Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
204 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 214 reviews. There are 204 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 10 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 204 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 138 |
|
68% |
9/10 | 37 |
|
18% |
8/10 | 18 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
93.63% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 93.63% and is based on 204 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
15 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 204 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 11 |
|
73% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 97.33% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.84%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Alex M | 10/10 | 70 days | 100% |
Alex | 9/10 | 100 days | 99% |
Jacinta | 9/10 | 100 days | 99% |
Ruth | 7/10 | 100 days | 93% |
Annie Mandelstam | 8/10 | 131 days | 97% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 131 days | 99% |
Paul | 8/10 | 131 days | 97% |
Wolf | 1/10 | 159 days | 40% |
TBKwashere | 10/10 | 190 days | 98% |
Debyron | 9/10 | 190 days | 97% |
Signe | 10/10 | 190 days | 98% |
Sabina | 8/10 | 190 days | 96% |
Rachel | 7/10 | 221 days | 91% |
Emily | 10/10 | 221 days | 97% |
L.L | 9/10 | 221 days | 97% |
Ellie | 9/10 | 282 days | 95% |
Laura | 9/10 | 312 days | 94% |
Stephane | 10/10 | 312 days | 95% |
Charlee d | 10/10 | 343 days | 94% |
Susan | 9/10 | 343 days | 93% |
El and Em | 10/10 | 374 days | 92% |
Caron | 9/10 | 465 days | 87% |
Valg | 7/10 | 465 days | 82% |
Jean | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
chen yunchaio | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
Ann | 10/10 | 496 days | 86% |
Klaudia Fekete | 9/10 | 496 days | 85% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 496 days | 86% |
Katie | 8/10 | 525 days | 83% |
Gauthier Poirier | 1/10 | 525 days | 34% |
Jorian | 9/10 | 525 days | 84% |
Nina S. Larsen | 9/10 | 525 days | 84% |
Jamie | 10/10 | 556 days | 83% |
Linda | 10/10 | 556 days | 83% |
Nina | 10/10 | 617 days | 78% |
Marie Perret | 10/10 | 648 days | 76% |
Alex Byrne | 10/10 | 678 days | 74% |
Thestevieniksshow | 9/10 | 678 days | 73% |
Giki | 7/10 | 740 days | 64% |
Laura | 10/10 | 890 days | 55% |
Edwige | 10/10 | 921 days | 52% |
Tom | 10/10 | 921 days | 52% |
Millie Cooper | 10/10 | 952 days | 49% |
Laura | 9/10 | 1074 days | 37% |
Jamie | 1/10 | 1105 days | 14% |
Instantly Lost | 10/10 | 1135 days | 32% |
James | 10/10 | 1227 days | 25% |
Valg | 10/10 | 1255 days | 24% |
Brandon | 10/10 | 1317 days | 20% |
Hakuna Matata | 9/10 | 1439 days | 13% |
Seth | 8/10 | 1470 days | 12% |
Alan Mcneil | 10/10 | 1561 days | 9% |
Luke McCallum | 10/10 | 1561 days | 9% |
Kristina | 10/10 | 1561 days | 9% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1592 days | 8% |
Alydia | 10/10 | 1620 days | 7% |
Liv | 10/10 | 1651 days | 7% |
me | 9/10 | 1773 days | 5% |
Christopher | 10/10 | 1773 days | 5% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
Maria | 10/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
Samantha Williamson | 9/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
Lauren | 8/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
Meyana Barnhart | 10/10 | 1986 days | 5% |
Liz Wade | 9/10 | 2017 days | 4% |
Angela | 10/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
Almudena | 10/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
Bek | 10/10 | 2048 days | 4% |
Robert Killey | 7/10 | 2048 days | 4% |
Tanja Rombey | 10/10 | 2048 days | 4% |
Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
Corryn Smith | 10/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
Forrest Poirier | 10/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
Javier Williams | 10/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
Chieco Family | 9/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
Steve Mac | 10/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
Ash | 10/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
Shannon | 10/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
kay | 8/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
Marta Jau | 9/10 | 2139 days | 4% |
MimzieTT | 10/10 | 2139 days | 4% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2139 days | 4% |
Clément | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
Kendal | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
Tegan | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
Chai | 10/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
Kate | 10/10 | 2262 days | 4% |
Brice | 10/10 | 2292 days | 4% |
Katy | 9/10 | 2292 days | 4% |
Suthep | 10/10 | 2292 days | 4% |
Patrizia Tosetti | 10/10 | 2292 days | 4% |
Amanda | 9/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
GavNads | 10/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
Elin | 10/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
Wazza Schulz | 3/10 | 2323 days | 2% |
Liz | 10/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
Freya | 8/10 | 2351 days | 4% |
Marcus Andrade | 10/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
laura hatton | 10/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
Mitchell | 10/10 | 2413 days | 4% |
Paula G | 8/10 | 2413 days | 4% |
Clarkeoz | 6/10 | 2413 days | 3% |
