Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for KJet Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
KJet Queenstown
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The KJet Queenstown experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
82.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown valid reviews is 82.46% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
47 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 47 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.55% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 82.55% and is based on 47 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
66.06%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ying | 2/10 | 713 days | 100% |
| Jenny Pasley | 8/10 | 1323 days | 59% |
| JW | 1/10 | 2174 days | 5% |
| Jenna Neivandt | 7/10 | 3013 days | 8% |
| Patz | 10/10 | 3118 days | 8% |
| Rachael Sleege | 9/10 | 3239 days | 7% |
| David Horley | 8/10 | 3255 days | 7% |
| Saskia Irblich | 6/10 | 3284 days | 6% |
| Adam Pullinger | 3/10 | 3286 days | 4% |
| Rebecca Holmes | 8/10 | 3290 days | 6% |
| Andy Howard | 7/10 | 3341 days | 6% |
| Sharron | 8/10 | 3341 days | 6% |
| Robertoi | 10/10 | 3343 days | 6% |
| Lucy Murray | 9/10 | 3574 days | 5% |
| Steve Elliott | 10/10 | 3575 days | 5% |
| Markus Spitzmueller | 7/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Andrew Cattanach | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 4852 days | 3% |
| Jeltje | 9/10 | 5045 days | 3% |
| Beeny | 8/10 | 5046 days | 3% |
| Richard Spandonk | 9/10 | 5053 days | 3% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 5384 days | 3% |
| Leroy Dimitri | 9/10 | 5384 days | 3% |
| Geoff Andrew | 7/10 | 5385 days | 3% |
| Richard Broughton | 9/10 | 5396 days | 3% |
| Matthys Kikke | 7/10 | 5406 days | 3% |
| Jill | 10/10 | 5522 days | 3% |
| Montys | 7/10 | 5553 days | 3% |
| OMPA | 10/10 | 5755 days | 3% |
| Jana Steve | 5/10 | 5761 days | 2% |
| dring | 10/10 | 5770 days | 3% |
| Sally Hall | 9/10 | 5815 days | 3% |
| joevw | 10/10 | 6056 days | 3% |
| Linsey Evans | 10/10 | 6071 days | 3% |
| StephaineFrance | 10/10 | 6098 days | 3% |
| Rory | 10/10 | 6101 days | 3% |
| Sandra Eschbaumer | 10/10 | 6101 days | 3% |
| Elise Thomson | 10/10 | 6101 days | 3% |
| brendar | 8/10 | 6101 days | 3% |
| Steve Budd | 3/10 | 6119 days | 2% |
| JensM | 7/10 | 6136 days | 3% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 6166 days | 3% |
| Jessy | 8/10 | 6166 days | 3% |
| Ray | 10/10 | 6191 days | 3% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 6214 days | 3% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6215 days | 3% |
| jonathan | 10/10 | 6223 days | 3% |
| Michelle | 9/10 | 6275 days | 3% |
| P&L Mooney | 9/10 | 6276 days | 3% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 6279 days | 3% |
| Arnaud Dionisio | 8/10 | 6317 days | 3% |
| Sanne | 10/10 | 6494 days | 3% |
| Matt Walker | 6/10 | 6515 days | 3% |
| Dan Adamson | 7/10 | 6520 days | 3% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 6543 days | 3% |
| Thomas Hartseiker | 10/10 | 6547 days | 3% |
| Davinia | 9/10 | 6576 days | 3% |
| Archie Murdoch | 8/10 | 6590 days | 3% |
| johnb1 | 6/10 | 6601 days | 3% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 6703 days | 3% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 6827 days | 3% |
| Martjn | 8/10 | 6829 days | 3% |
| Stevenson | 8/10 | 6836 days | 3% |
| Jennifer | 10/10 | 6855 days | 3% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 6866 days | 3% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The KJet Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the KJet Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The KJet Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
12.44% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
74%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.