Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for KJet Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
KJet Queenstown
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The KJet Queenstown experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
82.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown valid reviews is 82.46% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
47 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 47 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.55% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 82.55% and is based on 47 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
65.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ying | 2/10 | 475 days | 100% |
| Jenny Pasley | 8/10 | 1085 days | 89% |
| JW | 1/10 | 1936 days | 4% |
| Jenna Neivandt | 7/10 | 2775 days | 6% |
| Patz | 10/10 | 2880 days | 6% |
| Rachael Sleege | 9/10 | 3001 days | 6% |
| David Horley | 8/10 | 3017 days | 5% |
| Saskia Irblich | 6/10 | 3046 days | 4% |
| Adam Pullinger | 3/10 | 3048 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Holmes | 8/10 | 3052 days | 5% |
| Andy Howard | 7/10 | 3103 days | 5% |
| Sharron | 8/10 | 3103 days | 5% |
| Robertoi | 10/10 | 3105 days | 5% |
| Lucy Murray | 9/10 | 3336 days | 4% |
| Steve Elliott | 10/10 | 3337 days | 4% |
| Markus Spitzmueller | 7/10 | 4103 days | 0% |
| Andrew Cattanach | 10/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
| Jeltje | 9/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 8/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
| Richard Spandonk | 9/10 | 4815 days | 1% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
| Leroy Dimitri | 9/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
| Geoff Andrew | 7/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| Richard Broughton | 9/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
| Matthys Kikke | 7/10 | 5168 days | 1% |
| Jill | 10/10 | 5284 days | 1% |
| Montys | 7/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
| OMPA | 10/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
| Jana Steve | 5/10 | 5523 days | 1% |
| dring | 10/10 | 5532 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 9/10 | 5577 days | 1% |
| joevw | 10/10 | 5818 days | 1% |
| Linsey Evans | 10/10 | 5833 days | 1% |
| StephaineFrance | 10/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
| Rory | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Sandra Eschbaumer | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Elise Thomson | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| brendar | 8/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Steve Budd | 3/10 | 5881 days | 0% |
| JensM | 7/10 | 5898 days | 1% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 5928 days | 1% |
| Jessy | 8/10 | 5928 days | 1% |
| Ray | 10/10 | 5953 days | 1% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 5976 days | 1% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 5977 days | 1% |
| jonathan | 10/10 | 5985 days | 1% |
| Michelle | 9/10 | 6038 days | 1% |
| P&L Mooney | 9/10 | 6038 days | 1% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 6041 days | 1% |
| Arnaud Dionisio | 8/10 | 6079 days | 1% |
| Sanne | 10/10 | 6256 days | 1% |
| Matt Walker | 6/10 | 6277 days | 1% |
| Dan Adamson | 7/10 | 6282 days | 1% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 6305 days | 1% |
| Thomas Hartseiker | 10/10 | 6309 days | 1% |
| Davinia | 9/10 | 6338 days | 1% |
| Archie Murdoch | 8/10 | 6352 days | 1% |
| johnb1 | 6/10 | 6363 days | 1% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 6465 days | 1% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 6589 days | 1% |
| Martjn | 8/10 | 6591 days | 1% |
| Stevenson | 8/10 | 6598 days | 1% |
| Jennifer | 10/10 | 6617 days | 1% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 6628 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The KJet Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.36% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 69 days. However the KJet Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The KJet Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.31% |
| 198 | -3.32% |
| 199 | -3.34% |
| 200 | -3.36% |
| 201 | -3.37% |
| 202 | -3.39% |
| 203 | -3.41% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
12.00% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
75%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.