Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Ōkāreka Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Ōkāreka Campsite
Valid Reviews
64 Valid Reviews
The Lake Ōkāreka Campsite experience has a total of 65 reviews. There are 64 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
80.78% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Ōkāreka Campsite valid reviews is 80.78% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
26 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 64 valid reviews, the experience has 26 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 26 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Ōkāreka Campsite face-to-face reviews is 86.54% and is based on 26 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
72.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher | 10/10 | 94 days | 100% |
| Ruby | 8/10 | 94 days | 98% |
| Marijng | 1/10 | 307 days | 39% |
| Jakub Matyszczak | 5/10 | 307 days | 72% |
| Morgane | 7/10 | 369 days | 86% |
| Broos | 7/10 | 703 days | 67% |
| Brigit Pratt | 1/10 | 1282 days | 9% |
| Emer | 9/10 | 1433 days | 14% |
| Josiah | 9/10 | 1799 days | 5% |
| Izzy | 7/10 | 1860 days | 4% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 1860 days | 5% |
| Julianne McKie | 8/10 | 1891 days | 5% |
| Loretta | 10/10 | 1952 days | 5% |
| Andrea | 1/10 | 2225 days | 2% |
| Matt MacD | 3/10 | 2409 days | 2% |
| Thomas Syesha | 10/10 | 2534 days | 4% |
| Alisa Makkaveeva | 7/10 | 2541 days | 3% |
| deborah cooper | 7/10 | 2834 days | 3% |
| Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
| Laura David | 9/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| Nic | 10/10 | 3077 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3077 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 10/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3141 days | 2% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3148 days | 2% |
| S Scott | 9/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| Bryant Faaola | 8/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
| Jan B | 10/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
| Carsten Philipp | 10/10 | 3345 days | 2% |
| Ben Apellido | 8/10 | 3381 days | 2% |
| Christina L | 10/10 | 3482 days | 2% |
| K C Costonis | 10/10 | 3504 days | 2% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 3557 days | 1% |
| Dene | 9/10 | 3565 days | 1% |
| Ines | 7/10 | 3597 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 3746 days | 1% |
| Mattias | 8/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
| Guillaume Yedoux | 8/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
| Janek Belcher | 8/10 | 3908 days | 1% |
| Christoph Betten | 6/10 | 3909 days | 1% |
| Elena Goschia | 7/10 | 3957 days | 1% |
| Philipp Kluseuer | 7/10 | 3957 days | 1% |
| David Haines-Hanham | 7/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
| Sally Haines | 8/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Alexia Greasbaum | 10/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 9/10 | 3979 days | 1% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 3990 days | 1% |
| Thi Baut | 7/10 | 3995 days | 1% |
| Steffi and Phil | 6/10 | 4021 days | 0% |
| Sam Garret | 5/10 | 4174 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4204 days | 0% |
| Anton Thisted | 9/10 | 4263 days | 0% |
| Josefine Sjodin | 9/10 | 4263 days | 0% |
| Katie Fleck | 9/10 | 4263 days | 0% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4294 days | 0% |
| Neele & Philipp | 10/10 | 4306 days | 0% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4319 days | 0% |
| nl | 9/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Briulier | 10/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 8/10 | 4683 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 10/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Ōkāreka Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
5.79% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.