Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Hawkes Lookout Carpark.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Hawkes Lookout Carpark
Valid Reviews
40 Valid Reviews
The Hawkes Lookout Carpark experience has a total of 42 reviews. There are 40 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
75.75% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Hawkes Lookout Carpark valid reviews is 75.75% and is based on 40 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
5 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 40 valid reviews, the experience has 5 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 5 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
60% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Hawkes Lookout Carpark face-to-face reviews is 86.00% and is based on 5 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
76.16%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrie Brightwell | 7/10 | 102 days | 100% |
| Mike Dodger | 8/10 | 376 days | 97% |
| Henry | 8/10 | 407 days | 96% |
| Zuzana | 8/10 | 468 days | 93% |
| Maxime Dube | 6/10 | 619 days | 73% |
| Blandine | 6/10 | 619 days | 73% |
| Thom Mollinga | 8/10 | 680 days | 78% |
| Virg | 9/10 | 680 days | 79% |
| Karin kruger | 8/10 | 803 days | 67% |
| Jrod | 7/10 | 894 days | 55% |
| Shalamar | 10/10 | 1380 days | 17% |
| Its Me | 10/10 | 1410 days | 16% |
| Mike Howe | 7/10 | 1502 days | 11% |
| Cody | 1/10 | 1655 days | 3% |
| Roger from Wales | 7/10 | 1684 days | 6% |
| Kyle | 7/10 | 1715 days | 5% |
| Becca | 6/10 | 1929 days | 4% |
| Rena | 2/10 | 2021 days | 2% |
| Peter Lillie | 7/10 | 2021 days | 4% |
| Freya | 7/10 | 2049 days | 4% |
| Mahi | 8/10 | 2111 days | 4% |
| Molly | 9/10 | 2141 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2172 days | 4% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 8/10 | 2428 days | 2% |
| Michael Fife | 1/10 | 2441 days | 1% |
| kevin monaghan | 8/10 | 2482 days | 4% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2508 days | 4% |
| Jo Dawson | 8/10 | 2639 days | 3% |
| Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 2705 days | 3% |
| Patrick Holmes | 9/10 | 2878 days | 2% |
| Bryce Jones | 8/10 | 2878 days | 2% |
| Eric Pollard | 9/10 | 2937 days | 3% |
| Jessica Powell | 9/10 | 3007 days | 3% |
| Zdenda Barvinek | 7/10 | 3165 days | 2% |
| Martin Buchta | 8/10 | 3847 days | 1% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 3906 days | 1% |
| Elin Paulssen | 8/10 | 3906 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 3998 days | 0% |
| Marek Kam | 8/10 | 4090 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Hedmark | 10/10 | 4223 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Hawkes Lookout Carpark does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
4.21% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.