Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trout Pools Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Trout Pools Reserve
Valid Reviews
25 Valid Reviews
The Trout Pools Reserve experience has a total of 28 reviews. There are 25 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 25 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
12% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
71.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trout Pools Reserve valid reviews is 71.60% and is based on 25 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
74.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle | 7/10 | 52 days | 100% |
| Lucy | 2/10 | 144 days | 48% |
| Clem | 8/10 | 693 days | 76% |
| Matthew | 8/10 | 752 days | 71% |
| Melissa Bradley | 8/10 | 783 days | 68% |
| Matthias | 9/10 | 814 days | 66% |
| shaun mcgillicuddy | 7/10 | 875 days | 56% |
| Rachel Leghorn | 9/10 | 997 days | 47% |
| Vanessa | 9/10 | 1513 days | 11% |
| Joannda | 9/10 | 1544 days | 10% |
| Carl Bright | 10/10 | 1696 days | 6% |
| Fifi and Jay | 7/10 | 2828 days | 3% |
| Christine Allgaier | 4/10 | 2925 days | 1% |
| Niklas | 7/10 | 2937 days | 1% |
| Mark Haydon | 6/10 | 2942 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 7/10 | 3008 days | 2% |
| Chas Bronson | 9/10 | 3018 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 3018 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 8/10 | 3157 days | 2% |
| Jon Puttick | 7/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Tomas Soldat | 5/10 | 3339 days | 1% |
| Jeff | 6/10 | 3404 days | 1% |
| Bob Fontaine | 5/10 | 3519 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 7/10 | 4101 days | 0% |
| Will and Taylor | 6/10 | 4435 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trout Pools Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
4.90% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
79%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.