Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve
Valid Reviews
69 Valid Reviews
The Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve experience has a total of 70 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve valid reviews is 84.20% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
84.84%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 47 days | 100% |
| Maguelonne | 4/10 | 78 days | 65% |
| Elodie | 10/10 | 199 days | 98% |
| RGill | 8/10 | 230 days | 95% |
| Miriam | 10/10 | 261 days | 96% |
| Felicia | 7/10 | 261 days | 89% |
| Marine | 8/10 | 292 days | 93% |
| Graeme mac | 10/10 | 351 days | 93% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 351 days | 93% |
| K M | 9/10 | 382 days | 91% |
| Mathieu | 10/10 | 443 days | 89% |
| Milly Struthers | 8/10 | 472 days | 86% |
| Aaron | 7/10 | 472 days | 81% |
| Walvins | 10/10 | 472 days | 87% |
| A King | 8/10 | 534 days | 82% |
| AJC | 5/10 | 534 days | 64% |
| Holly | 7/10 | 595 days | 74% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 626 days | 76% |
| Holly | 9/10 | 657 days | 75% |
| Linda | 8/10 | 686 days | 72% |
| Dale Robinson | 8/10 | 748 days | 67% |
| Agnes | 9/10 | 748 days | 67% |
| Gunnar&Maria | 8/10 | 748 days | 67% |
| Pickles | 8/10 | 778 days | 64% |
| Mayla | 8/10 | 778 days | 64% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 809 days | 62% |
| Maartje | 7/10 | 838 days | 56% |
| Fluid | 10/10 | 838 days | 60% |
| Henry | 9/10 | 869 days | 56% |
| J Ryder | 10/10 | 900 days | 54% |
| KiwiSauce | 7/10 | 900 days | 50% |
| Jolanda Krikke | 8/10 | 900 days | 52% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 961 days | 47% |
| Julie | 9/10 | 961 days | 47% |
| Christa | 9/10 | 961 days | 47% |
| Paul | 9/10 | 961 days | 47% |
| Shel | 6/10 | 992 days | 38% |
| wvdbos | 7/10 | 992 days | 41% |
| HJR | 10/10 | 992 days | 44% |
| Matthew | 9/10 | 1051 days | 38% |
| Isa | 9/10 | 1051 days | 38% |
| Haze | 7/10 | 1051 days | 36% |
| Willow | 9/10 | 1082 days | 36% |
| Paige Hayward | 8/10 | 1143 days | 30% |
| BerryD | 9/10 | 1203 days | 26% |
| Leet | 8/10 | 1265 days | 22% |
| Curtis | 10/10 | 1326 days | 19% |
| Juni | 9/10 | 1447 days | 12% |
| Keybags | 10/10 | 1753 days | 5% |
| Tessie | 9/10 | 1781 days | 4% |
| Rey | 7/10 | 1843 days | 4% |
| Natalie | 10/10 | 1995 days | 4% |
| Carl Bright | 10/10 | 1995 days | 4% |
| Dave | 8/10 | 2025 days | 4% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 2056 days | 4% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
| Dennis Rijbroek | 7/10 | 2299 days | 3% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2299 days | 3% |
| Mark Jarvis | 7/10 | 2299 days | 3% |
| Clare & Gerry | 10/10 | 2484 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2484 days | 3% |
| Marion & Leonie | 8/10 | 2512 days | 3% |
| Anni | 8/10 | 2543 days | 3% |
| jofa972 | 8/10 | 2818 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 7/10 | 3167 days | 2% |
| Beth Goodrich | 8/10 | 3437 days | 1% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 3796 days | 0% |
| Berni Hart | 8/10 | 3944 days | 0% |
| Cherie Marshall | 8/10 | 4009 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.85% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.