Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Dunstan / Bendigo.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Dunstan / Bendigo
Valid Reviews
45 Valid Reviews
The Lake Dunstan / Bendigo experience has a total of 48 reviews. There are 45 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
78.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Dunstan / Bendigo valid reviews is 78.44% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Dunstan / Bendigo face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yaron Korn | 10/10 | 98 days | 100% |
| Christina | 9/10 | 159 days | 98% |
| Craig and Julia | 9/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Alex M | 10/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 220 days | 98% |
| MB | 9/10 | 251 days | 96% |
| Peter | 1/10 | 310 days | 38% |
| Ellen | 9/10 | 341 days | 93% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 341 days | 92% |
| Nicky | 8/10 | 371 days | 91% |
| George Geczy | 10/10 | 371 days | 93% |
| uptoone | 8/10 | 402 days | 89% |
| Dean | 8/10 | 463 days | 86% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 585 days | 79% |
| The Gokds | 10/10 | 616 days | 79% |
| Jorian | 9/10 | 645 days | 76% |
| Ana Capucho | 10/10 | 676 days | 74% |
| Vanessa | 6/10 | 707 days | 62% |
| Nina | 9/10 | 737 days | 69% |
| Jolanda Krikke | 10/10 | 829 days | 61% |
| Susan | 10/10 | 860 days | 58% |
| Lance Broyden | 8/10 | 1072 days | 37% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 1375 days | 16% |
| Stef | 6/10 | 1712 days | 5% |
| Vince | 8/10 | 1832 days | 5% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1924 days | 5% |
| Diana | 8/10 | 2077 days | 4% |
| Marleen | 9/10 | 2137 days | 4% |
| Julianne McKie | 6/10 | 2229 days | 4% |
| Juliane Haas | 8/10 | 2412 days | 4% |
| Hans Hummel | 2/10 | 2443 days | 2% |
| JirkaR | 8/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
| Marinette Kegels | 2/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| Megan Belanger | 8/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Maxime | 8/10 | 2502 days | 3% |
| Ave | 6/10 | 2594 days | 3% |
| Sandi Calvert | 7/10 | 3089 days | 2% |
| Marc Lambert | 7/10 | 3148 days | 2% |
| Frankie Winsor | 7/10 | 3170 days | 2% |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 3193 days | 1% |
| Lena Wesselink | 5/10 | 3542 days | 1% |
| Udo Wagner | 7/10 | 3615 days | 1% |
| Lilli Erni | 7/10 | 4247 days | 0% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 4247 days | 0% |
| Henry Thiel | 10/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Dunstan / Bendigo does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.35% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.