Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve
Valid Reviews
69 Valid Reviews
The Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve experience has a total of 70 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve valid reviews is 84.20% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
84.85%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 35 days | 100% |
| Maguelonne | 4/10 | 66 days | 65% |
| Elodie | 10/10 | 188 days | 98% |
| RGill | 8/10 | 219 days | 95% |
| Miriam | 10/10 | 249 days | 97% |
| Felicia | 7/10 | 249 days | 90% |
| Marine | 8/10 | 280 days | 94% |
| Graeme mac | 10/10 | 339 days | 93% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 339 days | 93% |
| K M | 9/10 | 370 days | 91% |
| Mathieu | 10/10 | 431 days | 89% |
| Milly Struthers | 8/10 | 461 days | 86% |
| Aaron | 7/10 | 461 days | 82% |
| Walvins | 10/10 | 461 days | 88% |
| A King | 8/10 | 523 days | 83% |
| AJC | 5/10 | 523 days | 64% |
| Holly | 7/10 | 584 days | 75% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 614 days | 77% |
| Holly | 9/10 | 645 days | 75% |
| Linda | 8/10 | 674 days | 72% |
| Dale Robinson | 8/10 | 736 days | 68% |
| Agnes | 9/10 | 736 days | 68% |
| Gunnar&Maria | 8/10 | 736 days | 68% |
| Pickles | 8/10 | 766 days | 65% |
| Mayla | 8/10 | 766 days | 65% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 797 days | 63% |
| Maartje | 7/10 | 827 days | 56% |
| Fluid | 10/10 | 827 days | 61% |
| Henry | 9/10 | 858 days | 57% |
| J Ryder | 10/10 | 889 days | 55% |
| KiwiSauce | 7/10 | 889 days | 51% |
| Jolanda Krikke | 8/10 | 889 days | 54% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 950 days | 48% |
| Julie | 9/10 | 950 days | 48% |
| Christa | 9/10 | 950 days | 48% |
| Paul | 9/10 | 950 days | 48% |
| Shel | 6/10 | 980 days | 39% |
| wvdbos | 7/10 | 980 days | 42% |
| HJR | 10/10 | 980 days | 45% |
| Matthew | 9/10 | 1039 days | 39% |
| Isa | 9/10 | 1039 days | 39% |
| Haze | 7/10 | 1039 days | 37% |
| Willow | 9/10 | 1070 days | 37% |
| Paige Hayward | 8/10 | 1131 days | 31% |
| BerryD | 9/10 | 1192 days | 27% |
| Leet | 8/10 | 1254 days | 23% |
| Curtis | 10/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Juni | 9/10 | 1435 days | 13% |
| Keybags | 10/10 | 1741 days | 5% |
| Tessie | 9/10 | 1769 days | 4% |
| Rey | 7/10 | 1831 days | 4% |
| Natalie | 10/10 | 1984 days | 4% |
| Carl Bright | 10/10 | 1984 days | 4% |
| Dave | 8/10 | 2014 days | 4% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 2045 days | 4% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 2166 days | 4% |
| Dennis Rijbroek | 7/10 | 2288 days | 3% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2288 days | 3% |
| Mark Jarvis | 7/10 | 2288 days | 3% |
| Clare & Gerry | 10/10 | 2472 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2472 days | 3% |
| Marion & Leonie | 8/10 | 2500 days | 3% |
| Anni | 8/10 | 2531 days | 3% |
| jofa972 | 8/10 | 2806 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 7/10 | 3156 days | 2% |
| Beth Goodrich | 8/10 | 3426 days | 1% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 3785 days | 0% |
| Berni Hart | 8/10 | 3932 days | 0% |
| Cherie Marshall | 8/10 | 3997 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.85% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.