Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Crown Range Summit.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
38 Valid Reviews
The Crown Range Summit experience has a total of 43 reviews. There are 38 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 38 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 11 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 11 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 9 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Crown Range Summit valid reviews is 85.26% and is based on 38 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
81.16%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
McLean | 8/10 | 38 days | 100% |
Morgan | 5/10 | 618 days | 61% |
Christy | 6/10 | 649 days | 67% |
Florian | 9/10 | 738 days | 70% |
Florian | 9/10 | 738 days | 70% |
Sanny | 10/10 | 769 days | 68% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1468 days | 12% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1805 days | 5% |
Peter | 10/10 | 1865 days | 5% |
Solveig | 10/10 | 1896 days | 5% |
Fran | 7/10 | 1896 days | 5% |
Forrest Poirier | 8/10 | 1926 days | 5% |
Emily Schacher | 10/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
Tiago | 10/10 | 2049 days | 5% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 2140 days | 4% |
Breeze | 8/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
Marilli | 6/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
Mischa | 10/10 | 2322 days | 4% |
Sophie Skinner | 6/10 | 2322 days | 3% |
Scooper | 10/10 | 2352 days | 4% |
Rachel | 10/10 | 2414 days | 4% |
Christina | 9/10 | 2505 days | 4% |
Klex Becker | 9/10 | 2573 days | 3% |
Alice Addy | 8/10 | 2848 days | 3% |
Tash van Leeuwen | 9/10 | 2868 days | 3% |
Niels Petit | 10/10 | 2910 days | 3% |
Craig Eagleton | 9/10 | 2934 days | 3% |
Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 2955 days | 3% |
Puneet Mishra | 9/10 | 3045 days | 3% |
Avery Wong | 9/10 | 3346 days | 2% |
Gerard Schlooz | 8/10 | 3379 days | 2% |
Anita and Wilbur | 8/10 | 3460 days | 2% |
Steffen Paul | 6/10 | 3581 days | 1% |
Niamh Duane | 8/10 | 3980 days | 0% |
Matt Weston | 9/10 | 3980 days | 0% |
Pioter Jurkowski | 7/10 | 4056 days | 1% |
patrick+ katerina | 9/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
S M | 8/10 | 4390 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Crown Range Summit does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.69% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.