G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Skyline Luge Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
162 Valid Reviews
The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has a total of 163 reviews. There are 162 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 162 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 39 |
|
24% |
9/10 | 47 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 40 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 23 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skyline Luge Queenstown valid reviews is 84.38% and is based on 162 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
121 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 162 valid reviews, the experience has 121 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 35 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 32 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 18 |
|
15% |
6/10 | 8 |
|
7% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skyline Luge Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 83.39% and is based on 121 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Katrina | 5/10 | 2691 days | 77% |
Nicole and Timm | 10/10 | 2723 days | 100% |
Phil Baker | 8/10 | 2725 days | 98% |
Jessica and Henry | 9/10 | 2963 days | 84% |
Audeme Mechain | 9/10 | 2965 days | 84% |
C Clarke | 10/10 | 2987 days | 84% |
Alice Ormandy | 7/10 | 3009 days | 76% |
Chloe Olsen | 6/10 | 3012 days | 70% |
Natasha | 9/10 | 3039 days | 80% |
Barbara Knops | 8/10 | 3044 days | 78% |
Dries | 9/10 | 3045 days | 79% |
Rebecca Holmes | 6/10 | 3046 days | 69% |
Nathalie | 10/10 | 3049 days | 80% |
Hannah Phoenix | 9/10 | 3053 days | 79% |
Manu Liberta | 10/10 | 3054 days | 79% |
Yee How | 8/10 | 3062 days | 77% |
Nanda Dyke | 8/10 | 3070 days | 77% |
Austin Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3093 days | 76% |
Niall Regan | 8/10 | 3101 days | 75% |
Dita Vasquez | 9/10 | 3114 days | 75% |
Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3302 days | 64% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3315 days | 62% |
Sonya Grimm | 9/10 | 3316 days | 63% |
Laura Schafer | 9/10 | 3349 days | 61% |
Remi Lopez | 7/10 | 3350 days | 57% |
David Tholander | 5/10 | 3350 days | 46% |
Melanie Kronbichler | 8/10 | 3361 days | 59% |
Lea Watterson | 9/10 | 3364 days | 60% |
Nicola Wiggan | 8/10 | 3404 days | 57% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 3687 days | 40% |
Chris | 7/10 | 3687 days | 37% |
Sam Smith | 7/10 | 3697 days | 37% |
Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 4028 days | 19% |
Iris Anette Berger | 9/10 | 4028 days | 19% |
Penny Lee | 8/10 | 4035 days | 18% |
Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 4089 days | 15% |
Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4096 days | 15% |
Daniel Danamer | 9/10 | 4099 days | 15% |
Andrew Cattanach | 8/10 | 4121 days | 13% |
Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4121 days | 13% |
Rory Seaton | 7/10 | 4122 days | 12% |
Emeline Dupre | 7/10 | 4122 days | 12% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4274 days | 4% |
hendrik king | 8/10 | 4335 days | 0% |
Yves Vennewald | 7/10 | 4414 days | 27% |
Pia Pitkala | 8/10 | 4416 days | 28% |
Billy Koichopolos | 10/10 | 4420 days | 29% |
Gina Lisi | 10/10 | 4420 days | 29% |
Dave Mertzig | 6/10 | 4427 days | 25% |
Lorna and Seb | 5/10 | 4430 days | 21% |
Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4486 days | 29% |
Dagette | 10/10 | 4578 days | 29% |
Paul Kelly | 10/10 | 4608 days | 29% |
Esther Goh | 10/10 | 4731 days | 29% |
Steffien | 10/10 | 4761 days | 29% |
Jill Homewood | 8/10 | 4785 days | 28% |
Armin Boehmer | 7/10 | 4787 days | 27% |
Anne King | 8/10 | 4801 days | 28% |
Hayley Atkinson | 10/10 | 4803 days | 29% |
Melanie | 6/10 | 4804 days | 25% |
Seth & Carla | 10/10 | 4806 days | 29% |
ToGy | 8/10 | 4821 days | 28% |
J Bliss | 9/10 | 4883 days | 29% |
James McColl | 7/10 | 4913 days | 27% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4974 days | 29% |
cruisysue | 7/10 | 5005 days | 27% |
Sam papworth | 10/10 | 5126 days | 29% |
Jon_and_Family | 10/10 | 5127 days | 29% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5142 days | 29% |
