Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaikoura Peninsula Carpark Seal Watching.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
43 Valid Reviews
The Kaikoura Peninsula Carpark Seal Watching experience has a total of 43 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 43 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 17 |
|
40% |
9/10 | 11 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 12 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
88.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaikoura Peninsula Carpark Seal Watching valid reviews is 88.14% and is based on 43 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
35 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 43 valid reviews, the experience has 35 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 35 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 12 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 10 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
31% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
87.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaikoura Peninsula Carpark Seal Watching face-to-face reviews is 87.14% and is based on 35 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
96.11%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 198 days | 100% |
Susanne | 10/10 | 1841 days | 5% |
Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2237 days | 4% |
S Weslake | 10/10 | 2451 days | 4% |
Lukas Trewel | 8/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
Laura Leoekloek | 10/10 | 2938 days | 3% |
Anna Urbanova | 10/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
Marek | 9/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
Marie Vaillant | 9/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
Matias Santos | 8/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
Sebastian Reinhardy | 9/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
Lars Barkhora | 6/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
David Sitton | 8/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
Anita Wallace | 10/10 | 3219 days | 2% |
Anna Guttle | 10/10 | 3223 days | 2% |
Fabian Kukla | 10/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
Sascha Kaffenberger | 9/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 7/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
Ixtaso Roncal | 10/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
Caro G | 8/10 | 3307 days | 2% |
leila rowbotham | 8/10 | 3631 days | 1% |
Claudia de Winter | 9/10 | 3883 days | 1% |
Katja | 10/10 | 3907 days | 1% |
Paul Wallace | 10/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 10/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
Neil Beckett | 9/10 | 4246 days | 0% |
Marie | 10/10 | 4262 days | 0% |
Janina Hoffmann | 8/10 | 4272 days | 0% |
Karine Scheers | 9/10 | 4278 days | 0% |
Andreas Garbin | 9/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
Jackie and Brian | 9/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
Sander Heike | 9/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
Harry Ruys | 8/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
Eric Lombaard | 8/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Jim Addicott | 8/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
Tobias Forst | 9/10 | 4734 days | 1% |
Petra | 10/10 | 4971 days | 1% |
Claire Colquhoun | 1/10 | 4995 days | 0% |
Michael Long | 10/10 | 5001 days | 1% |
James Hardern | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Plomp | 8/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Glenn | 8/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Jane Hancock | 8/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kaikoura Peninsula Carpark Seal Watching does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.33% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.