Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Camp.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Camp

Valid Reviews

37 Valid Reviews

The Lake Camp experience has a total of 39 reviews. There are 37 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 24
65%
9/10 8
22%
8/10 3
8%
7/10 1
3%
6/10 1
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

94.32% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Camp valid reviews is 94.32% and is based on 37 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

7 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 37 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
100%
9/10 0
0%
8/10 0
0%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

100.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Camp face-to-face reviews is 100.00% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

96.03%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Laura 8/10 76 days 98%
Viktoria 10/10 76 days 100%
Max 9/10 137 days 98%
Katrina 10/10 260 days 96%
Erin 10/10 260 days 96%
Clembribri 10/10 442 days 89%
Quentin 10/10 473 days 87%
Daggi 10/10 473 days 87%
Diederik de Jonge 10/10 776 days 66%
Haze 10/10 776 days 66%
Mylène 9/10 868 days 56%
Rod K 9/10 1172 days 29%
Ian 10/10 1172 days 29%
Ryan Purvis 10/10 1294 days 21%
me 8/10 1659 days 6%
Tam 10/10 1903 days 4%
Ara Rahim 9/10 1995 days 4%
Kelly Linn 10/10 2178 days 4%
Franz 10/10 2268 days 4%
Samantha H. 8/10 2299 days 4%
Jude Ong 10/10 2360 days 3%
Mike 9/10 2513 days 3%
Stephen Lindsay 9/10 2513 days 3%
Gemma 9/10 2543 days 3%
Tristan & Jolie 9/10 2574 days 3%
Maggie Konstanski 10/10 2665 days 3%
Tobias Eltze 10/10 2907 days 2%
Sarah 10/10 2969 days 1%
Caleigh 10/10 3286 days 1%
Volker Stroenisch 6/10 3315 days 1%
Averil Brown 7/10 3695 days 1%
Hannah 10/10 4125 days 0%
Marcel 10/10 4393 days 0%
Maria 10/10 4393 days 0%
Josefine Hedlund 10/10 4399 days 0%
Evelina Johansson 10/10 4399 days 0%
Sofia Anderson 10/10 4399 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Camp does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.34% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.