534 days | 27% |
Samantha Piekuta | 8/10 | 5544 days | 27% |
Gracieb | 9/10 | 5566 days | 28% |
wenerz | 8/10 | 5582 days | 27% |
TomL | 8/10 | 5627 days | 27% |
eowyn2k | 9/10 | 5627 days | 28% |
rincoln | 8/10 | 5627 days | 27% |
paulandcathy | 9/10 | 5658 days | 28% |
ToryL | 6/10 | 5719 days | 24% |
jessica | 8/10 | 5762 days | 27% |
DustyLaptop | 8/10 | 5780 days | 27% |
gerrys | 8/10 | 5796 days | 27% |
Sofie | 9/10 | 5811 days | 28% |
Johnnie | 8/10 | 5822 days | 27% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5841 days | 28% |
kymberlyw | 10/10 | 5842 days | 28% |
Becca1 | 10/10 | 5843 days | 28% |
Andy Baker | 8/10 | 5861 days | 27% |
amyd | 8/10 | 5872 days | 27% |
RichardB1 | 9/10 | 5876 days | 28% |
RobH | 10/10 | 5877 days | 28% |
Theresa | 10/10 | 5877 days | 28% |
Brian | 8/10 | 5880 days | 27% |
Amanda Williams | 10/10 | 5881 days | 28% |
Kelly23 | 10/10 | 5919 days | 28% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5954 days | 28% |
Laura | 9/10 | 5966 days | 28% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5966 days | 28% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6016 days | 27% |
Davina | 8/10 | 6016 days | 27% |
Jennie | 8/10 | 6047 days | 27% |
Spike | 10/10 | 6047 days | 28% |
Zoe Summers | 7/10 | 6053 days | 26% |
Annie Walsh | 6/10 | 6056 days | 24% |
Tsmith | 9/10 | 6084 days | 28% |
Charlie Bond | 9/10 | 6122 days | 28% |
Rhys Howell | 10/10 | 6183 days | 28% |
Ben | 10/10 | 6212 days | 28% |
Benjamin Throk | 8/10 | 6220 days | 27% |
Elizabeth Woodruff | 9/10 | 6221 days | 28% |
Jason Page | 7/10 | 6221 days | 26% |
Stuart Bartram | 9/10 | 6224 days | 28% |
Klaus Uhl | 6/10 | 6224 days | 24% |
Beixin Wang | 10/10 | 6227 days | 28% |
Neil | 10/10 | 6232 days | 28% |
Emily Houston | 7/10 | 6238 days | 26% |
Kenneth and Mette | 10/10 | 6241 days | 28% |
Lena1 | 9/10 | 6241 days | 28% |
Pauline Thai | 8/10 | 6260 days | 27% |
Bex | 9/10 | 6268 days | 28% |
Rebekah Holbrook | 8/10 | 6269 days | 27% |
Simon Chettleburgh | 7/10 | 6269 days | 26% |
Stephen Brightman | 7/10 | 6269 days | 26% |
Tim | 9/10 | 6281 days | 28% |
Hugh McCarthy | 7/10 | 6288 days | 26% |
Dave Simmons | 10/10 | 6316 days | 28% |
purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6328 days | 28% |
Wendy Williams | 7/10 | 6333 days | 26% |
Rene Schotvanger | 8/10 | 6443 days | 27% |
Julie | 7/10 | 6527 days | 26% |
Svenja | 9/10 | 6557 days | 28% |
Michael | 9/10 | 6559 days | 28% |
Adi | 10/10 | 6567 days | 28% |
Kate | 7/10 | 6567 days | 26% |
Raul | 9/10 | 6576 days | 28% |
Hanneke | 7/10 | 6585 days | 26% |
Jennifer | 9/10 | 6595 days | 28% |
Ian | 9/10 | 6595 days | 28% |
Pam | 4/10 | 6597 days | 17% |
Fabian | 8/10 | 6599 days | 27% |
Helle | 9/10 | 6606 days | 28% |
beesom | 6/10 | 6607 days | 24% |
Albert | 6/10 | 6624 days | 24% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.79% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Skyline Luge Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.73% |
198 | -3.75% |
199 | -3.77% |
200 | -3.79% |
201 | -3.81% |
202 | -3.83% |
203 | -3.85% |
… | … |
2.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.