Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for KJet Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
KJet Queenstown
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The KJet Queenstown experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
82.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown valid reviews is 82.46% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
47 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 47 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.55% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 82.55% and is based on 47 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
66.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ying | 2/10 | 307 days | 84% |
| Jenny Pasley | 8/10 | 917 days | 100% |
| JW | 1/10 | 1768 days | 3% |
| Jenna Neivandt | 7/10 | 2607 days | 5% |
| Patz | 10/10 | 2711 days | 5% |
| Rachael Sleege | 9/10 | 2833 days | 5% |
| David Horley | 8/10 | 2849 days | 5% |
| Saskia Irblich | 6/10 | 2878 days | 4% |
| Adam Pullinger | 3/10 | 2880 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Holmes | 8/10 | 2884 days | 5% |
| Andy Howard | 7/10 | 2935 days | 4% |
| Sharron | 8/10 | 2935 days | 4% |
| Robertoi | 10/10 | 2937 days | 5% |
| Lucy Murray | 9/10 | 3168 days | 4% |
| Steve Elliott | 10/10 | 3168 days | 4% |
| Markus Spitzmueller | 7/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
| Andrew Cattanach | 10/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 4446 days | 1% |
| Jeltje | 9/10 | 4639 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 8/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
| Richard Spandonk | 9/10 | 4647 days | 1% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
| Leroy Dimitri | 9/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
| Geoff Andrew | 7/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| Richard Broughton | 9/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
| Matthys Kikke | 7/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
| Jill | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
| Montys | 7/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| OMPA | 10/10 | 5349 days | 1% |
| Jana Steve | 5/10 | 5355 days | 0% |
| dring | 10/10 | 5364 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 9/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| joevw | 10/10 | 5650 days | 1% |
| Linsey Evans | 10/10 | 5665 days | 1% |
| StephaineFrance | 10/10 | 5692 days | 1% |
| Rory | 10/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Sandra Eschbaumer | 10/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Elise Thomson | 10/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| brendar | 8/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Steve Budd | 3/10 | 5713 days | 0% |
| JensM | 7/10 | 5730 days | 1% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 5759 days | 1% |
| Jessy | 8/10 | 5759 days | 1% |
| Ray | 10/10 | 5785 days | 1% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 5807 days | 1% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 5808 days | 1% |
| jonathan | 10/10 | 5816 days | 1% |
| Michelle | 9/10 | 5869 days | 1% |
| P&L Mooney | 9/10 | 5869 days | 1% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 5872 days | 1% |
| Arnaud Dionisio | 8/10 | 5910 days | 1% |
| Sanne | 10/10 | 6088 days | 1% |
| Matt Walker | 6/10 | 6109 days | 1% |
| Dan Adamson | 7/10 | 6114 days | 1% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 6137 days | 1% |
| Thomas Hartseiker | 10/10 | 6141 days | 1% |
| Davinia | 9/10 | 6170 days | 1% |
| Archie Murdoch | 8/10 | 6184 days | 1% |
| johnb1 | 6/10 | 6194 days | 1% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 6297 days | 1% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 6421 days | 1% |
| Martjn | 8/10 | 6423 days | 1% |
| Stevenson | 8/10 | 6430 days | 1% |
| Jennifer | 10/10 | 6449 days | 1% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 6460 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The KJet Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.89% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the KJet Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The KJet Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.84% |
| 198 | -3.86% |
| 199 | -3.87% |
| 200 | -3.89% |
| 201 | -3.91% |
| 202 | -3.93% |
| 203 | -3.95% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
11.88% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
75%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.