Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Iveagh Bay.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Iveagh Bay
Valid Reviews
38 Valid Reviews
The Iveagh Bay experience has a total of 39 reviews. There are 38 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Iveagh Bay valid reviews is 88.42% and is based on 38 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 38 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
100% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
100.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Iveagh Bay face-to-face reviews is 100.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amore | 9/10 | 50 days | 100% |
| Pauline | 9/10 | 324 days | 94% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 355 days | 93% |
| Lana Hantzsch | 8/10 | 416 days | 89% |
| Cholly | 9/10 | 447 days | 89% |
| ecom | 10/10 | 477 days | 88% |
| DBennie | 10/10 | 600 days | 80% |
| Willow | 10/10 | 661 days | 76% |
| Magic | 5/10 | 781 days | 50% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 842 days | 56% |
| Max | 8/10 | 1695 days | 5% |
| Drew | 9/10 | 1816 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 6/10 | 1877 days | 3% |
| Berthold Wagner | 6/10 | 2212 days | 3% |
| Lolo | 10/10 | 2242 days | 3% |
| Cefa | 10/10 | 2456 days | 3% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 2618 days | 3% |
| Nat Geider | 9/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Bruce Graham | 10/10 | 2795 days | 2% |
| Nick Lawson | 9/10 | 2811 days | 2% |
| Anja Röhrich | 10/10 | 2812 days | 2% |
| Rob & Colleen Elwood | 6/10 | 2820 days | 2% |
| Denise Hall | 10/10 | 2834 days | 2% |
| deborah cooper | 5/10 | 2851 days | 1% |
| Myles Petersen | 9/10 | 2913 days | 2% |
| Rosanne van Dooren | 7/10 | 3011 days | 2% |
| Zdenda Barvinek | 9/10 | 3269 days | 1% |
| Andrew Mercer | 10/10 | 3381 days | 1% |
| John Blyth | 9/10 | 3413 days | 1% |
| Kate Voss | 10/10 | 3498 days | 1% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 3582 days | 1% |
| Nell Hearle | 9/10 | 3620 days | 1% |
| Melanie Bloom | 10/10 | 3633 days | 1% |
| Moudry Vojtech | 10/10 | 3688 days | 0% |
| steffan williams | 10/10 | 3733 days | 0% |
| Tom Guthknecht | 10/10 | 3911 days | 0% |
| Te-Ana and Mark | 10/10 | 3927 days | 0% |
| Markus Eckert | 10/10 | 3944 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Iveagh Bay does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.