G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Go Orange.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
97 Valid Reviews
The Go Orange experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
82.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Go Orange valid reviews is 82.58% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
81 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 81 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 81 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 22 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Go Orange face-to-face reviews is 85.68% and is based on 81 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mike | 1/10 | 1902 days | 37% |
Adrian Macdonald | 9/10 | 2055 days | 100% |
Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 2239 days | 92% |
Hang Tran | 1/10 | 2267 days | 30% |
Rafi | 1/10 | 2298 days | 29% |
San Thompson | 1/10 | 2482 days | 25% |
Derek Green | 9/10 | 2604 days | 74% |
Molly | 2/10 | 2604 days | 27% |
Katrina | 10/10 | 2694 days | 70% |
Jared Cordner | 8/10 | 2944 days | 56% |
Nigel Mead | 10/10 | 2969 days | 57% |
Nazlinda Md Nasir | 10/10 | 2969 days | 57% |
Klaus | 10/10 | 2971 days | 57% |
Philip Busd | 9/10 | 2974 days | 56% |
Henna | 10/10 | 2999 days | 55% |
Felicity Hughes | 10/10 | 3009 days | 55% |
Sandra Marangi | 4/10 | 3018 days | 31% |
Sebasitian | 9/10 | 3021 days | 53% |
Max Mueller | 10/10 | 3043 days | 53% |
Barbara Knops | 10/10 | 3047 days | 53% |
Jasmine Rogers | 4/10 | 3061 days | 30% |
Olde Vogel | 8/10 | 3061 days | 51% |
Connor Hormell | 10/10 | 3062 days | 52% |
Karlee Hormell | 8/10 | 3063 days | 51% |
Petr Jesko | 7/10 | 3064 days | 48% |
Sandra Piechoua | 9/10 | 3064 days | 51% |
Joni Vihakara | 9/10 | 3065 days | 51% |
Bruno | 10/10 | 3067 days | 52% |
Megan Jurgensmeyer | 10/10 | 3096 days | 50% |
Timothy Delaney | 8/10 | 3263 days | 41% |
Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3301 days | 40% |
Max | 8/10 | 3304 days | 39% |
Olivier Reculeau | 10/10 | 3305 days | 40% |
Coralie Dhenin | 4/10 | 3306 days | 22% |
Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3307 days | 40% |
Valentine de Beer | 9/10 | 3308 days | 40% |
Mathilde | 8/10 | 3315 days | 39% |
Floriane Desnoyer | 9/10 | 3316 days | 39% |
Renoit Besnard | 8/10 | 3319 days | 39% |
Jaime Alarma Olmos | 10/10 | 3321 days | 39% |
Dominique | 9/10 | 3325 days | 39% |
Derick Trotter | 8/10 | 3325 days | 38% |
Dennis Springer | 8/10 | 3327 days | 38% |
Laura Mahdavian | 10/10 | 3330 days | 39% |
Stan | 9/10 | 3330 days | 39% |
Alexander Mattea | 7/10 | 3331 days | 35% |
S Black | 8/10 | 3334 days | 38% |
Gae Saevane | 8/10 | 3334 days | 38% |
Joe Rogers | 8/10 | 3338 days | 38% |
Riviere | 9/10 | 3345 days | 38% |
Gerardo Furtado | 10/10 | 3351 days | 38% |
Melanie Kronbichler | 8/10 | 3364 days | 36% |
Lucile Souday | 8/10 | 3372 days | 36% |
Franziska Hohmann | 9/10 | 3377 days | 36% |
Ian Hortop | 10/10 | 3378 days | 37% |
Rachael and Nik | 7/10 | 3378 days | 33% |
Gregory | 7/10 | 3380 days | 33% |
Laura Sturm | 10/10 | 3418 days | 35% |
Xue Rong Kok | 10/10 | 3425 days | 34% |
Frans Diebrink | 9/10 | 3425 days | 34% |
Fides | 10/10 | 3690 days | 22% |
Christoph | 8/10 | 3690 days | 21% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 3690 days | 21% |
Chris | 10/10 | 3690 days | 22% |
Annika Funk | 8/10 | 3725 days | 19% |
Ivan Dimitrov | 9/10 | 3748 days | 18% |
Cora and Franzi | 10/10 | 3781 days | 17% |
Stefanie | 8/10 | 4033 days | 4% |
Karolina Gren | 7/10 | 4034 days | 4% |
Maria-Julia Frilaj | 8/10 | 4042 days | 4% |
Adriana | 9/10 | 4042 days | 4% |
Pavel Jarolimek | 8/10 | 4042 days | 4% |
Lilli Erni | 10/10 | 4043 days | 4% |
Manuel Bleiker | 9/10 | 4043 days | 4% |
Marie Toulemonde | 5/10 | 4044 days | 0% |
Annika Marz | 10/10 | 4057 days | 4% |
Julian Zeissler | 9/10 | 4057 days | 3% |
Claudia Bauch | 9/10 | 4063 days | 3% |
thibaut vernelle | 9/10 | 4063 days | 3% |
Mara | 8/10 | 4067 days | 3% |
Andrea Morello | 8/10 | 4067 days | 3% |
Vera Kreipe | 8/10 | 4070 days | 3% |
Kathrin Deichmann | 8/10 | 4070 days | 3% |
Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4079 days | 2% |
Matusala Habtemariam | 9/10 | 4089 days | 2% |
Francisco Pablo Miguel | 7/10 | 4090 days | 1% |
Bjoern | 8/10 | 4092 days | 2% |
Viola | 9/10 | 4092 days | 2% |
Amanda | 10/10 | 4093 days | 2% |
Julien de la lande | 9/10 | 4106 days | 1% |
Aude Moulin | 9/10 | 4106 days | 1% |
Emmanuelle Brevier | 7/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
Jean Batiste Le meur | 8/10 | 4113 days | 1% |
Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 4114 days | 1% |
Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 4114 days | 1% |
Maya Barad | 8/10 | 4114 days | 1% |
Nora Zeitz | 10/10 | 4123 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Go Orange experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.42% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 67 days. However the Go Orange experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Go Orange experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.37% |
198 | -3.39% |
199 | -3.40% |
200 | -3.42% |
201 | -3.44% |
202 | -3.46% |
203 | -3.47% |
… | … |
2.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.