Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve

Valid Reviews

57 Valid Reviews

The Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 57 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 57 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 11
19%
9/10 14
25%
8/10 18
32%
7/10 12
21%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve valid reviews is 83.33% and is based on 57 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

83.19%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Milly Struthers 8/10 18 days 100%
Aaron 7/10 18 days 95%
A King 8/10 80 days 100%
AJC 5/10 80 days 77%
Holly 7/10 141 days 94%
Valg 8/10 171 days 98%
Holly 9/10 202 days 99%
Linda 8/10 231 days 97%
Dale Robinson 8/10 293 days 95%
Agnes 9/10 293 days 96%
Gunnar&Maria 8/10 293 days 95%
Pickles 8/10 323 days 94%
Mayla 8/10 323 days 94%
Marie Perret 9/10 354 days 94%
Maartje 7/10 384 days 87%
Fluid 10/10 384 days 93%
Henry 9/10 415 days 91%
J Ryder 10/10 446 days 90%
KiwiSauce 7/10 446 days 84%
Jolanda Krikke 8/10 446 days 88%
Paul 10/10 507 days 87%
Julie 9/10 507 days 86%
Christa 9/10 507 days 86%
Paul 9/10 507 days 86%
Shel 6/10 537 days 73%
wvdbos 7/10 537 days 79%
HJR 10/10 537 days 85%
Matthew 9/10 596 days 80%
Isa 9/10 596 days 80%
Haze 7/10 596 days 75%
Willow 9/10 627 days 78%
Paige Hayward 8/10 688 days 73%
BerryD 9/10 749 days 68%
Leet 8/10 811 days 62%
Curtis 10/10 872 days 57%
Juni 9/10 992 days 44%
Keybags 10/10 1298 days 20%
Tessie 9/10 1326 days 18%
Rey 7/10 1388 days 14%
Natalie 10/10 1541 days 8%
Carl Bright 10/10 1541 days 8%
Dave 8/10 1571 days 7%
Lauren 10/10 1602 days 6%
Peter 9/10 1723 days 4%
Dennis Rijbroek 7/10 1845 days 3%
Adam 7/10 1845 days 3%
Mark Jarvis 7/10 1845 days 3%
Clare & Gerry 10/10 2029 days 3%
Pat Burns 7/10 2029 days 3%
Marion & Leonie 8/10 2057 days 3%
Anni 8/10 2088 days 3%
jofa972 8/10 2363 days 2%
Judy Aspinall 7/10 2713 days 2%
Beth Goodrich 8/10 2983 days 1%
Michal 10/10 3342 days 0%
Berni Hart 8/10 3489 days 0%
Cherie Marshall 8/10 3554 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.20% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.