Sunny | 10/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
Noreasters | 10/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
Angela | 10/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
Eranda | 10/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
Mischa | 10/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
Becky | 10/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
TT Tang | 9/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
Eddy P | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
Claire Desat | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
Margaret Kajewski | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
Jenna webber | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
Holly Bartholomew | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
J wells | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
Rachel | 8/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
Mike | 10/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
Robin | 10/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
Juliane | 9/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
Florian | 10/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
Mike78 | 10/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
Christina | 10/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
Anna | 10/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
Katherine | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
Mallory | 10/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
Tristan & Jolie | 10/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2708 days | 2% |
Jill McGrath | 9/10 | 2711 days | 2% |
Niall McGrath | 10/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
Donna | 10/10 | 2719 days | 3% |
Nick Cartmell | 10/10 | 2721 days | 2% |
Robert Webster | 10/10 | 2725 days | 3% |
Luis Vigil Vidal | 9/10 | 2730 days | 2% |
Tina I | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
Maggie Konstanski | 9/10 | 2779 days | 3% |
Paul and Paula | 8/10 | 2783 days | 3% |
Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2826 days | 3% |
Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2827 days | 3% |
Gary Prescot | 10/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
Tom Sanft | 9/10 | 2972 days | 3% |
Cathy Mead | 10/10 | 3045 days | 3% |
Nikolaj Lambertsen | 10/10 | 3050 days | 3% |
deborah cooper | 8/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
Niels Petit | 10/10 | 3070 days | 2% |
Craig Eagleton | 10/10 | 3086 days | 2% |
Florence Boinay | 10/10 | 3087 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 10/10 | 3101 days | 2% |
Trent O'Keeffe | 10/10 | 3102 days | 2% |
Peter Brock | 10/10 | 3105 days | 2% |
sara hoeflaken | 10/10 | 3109 days | 2% |
Erich Brueggermann | 9/10 | 3110 days | 2% |
CMG | 9/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
The Beans | 10/10 | 3171 days | 2% |
Richard Houghton | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
Jude Ong | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
Alf Caruana | 8/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
Olivia Swisher | 10/10 | 3189 days | 1% |
Dylan McBride | 10/10 | 3189 days | 1% |
Claire | 10/10 | 3189 days | 1% |
Anna Dalby | 10/10 | 3190 days | 1% |
Theo Mallais | 10/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
Derek Drost | 8/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
Kevin Mayer | 10/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
Rita Ashby | 6/10 | 3326 days | 2% |
Pamela Hoffman | 10/10 | 3379 days | 2% |
Justin Caldwell | 10/10 | 3402 days | 2% |
Dennis Page | 10/10 | 3418 days | 2% |
Gilles Andrieu | 8/10 | 3428 days | 2% |
Marina | 10/10 | 3444 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 10/10 | 3478 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 10/10 | 3509 days | 2% |
Renee Willhuber | 10/10 | 3512 days | 2% |
Antoine Germaine | 9/10 | 3524 days | 2% |
Kaseylee Hibbert | 10/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
Karmen Bond | 10/10 | 3567 days | 1% |
Steve Warren | 10/10 | 3570 days | 1% |
Mitchell Henderson | 8/10 | 3629 days | 1% |
Ian Gilbert | 10/10 | 3692 days | 1% |
Oliver Pester | 10/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
Andrew Jones | 10/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
Mike Merrick | 9/10 | 3791 days | 1% |
Averil Brown | 10/10 | 3809 days | 1% |
Nell Hearle | 10/10 | 3819 days | 1% |
Patrick Schwerhoff | 10/10 | 3836 days | 1% |
Manolis Pavlakis | 10/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
sreve | 10/10 | 3874 days | 1% |
Ron Clarke | 10/10 | 3874 days | 1% |
Alexandre Moleiro | 10/10 | 3874 days | 1% |
John Scott | 10/10 | 3884 days | 0% |
silvia | 8/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
Kane F | 10/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
Scott Atkinson | 10/10 | 4027 days | 1% |
Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 4027 days | 1% |
Tom Guthknecht | 9/10 | 4112 days | 0% |
Matt Weston | 10/10 | 4132 days | 0% |
tracey aylmer | 9/10 | 4149 days | 0% |
Saskia | 10/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
Karen Perry | 10/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
Fernando Martin | 9/10 | 4521 days | 0% |
Tinne Cis | 10/10 | 4876 days | 1% |
Chris Marsh | 10/10 | 4905 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.89% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.