Steve & Pearl Baker | 9/10 | 5148 days | 29% |
Victoria Boolsen | 9/10 | 5150 days | 29% |
Tanya & Florian | 10/10 | 5152 days | 29% |
taniadeanryanbrittany | 9/10 | 5158 days | 29% |
Katie Mitchell | 10/10 | 5158 days | 29% |
Lenore Dejong | 9/10 | 5160 days | 29% |
Caroline Sheridan | 7/10 | 5162 days | 27% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5165 days | 29% |
Lauren Pestell | 10/10 | 5165 days | 29% |
John | 8/10 | 5170 days | 28% |
Van den Borne | 8/10 | 5172 days | 28% |
Julia | 9/10 | 5178 days | 29% |
georgiarose89 | 7/10 | 5217 days | 27% |
Lyndell | 7/10 | 5248 days | 27% |
Jill | 9/10 | 5278 days | 29% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5309 days | 29% |
thomas merrin | 10/10 | 5492 days | 29% |
Marcus Kippner | 8/10 | 5514 days | 28% |
John Bost | 8/10 | 5523 days | 28% |
Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5532 days | 29% |
Pete Hallam | 8/10 | 5550 days | 28% |
Samantha Piekuta | 8/10 | 5560 days | 28% |
Gracieb | 9/10 | 5582 days | 29% |
wenerz | 8/10 | 5598 days | 28% |
TomL | 8/10 | 5643 days | 28% |
eowyn2k | 9/10 | 5643 days | 29% |
rincoln | 8/10 | 5643 days | 28% |
paulandcathy | 9/10 | 5674 days | 29% |
ToryL | 6/10 | 5735 days | 25% |
jessica | 8/10 | 5778 days | 28% |
DustyLaptop | 8/10 | 5796 days | 28% |
gerrys | 8/10 | 5812 days | 28% |
Sofie | 9/10 | 5827 days | 29% |
Johnnie | 8/10 | 5838 days | 28% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5858 days | 29% |
kymberlyw | 10/10 | 5858 days | 29% |
Becca1 | 10/10 | 5859 days | 29% |
Andy Baker | 8/10 | 5877 days | 28% |
amyd | 8/10 | 5888 days | 28% |
RichardB1 | 9/10 | 5892 days | 29% |
RobH | 10/10 | 5893 days | 29% |
Theresa | 10/10 | 5894 days | 29% |
Brian | 8/10 | 5896 days | 28% |
Amanda Williams | 10/10 | 5898 days | 29% |
Kelly23 | 10/10 | 5935 days | 29% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5970 days | 29% |
Laura | 9/10 | 5983 days | 29% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5983 days | 29% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6032 days | 28% |
Davina | 8/10 | 6032 days | 28% |
Jennie | 8/10 | 6063 days | 28% |
Spike | 10/10 | 6063 days | 29% |
Zoe Summers | 7/10 | 6069 days | 27% |
Annie Walsh | 6/10 | 6073 days | 25% |
Tsmith | 9/10 | 6100 days | 29% |
Charlie Bond | 9/10 | 6139 days | 29% |
Rhys Howell | 10/10 | 6199 days | 29% |
Ben | 10/10 | 6228 days | 29% |
Benjamin Throk | 8/10 | 6236 days | 28% |
Elizabeth Woodruff | 9/10 | 6237 days | 29% |
Jason Page | 7/10 | 6237 days | 27% |
Stuart Bartram | 9/10 | 6240 days | 29% |
Klaus Uhl | 6/10 | 6240 days | 25% |
Beixin Wang | 10/10 | 6243 days | 29% |
Neil | 10/10 | 6248 days | 29% |
Emily Houston | 7/10 | 6254 days | 27% |
Kenneth and Mette | 10/10 | 6257 days | 29% |
Lena1 | 9/10 | 6257 days | 29% |
Pauline Thai | 8/10 | 6276 days | 28% |
Bex | 9/10 | 6284 days | 29% |
Rebekah Holbrook | 8/10 | 6285 days | 28% |
Simon Chettleburgh | 7/10 | 6285 days | 27% |
Stephen Brightman | 7/10 | 6285 days | 27% |
Tim | 9/10 | 6297 days | 29% |
Hugh McCarthy | 7/10 | 6304 days | 27% |
Dave Simmons | 10/10 | 6332 days | 29% |
purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6344 days | 29% |
Wendy Williams | 7/10 | 6349 days | 27% |
Rene Schotvanger | 8/10 | 6459 days | 28% |
Julie | 7/10 | 6543 days | 27% |
Svenja | 9/10 | 6573 days | 29% |
Michael | 9/10 | 6575 days | 29% |
Adi | 10/10 | 6583 days | 29% |
Kate | 7/10 | 6583 days | 27% |
Raul | 9/10 | 6592 days | 29% |
Hanneke | 7/10 | 6601 days | 27% |
Jennifer | 9/10 | 6611 days | 29% |
Ian | 9/10 | 6611 days | 29% |
Pam | 4/10 | 6613 days | 18% |
Fabian | 8/10 | 6615 days | 28% |
Helle | 9/10 | 6622 days | 29% |
beesom | 6/10 | 6623 days | 25% |
Albert | 6/10 | 6640 days | 25% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.48% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 65 days. However the Skyline Luge Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Skyline Luge Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.43% |
198 | -3.45% |
199 | -3.47% |
200 | -3.48% |
201 | -3.50% |
202 | -3.52% |
203 | -3.54% |
… | … |
2.69% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.