Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for National Army Museum.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

National Army Museum

Valid Reviews

45 Valid Reviews

The National Army Museum experience has a total of 45 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 11
24%
9/10 17
38%
8/10 8
18%
7/10 7
16%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the National Army Museum valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

88.13%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Marine 8/10 56 days 99%
Liam S 10/10 115 days 100%
Kii 9/10 360 days 92%
Joel Fryett 9/10 481 days 87%
Voro 9/10 512 days 85%
Steph 7/10 512 days 80%
Annalena 10/10 542 days 84%
Jonathan Bedford 8/10 573 days 80%
Henry 7/10 634 days 72%
Penelope 10/10 665 days 75%
Dumytru Horda 9/10 815 days 62%
Lucie 9/10 846 days 59%
Rich T 10/10 846 days 60%
Paige Hayward 8/10 877 days 55%
Dave 9/10 877 days 56%
Paul Tayler 9/10 877 days 56%
Mylène 7/10 907 days 50%
vwvanlife 9/10 938 days 50%
Alex 10/10 1030 days 41%
Terry 10/10 1152 days 31%
Mike&Fe 9/10 1180 days 29%
Hannah 9/10 1211 days 26%
Tourist in my own country 9/10 1576 days 8%
Gia 8/10 1942 days 5%
D&R 5/10 2064 days 3%
Chulses 9/10 2126 days 4%
Alison 9/10 2156 days 4%
Nadia 8/10 2248 days 4%
Marion & Leonie 10/10 2276 days 4%
Michael S 9/10 2276 days 4%
Tim Bartlett 10/10 2307 days 4%
Dan 10/10 2307 days 4%
Jude 8/10 2368 days 4%
Steffi 6/10 2368 days 3%
Jess 10/10 2521 days 4%
Julien Turpin 9/10 2817 days 3%
Judy Aspinall 8/10 2932 days 3%
Anh Huynh 7/10 3034 days 2%
Marina 7/10 3369 days 2%
Chris Whittington 9/10 3760 days 1%
Mathieu Flechelle 8/10 3767 days 1%
Lois Moreland 9/10 3798 days 1%
John Treasure 7/10 4102 days 0%
GN100 7/10 4286 days 0%
L P 10/10 4317 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. National Army Museum does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.27% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.